MPE Mathematical Problems in Engineering 1563-5147 1024-123X Hindawi Publishing Corporation 10.1155/2014/126398 126398 Research Article Numerical Simulation of Soil Water Movement under Subsurface Irrigation Qin Xinqiang Duan Xianbao Su Lijun Shen Xiaoqin Hu Gang Liew Kim M. 1 Department of Applied Mathematics Xi’an University of Technology Xi’an 710048 China xaut.edu.cn 2014 382014 2014 30 04 2014 14 07 2014 14 07 2014 3 8 2014 2014 Copyright © 2014 Xinqiang Qin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

By constructing a radial basis function collocation method combined with a difference method, a two-dimensional mathematical model with boundary conditions of soil water movement under irrigation is proposed. The nonlinear term is dealt with a difference method and the equation is solved using an implicit scheme. In addition, the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the soil water movement equation are proven. Numerical results show that the proposed method has high precision and is easier to use than traditional methods. Moreover, the selection of parameter c plays an important role in guaranteeing calculation precision. It lays the foundation for the numerical solutions to high-dimensional soil water movement equations.

1. Introduction

Between 1960 and 2000, numerical techniques such as boundary element and finite element methods have made spectacular advances in the computation of physical phenomena in engineering and sciences. Particularly, the last two decades have witnessed substantial efforts in developing a new class of numerical methods. These methods, using traditional methods that require certain underlying meshes such as the triangulation of a region for computation, were primarily developed for simulating low-dimensional application problems. However, designing relevant meshes is usually quite a difficult task for two-dimensional regions and might become impossible for higher-dimensional problems.

However, the triangulation process is too time consuming, even if a sophisticated mesh-generator is employed. In fact, for a given distribution of points, it is possible to achieve a mesh quickly, but this always requires a considerable number of iterations including manual interaction before reaching a satisfactory mesh.

Meshless methods were first introduced by Lucyt, and Gingold and Monaghan in 1977 [1, 2]. Further works, such as Nayroles et al. , Belytschko et al. , Schaback , Sukumar et al. , Wu , and Wendland [8, 9] (see books [10, 11]), attempted to reduce or even eliminate the need for discretization of a domain or surface in the context of numerical solutions for boundary and initial value problems. These rapidly developed methods can not only reduce the large costs of labor, but also spare computational time compared to the finite element method, boundary element method, and other mesh-dependent methods.

The initial idea of meshless methods could date back to the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method for modeling astrophysical phenomena [1, 2]. In 1992, Nayroles et al. proposed the diffuse element method (DEM) . In 1994, Belytschko et al. improved the DEM and introduced the element-free Galerkin method (EFG) . Since then, there has been a great deal of research into meshless methods. Meshless methods, such as the reproducing kernel particle method (RKPM) by Liu et al. , Hp-cloud method by Duarte and Oden , natural element method (NEM) by Sukumar et al. , partition of unity finite element method (PUFEM) by Babuška and Melenk , and meshless Galerkin method using radial basis functions (RBF) by Wendland , have also been described in literatures. The major differences between these meshless methods, all of which can be classified as Galerkin methods, come only from the techniques used for interpolating the trial functions. Even though no mesh is required in these methods for the interpolation of the trial or test functions and the solution variables, the use of shadow elements is unavoidable during the integration of the symmetric weak form. Therefore, these methods are not truly meshless.

The finite point method (FPM) introduced by Oñate et al. , which is based on the moving least-squares and the collocation method, is a truly meshless method. Other truly meshless methods include the PCM , the Hp-meshless clouds , the LBIE , the LSC , and the WLSM  among others. In particular, in 1990, Kansa introduced the radial basis function (RBF) collocation method for solving elliptic, hyperbolic, and parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs) . Later, the RBF was further developed by Schaback  and Fasshauer . Hon et al. applied the RBF to the numerical computation of the variable normal equations, nonlinear Burgers equation, and shallow water wave equation . In 1999, Rippa carried out work on selecting the correct shape parameter c for the RBFs . Another class of RBF was further developed by Wendland [8, 9], Wu , and Buhmann . Zhang et al. have made more research on element-free kp-Ritz method and applied it to solve different problems . Therefore, the collocation-based meshless method has been an important meshless method in the current literature .

