Comparative Analysis of Strength Calculation for Railway’s Flat Car Body Using Fuzzy Logic and Evolutionary Algorithms

is article makes an in-depth analysis of dierent body strength calculation methods using fuzzy logic and evolutionary algorithm by taking the universal at car body strength calculation as an example. For this study, a more scientic and reliable theoretical basis for the structural strength design and analysis of railway at car surveying and mapping is considered. If the expansion and contraction of the jack are not synchronised while jacking the vehicle body with a jack when the vehicle is freshly manufactured and maintained, the vehicle body will be in a three-point support state. e 3-point support state will result in permanent deformation if a structure with low torsional stiness is used. If the structure characterized by small torsional stiness is adopted, the 3-point support state will produce permanent deformation. e safety factor specied in EN12663 is only 1.15, which shows that the Interim Provisions have the highest requirements for the design of vehicle body strength and the corresponding design cost. From the fatigue strength analysis, it can be seen that the dierence between themaximum principal stress and the corresponding allowable stress at the node level with the maximum von Mises stress is high, which is not the dangerous position of the structure. e research shows that there are great dierences in the provisions of jacking load in various specications.


Introduction
As a representative of long-distance public transportation, railway transportation is particularly important [1]. At present, there are two main problems in the structural design of large-scale car body. First, under the condition of meeting the existing railway gauge, the bearing area of the car body is relatively limited due to the relatively general width of the car body and the relatively small length of the car body, which is often easy to occur, so that the volume of goods carried by the car body rst seriously a ects the bearing capacity of the car body of railway at car [2]; secondly, because the total length of the car body is relatively limited, it can not meet the transportation requirements of large quantities and long goods. erefore, it is particularly important to strengthen the strength design of railway at car body [3,4]. Taking the strength calculation of the general at car body of a company as an example, this article compares di erent strength calculation methods and strength evaluation standards so as to deeply analyze the rationality of China's car body strength design code and provide a more scienti c and reliable theoretical basis for the structural strength design and analysis of railway at car surveying and mapping.

