Journal of Parasitology Research
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 8076274, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8076274

Research Article

Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infections among Patients of King Fahd Medical City in Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia: A 5-Year Retrospective Study

Omar S. O. Amer,1,2 Esam S. Al-Malki,¹ Mohamed I. Waly,³ Abdulaziz AlAgeel,⁴ and Mahmoud Y. Lubbad⁵

¹Medical Laboratory Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, 11952, Saudi Arabia
²Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Assiut Branch), Assiut, Egypt
³Medical Equipment Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, 11952, Saudi Arabia
⁴Microbiology Department, King Fahd Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
⁵Environmental and Occupational Health, Public Health Agency, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence should be addressed to Omar S. O. Amer; marzoukmo@yahoo.com

Received 26 April 2018; Accepted 17 July 2018; Published 26 July 2018

Academic Editor: Bernard Marchand

Copyright © 2018 Omar S. O. Amer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

This study is a retrospective analysis of the recorded intestinal parasitic infections for in- and outpatients visiting King Fahd Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 2013 to 2017. In this study, a total of 5987 in- and outpatient were examined for intestinal parasitic infection. 30 patients out of 5987 were infected with 6 species of intestinal parasites with prevalence rate 0.5%. These parasites were Entamoeba histolytica (P = 0.27%), Cryptosporidium sp. (P = 0.1%), Giardia lamblia (P = 0.07%), Trichuris trichiura (P = 0.03%), Hymenolepis nana (P = 0.02%), and Chilomastix mesnili (P = 0.02%). The prevalence of infection in both males and females was 0.38% and 0.58%, respectively. Also, the prevalence of infection in different years and age groups as well as different seasons was provided. Intestinal parasitic infections are still a public health problem in Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia. Updating the epidemiologic survey of these parasites at regular intervals using the appropriate statistical methods is necessary to develop effective prevention and control strategies.

1. Introduction

The intestinal parasitic infections in developing countries are considered the main cause of public health problem [1, 2]. The recent studies revealed that around 30% of the total population in the world is infected with intestinal parasites [3, 4]. The prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections is considerably varied in the different regions of the world. It depends on so many factors such as geographic and socioeconomic factors, relatively humid areas, poverty, malnutrition, personal and community hygiene, high population density, unavailability of potable water and low health status, and poor sanitary facilities [5–7]. These factors give the optimum conditions for the growth and transmission and increase the probability of exposure to intestinal parasites [5–7]. Also, it has been affected by the used diagnostic methods and the number of the investigated stool samples [8]. The major tracks for transmission of intestinal parasites are the contamination of food or drinking water or personal contact via fecal-oral route [9]. As well known, Saudi Arabia is considered one of the largest destinations of expatriate workers, particularly the food handlers and catering staff, from different countries such as Bangladesh, Philippine, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Egypt. All of these countries are known to be endemic with many diseases including those caused by intestinal parasites [8]. Many studies in different regions of Saudi Arabia monitored a high prevalence of infection with intestinal parasites among specific populations such as food handlers (23%), school children (33.8%), expatriates (14.9% to 55%), and Saudi and Non-Saudi patients attending hospitals (39.7% to 77.1%) [8, 10–18]. As per the available literature, there are no updated surveys for intestinal parasitic infections that were carried out in Riyadh region except that of [19]. In that research, a retrospective study was conducted for intestinal parasitic infections of military personnel during the period from 2010 to 2014. Hence, this study aims to produce an updated report on the intestinal parasitic infections from 2013 to 2017 using the data records of King Fahd Medical City in Riyadh by applying the appropriate statistical methods.

2. Materials and Methods

The present study is a retrospective analysis of 5987 in- and outpatient stool samples reports from the King Fahd Medical City, Riyadh, KSA, during the period from 2013 to 2017 for intestinal parasitic infections.