By creating a univariate basis function with an Euclidean norm, meshless methods are often naturally radically symmetric, and the high-dimensional problem can be turned into virtually one-dimensional one. Consequently, the study of the numerical solutions of PDEs through radial basis function interpolation has yielded a number of significant results.

1.1. The Problem and the Approach to Solve the Problem

The FEM has difficulty in remeshing and adaptive analysis. In contrast, meshless methods do not require a mesh to discretize the domain, and the approximate solution is constructed entirely with a set of scattered nodes . However, meshless methods may lead to lower computational efficiency than FEM because more computational effort for the meshless interpolation and numerical integrations are required . Hence, the improvement of the computational efficiency of meshless methods targeted at meshless interpolation and numerical integrations becomes an important issue. Other concerns or weaknesses of the existing meshless methods include difficulty in introducing the essential boundary conditions, a greater cost in evaluating the shape function derivatives, problems in handling discontinuities such as those due to heterogeneous material distributions, and the need for complicated node connectivity to ensure accurate results.

A truly meshless method, based on collocation with radial basis functions and radial basis functions are chosen to represent the solutions of PDEs, is the main focus of this paper. Moreover, the collocation-based meshless method is a truly meshless technique without mesh discretization. This method has the advantage of higher accuracy, convenient for computing, and has been successfully applied to numerical solutions of various PDEs. By using collocation with radial basis functions, the partition of the domain is not needed; hence the method can be applied to complex domains and overcomes some drawbacks of the traditional finite element method. It only needs to compute the shape functions and their derivatives, while the finite element method requires a calculation of the relevant integrals that often lowers the efficiency of computation significantly. The boundary conditions are relatively easier to be imposed without special manipulation. Finally, the way of obtaining the solutions to the PDEs is intuitive. From a practical point of view, this approach can achieve higher accuracy with more easily coded computer programs. Therefore, the collocation method with radial basis function interpolation can produce good results.

1.2. Mathematical Model of Soil Water Movement

Assume that permeable pipes in fields are parallel and have the same spacing and depth. Figure 1 shows a soil profile which is perpendicular to the permeable pipeline. Assuming that the water flow in the soil is negligible, then the problem considering irrigation can be solved as a plane problem. Obviously, in the case of Figure 1, it is sufficient to focus on soil water movement in the shaded part abcd, namely, the flow region.

Schematic diagram of flow region.

In the region of soil water flow, both perpendiculars ad and bc are symmetrical lines, where ad traverses through the center of a permeable pipe and bc is equidistant from two adjacent permeable pipes. The symmetry means that the water flux along the normal direction of two lines equals zero. Line ab, the earth's surface, is the upper boundary of the region of soil water flow. The water flow which crosses line ab is affected by the soil’s conveyance capacity, which is in turn related to the surface soil transpiration and strength of rainfall. By ignoring the transpiration and rainfall effects, the water flux across ab is zero. Line dc is the lower boundary of the region of soil water flow but is deep enough so that water movement caused by irrigation cannot reach it.

Assume that, in the region of soil water flow, the soil water flow is continuous in time and space, obeying the law of mass conservation. Then we can develop mathematical models of the soil water movement based on the physical process through the area.

The mathematical model of 2D water movement in unsaturated soil can be established as (1)θt=x(D(θ)θx)+z(D(θ)θz)+K(θ)z, where θ is the volumetric soil water content; D(θ) and K(θ) both are continuous functions which denote the diffusivity and hydraulic conductivity of the unsaturated soil flow respectively; t is time and z is the distance with the upward direction defined as positive.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the construction of the meshless method based on the collocation method with radial basis functions, where the explicit schemes for the given equation are proposed and the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the method are proved. In Section 3, we give some applications and apply the method developed in this paper to examine the appropriateness and efficiency of the numerical solutions and to analyze the factors influencing the accuracy. We also compare our method to FEM. Section 4 comprises the conclusions and remarks.