Literature Review
Mathematicians successively obtained the proof of convergence, error analysis model, and nonconforming convergence from mathematics, which made the nite element method have a solid mathematical theoretical foundation. Now, the nite element method has been widely recognized in the treatment of physics, mechanics, and engineering. During this period, a large number of general nite element programs have also been rapidly developed and widely used [5]. e nite element method is active in various engineering fields. e reason is that it can solve various engineering problems. It has the characteristics of high calculation accuracy and flexible use. e general application of electronic computers is the material basis of its development.
From the 1970s to now, the finite element method has made many great breakthroughs, but the research focus has changed. It is mainly reflected in the expansion from static, linear, and deterministic analysis to dynamic, stability and material, geometric nonlinearity, and reliability analysis from solid mechanics to fluid, electromagnetic field, thermodynamics, geomechanics, biomechanics, and other problems [6]. e application of the finite element method in ship structure has revolutionized the resulting problem of traditional ship structure [7]. Among them, the most prominent aspect is that the traditional research of dividing the total transverse strength, total longitudinal strength, and local strength is changed into a seemingly unsolvable problem by the manual calculation method before the comprehensive analysis of the overall structure. e application of the finite element method can draw a conclusion conveniently and quickly.
at is gray areas. For example, there is no obvious boundary between tall and short, fat and thin. It can be said that it is a little, very, or very high, so the boundary (or critical condition) is fuzzy. Figure 1 shows the fuzzy logic system [8].
Fortran language is one of the earliest and most widely used computer languages. It is the abbreviation of formula translation. It was originally designed for numerical calculation. e first Fortran text was proposed in 1954 and was really used in 1956. Fortran is a process-oriented language. Process-oriented programming is mainly used to obtain results for large-scale engineering calculations or to complete a task. It has low requirements for the interface, and its advantage is its fast running speed [9]. e related software is called CAE software. CAE technology has a development history of more than 30 years. With the progress of graphics technology and database technology and the development of high-performance computer system, the research and application of CAE have also made rapid development, which has become the key means and the main design guarantee to realize the innovative design. CAE software has become a powerful assistant and effective tool for engineers to realize engineering innovation and product innovation. CAE technology has been paid more and more attention in China, and the automotive industry has generally realized the importance of CAE technology in improving product competitiveness [10]. In order to accelerate the development of new products and further improve the performance and scientific and technological content of products, CAE software can be used to analyze the structural strength and stiffness of existing models and the corresponding structural improvement so as to provide reference and verification methods for the research and development of new models.
To solve this research problem, Chawla, S. and others used a triangular element to wake up the contact stress analysis for the first time when analyzing the swept wing structure [11]. Zitrick and others derived the displacement method finite element model from the minimum potential energy principle, the force method from the minimum complementary energy principle, the hybrid method from the Hellinger-Reissner variational principle, the hybrid method finite element model from the modified complementary energy principle, etc. [12]. e research and analysis of Hoterova and others of the finite element method are active in various engineering fields. e reason is that it can solve various engineering problems and has the characteristics of high calculation accuracy and flexible use. e general application of electronic computers is the material basis for its development [13]. Xu and others believe that CAE is a comprehensive and knowledge-intensive discipline based on finite element analysis technology. e related software is called CAE software [14]. Wang and others worked out the calculation condition of static strength of high-speed car body based on EN12663 car body strength evaluation criteria and combined with the calculation characteristics of car body strength of the EMU, calculated and analyzed its stiffness and strength, and evaluated the results [15]. Rogulenko and others took the strength calculation of a general flat car body as an example to compare and analyze the calculation methods and evaluation standards in the strength specifications of railway freight car body in Russia and China [16]. Zaytsev and others improved the streamline of the car body on the E2 series 1000 highspeed train. By increasing the slenderness ratio of the head car, the micro air pressure wave when entering the tunnel was greatly reduced. ey paid attention to the optimization of aerodynamic performance, and the car body was made of aluminum alloy [17]. Stopková and others take the TGV of the third-generation high-speed train as an example. On average, a trailer has only one bogie to carry. Under the condition of keeping the axle load no more than 17T, the total weight of each trailer is less than 34T [12]. Yuditskaya and others studied that an ice high-speed train body is welded with large extruded aluminum alloy profiles, without pillar and beam structure, so the self-weight is greatly reduced, and the axle load is less than 15t [18]. Based on the current research, this article puts forward the comparative analysis of railway flat car body strength calculation methods based on fuzzy logic and evolutionary algorithm. Based on fuzzy logic and evolutionary algorithm and taking the universal flat car body strength calculation as an example, this article makes an in-depth analysis of different body strength calculation methods in order to provide a more scientific and reliable theoretical basis for the structural strength design and analysis of railway flat car surveying and mapping. e experiment shows that in the strength design of the car body, the combination of longitudinal tensile load and vertical load should choose the combination of longitudinal compressive load and vertical maximum load. Because the synthetic stress is the largest under this combination condition, the safety of evaluating car body strength under this combination condition is higher. Compared with the traditional static strength allowable stress evaluation method, OREB12/RPL7 can qualitatively analyze the fatigue strength allowance of the structure and evaluate the areas where the strength reserve of the car body is insufficient.

Fuzzy Logic System
at is gray areas. For example, there is no obvious boundary between tall and short and fat and thin. It can be said that it is a little ot very high, so the boundary (or critical condition) is fuzzy [19]. To explain the above fuzzy ordering, we introduce the concept of membership: the value between 0 and 1 is the degree to which an event belongs to 0 or 1, that is, membership. We can write membership functions to judge membership or represent the probability of this state. Membership indicates rank. e higher its value, the higher the probability of this state. Instead, the probability of this state will be low. It is important to note that there are two basic principles of fuzzy logic systems. First, the meaning of fuzzy logic is to let computers take problems closer to human behavior. Second, the nature of fuzzy logic is about everything.