2.1. Samples Collection and Examination

Samples were collected in sterile plastic containers, carefully labeled and transported to the Microbiology lab. The stool specimens were examined macroscopically for detecting the colour, consistency, the presence of mucous and blood, and any adult worms. On the other hand, the direct microscopic examination using normal saline and iodine was used to detect the protozoan parasites. For coccidian parasites, the permanent stained smears using modified Ziehl-Neelsen and modified trichrome stains were performed.

2.2. Data Collection

The datasets of stool samples examination for a total 5987 in- and outpatients during the period from 2013 to 2017 were collected from the hospital information system database department based on prior permission from the administration officials of the hospital.

2.3. Data Analysis

The collected data were yearly classified to determine the intestinal parasitic infections per years. The prevalence of infection for all and individual parasites per year, season, sex, and age groups was calculated and presented in tables accordingly. All statistical analysis was done using SPSS program version number (24) and the normality of collected data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test. The nonparametric test, Chi-square test, was applied to check the association between the used variables (years, seasons, sex, and age groups) and the intestinal parasitic infections at confidence level 95%.

3. Results

The datasets of a total of 5987 in- and outpatients examined stool samples were collected, classified, and analysed using the nonparametric Chi-square test. Among those examined samples, there were 3616 (60.4%) females and 2371 (39.6%) males. Out of 5987 in- and outpatients who had been examined during the period of study (2013 – 2017), 30 patients were infected (P = 0.5%) with 6 species of intestinal parasites. These recorded parasites were Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium parvum, Chilomastix mesnili, Trichuris trichiura, and Hymenolepis nana.

3.1. Prevalence of Parasitic Infections per Years and Seasons

Overall, the prevalence of protozoan infections (0.45%) was higher than the helminth infections (0.05%). Entamoeba histolytica (0.27%) and Cryptosporidium parvum (0.1%) were the common identified intestinal protozoan parasites. Only two helminth parasites were recovered: Trichuris trichiura (0.03%) and Hymenolepis nana (0.02%). The prevalence of parasitic infections during the period of study (2013 – 2017) is shown in Table 1. In terms of the prevalence of infection with season, it was higher in fall (0.79%) and summer (0.63%) seasons and lower in winter (0.25%) and spring season (0.35%) (Table 2).

Table 1: Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection during the period of study (2013 - 2017).

Type of parasite
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017

No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P

Entamoeba histolytica
7
0.52%
2
0.17%
0
0.00%
4
0.29%
3
0.05%

Cryptosporidium parvum
6
0.44%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%

Giardia lamblia
2
0.15%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
0.07%
1
0.02%

Trichuris trichiura
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%

Chilomastix mesnili
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%

Hymenolepis nana
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%

Total infected
16
1.18
2
0.17
1
0.07
7
0.51
4
0.07

Total examined
1354
1158
1521
1373
581

Table 2: Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in different seasons during the study (2013 – 2017).

Type of parasite
Spring
Summer
Fall
Winter

No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P

Entamoeba histolytica
2
0.14%
5
0.39%
7
0.43%
2
0.12%

Cryptosporidium parvum
2
0.14%
1
0.08%
2
0.12%
1
0.06%

Giardia lamblia
0
0.00%
2
0.16%
2
0.12%
0
0.00%

Trichuris trichiura
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
1
0.06%
0
0.00%

Chilomastix mesnili
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
0.06%
0
0.00%

Hymenolepis nana
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
0.06%

Total infected
5
0.35%
8
0.63%
13
0.79%
4
0.25%

Total examined
1446
1280
1643
1618

3.2. Prevalence of Parasitic Infection in Both Males and Females

Overall, the prevalence of parasitic infection was higher (0.58%) in females than males (0.38%). Entamoeba histolytica was the most prevalent protozoan in both males (0.30%) and females (0.25%); however the helminth parasites were recovered from females only (Table 3).

Table 3: Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in both males and females during the study (2013 – 2017).

Type of parasite
Female
Male

No.
Prevalence
No.
Prevalence.

