Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 6379493, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6379493

Research Article

Effects of Lycium barbarum Polysaccharides on Health and Aging of C. elegans Depend on daf-12/daf-16

Zhaokang Zhang,¹ Yannan Zhou,¹ Haitao Fan,² Kirunda John Billy,¹ Yunjie Zhao,¹ Xuan Zhan,¹ Lijian Yang,¹ and Ya Jia¹

¹Institute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
²College of Bioengineering, Beijing Polytechnic, Beijing 100029, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Lijian Yang; janeyang@mail.ccnu.edu.cn and Ya Jia; jiay@mail.ccnu.edu.cn

Received 25 April 2019; Revised 4 July 2019; Accepted 7 August 2019; Published 10 September 2019

Guest Editor: Myon-Hee Lee

Copyright © 2019 Zhaokang Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

As the global population ages, searching for drugs and functional foods which can slow down the aging process has attracted a number of researchers. In this paper, the Lycium barbarum polysaccharides (LBP) extracted from Lycium barbarum was characterized and the effects of LBP on the aging and health of C. elegans were studied. Results showed that LBP can prolong the lifespan, improve the abilities to withstand environmental stress, enhance reproductive potentials, and maintain muscle integrity of C. elegans. By using genetically mutated C. elegans strains, RNAi gene silencing, and measuring the mRNA expression level, it was demonstrated that the lifespan of C. elegans was extended by LBP mainly through sir-2.1, daf-12, and daf-16. The present study might provide a basis for further study of LBP as a food or drug to interfere with aging and reduce the incidence of age-related diseases.

1. Introduction

Aging is defined by the time-dependent functional decline of living organisms, during which the self-renewal and repair abilities of the organism are weakened [1]. Aging is often accompanied by a gradual decline in environmental adaptability, deterioration of physiological functions, and increase of vulnerability to diseases (such as hardening of the arteries, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease) [1, 2]. As the global population ages, searching for drugs, which can treat age-related diseases, slow down the normal aging process, and prolong lifespan, is an important aspect of current aging researches [3–5]. In addition, genetic pathways that regulate the lifespan have been shown to be evolutionarily conserved; therefore, revealing the molecular mechanism of using drugs to extend the lifespan of C. elegans can help to better understand the biological mechanisms related to lifespan [6].

As people pay more attention to the quality of life, it is more and more popular to choose drugs and functional foods which may reduce the risk of death. Therefore, a traditional Chinese herb, Lycium barbarum, has become the focus of many studies [7]. Lycium barbarum is widely grown in the western and northern regions of China (such as Gansu province, Ningxia province) [8]. It is generally used to improve vision, nourish the liver and kidneys, and delay aging [9, 10]. Due to its excellent health care function, it has been very popular not only in Asia but also in other continents [11, 12]. Recent medical research has shown that Lycium barbarum contains a variety of nutrients, with Lycium barbarum polysaccharides (LBP) as one of its main active ingredients [13].

The LBP can usually be obtained by water extraction and alcohol precipitation, ultrasonic assistance, or enzymatic hydrolysis [14]. It was reported that the main pharmacological effects of LBP include regulating immunity [15, 16], blood sugar, and lipids [17]; preventing tumors [18, 19]; and delaying aging [20–25]. By analyzing the expression levels of interleukin-2 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-related mRNA and protein in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, Gan et al. [15] showed that LBP can increase the activity of interleukin-2 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, which can induce the immune responses. Chen et al. [16] revealed that LBP can enhance the ability of dendritic cells to respond to Th1 and Th2 and then enhance hosts’ immunity. By feeding mice with food of different fat contents and LBP, Ma et al. [17] found that LBP has no significant effect on the body weight of the mouse but significantly reduces blood lipids, lowers blood glucose, and inhibits lipid oxidation. Gan et al. [18] reported that feeding LBP to the mice inoculated with sarcoma S180 cells can inhibit the growth of the sarcoma S180, increase the immunity, improve the phagocytic function of macrophages, and proliferate spleen lymphocytes; thus, LBP can prevent tumors in the mouse. Luo et al. [19] demonstrated that LBP can induce apoptosis of prostate cancer cells (PC-3 and DU-145) in in vitro cell culture and inhibit the growth of prostate cancer in the nude mouse xenograft tumor model.