Basic Process.
e uncertainty process consists of three main steps: (i) Uncertainty: the process of obtaining membership from a certain set of uncertain inputs according to a membership function (ii) Confirmation methods: methods for drawing fuzzy conclusions from ambiguous rules, membership in relevant fuzzy sets (iii) Incompatibility: the process of turning ambiguous conclusions into clear and accurate outputs e calculation process is roughly as follows: Input (collection of specific data) ⟶ dimming (according to membership functions such as piecewise functions and distribution functions, and then get a set of fuzzy memberships (analytical data) from specific inputs).
Next, we will introduce each stage in the process of the fuzzy logic system in detail.
In order to facilitate understanding, before discussing the membership function of fuzzy logic, we first talk about the membership function of traditional logic, such as Boolean logic. Figure 2 shows the membership function of Boolean logic [20].
ere is no intermediate value between false and true, that is, nonblack or white, nonfalse or true in traditional logic. is is very unreasonable when making a judgment in real life. For example, if x 0 � 170 kg, anyone who exceeds 170 kg is overweight, and anyone who is less than 170 kg is not overweight. Even if someone is 169 kg, it is still regarded as not overweight. is is too extreme and impractical for judgment in daily life.
For the above traditional Boolean logic membership function, we can make a simple expansion and convert it into the membership function of fuzzy logic, as shown in Figure 3.
As can be seen from Figure 3, the gradual change is between 0 and 1. If it is less than x 0 , the result will be false; that is, the membership degree is 0, while if it is greater than x 1 , the result will be true; that is, the membership degree is 1. For values between x 0 and x 1 , the membership varies linearly. We can easily give the membership equation: If they weigh 185 kg, according to the calculation, their membership degree is 0.5; that is, they are a little overweight. Now there is a vague concept. In general, we consider how well the input variables correspond to indefinite sets in terms of membership functions. For example, we want to know if someone is overweight, underweight, or very healthy. For  Mobile Information Systems this, we need to create a fuzzy set so that we can observe what interval the membership is in, depending on the membership function, which is its degree [21]. As shown in Figure 4, we assume a fuzzy set of three weights: too thin, ideal, and overweight.
With such a set, we can calculate the degree of membership for each input value in these three sets. If a person is thin, the membership is 0, the ideal membership is 0.75, and the overweight membership is 0.15. en we can compare the membership degrees of the three fuzzy sets and come to the conclusion that the weight of this person is optimal, and the membership degree is 75% (0.75). Common membership functions include Gaussian membership functions, general bell membership functions, triangular membership functions, trapezoidal membership functions, and Z-shaped membership functions, as shown in  Like traditional logic operations, we introduce fuzzy logic operators intersection (AND), Union (OR), and complement (NOT) [22,23].
After the fuzzy logic operation, we can get a multidimensional truth table and choose actions or scores according to the fuzzy results of each dimension. We take a simple example as an example of air combat [24]. According to the angle of our aircraft pointing to the opponent and the relative distance from the opponent, we give the score of "azimuth/distance situation." e higher the score, the more favorable the situation. erefore, the fuzzy logic modeling is shown in Figure 8 and Table 1.
On the left are two fuzzy sets, namely, distance and pointing angle. On the right are fuzzy rules. e numbers in the table represent the azimuth/distance situation score. e higher the score, the more favorable the situation. For example, if the input data is blurred and the fuzzy results with close relative distance and positive pointing angle are obtained, we will check the table and get 3 points; that is, we think the situation is very favorable.
Fuzziness: when you want to use the exact value as the output data of the fuzzy system, you need to solve the fuzziness process [25]. As mentioned, each rule has some degree of membership in the outgoing set. e process of choosing a value that best represents an indeterminate set is called defuzzification. Commonly used methods include the     maximum membership method, the maximum average method, the field average method, and the center of gravity method.

Practical Application.
In practical application, the fuzzy logic system involves the design of a fuzzy controller, including five main contents: fuzzy process (fuzzy method, fuzzy set division, and fuzzy function optimization), knowledge base (control rule type, consistency, completeness, and interaction), reasoning decision (fuzzy reasoning and defuzzification method), and optimization calculation (adjusting and optimizing fuzzy controller).
We use an example to illustrate how to design a fuzzy controller. An example is the inverted pendulum control system, as shown in Figure 9. e controlled objects include an inverted simple pendulum, trolley, guide rail, and motor. Control scene: the single pendulum with a length of 2l and mass of M is fixed on the trolley with a mass of m by hinges. rough the hinge pendulum, the trolley can swing freely on a plane. e trolley is controlled by the motor and generates control force on the motor horizontally by means of electric current so as to make the trolley move on the limited guide rail and keep the inverted pendulum from falling down.
First, specify the input variables: angle (−90°∼ 90°) and angular velocity (real field); output variable: thrust (real field). en we set the membership function to blur the input and output.
Five fuzzy sets of positive large, positive small, zero, negative small, and negative large are established, respectively, in the angle and angular velocity of input variables.
On the output variable thrust, five fuzzy sets are established: positive large, positive small, zero, negative small, and negative large. According to the fuzzy set, we establish fuzzy rules, as shown in Table 2.
Change-in-error refers to the angular velocity deviation, error refers to the angular deviation, and the values in the table refer to the fuzzy value of thrust u. For example, if we get that change-in-error is −2 and error is −2, we can find that u is 2 by looking up the table, which means that the current reverse deviation is very large, and we need a large forward thrust to balance the inverted pendulum. en we use a defuzzification method to convert the output fuzzy value into a signal acceptable to the motor. For example, the center of gravity method is used to defuzzify. So far, the whole fuzzy controller has been designed.