Entamoeba histolytica
9
0.25%
7
0.30%

Cryptosporidium parvum
5
0.14%
1
0.04%

Giardia lamblia
3
0.08%
1
0.04%

Trichuris trichiura
2
0.06%
0
0.00%

Chilomastix mesnili
1
0.03%
0
0.00%

Hymenolepis nana
1
0.03%
0
0.00%

Total infected
21
0.58%
9
0.38%

Total examined
3616
2371

3.3. Prevalence of Parasitic Infection in Different Age Groups

Overall, the prevalence of parasitic infection was higher (0.89%) in the age group (11 – 20 years) and lower (0.17%) in the age group (31 – 40 years); however no infections were recorded in age group (51 – 60 years) (Table 4).

Table 4: Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in different age group during the study (2013 – 2017).

Type of parasite
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age

0 - 10 y
11 - 20 y
21 - 30 y
31 - 40 y
41 - 50 y
51 – 60 y
61 - 70 y
71 - 80 y
81 - 90 y
91 - 100 y
101- 110 y

No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P
No.
P

E. histolytica
2
0.10%
4
0.89%
5
0.46%
2
0.17%
2
0.39%
0
0.00%
1
0.47%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%

C. parvum
5
0.26%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
0.19%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%

G. lamblia
3
0.15%
0
0.00%
1
0.09%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%

T. trichiura
2
0.10%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%

Ch. mesnili
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
0.09%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%

H. nana
1
0.05%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%

Total infected
13
0.67%
4
0.89%
7
0.64%
2
0.17%
3
0.58%
0
0.00%
1
0.47%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%

Total examined
1947
449
1094
1191
518
329
211
160
77
9
2

4. Discussion

It is well known that the intestinal parasitic infections are in close relation to the poor sanitary habits and lack access to safe potable water and improper hygiene. It is worth mentioning that KFMCH is accessible only for Saudi citizens besides limited number of foreigners who work for the government. The current study revealed that 0.5% of examined patients were infected with 6 species of intestinal parasites. The previous studies of stool analysis surveys, in Saudi Arabia and many other countries, have revealed a wide range of variation in the prevalence of intestinal parasites. The prevalence was 13.3% in India [20], 32.0 – 41.5% in Palestine [21], 8.8% in Iran [22], 57.9% in Iraq [23], 10.2% in Qatar [24], 64.4% in Sudan [25], 7.7% in UAE [26], and 58.7% in Yemen [27]. However in KSA, the prevalence rate was 27.2% in Al-Ahsa [28], 47.01% in Jeddah [29], 6.2% in Makkah [30], 8.4% in Tabuk [31], and 2.3 – 39.7% in Riyadh [15, 32–34]. The much lower prevalence of infection during this study, compared to the previous studies particularly in Riyadh region, could be explained in one hand to the fact that most of the examined patients were Saudi citizens and most of them urban dwellers with a high socioeconomic status. On the other hand, it may be attributed to the general improvement in health services and sanitary conditions and increase awareness and health education in the Kingdom [32, 34–37]. The most common parasite in this study was Entamoeba histolytica and this finding is consistent with many previous reports outside and inside Saudi Arabia [26, 28, 30, 31, 38–41]. However, it disagrees with some others outside and inside the Kingdom, particularly those conducted in Riyadh region [8, 15, 19, 23, 27, 32, 34, 42]. This finding could be attributed to the susceptibility for infection by Entamoeba histolytica and/or the availability of the sources of infection by this parasite. Regarding the helminth infection, the current study revealed low prevalence of these parasites, compared to the protozoans’ infection. This result is consistent with the previously reported surveys in many different regions inside the Kingdom, particularly in Riyadh region [8, 15, 28, 30–32, 34, 40, 42]. However, this finding disagrees with the most recent survey conducted in Riyadh region [19]. The similarity between the aforementioned finding and those reported surveys in many regions inside the Kingdom, including the Riyadh region, may reflect the consistency in environmental factors, socioeconomic conditions, and health status of these regions, while the dissimilarity could be attributed to the unfavourable ecological and sociocultural factors that influence the survival and transmission of soil transmitted helminths.

The prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections was slightly higher in females (0.58%) than males (0.38%); however this difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.569). The higher infection in females can be justified by considering the females are more exposed to the infective stages of parasitic infection due to the nature of the chores they perform in the house and their life style. This finding is in agreement with some previously reported surveys inside and outside the Kingdom [8, 40, 43]. Nevertheless, this result is not compatible with some other reports outside and inside the Saudi Arabia [23, 26, 31]. This study also revealed that the higher prevalence (0.89%) was recorded among 11–20-year age group, while the lower prevalence was recorded among 31–40-year age group. Otherwise, there is no infection recorded among 51–60- and above 70-year age groups. Statistically, there is no significant difference detected among the different age groups at P = 0.656. This finding disagrees with some previous studies outside and inside Saudi Arabia [15, 19, 23, 28, 30, 32, 34, 44, 45]. The high prevalence among 11–20-year age group could be attributed to the close contact with the contaminated environment through their tendency to spend most of their times in playing outside their houses and to eat the fast foods from the restaurants. The relationship between the intestinal parasitic infection and seasonality was studied in the current survey. The higher prevalence of infection was recorded in fall and summer seasons (0.79% and 0.63%), while the lower prevalence of infection was recorded in winter and spring (0.25% and 0.35%), respectively. Statistically, there is no significant difference detected in prevalence of infection among the different seasons (P = 0.546). The slight difference in prevalence of infection between fall and summer seasons could be attributed to the difference in examined number of patients in the two seasons. Our finding in the current study is nearly consistent with the previous studies which had been conducted in Qassim region [46] and [19] in Riyadh region. Also, in those studies the authors attributed the high prevalence of infection during the summer season to many factors affecting the transmission of parasitic infections. These factors were related to the human exposure to valley water collections during outdoor activities in summer time and the favourable ecological conditions such as temperature and humidity. The current authors, to large extent, accept the explanation as reasons for increasing the prevalence of infection during the summer season.

5. Conclusion

Overall, the low prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in the current study reveals the improvement in living conditions and hygiene besides the combined efforts of the healthcare authorities in Riyadh region. Entamoeba histolytica was the most common intestinal parasite in the examined patients and the infection in females was higher than males. Moreover, 11–20-year age group was the most affected group and the higher infection was in summer and fall seasons. The food and drink safety and health education should be increased to raise the awareness of society about intestinal parasitic diseases. Therefore, it is important to keep a constant epidemiological surveillance through periodical surveys and improving the healthcare to resolve the problem of parasitic infections.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Disclosure

The former address of Mohamed I. Waly is Biomedical Engineering Department, Higher Institute for Engineering, El Shorouk Academy, Cairo, Egypt.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank and appreciate the Director of King Fahd Medical City Hospital and the head of clinical laboratory for their kind cooperation in providing the datasets of parasitic infection with ethical and appropriate manner. Also, the authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Majmaah University for supporting this work under Project no. 38 /136.

References

L. Savioli, D. Bundy, and A. Tomkins, “Intestinal parasitic infections: a soluble public health problem,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 353-354, 1992.

V. Mehraj, J. Hatcher, S. Akhtar, G. Rafique, and M. A. Beg, “Prevalence and factors associated with intestinal parasitic infection among children in an urban slum of Karachi,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 11, Article ID e3680, 2008.

J. Keiser and J. Utzinger, “The Drugs We Have and the Drugs We Need Against Major Helminth Infections,” Advances in Parasitology, vol. 73, pp. 197–230, 2010.

S. Brooker, N. B. Kabatereine, J. L. Smith et al., “An updated atlas of human helminth infections: the example of East Africa,” International Journal of Health Geographics, vol. 8, no. 1, article 42, 2009.

N. Thapar and I. R. Sanderson, “Diarrhoea in children: an interface between developing and developed countries,” The Lancet, vol. 363, no. 9409, pp. 641–653, 2004.

A. A. Sayyari, F. Imanzadeh, S. A. Bagheri Yazdi, H. Karami, and M. Yaghoobi, “Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 377–383, 2005.

