Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 4924963, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4924963

Research Article

Stability and Stabilization for Polytopic LPV Systems with Parameter-Varying Time Delays

Fu Chen,¹ Shugui Kang,¹ and Fangyuan Li²

¹School of Mathematics and Statistics, Shanxi Datong University, Datong, Shanxi 037009, China
²School of Electronics and Information, Nanjing Vocational College of Information Technology, Nanjing 210046, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Fu Chen; chenfu-88@163.com

Received 15 January 2019; Revised 19 March 2019; Accepted 10 April 2019; Published 5 May 2019

Academic Editor: Sergey Dashkovskiy

Copyright © 2019 Fu Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

In this paper, we deal with the problem of stability and stabilization for linear parameter-varying (LPV) systems with time-varying time delays. The uncertain parameters are assumed to reside in a polytope with bounded variation rates. Being main difference from the existing achievements, the representation of the time derivative of the time-varying parameter is under a polytopic structure. Based on the new representation, delay-dependent sufficient conditions of stability and stabilization are, respectively, formulated in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMI). Simulation examples are then provided to confirm the effectiveness of the given approach.

1. Introduction

Linear time-varying (LPV) systems, which depend on unknown but measurable time-varying parameters, have received much attention. This is mainly due to the context of gain scheduled control of nonlinear systems. In the framework of gain scheduled control, the design can be regarded as applicable for the underlying LPV system, which is a weighted combination of linearized systems. This type of system was first presented in [1], which was extensively studied by many researchers in [2–4] and the references therein. Many approaches used the parameter-independent Lyapunov approach and parameter-dependent Lyapunov approach; see [5–12] and the references therein. It is well known that much less conservative results can be obtained by using the parameter-dependent Lyapunov approach than using the parameter-independent one. However, the difficulty of using a parameter-dependent Lyapunov function is that if the parameter is time-varying, the rate of variation needs to be taken into account. Thus, for the parameter-dependent Lyapunov function, how to seek an appropriate method to represent the derivative of the time-varying parameter is particularly important.

On the other hand, time delay is frequently encountered in control systems [13–16]. It is well recognized that the time delay is a source of instability and degrades the system performance. Therefore, it is important to investigate the time-delay effects on the stability of LPV systems. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the stability analysis of LPV systems with parameter-varying time delays. For example, in [17], the analysis and state-feedback control synthesis problem for LPV systems with parameter-dependent state delays are considered. The corresponding analysis and synthesis conditions for stabilization and induced norm performance are obtained in terms of LMIs that can be solved by interior-point algorithms. In [18], by using parameter-dependent Lyapunov functionals and interior-point algorithms, the stability, gain performance, gain performance, and -to- gain performance are explored for LPV systems with parameter-varying time delays. Moreover, polytopic LPV systems whose parameter is contained in an a priori given set also have aroused the general scholars’ attention; see [19] and the references therein. However, to the best of our knowledge, there have not been any available results on the stability and stabilization on polytopic LPV systems with parameter-varying time delays.

In the light of the above, this paper investigates the stability and stabilization of polytopic LPV systems with parameter-varying time delays. Firstly, an innovative representation for the rate of variation of the parameter is stated. Secondly, based on this representation and parameter-dependent Lyapunov functionals, delay-dependent sufficient conditions for the stability and stabilization are derived in terms of LMIs. Finally, two examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the methods presented in this paper.

Notation. stands for the set of real numbers and stands for the nonnegative real numbers. is the set of matrices. For a symmetric block matrix, we use as an ellipsis for the terms that are introduced by symmetry. For a real matrix , denotes its transpose. And, finally, we use the symbol , and means that is symmetric and positive-definite (positive semidefinite). denotes the Kronecker products. The space of continuous functions will be denoted by and the corresponding norm is .

2. Problem Statement

Consider a polytopic system with time parameter-varying time delays described by state-space equations.

where is the state vector, is the control input, the real-valued initial function in (1b) is a given function in , and is a differentiable scalar function representing the parameter-varying delay. The system matrices and the delay are dependent on the parameters ; that is,

where is the time-varying parameter. We make the following assumptions:

(A1)The time-varying parameter varies in a polytope given by , where .(A2)The time derivative of the parameter is such that , where, .(A3)The delay is bounded and the function is monotonically increasing; that is, lies in the set .

In this paper, we will establish stability and stabilization conditions for system (1a) with (1b) by using Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional and a novel representation of the time derivative of the parameter .

