The orbital dynamics of synchronous satellites is studied. The 2 : 1 resonance is considered; in other words, the satellite completes two revolutions while the Earth completes one. In the development of the geopotential, the zonal harmonics J20 and J40 and the tesseral harmonics J22 and J42 are considered. The order of the dynamical system is reduced through successive Mathieu transformations, and the final system is solved by numerical integration. The Lyapunov exponents are used as tool to analyze the chaotic orbits.
1. Introduction
Synchronous satellites in circular or elliptical orbits have been extensively used for navigation, communication, and military missions. This fact justifies the great attention that has been given in literature to the study of resonant orbits characterizing the dynamics of these satellites since the 60s [1–14]. For example, Molniya series satellites used by the old Soviet Union for communication form a constellation of satellites, launched since 1965, which have highly eccentric orbits with periods of 12 hours. Another example of missions that use eccentric, inclined, and synchronous orbits includes satellites to investigate the solar magnetosphere, launched in the 90s [15].
The dynamics of synchronous satellites are very complex. The tesseral harmonics of the geopotential produce multiple resonances which interact resulting significantly in nonlinear motions, when compared to nonresonant orbits. It has been found that the orbital elements show relatively large oscillation amplitudes differing from neighboring trajectories [11].
Due to the perturbations of Earth gravitational potential, the frequencies of the longitude of ascending node Ω and of the argument of pericentre ω can make the presence of small divisors, arising in the integration of equation of motion, more pronounced. This phenomenon depends also on the eccentricity and inclination of the orbit plane. The importance of the node and the pericentre frequencies is smaller when compared to the mean anomaly and Greenwich sidereal time. However, they also have their contribution in the resonance effect. The coefficients l, m, p which define the argument ϕlmpq in the development of the geopotential can vary, producing different frequencies within the resonant cosines for the same resonance. These frequencies are slightly different, with small variations around the considered commensurability.
In this paper, the 2 : 1 resonance is considered; in other words, the satellite completes two revolutions while the Earth carries one. In the development of the geopotential, the zonal harmonics J20 and J40 and the tesseral harmonics J22 and J42 are considered. The order of the dynamical system is reduced through successive Mathieu transformations, and the final system is solved by numerical integration. In the reduced dynamical model, three critical angles, associated to the tesseral harmonics J22 and J42, are studied together. Numerical results show the time behavior of the semimajor axis, argument of pericentre and of the eccentricity. The Lyapunov exponents are used as tool to analyze the chaotic orbits.
2. Resonant Hamiltonian and Equations of Motion
In this section, a Hamiltonian describing the resonant problem is derived through successive Mathieu transformations.
Consider (2.1) to the Earth gravitational potential written in classical orbital elements [16, 17]V=μ2a+∑l=2∞∑m=0l∑p=0l∑q=+∞-∞μa(aea)lJlmFlm(I)Glpq(e)cos(ϕlmpq(M,ω,Ω,θ)),
where μ is the Earth gravitational parameter, μ=3.986009×1014 m3/s2, a, e, I, Ω, ω, M are the classical keplerian elements: a is the semimajor axis, e is the eccentricity, I is the inclination of the orbit plane with the equator, Ω is the longitude of the ascending node, ω is the argument of pericentre, and M is the mean anomaly, respectively; ae is the Earth mean equatorial radius, ae=6378.140 km, Jlm is the spherical harmonic coefficient of degree l and order m, Flmp(I) and Glpq(e) are Kaula’s inclination and eccentricity functions, respectively. The argument ϕlmpq(M,ω,Ω,θ) is defined byϕlmpq(M,ω,Ω,θ)=qM+(l-2p)ω+m(Ω-θ-λlm)+(l-m)π2,
where θ is the Greenwich sidereal time, θ=ωet (ωe is the Earth’s angular velocity, and t is the time), and λlm is the corresponding reference longitude along the equator.