H. H. Raza and R. A. Sami, “Epidemiological study on gastro-intestinal parasites among different sexes, occupations and age groups in Sulaimani district,” Journal of Duhok University, vol. 12, pp. 317–323, 2009.

O. Hassen Amer, I. M. Ashankyty, and N. A. S. Haouas, “Prevalence of intestinal parasite infections among patients in local public hospitals of Hail, Northwestern Saudi Arabia,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 44–48, 2016.

WHO, “Intestinal Parasites,” Available at: http://apps.who.int/etd/intpara/burdens.htm.

D. A. Zaglool, Y. A. Khodari, R. A. M. Othman, and M. U. Farooq, “Prevalence of intestinal parasites and bacteria among food handlers in a tertiary care hospital,” Nigerian Medical Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 266–270, 2011.

H. A. Taha, M. I. Soliman, and S. A. N. Banjar, “Intestinal parasitic infections among expatriate workers in Al-Madina Al-Munawara, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 30, pp. 78–88, 2013.

E. A. Koshak and H. A. Zakai, “A spectrum of pathogenic and nonpathogenic intestinal parasites in pre-employment medical checkup for workers and their family,” Journal of Family and Community Medicine, vol. 10, pp. 47–53, 2003.

F. A. Al-Braiken, “Is intestinal parasitic infection still a public health concern among Saudi children?” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1630–1635, 2008.

K. A. Mohammad and E. A. Koshak, “A prospective study on parasites among expatriate workers in Al-Baha from 2009–2011, Saudi Arabia,” Journal of Egyptian Society of Parasitology, vol. 41, pp. 423–443, 2011.

W. A. I. Al-Megrin, “Intestinal parasites infection among immunocompromised patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 390–394, 2010.

A. B. M. Barnawi, A. M. Tonkal, M. A. H. Fouad, and F. A. Al-Braiken, “Detection of Entamoeba histolytica/dispar in stool specimens by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the population of Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia,” Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 143–150, 2007.

S. A. Al-Harthi and M. B. Jamjoom, “Preliminary study of the prevalence of intestinal parasites among diarrheic inhabitants in Makkah Al-Mukarramah,” Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 671–680, 2007.

O. H. Amer, M. A. Fareid, and I. M. Al-Shankyty, “Prevalence of intestinal parasitic and bacterial pathogens in diarrhoeal and non diarrhoeal school children at Hail, Saudi Arabia,” New York Science Journal, vol. 4, pp. 106–113, 2011.

O. S. O. Amer, M. I. Waly, and S. A. Al-Zahrani, “Intestinal parasitic infections among patients of prince sultan military medical city in Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia: A 5-year retrospective study,” Pakistan Journal Of Zoology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1889–1899, 2017.

H. Assudani, J. Gusani, S. Mehta, and H. Agravat, “Intestinal parasitic infections in pediatric patients with diarrhea with special emphasis to opportunistic parasites and predisposing factors,” International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 841–844, 2015.

S. Bdir and G. Adwan, “Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in Jenin Governorate, Palestine: A 10-year retrospective study,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 745–747, 2010.

J. Saki, S. Khademvatan, K. Masoumi, and M. Chafghani, “Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among food handlers in Khuzestan , Southwest of Iran: A 10-year retrospective study,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 6, pp. 2475–2480, 2012.

R. A. Hussein, M. J. Shaker, and H. A. Majeed, “Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among children in Baghdad City,” Journal of College of Basic Education, vol. 71, pp. 130–147, 2011.

M. A. Abu-Madi, J. M. Behnke, and S. H. Doiphode, “Changing trends in intestinal parasitic infections among long-term-residents and settled immigrants in Qatar,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 98, 2010.

A. A. Gabbad and M. A. Elawad, “Prevalence of intestinal parasite infection in primary school children in Elengaz Area, Khartoum, Sudan,” Academic Research International, vol. 5, pp. 86–90, 2014.