Evolutionary Algorithm Calculation
3.2.1. Concept. Evolutionary algorithm borrows the law of biological evolution, realizes the survival of the fittest through reproduction, competition, reproduction, and recompetition, and approaches the optimal solution of complex engineering and technical problems step by step. Starting from the first set of randomly generated individuals in an evolutionary algorithm, the next generation of individuals is generated through three series of actions: duplication, exchange, and mutation, imitating the genetic mechanism of an organism. en, according to the size of the fitness, do the best survival to improve the quality of the new generation group and gradually approach the optimal solution after repeated iterations. From a mathematical point of view, an evolutionary algorithm is basically a search and optimization method [26]. e main branches of evolutionary computing are as follows: genetic algorithm GA, genetic programming GP, evolutionary strategy ES, and evolutionary programming EP. Here we mainly introduce the genetic algorithm GA and evolution strategy ES.

Genetic Algorithm.
e basic flow of the genetic algorithm is as follows.
Step 1. (gGroup startup). Plan the startup process according to the nature of the problem (the startup process should be as simple as possible, and the time complexity should not be too high), and start n groups. e second step: individual evaluation is used to calculate the physical fitness value of the individual group according to the optimal objective function.
Step 2. (repeat adjustment). Set the maximum number of iterations in the population to gmax, and the current number of iterations to be g � 1.
Step 3. (individual selection). e selected individuals enter the unified database to form the FP (g) of the first population to be traversed to form new individuals. e selection strategy should be based on the individual's physical abilities. If optimization is a mitigation problem, the odds of picking someone with a physical problem should be high. Common selection strategies include roulette selection and tournament selection.
e parent node will judge whether a crossover operation is required according to the crossover probability PM (prediction, generally 0.9). e crossover operator must be designed according to the properties of the optimal problem. is is the heart of all genetic algorithms. Its design will directly determine the performance of the entire algorithm.
Step 5. (mutation operator). according to the probability of PC mutation, the parents determine whether the individual needs to be mutated (predefined, generally 0.1). e main function of the mutation operator is to maintain the diversity of the population and prevent the local optimization of the population, so it usually takes the form of random transformation.

Comparison between Evolutionary Algorithm and
Other Algorithms. Evolutionary computation and backpropagation algorithm: for supervised learning tasks that can directly and accurately calculate gradients, the evolutionary computation algorithm is not suitable in this scenario, but backpropagation is more efficient. Evolutionary computation becomes competitive in scenarios where the gradient of expected return needs to be estimated by sampling. In some scenarios, the backpropagation algorithm is difficult to adapt. For example, the reward is very sparse; that is, we have almost no labels for each sample, and there are rewards only in several specific states. In the scene where the reward is very sparse, the gradient is difficult to calculate. At this time, evolutionary computing has great advantages over backpropagation algorithms.
Reinforce-ES and TRPO: compared with TRPO, the performance of Reinforce-ES is similar, but the former has two characteristics.
First, the data efficiency is poor. Reinforce-ES needs to constantly eliminate data, and most of the data is eliminated, so the data utilization is much worse than TRPO. e second is very scalable. We take the difficult MuJoCo task as an example and use two algorithms for large-scale calculation. In the A3C algorithm, when assigning computing tasks to workers from the master node, all parameters of the network need to be assigned, and the computing cost is particularly high.
e Reinforce-ES algorithm allocates only the fitness value of each iteration, only some scalars, so this algorithm is very efficient in large-scale computing engineering and is very suitable for this large-scale scenario.

Strength Calculation of Vehicle Body.
Take the length of a beam as L, the bending modulus of the section as I, and the elastic modulus of the material as E. Apply a unit relative bending angle θ at both ends of the beam, and the resulting end reaction moment M is the bending stiffness of the beam, as shown in Figure 10: the calculation formula is as follows: Simply supported beam with equal section: Simply supported beam with variable section: where I is the equivalent bending modulus. Deflection and rotation angle are two basic quantities to measure bending deformation. is section will discuss the bending deformation of the simply supported beam under two loads. When the concentrated load acts on any point of the beam, the bending deformation deflection curve equation is as follows:  Mobile Information Systems Corner of end section: 6EIL .