In order to describe the problem in Hamiltonian form, Delaunay canonical variables are introduced,L=μa,G=μa(1-e2),H=μa(1-e2)cos(I),l=M,g=ω,h=Ω.L, G, and H represent the generalized coordinates, and ℓ, g, and h represent the conjugate momenta.
Using the canonical variables, one gets the Hamiltonian F̂,F̂=μ22L2+∑l=2∞∑m=0lRlm,
with the disturbing potential Rlm given byRlm=∑p=0l∑q=-∞+∞Blmpq(L,G,H)cos(ϕlmpq(l,g,h,θ)).
The argument ϕlmpq is defined byϕlmpq(l,g,h,θ)=ql+(l-2p)g+m(h-θ-λlm)+(l-m)π2,
and the coefficient Blmpq(L,G,H) is defined byBlmpq=∑l=2∞∑m=0l∑p=0l∑q=+∞-∞μ2L2(μaeL2)lJlmFlmp(L,G,H)Glpq(L,G).
The Hamiltonian F̂ depends explicitly on the time through the Greenwich sidereal time θ. A new term ωeΘ is introduced in order to extend the phase space. In the extended phase space, the extended Hamiltonian Ĥ is given byĤ=F̂-ωeΘ.
For resonant orbits, it is convenient to use a new set of canonical variables. Consider the canonical transformation of variables defined by the following relations:X=L,Y=G-L,Z=H-G,Θ=Θ,x=l+g+h,y=g+h,z=h,θ=θ,
where X,Y,Z,Θ,x,y,z,θ are the modified Delaunay variables.
The new Hamiltonian H′̂, resulting from the canonical transformation defined by (2.9), is given byH′̂=μ22X2-ωeΘ+∑l=2∞∑m=0lRlm′,
where the disturbing potential Rlm′ is given byRlm′=∑p=0l∑q=-∞+∞Blmpq′(X,Y,Z)cos(ϕlmpq(x,y,z,θ)).
Now, consider the commensurability between the Earth rotation angular velocity ωe and the mean motion n=μ2/X3. This commensurability can be expressed asqn-mωe≅0,
considering q and m as integers. The ratio q/m defining the commensurability will be denoted by α. When the commensurability occurs, small divisors arise in the integration of the equations of motion [9]. These periodic terms in the Hamiltonian H′̂ with frequencies qn-mωe are called resonant terms. The other periodic terms are called short- and long-period terms.
The short- and long-period terms can be eliminated from the Hamiltonian H′̂ by applying an averaging procedure [12, 18]:〈H′̂〉=14π2∫02π∫02πH′̂dξspdξlp.
The variables ξsp and ξlp represent the short- and long-period terms, respectively, to be eliminated of the Hamiltonian H′̂.
The long-period terms have a combination in the argument ϕlmpq which involves only the argument of the pericentre ω and the longitude of the ascending node Ω. From (2.10) and (2.11), these terms are represented by the new variables in the following equation:Hlp′̂=∑l=2∞∑m=0l∑p=0l∑q=-∞+∞Blmpq′(X,Y,Z)cos((l-2p)(y-z)+mz).
The short-period terms are identified by the presence of the sidereal time θ and mean anomaly M in the argument ϕlmpq; in this way, from (2.10) and (2.11), the term Hsp′̂ in the new variables is given by the following equations:Hsp′̂=∑l=2∞∑m=0l∑p=0l∑q=-∞+∞Blmpq′(X,Y,Z)cos(q(x-y)-mθ+ζp).
The term ζp represents the other variables in the argument ϕlmpq, including the argument of the pericentre ω and the longitude of the ascending node Ω, or, in terms of the new variables, y-z and z, respectively.
A reduced Hamiltonian Ĥr is obtained from the Hamiltonian H′̂ when only secular and resonant terms are considered. The reduced Hamiltonian Ĥr is given byĤr=μ22X2-ωeΘ+∑j=1∞B2j,0,j,0′(X,Y,Z)+∑l=2∞∑m=2l∑p=0lBlmp(αm)′(X,Y,Z)cos(ϕlmp(αm)(x,y,z,θ)).