2. Construction of a Meshless Method Based on Collocation with Radial Basis Functions 2.1. Radial Basis Functions

Radial basis functions (RBFs), also known as distance basis functions, are a type of functions with a basic variable dj  (dj=x-xj). They are isotropic and simple in form and can be solved easily with numerical calculation. The method, which combines radial basis functions with collocation, has many advantages when solving the partial differential equation [33, 34]. It has no correlation with the space dimensions and does not need any element or mesh for interpolation. Therefore, it is a truly meshless method. Currently, FEM  and FDM  are mostly used to solve soil moisture movement equations. With the development of meshless methods in recent years, many scholars now solve the soil water seepage problem using the finite volume method  and the RBF method . The mathematical models of soil water movement are usually convection-diffusion equations, meaning that numerical oscillation occurs frequently when FDM or FEM is used. However, the radial basis function collocation method can solve many of these problems.

2.2. Construction of Radial Basis Function Collocation Method

The 2D soil water movement equation is (2)θt=x(D(θ)θx)+z(D(θ)θz)+K(θ)z,(x,z)Ω,θ(x,z,0)=θ0,(x,z)Ω,θ(x,z,t)=θ1,(x,z)Ω, where θ is the volumetric soil water content, D(θ) and K(θ) are the diffusivity and hydraulic conductivity of the unsaturated soil flow, respectively, t is time, and z is the distance with the upward direction defined as positive. θ0 is the initial water content, θ1 is the constant water content of ground under humid conditions, Ω is the seepage region, and Ω is the boundary of Ω.

Because the quadratic term in (2) is nonlinear, we cannot use the collocation method directly. Thus, we apply centered differences to deal with the nonlinear term in (xi,zj): (3)x[D(θ)θx]x=xi12Δx{[D(θ)θx]x=xi+1-[D(θ)θx]x=xi-1}=12Δx[D(θi+1,j)(θi+1,jx)x=xi+1kkkkkkkkk-D(θi-1,j)(θi-1,jx)x=xi-1],z[D(θ)θz]z=zj12Δz{[D(θ)θz]z=zj+1-[D(θ)θz]z=zj-1}=12Δz[D(θi,j+1)(θi,j+1z)z=zj+1kkkkkkkkk-D(θi,j-1)(θi,j-1z)z=zj-1], where Δx and Δz are spatial intervals, respectively. (xi,zj) are boundary points when i,j=1,N, are inner points when i,j=2,3,,N-1.

Discretizing the left side of (2) with forward differences gives (4)(θt)(xi,zj)t=tn+1(θn+1-θnΔt)(xi,zj)=θi,jn+1-θi,jnΔt.

Discretizing the third term in the right side of (2) with central differences gives (5)(K(θ)z)(xi,zj)t=tn+1K(θi,j+1n+1)-K(θi,j-1n)2Δz.

Let function θ~(X,tn) be an approximation of θ(X,tn): (6)θ~(X,tn)=i=1NIαinφ(X-Ii)+i=1Nbβinφ(X-Bi), where X=(x,z), IiΩ, and BΩ. NI is the number of the nodes in the region and Nb is the number of the nodes on the border.

Applying collocation method, (6) should satisfy the differential equation for the region Ω in (7) and boundary conditions on the borders Ω in (8). That is, (7)i=1NIαin(φ(Ij-Ii)-ddx(D(θn(Ij))dφ(Ij-Ii)dx)kkkkkkk-ddz(D(θn(Ij))dφ(Ij-Ii)dz))+i=1Nbβin((D(θn(Ij))dφ(Ij-Bi)dz)φ(Ij-Bi)kkkkkkkkkkkki-ddx(D(θn(Ij))dφ(Ij-Bi)dx)kkkkkkkkkkkkk-ddz(D(θn(Ij))dφ(Ij-Bi)dz))=θi,jn+K(θn(Ij))z,j=1,2,,NI,(8)i=1NIαinφ(Bj-Ii)+i=1Nbβinφ(Bj-Bi)=θ1n(Bj).j=1,2,,Nb.