(6)
When a >b is set, the following formula is satisfied: Based on the above formula, the following formula is satisfied: e bending stiffness is as follows: e bending stiffness expressed by the angle of the end section is as follows: where P is the concentrated load force (unit: n); a and b are the distances between the front and rear support points and the load (unit: m); θ A and θ B are the rotation angles of the end section, that is, the rotation angle of the cross-section of the beam relative to its original position. It is specified that the counterclockwise rotation angle is positive (unit: RAD).

Comparative Analysis of Vertical Maximum Operating
Load. Typical domestic and foreign strength specifications mainly referred to in the strength calculation of high-speed train body in China include JISE7106, ENl2663 formulated by the European Railway Union, and the Interim Regulations on strength design test and appraisal of railway vehicles with a speed class of 200 km/h and above formulated by China (hereinafter referred to as the Interim Regulations). By comparing the above three specifications, the provisions on vertical running load are basically the same, except that the JISE7106 standard stipulates that the maximum vertical running load loaded on the vehicle body shall be considered according to the vibration during operation. If the secondary suspension device of the vehicle body adopts an air spring device, the maximum running load is 1.1 × g × (M1 + MZ). If the metal spring is used as the secondary suspension device of the vehicle body, the maximum operating load is 1.3 × g × (M1 + MZ) as specified in ENl2663. In the Interim Provisions, the maximum operating load is 1.2g × (M1 + MZ). rough comparative analysis, it can be seen that JISE7106 fully considers the advantages that an air spring can better absorb vibration than a metal spring so as to reduce the vertical dynamic load caused by wheel-rail impact and vehicle spring vibration to 0.1g × (M1 + MZ). It is stated in the Interim Provisions that the load in the application state may lead to material fatigue, so whether the maximum operating load is reduced to 1.2g × (M1 + MZ) meets the design requirements and whether it can be considered separately according to the different secondary suspension devices like JISE7106 needs to be proved by test and actual measurement.

Comparative Analysis of Vehicle Load.
ere are two regulations on the jacking load in the European standard ENl2663: lift the vehicle at one end of the designated unwheeling space (2-point support), and its load is 1.1g × (M1 + m3); lift the whole vehicle at the designated unwheeling position (4-point support), and its load is 1.1gm2 + m3. e Japanese standard JISE7106 stipulates that the jacking load is 3-point support. ere are two kinds of provisions on the jacking load in China's Interim Provisions: take the bogie at one end as the fulcrum and jack up the car body together with the bogie at the other end of the car body (2-point support), and the vertical load at this time is GX (M1 + m3); when jacking up the whole vehicle body at the jacking positions at both ends of the vehicle body (4-point support), unbalanced factors (3-point support) shall be considered. At this time, the vertical load is g × m4 (M3 bogie mass; M4 empty vehicle body mass).
rough comparative analysis, it can be seen that there are great differences in the provisions of jacking load in various specifications. In fact, when the vehicle is newly built and maintained, in the operation of jacking the vehicle body with jack, if the expansion and contraction of jack are not synchronous, the vehicle body will be in the state of threepoint support. If the structure characterized by small torsional stiffness is adopted, the 3-point support state will produce permanent deformation. erefore, the 2-point support, 3-point support, and 4-point support should be taken into account in the jacking load condition.  Table 3.

Comparative Analysis of Axial
rough the comparative analysis in Table 3, it can be seen that the Japanese standard JISE7106 takes a low value for the compressive load and tensile load at the coupler area, Mobile Information Systems and the specification directly uses the yield strength of the material as the allowable stress; that is, the safety factor is 1. erefore, it is worth studying whether this standard can be used to evaluate the strength of the Chinese high-speed train body. e provisions of the Interim Provisions and ENl2663 on the compression and tensile load at the coupler are basically the same. However, the safety factor specified in the Interim Provisions is as high as 1.5, while the safety factor specified in EN12663 is only 1.15, which shows that the Interim Provisions have the highest requirements for the design of vehicle body strength and the corresponding design cost. However, considering that there is still a gap between China and foreign countries in terms of design, manufacturing, and process materials, the provisions in the Interim Provisions are relatively reasonable. e compression load in the end wall area mainly considers the strength and stability of the vehicle body under the condition of a train collision. JISE7106 has no clear provisions on the compression load in the end wall area but only needs to be negotiated with the user. e provisions of the Interim Provisions and ENl2663 on the longitudinal compressive load of the end wall area are basically the same, except that ENl2663 has an additional compression load condition of 400 kN acting on the end wall 150 mm from the floor.