Several authors, [11, 15, 19–22], also use this simplified Hamiltonian to study the resonance.
The dynamical system generated from the reduced Hamiltonian, (2.16), is given byd(X,Y,Z,Θ)dt=∂Ĥr∂(x,y,z,θ),d(x,y,z,θ)dt=-∂Ĥr∂(X,Y,Z,Θ).
The equations of motion dX/dt, dY/dt, and dZ/dt defined by (2.17) aredXdt=-α∑l=2∞∑m=2l∑p=0lmBlmp(αm)′(X,Y,Z)sin(ϕlmp(αm)(x,y,z,θ)),dYdt=-∑l=2∞∑m=2l∑p=0l(l-2p-mα)Blmp(αm)′(X,Y,Z)sin(ϕlmp(αm)(x,y,z,θ)),dZdt=∑l=2∞∑m=2l∑p=0l(l-2p-m)Blmp(αm)′(X,Y,Z)sin(ϕlmp(αm)(x,y,z,θ)).
From (2.18) to (2.20), one can determine the first integral of the system determined by the Hamiltonian Ĥr.
Equation (2.18) can be rewritten as1αdXdt=-∑l=2∞∑m=2l∑p=0lmBlmp(αm)′(X,Y,Z)sin(ϕlmp(αm)(x,y,z,θ)).
Adding (2.19) and (2.20),dYdt+dZdt=(α-1)∑l=2∞∑m=2l∑p=0lmBlmp(αm)′(X,Y,Z)sin(ϕlmp(αm)(x,y,z,θ)),
and substituting (2.21) and (2.22), one obtainsdYdt+dZdt=-(α-1)1αdXdt.
Now, (2.23) is rewritten as(1-1α)dXdt+dYdt+dZdt=0.
In this way, the canonical system of differential equations governed by Ĥr has the first integral generated from (2.24):(1-1α)X+Y+Z=C1,
where C1 is an integration constant.
Using this first integral, a Mathieu transformation(X,Y,Z,Θ,x,y,z,θ)⟶(X1,Y1,Z1,Θ1,x1,y1,z1,θ1)
can be defined.
This transformation is given by the following equations:X1=X,Y1=Y,Z1=(1-1α)X+Y+Z,Θ1=Θ,x1=x-(1-1α)z,y1=y-z,z1=z,θ1=θ.
The subscript 1 denotes the new set of canonical variables. Note that Z1=C1, and the z1 is an ignorable variable. So the order of the dynamical system is reduced in one degree of freedom.
Substituting the new set of canonical variables, X1, Y1, Z1, Θ1, x1, y1, z1, θ1, in the reduced Hamiltonian given by (2.16), one gets the resonant Hamiltonian. The word “resonant” is used to denote the Hamiltonian Hrs which is valid for any resonance. The periodic terms in this Hamiltonian are resonant terms. The Hamiltonian Hrs is given byHrs=μ22X12-ωeΘ1+∑j=1∞B2j,0,j,0(X1,Y1,C1)+∑l=2∞∑m=2l∑p=0lBlmp,(αm)(X1,Y1,C1)cos(ϕlmp(αm)(x1,y1,θ1)).
The Hamiltonian Hrs has all resonant frequencies, relative to the commensurability α, where the ϕlmp(αm) argument is given byϕlmp(αm)=m(αx1-θ1)+(l-2p-αm)y1-ϕlmp(αm)0,
withϕlmp(αm)0=mλlm-(l-m)π2.
The secular and resonant terms are given, respectively, by B2j,0,j,0(X1,Y1,C1) and Blmp(αm)(X1,Y1,C1).
Each one of the frequencies contained in dx1/dt, dy1/dt, dθ1/dt is related, through the coefficients l, m, to a tesseral harmonic Jlm. By varying the coefficients l, m, p and keeping q/m fixed, one finds all frequencies dϕ1,lmp(αm)/dt concerning a specific resonance.