Let (9)ψ(X-I)=φ(X-I)-ddx(D(θ(X))(dφ(X-I)dx))-ddz(D(θ(X))(dφ(X-I)dz))fn(Ij)=θn-1(Ij)+K(θn(Ij))z. Then (7) and (8) can be expressed with the following matrix equation: (10)HU=F, where(11)H=[ψ(0)ψ(I1-INi)ψ(I1-B1)ψ(I1-BNb)ψ(INi-I1)ψ(0)ψ(INi-B1)ψ(INi-BNb)φ(B1-I1)φ(B1-INi)φ(0)φ(B1-BNb)φ(BNb-I1)φ(BNb-INi)φ(BNb-B1)φ(0)],U=[α1n,α2n,,αNin,β1n,β2n,,βNbn]T,F=[f1n(I1),f1n(I2),,f1n(INi),θ1n(B1),θ1n(B2),,θ1n(BNb)]T.

2.3. The Existence and Uniqueness of the Solution

Let (12)A1=[ψ(0)ψ(I1-INi)ψ(INi-I1)ψ(0)],A2=[ψ(I1-B1)ψ(I1-BNb)ψ(INi-B1)ψ(INi-BNb)],A3=[φ(B1-I1)φ(B1-INi)φ(BNb-I1)φ(BNb-INi)],A4=[φ(0)φ(B1-BNb)φ(BNb-B1)φ(0)]. Then H=[A1A2A3A4]. For (10), the following theorem is obtained.

Theorem 1.

If the Fourier transform F[ϕ] of ϕ(ω) is almost everywhere larger than 0 and (A3A1-1A2-A4)-1 exists, then H is invertible. Consequently, the matrix equation (10) has a unique solution.

Proof.

First, we can show that A1-1 and A4-1 exist. According to the characteristics of radial basis function, matrix A1 is symmetric. Then we show that it is positive definiteness. For ξ(ξ0)RNb, (13)(A1ξ,ξ)=j=1Nbk=1Nbξjξkφj(xj)=j=1Nbk=1Nbξjξkφ(xj-xk)=(12π)Nb-+F[φ]|ξ(ω)|2dω>0, where ξ(ω)=j=1Nbξjei<ω,xj>. So A1 is a symmetric positive definite matrix; that is, A1-1 exists.

Because φ(r) is an even function, then -φ(r) is an even function too. Moreover, F[-φ]=-(iω)2F[φ]=ω2F[φ]>0. Similarly, A4 is also a symmetric positive definite matrix. Hence, A4-1 exits. Now, we have (14)[E-A2A4-10E][A1A2A3A4]=[A1-A2A4-1A30A3A4]. Computing the determinants of both sides of (14), we have (15)|H|=|A1A2A3A4|=|A1-A2A4-1A3|·|A4|. As (A3A1-1A2-A4)-1 exists, (16)(A1-A2A4-1A3)×[A1-1-A1-1A2(A3A1-1A2-A4)-1A3A1-1]=E-A2(A3A1-1A2-A4)-1A3A1-1-A2A4-1A3A1-1+A2A4-1A3A1-1A2×(A3A1-1A2-A4)-1A3A1-1. In addition, (17)A2A4-1A3A1-1A2(A3A1-1A2-A4)-1A3A1-1-A2(A3A1-1A2-A4)-1A3A1-1=A2A4-1(A3A1-1A2-A4)×(A3A1-1A2-A4)-1A3A1-1=A2A4-1A3A1-1. By (16) and (17), we obtain (18)(A1-A2A4-1A3)×[A1-1-A1-1A2(A3A1-1A2-A4)-1A3A1-1]=E. So (19)(A1-A2A4-1A3)-1=A1-1-A1-1A2(A3A1-1A2-A4)-1A3A1-1.

According to (15) and (19), we know that |H|0. Thus, the matrix equation (10) has a unique solution. Now the numerical solution to problem (1), based on the radial basis function collocation method, can be calculated.

3. Numerical Examples Example 1.

Solve the following linear model using the radial basis function collocation method: (20)θt=x(D(θ)θx)+z(D(θ)θz)+f,kkkkkkk(x,z)Ω=[0,1]×[0,1],θ(x,z,0)=θ0,(x,z)Ω,θ(x,z,t)=θ1,(x,z)Ω,t>0.