N. Dash, M. Al-Zarouni, K. Anwar, and D. Panigrahi, “Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates,” Human Parasit. Dis, vol. 2, pp. 21–24, 2010.

A. M. Al-Haddad and S. H. Baswaid, “Frequency of intestinal parasitic infection among children in Hadhramout governorate (Yemen),” Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 479–488, 2010.

H. I. Al-Mohammed, T. T. Amin, E. Aboulmagd, H. R. Hablus, and B. O. Zaza, “Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and its relationship with socio–demographics and hygienic habits among male primary schoolchildren in Al–Ahsa, Saudi Arabia,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 906–912, 2010.

M. H. Wakid, “Fecal occult blood test and gastrointestinal parasitic infection,” Journal of Parasitology Research, vol. 2010, 4 pages, 2010.

D. A. M. Zaglool, Y. A. W. Khodari, Z. J. Gazzaz, K. O. Dhafar, H. A. S. Shaker, and M. U. Farooq, “Prevalence of intestinal parasites among patients of Al-Noor specialist hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia,” Oman Medical Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 182–185, 2011.

N. S. M. Aly and M. M. M. Mostafa, “Intestinal parasitic infection among Children in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 4200–4204, 2010.

I. S. Alkhalife, “Retrospective analysis of intestinal parasitic infections diagnosed at a University Hospital in Central, Saudi Arabia,” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1714–1718, 2006.

K. A. Kalantan, E. A. Al-Faris, and A. A. Al-Taweel, “Pattern of intestinal parasitic infection among food handlers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,” Journal of Family and Community Medicine, vol. 8, pp. 67–72, 2001.

S. Al-Shammari, T. Khoja, F. El-Khwasky, and A. Gad, “Intestinal parasitic diseases in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Prevalence, sociodemographic and environmental associates,” Tropical Medicine & International Health, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 184–189, 2001.

M. M. A. Abdel-Hafez, N. El-Kady, A. S. Bolbol, and M. H. Baknina, “Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in Riyadh district, Saudi Arabia,” Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 631–634, 1986.

S. M. Qadri and S. H. Khalil, “Intestinal Parasites: Incidence and Etiology in over 1,000 Patients at King Faisal Specialist Hospital in Riyadh,” Annals of Saudi Medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 207–211, 1987.

M. U. Khan, S. E.-D. Amir, O. M. Eid, and S. Aggerwal, “Prevalence of intestinal parasites among patients in the Abha region,” Annals of Saudi Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 471–474, 1989.

Y. Garedaghi and Y. Firouzivand, “Protozoan Infections of Restaurant Workers in Tabriz, Iran,” Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 46–48, 2014.

P. K. Patel and R. Khandekar, “Intestinal parasitic infections among school children of the Dhahira Region of Oman,” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 627–632, 2006.

N. F. A. Imam, Z. B. Abdulbaqi, and R. A. Fahad, “The Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among foreign workers in Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” Saudi Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 112–117, 2015.

P. Rawal, R. S. Adhikari, K. Danu, and A. Tiwari, “Prevalence of intestinal parasites in Afif, Saudi Arabia: A 5-year retrospective study,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 746–751, 2015.

W. A. I. Al-Megrin, “Assessment the prevalence of intestinal parasites and associated risk factors among preschool children in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,” Research Journal of Parasitology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2015.

M. A. Kadir, A. A. Kadir, and K. K. Faraj, “Survey study of intestinal parasites among different population of Arbil city,” Journal of the Faculty of Medicine Baghdad, vol. 29, pp. 455–458, 1987.

A. L. Molan and A. M. Farag, “Prevalence of intestinal parasites in school children of Arbil, northern Iraq,” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 107–110, 1989.

T. A. Kadhim, A study in the epidemiology of intestinal parasites in elementary school children in Baghdad governorate [M. S. Thesis], University Baghdad, 1986.

A. Imam, A. Altayyar, E. Eltayeb, and Y. Almushawa, “Frequency and seasonality of intestinal parasitism in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia,” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 28, pp. 913–916, 2012.