From Hrs, taking, j=1,2, l=2,4, m=2, α=1/2, and p=0,1,2,3, one getsĤ1=μ22X12-ωeΘ1+B1,2010(X1,Y1,C1)+B1,4020(X1,Y1,C1)+B1,2201(X1,Y1,C1)cos(x1-2θ1+y1-2λ22)+B1,2211(X1,Y1,C1)cos(x1-2θ1-y1-2λ22)+B1,2221(X1,Y1,C1)cos(x1-2θ1-3y1-2λ22)+B1,4211(X1,Y1,C1)cos(x1-2θ1+y1-2λ42+π)+B1,4221(X1,Y1,C1)cos(x1-2θ1-y1-2λ42+π)+B1,4231(X1,Y1,C1)cos(x1-2θ1-3y1-2λ42+π).
The Hamiltonian Ĥ1 is defined considering a fixed resonance and three different critical angles associated to the tesseral harmonic J22; the critical angles associated to the tesseral harmonic J42 have the same frequency of the critical angles associated to the J22 with a difference in the phase. The other terms in Hrs are considered as short-period terms.
Table 1 shows the resonant coefficients used in the Hamiltonian Ĥ1.
Resonant coefficients.
Degree (l)
Order (m)
p
q
2
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
4
2
1
1
4
2
2
1
4
2
3
1
Finally, a last transformation of variables is done, with the purpose of writing the resonant angle explicitly. This transformation is defined byX4=X1,Y4=Y1,Θ4=Θ1+2X1,x4=x1-2θ1,y4=y1,θ4=θ1.
So, considering (2.31) and (2.32), the Hamiltonian H4 is found to beH4=μ22X42-ωe(Θ4-2X4)+B4,2010(X4,Y4,C1)+B4,4020(X4,Y4,C1)+B4,2201(X4,Y4,C1)cos(x4+y4-2λ22)+B4,2211(X4,Y4,C1)cos(x4-y4-2λ22)+B4,2221(X4,Y4,C1)cos(x4-3y4-2λ22)+B4,4211(X4,Y4,C1)cos(x4+y4-2λ42+π)+B4,4221(X4,Y4,C1)cos(x4-y4-2λ42+π)+B4,4231(X4,Y4,C1)cos(x4-3y4-2λ42+π),
with ωeΘ4 constant and
B4,2010=μ4X46ae2J20(-34(C1+2X4)2(X4+Y4)2+14)(1+32-Y42-2X4Y4X42),B4,4020=μ6X410ae4J40(10564(1-(C1+2X4)2(X4+Y4)2)2-32+158(C1+2X4)2(X4+Y4)2)×(1+5-Y42-2X4Y4X42),B4,2201=218X47μ4ae2J22(1+C1+2X4X4+Y4)2-Y42-2X4Y4,B4,2211=32X47μ4ae2J22(32-32(C1+2X4)2(X4+Y4)2)-Y42-2X4Y4,B4,2221=-38X47μ4ae2J22(1-C1+2X4X4+Y4)2-Y42-2X4Y4,B4,4211=92X411μ6ae4J42(3527(1-(C1+2X4)2(X4+Y4)2)(C1+2X4)×(1+C1+2X4X4+Y4)(X4+Y4)-1-158(1+C1+2X4X4+Y4)2)-Y42-2X4Y4B4,4221=52X411μ6ae4J42(10516(1-(C1+2X4)2(X4+Y4)2)(1-3(C1+2X4)2(X4+Y4)2)+154-154(C1+2X4)2(X4+Y4)2)-Y42-2X4Y4,B4,4231=μ6X410ae4J42(-3527(1-(C1+2X4)2(X4+Y4)2)(C1+2X4)×(1-C1+2X4X4+Y4)(X4+Y4)-1-158(1-C1+2X4X4+Y4)2)×(12-Y42-2X4Y4X4+3316-Y42-2X4Y4X42).
Since the term ωeΘ4 is constant, it plays no role in the equations of motion, and a new Hamiltonian can be introduced,Ĥ4=H4+ωeΘ4.