Let D(θ)=1; then the analytic solution of (20) is θ(z,t)=(x2-x)(z2-z)t and f=(x2-x)(z2-z)-2t(x2+z2-x-z). The values of θ0 and θ1 are determined by analytic solution using a spatial step h=0.1 and a time step Δt=0.01 from t=0 to t=10. The Gaussian function exp(-cr2) is selected as the radial basis function and the error estimate is based on L2-norm. The numerical and exact solutions of Example 1 are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.

The exact solutions of Example 1.

Numerical solutions using the radial basis function collocation method.

Table 1 shows a comparison of this method with FEM, where h=0.1 and t=10.

The results of the new method compared with FEM.

Numerical methods t Calculation errors Calculation time(s) Degree of convergence
New method 0.5 8.4197 e - 004 1.230020 2.7300
1.0 9.1056 e - 004 2.427944 2.4725

FEM 0.5 1.0017 e - 003 1.021520 2.6720
1.0 1.6667 e - 003 3.825802 2.2707

Next, we consider the time step Δt=0.01, a different spatial step, and different parameters c in the Gaussian function exp(-cr2). The results are shown in Table 2.

Numerical solutions of Example 1 related to the parameter and spatial step.

Spatial step Parameters c Calculation errors Calculation time(s)
0.1 9.0 3.4000 e - 003 1.372784
9.5 9.1056 e - 004 2.427944
9.6 3.4000 e - 003 1.580791

0.25 0.33 1.1000 e - 003 0.672394
0.35 5.7098 e - 004 0.659509
0.4 9.2511 e - 004 0.659885

For the linear model, Figures 14 and Table 1 show that the method presented in this paper is feasible. And comparing it with the traditional method, it showed good accuracy and rapid convergence rate. And Table 2 shows that the computational accuracy and computing time are both related to the selections of parameter c in the radial basis functions and the spatial step.

The error graph of the new method.

Example 2.

We consider the 2D horizontal absorption soil water movement equation: (21)θt=x(D(θ)θx)+z(D(θ)θz)+f,kkkkkkk(x,z)Ω=[0,1]×[0,1],θ(x,z,0)=θ0,(x,z)Ω,θ(x,z,t)=θ1,(x,z)Ω,t>0. Here D(θ)=0.01eθ, f=-0.02t2(x-x2)(z-z2)(x2-x+z2-z)-0.01t2(z2(2xz-z-2x+1)2)+x2(2xz-2z-x+1)2+(x-x2)(z2-z) and the analytic solution is θ(z,t)=(x2-x)(z2-z)t. The values of θ0 and θ1 are determined by analytic solution. It is a nonlinear equation with the spatial step h=0.1 and time step Δt=0.01 from t=0 to t=10. The radial basis function is also a Gaussian function exp(-cr2)  (c>0). The error estimate is based on L2-norm. The numerical and exact solutions of Example 2, along with the error, are shown in Figures 5, 6, and 7, respectively.

The exact solutions of Example 2.

Numerical solutions using the radial basis function collocation method.

The error graph.

Table 3 shows the comparison of this method with FEM, where h=0.1 and t=10

The results of the new method compared with FEM for Example 2.

Numerical methods t Calculation errors Calculation time(s) Degree of convergence
New method 0.5 4.6462 e - 005 2.100832 3.6871
1.0 9.6914 e - 005 3.782251 3.2203

FEM 0.5 1.0701 e - 004 2.201250 3.4186
1.0 1.5367 e - 004 3.882052 3.0664

For the time step Δt=0.01, we give the results of the new method based on different spatial steps and different parameters c. These are shown in Table 4.

Numerical solution based on different spatial steps and different parameters in Example 2.

Spatial step Parameters c Calculation errors Calculation time(s)
0.1 10 3.1488 e - 004 2.995965
11 9.6914 e - 005 3.782251
12 1.0218 e - 004 4.800045

0.25 0.45 1.5427 e - 004 1.682164
0.50 7.7579 e - 005 1.645171
0.55 9.8661 e - 005 1.686100

For the nonlinear soil water movement equation, we can get the same conclusions as in linear equation.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a mathematical model with the boundary conditions for soil water movement under irrigation has been developed by constructing a radial basis function collocation method. The existence and uniqueness of the solution were proven. Several numerical examples show that the proposed method yields higher precision and is easier to solve 2D soil water movement equations than traditional methods. Moreover, the selection of the time, spatial steps, and parameter c has a direct influence on calculation accuracy. Therefore, it is necessary to study the combination of steps, radial basis function, and parameter c to obtain the numerical solutions. In addition, it lays the foundation for the numerical solutions to high-dimensional soil water movement equations, which is very important.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 11101330, 51305344) and Scientific Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2014K05-22).