3. New Representation of the Time Derivative of the Parameter

Lemma 1. If parameter satisfies assumptions (A1) and (A2), then its time derivative can be written as

where

Proof. To complete the proof of Lemma 1, we need to distinguish two cases: and .
Case 1 (). It is known that . In this situation, Lemma 1 is obviously right.
Case 2 (). From assumptions (A1) and (A2), it is known that satisfies the following inequality:

can be written as follows:

Let

and then

It follows from (5) that

It follows that and
The proof is completed.

Remark 2. The main difference for studying the stability problems of LPV time-dependent systems is how to represent the derivative of the time-varying parameter.
We note, for instance, the results presented in [20], where the rate of variation is well defined at all times and satisfies

The weakness of this representation is that, in numerous practical cases, it cannot be physically justified.
We mention in a second case the results given in [21], where the time derivative is defined in a polytope such that

where for all are given vectors. And . Contrary to (10), expression (11) does not impose any particular condition on the derivative of the uncertain parameter, although it does not give any idea about the dimension of the polyhedral convex set, where it evolves.
The main advantage of the new representation is that it does not directly depend on the parameter itself and that it is simply defined as a difference between two parameters that evolve in two known and well-defined polytopes.

4. Stability Analysis

Now, we use Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional and Lemma 1 to develop robust stability condition for the unforced system (1a) with the initial condition (1b). The following technical lemma will be employed to establish our robust stability condition.

Lemma 3 (see [22]). Let be a full-rank matrix; then, for an arbitrary negative definite matrix Y, the following inequality is satisfied:

Theorem 4. Consider the unforced system (1a) with the initial condition (1b). If there exist matrices such that

is satisfied for , then the unforced system (1a) with the initial condition (1b) is asymptotically stable.

Proof. Consider the following Lyapunov-Krasovskii type functional:

where
Let

and then we have that, for ,

The time derivative of along the trajectories of unforced system (1a) is given by

where

Notice that the time derivatives of and are, respectively, given by

It follows from Lemma 1 that there exist and such that

where

Multiplying condition (20), respectively, by and , we get

Multiplying condition (13), respectively, by and and summing up for , we have

where

Pre- and postmultiplying condition (23), respectively, by a full-row matrix

as well as its transpose, which combined with Lemma 3 yields

Substituting condition (22) into the above inequality, we can easily obtain that condition (17) is negative. Thus, is a Lyapunov functional and the unforced system (1a) with initial condition (1b) is asymptotically stable.
The proof is completed.

5. Stabilization

In this paper, we consider the following control law:

where matrices are to be designed. Then, the closed-loop system from (1a) and (27) reads

Before giving a solution to the robust stabilization problem of system (1a) with the initial condition (1b), the following technical lemmas will be employed to establish our main results.

Lemma 5 (see [10]). Let be a symmetric matrix and are matrices of appropriate dimensions. The following statements are equivalent:

(1)

(2)There exists a matrix such that

Lemma 6. Consider the system matrices and ; the following two conditions are equivalent:

(1)there exist matrices and such that

(2)for the above matrices and , there exist a sufficient large scalar and matrices such that

where

Proof. For necessity, we perform multiplication on the left by

and on the right we do it by its transpose; we have

where

If we let

then we obtain

Defining matrices

condition (38) then can be rewritten as

From conditions (40) and Lemma 5, we can easily verify that condition (38) is satisfied if and only if

that is

Applying Schur complement to the above inequality, we have

which implies that condition (32) is satisfied for a sufficiently large scalar of condition (31).
For Sufficiency, defining

condition (32) can be written as

By Lemma 5, condition (45) is equivalent to

We perform multiplication on the left by

and on the right we do it by its transpose; we obtain

The proof is completed.

Theorem 7. If there exist a sufficient large scalar and matrices , and such that the inequalities

hold, where

then the matrix gains , stabilize the closed-loop system (28) with the initial condition (1b).

Proof. Let

Multiplying condition (49) at the left by full-row matrix

and at the right by its transpose, then, using Lemma 3, we have

and similar to the proof of Theorem 4, there exist

Therefore

Multiplying (53), respectively, by and and summing up for , we have

Substituting (55) into (56) gives

Multiplying condition (57) at the left by full-row matrix and at the right by its transpose, then, using Lemma 3, we obtain

and applying Lemma 6 to (58), we have

consider the Lyapunov functional

and its time derivative along the trajectories of system (28) is given by

where

It follows from (59) that, for ,

which combined with (16) yielding that is a Lyapunov functional. Thus, system (28) with initial condition (1b) is asymptotically stable.
The proof is completed.

6. Simulation Results

In this section, we give two examples to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Example 1. Let us consider a polytopic system in the form of (1a) with . Assume that the system data are given by

One can verify that assumptions (A1)–(A3) are satisfied with parameters

Using Theorem 4 and MATLAB LMI Control Toolbox, we can obtain a set of feasible solutions as

For an initial condition , we simulate the open-loop behavior of the system. The states are shown in Figure 1. Note that both states and converge to zero.