The dynamical system described by Ĥ4 is given byd(X4,Y4)dt=∂Ĥ4∂(x4,y4),d(x4,y4)dt=-∂Ĥ4∂(X4,Y4).
The zonal harmonics used in (2.34) and (2.35) and the tesseral harmonics used in (2.36) to (2.41) are shown in Table 2.
The zonal and tesseral harmonics.
Zonal harmonics
Tesseral harmonics
J20=1.0826×10-3
J22=1.8154×10-6
J40=-1.6204×10-6
J42=1.6765×10-7
The constant of integration C1 in (2.34) to (2.41) is given, in terms of the initial values of the orbital elements, ao, eo, and Io, byC1=μao(1-eo2cos(Io)-2),
or, in terms of the variables X4 and Y4,C1=X4(cos(Io)-2)+Y4cos(Io).
In Section 4, some results of the numerical integration of (2.43) are shown.
3. Lyapunov Exponents
The estimation of the chaoticity of orbits is very important in the studies of dynamical systems, and possible irregular motions can be analyzed by Lyapunov exponents [23].
In this work, “Gram-Schmidt’s method,” described in [23–26], will be applied to compute the Lyapunov exponents. A brief description of this method is presented in what follows.
The dynamical system described by (2.43) can be rewritten as
dX4dt=P1(X4,Y4,x4,y4;C1),dY4dt=P2(X4,Y4,x4,y4;C1),dx4dt=P3(X4,Y4,x4,y4;C1),dy4dt=P4(X4,Y4,x4,y4;C1).
Introducingz=(X4Y4x4y4),Z=(P1P2P3P4).
Equations (3.2) can be put in the formdzdt=Z(z).
The variational equations, associated to the system of differential equations (3.3), are given bydζdt=Jζ,
where J=(∂Z/∂z) is the Jacobian.
The total number of differential equations used in this method is n(n+1), n represents the number of the motion equations describing the problem, in this case four. In this way, there are twenty differential equations, four are motion equations of the problem and sixteen are variational equations described by (3.4)
The dynamical system represented by (3.3) and (3.4) is numerically integrated and the neighboring trajectories are studied using the Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization to calculate the Lyapunov exponents.
The method of the Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization can be seen in [25, 26] with more details. A simplified denomination of the method is described as follows.
Considering the solutions to (3.4) as uκ(t), the integration in the time τ begins from initial conditions uκ(t0)=eκ(t0), an orthonormal basis.
At the end of the time interval, the volumes of the κ-dimensional (κ=1,2,…,N) produced by the vectors uκ are calculated byVκ=‖⋀j=1κuj(t)‖,
where ⋀ is the outer product and ∥·∥ is a norm.
In this way, the vectors uκ are orthonormalized by Gram-Schmidt method. In other words, new orthonormal vectors eκ(t0+τ) are calculated, in general, according toeκ=uκ-∑j=1κ-1(uκ⋅ej)ej‖uκ-∑j=1κ-1(uκ⋅ej)ej‖.
The Gram-Schmidt method makes invariant the κ-dimensional subspace produced by the vectors u1,u2,u3,…,uκ in constructing the new κ-dimensional subspace spanned by the vectors e1,e2,e3,…,eκ.
With new vector uκ(t0+τ)=eκ(t0+τ), the integration is reinitialized and carried forward to t=t0+2τ. The whole cycle is repeated over a long-time interval. The theorems guarantee that the κ-dimensional Lyapunov exponents are calculated by [25, 26]:λ(κ)=limn→∞1nτ∑j=1nln(Vκ(t0+jτ))ln(Vκ(t0+(j-1)τ)).
The theory states that if the Lyapunov exponent tends to a positive value, the orbit is chaotic.
In the next section are shown some results about the Lyapunov exponents.