Comparative Analysis of Torsional Load.
Due to the irregularity of the line and the geometric error of vehicle manufacturing, the vehicle body in operation will produce torsional deformation. e provisions on torsional load in the Interim Provisions are that the torsional load of the vehicle body is taken as 40 kN m. e provision of torsional load in jlse7106 is that under the condition of ensuring that the spring device on one side does not rotate, the torsional load acting on the spring part on the other sides is 40 kN M. e torsional load is not specified in ENl2663, but it needs to be negotiated with the user. rough comparative analysis, it can be seen that the provisions on torsional load in JISE7106 are consistent with those in the Interim Provisions. e torsion of the car body has a great impact on the strength of the vehicle in operation, so the torsion load condition should be clearly specified in the car body strength specification.

Comparative Analysis of Combined Working
Conditions.
e European standard ENl2663 and the Japanese design general rule JISE7106 specify the combined working conditions as the longitudinal compression/tensile load and a maximum vertical load of the coupler, as well as the longitudinal compression/tensile load and vertical load of the coupler. e load superposition is shown in Tables 4  and 5. China's Interim Provisions are different from European standards and Japanese standards in the selection of combined working conditions. It is stipulated that the combined working conditions are the combination of longitudinal compression/tension load of the coupler and 1.3 times the maximum vertical load.
According to the structural fatigue evaluation method given in the OREB12/RPL7 Research Report: the direction of fatigue crack and the direction of maximum principal stress are perpendicular to each other. Calculate the three-dimensional principal stress value and direction cosine of the node so as to determine the maximum and minimum principal stress values of the node under different load conditions, calculate the average stress and stress amplitude of the node according to the following formula, and finally evaluate the fatigue strength of the structure according to the modified Goodman fatigue limit diagram. Tensile force and maximum vertical load 1 000 kN and g × (m 1 + m 2 ) Tensile force and vertical load 1000 kN and g × m 1  In this article, the fatigue strength of the car body is evaluated by two methods: according to the fatigue load conditions given in ENl2663, the magnitude and direction cosine of the three principal stress values at the stress concentration position are calculated, and then the fatigue strength of the car body is evaluated according to the ore fatigue evaluation method and the modified Goodman fatigue limit diagram. Select the parts with the maximum stress in the static strength analysis, calculate the size and direction of the three principal stress values of these parts, and then evaluate the fatigue strength of the car body according to the ore fatigue evaluation method (see Figure 11). e results shown in Figure 11 show that from the fatigue strength analysis, the difference between the maximum principal stress and the corresponding allowable stress at the node where the maximum von Mises stress occurs is high, which is not the dangerous position of the structure. Under the specified service life, the stress of the selected key points is within the allowable range, and the car body structure meets the service requirements of fatigue strength. In the process of car body manufacturing, the welds in dangerous areas need to be processed to improve the fatigue strength of the weld area by reducing the stress concentration caused by welding.

Conclusion
is article presents a comparative analysis of the strength calculation methods of railway flat car body based on fuzzy logic and evolutionary algorithm. rough the comparison of the strength calculation methods of railway flat car body through the fuzzy logic system and evolutionary algorithm, it is concluded that three compression load conditions in the end wall area should be fully considered in the strength design of car body structure. In the strength design of the car body, the combination of longitudinal compression load and vertical load shall be selected as the combination of longitudinal compression load and vertical load because the synthetic stress under this combination condition is the largest, so the evaluation of the car body strength safety is more reliable. In the strength design of the car body, the combination of longitudinal tensile load and vertical load shall be the combination of longitudinal compressive load and vertical maximum load. Because the synthetic stress is the largest under this combination condition, the safety of evaluating car body strength under this combination condition is higher. Compared with the traditional static strength allowable stress evaluation method, OREB12/RPL7 can qualitatively analyze the fatigue strength allowance of the structure and evaluate the areas where the strength reserve of the car body is insufficient. In the future, the components of the high-speed test train body will be diversified, and the influence of the optimization results of its side wall on the optimization results of finishing remains to be investigated. It is expected to obtain comprehensive optimization results.

Data Availability
No data were used to support this study.