Lucyt L. B. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis The Astronomical Journal 1977 82 1013 1024 Gingold R. A. Monaghan J. J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 1977 181 375 389 Zbl0421.76032 Nayroles B. Touzot G. Villon P. Generalizing the finite element method: diffuse approximation and diffuse elements Computational Mechanics 1992 10 5 307 318 10.1007/BF00364252 2-s2.0-0027035536 Belytschko T. Lu Y. Y. Gu L. Element-free Galerkin methods International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1994 37 2 229 256 10.1002/nme.1620370205 MR1256818 2-s2.0-0028259955 Schaback R. Improved error bounds for scattered data interpolation by radial basis functions Mathematics of Computation 1999 68 225 201 216 10.1090/S0025-5718-99-01009-1 MR1604379 ZBL0917.41011 2-s2.0-0033475852 Sukumar N. Moran B. Belytschko T. The natural element method in solid mechanics International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1998 43 5 839 887 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19981115)43:5&lt;839::AID-NME423&gt;3.0.CO;2-R MR1650918 ZBL0940.74078 2-s2.0-0032208727 Wu Z. About the convergence of interpolation with radial basis function Annals of Mathematics 1993 14A 480 486 Wendland H. Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree Advances in Computational Mathematics 1995 4 1 389 396 10.1007/BF02123482 2-s2.0-0346847275 Wendland H. Meshless Galerkin methods using radial basis functions Mathematics of Computation 1999 68 228 1521 1531 10.1090/S0025-5718-99-01102-3 MR1648419 ZBL1020.65084 2-s2.0-0033465031 Atluri S. N. Shen S. The Meshless Local Petrov—Galerkin (MLPG) Method 2002 Encino, Calif, USA Tech Science Press Liu G. R. Meshfree Methods: Moving beyond the Finite Element Method 2002 Boca Raton, Fla, USA CRC Press MR2574356 Liu W. K. Chen Y. Uras R. A. Chang C. T. Generalized multiple scale reproducing kernel particle methods Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996 139 1–4 91 157 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01081-X MR1426007 2-s2.0-0030380579 Duarte C. A. Oden J. T. An {\$h\$}-{\$p\$} adaptive method using clouds Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996 139 1–4 237 262 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01085-7 MR1426011 2-s2.0-0030412998 Babuška I. Melenk J. M. The partition of unity method International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1997 40 4 727 758 MR1429534 2-s2.0-0031076132 Oñate E. Idelsohn S. Zienkiewicz O. C. Taylor R. L. A finite point method in computational mechanics: applications to convective transport and fluid flow International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1996 39 22 3839 3866 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961130)39:22<3839::AID-NME27>3.0.CO;2-R MR1417792 2-s2.0-0030294780 Aluru N. R. A point collocation method based on reproducing kernel approximations International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000 47 6 1083 1121 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000228)47:6<1083::AID-NME816>3.0.CO;2-N 2-s2.0-0033895789 Liszka T. J. Duarte C. Tworzydlo W. W. Hp-meshless cloud method Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996 139 1–4 263 288 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01086-9 2-s2.0-0030379723 Zhu T. Zhang J. Atluri S. N. A local boundary integral equation (LBIE) method in computational mechanics, and a meshless discretization approach Computational Mechanics 1998 21 3 223 235 10.1007/s004660050297 MR1633729 2-s2.0-0032047472 Zhang X. Liu Y. Meshless Methods 2004 Beijing, China Tsinghua University Press Kansa E. J. Multiquadrics—a scattered data approximation scheme with applications to computational fluid-dynamics. I. Surface approximations and partial derivative estimates Computers & Mathematics with Applications 1990 19 8-9 127 145 10.1016/0898-1221(90)90270-T MR1040157 2-s2.0-0025229330 Fasshauer G. E. Solving differential equations with radial basis functions: multilevel