4. Results
Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 show the time behavior of the semimajor axis, x4 angle, argument of perigee and of the eccentricity, according to the numerical integration of the motion equations, (2.43), considering three different resonant angles together: ϕ2201, ϕ2211, and ϕ2221 associated to J22, and three angles, ϕ4211, ϕ4221, and ϕ4231 associated to J42, with the same frequency of the resonant angles related to the J22, but with different phase. The initial conditions corresponding to variables X4 and Y4 are defined for eo=0.001, Io=55°, and ao given in Table 3. The initial conditions of the variables x4 and y4 are 0° and 0°, respectively. Table 3 shows the values of C1 corresponding to the given initial conditions.
Values of the constant of integration C1 for e=0.001, I=55° and different values for semimajor axis.
a(0)×103(m)
C1×1011(m2/s)
26555.000
−1.467543158
26561.700
−1.467728282
26562.400
−1.467747623
26563.500
−1.467778013
26565.000
−1.467819454
Time behavior of the semimajor axis for different values of C1 given in Table 3.
Time behavior of x4 angle for different values of C1 given in Table 3.
Time behavior of the argument of pericentre for different values of C1 given in Table 3.
Time behavior of the eccentricity for different values of C1 given in Table 3.
Figures 5, 6, 7, and 8 show the time behavior of the semimajor axis, x4 angle, argument of perigee and of the eccentricity for two different cases. The first case considers the critical angles ϕ2201, ϕ2211, and ϕ2221, associated to the tesseral harmonic J22, and the second case considers the critical angles associated to the tesseral harmonics J22 and J42. The angles associated to the J42, ϕ4211, ϕ4221, and ϕ4231, have the same frequency of the critical angles associated to the J22 with a different phase. The initial conditions corresponding to variables X4 and Y4 are defined for eo=0.05, Io=10°, and ao given in Table 4. The initial conditions of the variables x4 and y4 are 0° and 60°, respectively. Table 4 shows the values of C1 corresponding to the given initial conditions.
Values of the constant of integration C1 for e=0.05, I=10°, and different values for semimajor axis.
a(0)×103(m)
C1×1011(m2/s)
26555.000
−1.045724331
26565.000
−1.045921210
26568.000
−1.045980267
26574.000
−1.046098370
Time behavior of the semimajor axis for different values of C1 given in Table 4.
Time behavior of x4 angle for different values of C1 given in Table 4.
Time behavior of the argument of pericentre for different values of C1 given in Table 4.
Time behavior of the eccentricity for different values of C1 given in Table 4.
Analyzing Figures 5–8, one can observe a correction in the orbits when the terms related to the tesseral harmonic J42 are added to the model. Observing, by the percentage, the contribution of the amplitudes of the terms B4,4211, B4,4221, and B4,4231, in each critical angle studied, is about 1,66% up to 4,94%. In fact, in the studies of the perturbations in the artificial satellites motion, the accuracy is important, since adding different tesseral and zonal harmonics to the model, one can have a better description about the orbital motion.
Figures 9, 10, 11, and 12 show the time behavior of the semimajor axis, x4 angle, argument of perigee and of the eccentricity, according to the numerical integration of the motion equations, (2.43), considering three different resonant angles together; ϕ2201, ϕ2211, and ϕ2221 associated to J22 and three angles ϕ4211, ϕ4221, and ϕ4231 associated to J42. The initial conditions corresponding to variables X4 and Y4 are defined for eo=0.01, Io=55°, and ao given in Table 5. The initial conditions of the variables x4 and y4 are 0° and 60°, respectively. Table 5 shows the values of C1 corresponding to the given initial conditions.
Values of the constant of integration C1 for e=0.01, I=55°, and different values for semimajor axis.
a(0)×103(m)
C1×1011(m2/s)
26555.000
−1.467572370
26558.000
−1.467655265
26562.000
−1.467765786
26564.000
−1.467821043
26568.000
−1.467931552
Time behavior of the semimajor axis for different values of C1 given in Table 5.
Time behavior of x4 angle for different values of C1 given in Table 5.
Time behavior of the argument of pericentre for different values of C1 given in Table 5.
Time behavior of the eccentricity for different values of C1 given in Table 5.