Figure 1: System response: (solid) and (dotted).

Example 2. Let us consider a polytopic system in the form of (1a). Assume that the system data are given by

One can verify that assumptions (A1)–(A3) are satisfied with parameters

Now, we choose and then, using Theorem 7 and MATLAB LMI Control Toolbox, we can obtain the control gains as

For an initial condition , we simulate the closed-loop behavior of the system. The states are shown in Figure 2. Note that both states and converge to zero.

Figure 2: System response: (dotted) and (solid).

7. Conclusions

This paper develops the stability and stabilization of polytopic LPV systems with parameter-varying time delays. For this purpose, an innovative representation for the rate of variation of the parameter is addressed. By using this representation and parameter-dependent Lyapunov functionals, delay-dependent sufficient conditions for the stability and stabilization are then derived in terms of LMIs. Two examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the methods presented in this paper.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Fu Chen carried out the molecular genetic studies, participated in the sequence alignment, and drafted the manuscript. Shugui Kang conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination. Fangyuan Li gave some important insights and revised the first draft.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants no. 61803241 and no. 11871314).

References

J. S. Shamma and M. Athans, “Analysis of nonlinear gain scheduled control systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 898–907, 1990.

A. Packard, “Gain scheduling via linear fractional transformations,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 79–92, 1994.

P. Apkarian and R. J. Adams, “Advanced gain-scheduling techniques for uncertain systems,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 1998.

J. De Caigny, J. F. Camino, R. C. Oliveira, P. L. Peres, and J. Swevers, “Gain-scheduled dynamic output feedback control for discrete-time LPV systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 535–558, 2012.

P. Dorato, R. Tempo, and G. Muscato, “Bibliography on robust control,” Automatica, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 201–213, 1993.

P. Gahinet, P. Apkarian, and M. Chilali, “Affine parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions and real parametric uncertainty,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 436–442, 1996.

F. Chen, S. Kang, L. Ji, and X. Zhang, “Stability and stabilisation for time-varying polytopic quadratic systems,” International Journal of Control, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 373–383, 2017.

J. C. Geromel and P. Colaneri, “Robust stability of time varying polytopic systems,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 81–85, 2006.

C. Briat, “Linear parameter-varying and time-delay systems,” Analysis, Observation, Filtering & Control, 2014.

N. Aouani, S. Salhi, G. Garcia, and M. Ksouri, “Robust control analysis and synthesis for lpv systems under affine uncertainty structure,” in Proceedings of the 2009 6th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, SSD 2009, Taiwan, March 2009.

N. Aouani, S. Salhi, G. Garcia, and M. Ksouri, “New robust stability and stabilizability conditions for linear parameter time varying polytopic systems,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Signals, Circuits and Systems, SCS 2009, Tunisia, November 2009.

Q. Rong and G. W. Irwin, “LMI-based control design for discrete polytopic LPV systems,” in Proceedings of the 2003 European Control Conference (ECC), pp. 1489–1494, Cambridge, UK, September 2003.

S. Xu, G. Feng, Y. Zou, and J. Huang, “Robust controller design of uncertain discrete time-delay systems with input saturation and disturbances,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 2604–2609, 2012.

F. Chen, S. Xu, Y. Zou, and M. Zhang, “Finite-time boundedness and stabilisation for a class of non-linear quadratic time-delay systems with disturbances,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 1683–1688, 2013.

S. Xu, J. Lam, B. Zhang, and Y. Zou, “New insight into delay-dependent stability of time-delay systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 961–970, 2015.

F. Chen, S. Kang, S. Qiao, and C. Guo, “Exponential stability and stabilization for quadratic discrete-time systems with time delay,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 276–285, 2018.

F. Wu and K. M. Grigoriadis, “LPV systems with parameter-varying time delays: analysis and control,” Automatica, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 221–229, 2001.

K. Tan, K. M. Grigoriadis, and F. Wu, “H∞ and L2-to-L∞ gain control of linear parameter-varying systems with parameter-varying delays,” IEE Proceedings-Control Theory and Applications, vol. 150, no. 5, pp. 509–517, 2003.

Q. Rong and G. W. Irwin, “LMI-based control design for discrete polytopic LPV systems,” in Proceedings of the European Control Conference, IEEE, 2015.

Y.-Y. Cao and Z. Lin, “A descriptor system approach to robust stability analysis and controller synthesis,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 2081–2084, 2004.

J. C. Geromel and P. Colaneri, “Robust stbility of time varying polytopic systema,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 55, pp. 81–85, 2006.

S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E . Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1994.