methods and smoothing Advances in Computational Mathematics 1999 11 2-3 139 159 10.1023/A:1018919824891 MR1731694 ZBL0940.65122 2-s2.0-0041593773 Hon Y. C. Cheung K. F. Mao X. Z. Kansa E. J. Multiquadric solution for shallow water equations Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1999 125 5 524 533 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:5(524) 2-s2.0-0033133932 Rippa S. An algorithm for selecting a good value for the parameter c in radial basis function interpolation Advances in Computational Mathematics 1999 11 2-3 193 210 10.1023/A:1018975909870 MR1731697 ZBL0943.65017 2-s2.0-0033434521 Buhmann M. D. A new class of radial basis functions with compact support Mathematics of Computation 2001 70 233 307 318 10.1090/S0025-5718-00-01251-5 MR1803129 2-s2.0-0035606001 Zhang L. W. Deng Y. J. Liew K. M. An improved element-free Galerkin method for numerical modeling of the biological population problems Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 2014 40 181 188 10.1016/j.enganabound.2013.12.008 MR3161279 Cheng R. J. Zhang L. W. Liew K. M. Modeling of biological population problems using the element-free kp-Ritz method Applied Mathematics and Computation 2014 227 274 290 10.1016/j.amc.2013.11.033 MR3146315 Guo P. F. Zhang L. W. Liew K. M. Numerical analysis of generalized regularized long wave equation using the element-free kp-Ritz method Applied Mathematics and Computation 2014 240 91 101 10.1016/j.amc.2014.04.023 MR3213675 Yan J. W. Zhang L. W. Liew K. M. He L. H. A higher-order gradient theory for modeling of the vibration behavior of single-wall carbon nanocones Applied Mathematical Modelling 2014 38 11-12 2946 2960 10.1016/j.apm.2013.11.010 MR3201808 Lei Z. X. Zhang L. W. Liew K. M. Yu J. L. analysis of carbon nanotube-reinforced functionally graded cylindrical panels using the element-free kp-Ritz method Composite Structure 2014 113 328 338 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.035 Pan X. F. Zhang X. Lu M. W. Meshless Galerkin least-squares method Computational Mechanics 2005 35 3 182 189 10.1007/s00466-004-0615-8 MR2124596 ZBL1143.74390 2-s2.0-16344390055 Gu Y. Zhang L. Coupling of the meshfree and finite element methods for determination of the crack tip fields Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2008 75 986 1004 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.05.003 Duan Y. Tan Y. On condition number of meshless collocation method using radial basis functions Applied Mathematics and Computation 2006 172 1 141 147 10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.143 MR2197894 ZBL1090.65132 2-s2.0-31144474802 Hu H. Li Z. Cheng A. H. Radial basis collocation methods for elliptic boundary value problems Computers and Mathematics with Applications 2005 50 1-2 289 320 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.02.014 2-s2.0-27544432416 Su L. Qin X. Miao B. Wang Q. Radial basis function collocation method with difference for nonlinear convection-dominated diffusion equations Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC '10) August 2010 Yantai, China 3203 3207 10.1109/ICNC.2010.5582709 2-s2.0-78149353712 Guo W. Li B. Ji Z. Jiang Y. Yan F. Two-dimensional numerical simulation of soil water infiltration under bed-irrigating sowing Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2001 17 2 24 27 2-s2.0-0035264949 Neuman S. P. Saturated-unsaturated seepage by finite elements Journal of the Hydraulics Division 1973 99 12 2233 2250 2-s2.0-0015726449 Zhang H. Chen S. Numerical simulation of infiltration in unsaturated soil Rock and Soil Mechanics 2003 24 5 715 718 Lu X. Wu D. H. Numerical simulation of infiltration in unsaturated soil China Water Transport 2006 4 4 136 137 Li H. R. Luo Z. D. Semi-discrete finite volume element simulation for two-dimensional unsaturated soil water flow problem Mathematica Numerica Sinica 2011 33 1 57 68 MR2850396 Zhou D. Wang H. Application of RBF in simulation of groundwater flow Journal of Liaoning Normal University 2008 31 4 390 392