Analyzing Figures 1–12, one can observe possible irregular motions in Figures 1–4, specifically considering values for C1=-1.467778013×1011 m2/s and C1=-1.467819454×1011 m2/s, and, in Figures 9–12, for C1=-1.467765786×1011 m2/s and C1=-1.467821043×1011 m2/s. These curves will be analyzed by the Lyapunov exponents in a specified time verifying the possible regular or chaotic motions.
Figures 13 and 14 show the time behavior of the Lyapunov exponents for two different cases, according to the initial values of Figures 1–4 and 9–12. The dynamical system involves the zonal harmonics J20 and J40 and the tesseral harmonics J22 and J42. The method used in this work for the study of the Lyapunov exponents is described in Section 3. In Figure 13, the initial values for C1, x4, and y4 are C1=-1.467778013×1011 m2/s and C1=-1.467819454×1011 m2/s, x4=0° and y4=0°, respectively. In Figure 14, the initial values for C1, x4, and y4 are C1=-1.467765786×1011 m2/s and C1=-1.467821043×1011 m2/s, x4=0° and y4=60°, respectively. In each case are used two different values for semimajor axis corresponding to neighboring orbits shown previously in Figures 1–4 and 9–12.
Lyapunov exponents λ(1) and λ(2), corresponding to the variables X4 and Y4, respectively, for C1=-1.467778013×1011 m2/s and C1=-1.467819454×1011 m2/s, x4=0° and y4=0°.
Lyapunov exponents λ(1) and λ(2), corresponding to the variables X4 and Y4, respectively, for C1=-1.467765786×1011 m2/s and C1=-1.467821043×1011 m2/s, x4=0° and y4=60°.
Figures 13 and 14 show Lyapunov exponents for neighboring orbits. The time used in the calculations of the Lyapunov exponents is about 150.000 days. For this time, it can be observed in Figure 13 that λ(1), corresponding to the initial value a(0)=26565.0 km, tends to a positive value, evidencing a chaotic region. On the other hand, analyzing the same Figure 13, λ(1), corresponding to the initial value a(0)=26563.5 km, does not show a stabilization around the some positive value, in this specified time. Probably, the time is not sufficient for a stabilization in some positive value, or λ(1), initial value a(0)=26563.5 km, tends to a negative value, evidencing a regular orbit. Analyzing now Figure 14, it can be verified that λ(1), corresponding to the initial value a(0)=26564.0 km, tends to a positive value, it contrasts with λ(1), initial value a(0)=26562.0 km. Comparing Figure 13 with Figure 14, it is observed that the Lyapunov exponents in Figure 14 has an amplitude of oscillation greater than the Lyapunov exponents in Figure 13. Analyzing this fact, it is probable that the necessary time for the Lyapunov exponent λ(2), in Figure 14, to stabilize in some positive value is greater than the necessary time for the λ(2) in Figure 13.
Rescheduling the axes of Figures 13 and 14, as described in Figures 15 and 16, respectively, the Lyapunov exponents tending to a positive value can be better visualized.
Lyapunov exponents λ(1) and λ(2), corresponding to the variables X4 and Y4, respectively, for C1=-1.467778013×1011 m2/s and C1=-1.467819454×1011 m2/s, x4=0° and y4=0°.
Lyapunov exponents λ(1) and λ(2), corresponding to the variables X4 and Y4, respectively, for C1=-1.467765786×1011 m2/s and C1=-1.467821043×1011 m2/s, x4=0° and y4=60°.
5. Conclusions
In this work, the dynamical behavior of three critical angles associated to the 2 : 1 resonance problem in the artificial satellites motion has been investigated.
The results show the time behavior of the semimajor axis, argument of perigee and e-ccentricity. In the numerical integration, different cases are studied, using three critical angles together: ϕ2201, ϕ2211, and ϕ2221 associated to J22 and ϕ4211, ϕ4221, and ϕ4231 associated to the J42.
In the simulations considered in the work, four cases show possible irregular motions for C1=-1.467778013×1011 m2/s, C1=-1.467819454×1011 m2/s, C1=-1.467765786×1011 m2/s, and C1=-1.467821043×1011 m2/s. Studying the Lyapunov exponents, two cases show chaotic motions for C1=-1.467819454×1011 m2/s and C1=-1.467821043×1011 m2/s.
Analyzing the contribution of the terms related to the J42, it is observed that, for the value of C1=-1.045724331×1011 m2/s, the amplitudes of the terms B4,4211, B4,4221, and B4,4231 are greater than the other values of C1. In other words, for bigger values of semimajor axis, it is observed a smaller contribution of the terms related to the tesseral harmonic J42.
The theory used in this paper for the 2 : 1 resonance can be applied for any resonance involving some artificial Earth satellite.
Acknowledgments
This work was accomplished with support of the FAPESP under the Contract no. 2009/00735-5 and 2006/04997-6, SP Brazil, and CNPQ (Contracts 300952/2008-2 and 302949/2009-7).
MorandoM. B.Orbites de resonance des satellites de 24h1963244767BlitzerL.Synchronous and resonant satellite orbits associated with equatorial ellipticity19633210161019GarfinkelB.The disturbing function for an artificial satellite1965709688704GarfinkelB.Tesseral harmonic perturbations of an artificial satellite196570784786019160310.1086/109817GarfinkelB.Formal solution in the problem of small divisors196671657669034196710.1086/110171GedeonG. S.DialO. L.Along-track oscillations of a satellite due to tesseral harmonics1967559359510.2514/3.4027ZBL0146.20802GedeonG. S.DouglasB. C.PalmiterM. T.Resonance effects on eccentric satellite orbits196714147157GedeonG. S.Tesseral resonance effects on satellite orbits1969116718910.1007/BF01228837ZBL0183.53401LaneM. T.An analytical treatment of resonance effects on satellite orbits198842338JuppA.A solution of the ideal resonance problem for the case of libration196974354310.1086/110771ElyT. A.HowellK. C.Long-term evolution of artificial satellite orbits due to resonant tesseral harmonics199644167190SanckezD. M.YokoyamaT.BrasilP. I. O.CordeiroR. R.Some initial conditions for disposed satellites of the systems GPS and galileo constellations200920092251075910.1155/2009/510759FerreiraL. D. D.Vilhena de MoraesR.GPS satellites orbits: resonance200920091234783510.1155/2009/347835ZBL1185.86023SampaioJ. C.Vilhena de MoraesR.FernandesS. S.Artificial satellites dynamics: resonant effectsProceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics2011São José dos Campos, BrazilNetoA. G. S.2006Tese de Mestrado, ITAOsorioJ. P.1973Porto, PortugalImprensa PortuguesaKaulaW. M.1966Waltham, Mass, USABlaisdelRoyA. E.19883rdInstitute of Physics Publishing Bristol and PhiladelphiaLimaP. H. C. N.Jr.1998Tese de Doutorado, Instituto Tecnológico de AeronáuticaGrossoP. R.1989Tese de Mestrado, Instituto Tecnológico de AeronáuticaFormigaJ. K. S.Vilhena de MoraesR.Dynamical systems: an integrable kernel for resonance effects2009128994Vilhena de MoraesR.FitzgibbonK. T.KonembaM.Influence of the 2:1 resonance in the orbits of GPS satellites19951612374010.1016/0273-1177(95)98776-KChristiansenF.RughH. H.Computing lyapunov spectra with continuous gram-schmidt orthonormalization19971051063107210.1088/0951-7715/10/5/0041473374ZBL0910.34055Qun-HongL.Jie-YanT.Lyapunov exponent calculation of a two-degree-of-freedom vibro-impact system with symmetrical rigid stops201120404050510.1088/1674-1056/20/4/040505ShimadaI.NagashimaT.A numerical approach to ergodic problem of dissipative dynamical systems19796161605161610.1143/PTP.61.1605539440ZBL1171.34327WieselW. E.Continuous time algorithm for Lyapunov exponents19934753686369710.1103/PhysRevE.47.36861377901