Up to now, the investigations on the effects of LBP on the aging process have been focused on eliminating free radicals and delaying skin aging [20–25]. In various antioxidant systems in vitro, Li et al. [20] indicated that LBP has the function of antioxidant remedies, such as inhibition of 1,1,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radicals, superoxide scavenging ability, hydrogen peroxide-mediated erythrocyte hemolysis, and ferrous ion sequestration in mice. Lin et al. [21] showed that LBP can effectively scavenge DPPH and ABTS+free radicals, superoxide anion, and hydroxyl radical. Tian et al. [22] reported that LBP can enhance the antioxidation capacity of chicken embryo liver cells, via resisting the decrease of the activity of chicken embryo liver cells induced by H₂O₂, reducing the ROS content and promoting the activity of antioxidant enzymes. Liang and Zhang [23] proved that LBP can delay skin aging through significantly increasing skin water content, skin thickness, subcutaneous thickness, and fibroblast count of the mice and improving the tissue of decayed skin. However, there is little direct evidence that the LBP can extend lifespan.

In this paper, the LBP used was extracted from Ningxia Lycium barbarum. First, we characterized the molecular weight distribution, monosaccharide composition, and infrared absorption spectrum of LBP. Then, the effects of LBP on lifespan and health of C. elegans were investigated and it was shown that LBP extends the lifespan, improves the abilities to withstand environmental stress, boosts reproductive potentials, and maintains muscle integrity. Finally, by using genetic mutated C. elegans strains, RNAi gene silencing, and examining mRNA expression level, our results revealed that the LBP extended lifespan mainly through sir-2.1, daf-12, and daf-16.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of LBP

The LBP from Ningxia Lycium barbarum was prepared by water extraction, alcohol precipitation, deproteinization, and recrystallization. In brief, the fruits of Ningxia Lycium barbarum were vacuum dried in a vacuum drying oven at 60°C, taken out, and placed in a desiccator for 24 h. We took 10 g of the crushed element and placed it in a normal reflux device, then added 20 ml chloroform+methanol in the ratio of 2 : 1 each time. We degreased twice at 60°C. Filtration was done, the liquid was discarded, and the residue was vacuum dried. Then, 20 ml of 80% ethanol was added and the mixture was refluxed twice at 60°C to recover ethanol. After that, the mixture was extracted twice with water at 60°C, with the liquid-solid ratio being 1 : 20. The resultant compound was concentrated, precipitated 4 times with 95% ethanol, and kept in the oven for 24 hours. Filtration was then done by suction. The product was washed with 95% ethanol, absolute ethanol, and acetone, then vacuum dried (50°C) to obtain a crude powder of LBP. Finally, the product was deproteinized and recrystallized.

2.2. Characterization of LBP

2.2.1. Chemical Composition Analysis

We measured the carbohydrate content of LBP by phenol-sulfuric acid method [26], determined the content of uronic acid by m-hydroxydiphenyl method [27], and then detected the protein content by BCA method. The retention time (RT) of the dextran standard was determined by HPLC-GPC, and a standard curve was drawn. The HPLC-GPC was then used to detect the molecular weight distribution of the LBP.

2.2.2. Determination of the Composition of LBP Monosaccharides

5 mg of LBP was dissolved in 2 mol/L TFA, hydrolyzed at 99°C for 5 h, removed with acid by rotary distillation, and then added 0.5 ml of 4% sodium borohydride solution. The resultant solution was placed at room temperature for 1.5 h and added acetic acid dropwise until no bubbles were generated, and then, the concentration process was repeated. Next, the concentrated sample was vacuum dried, 1 ml of pyridine and n-propylamine was added, and the mixture was placed in a water bath at 55°C for 30 min. The mixture was vacuum dried, 0.5 ml of pyridine and acetic anhydride was added followed by heating at 95°C for 1 h, blown dried with nitrogen, and vacuum dried. The mixture was then dissolved in chloroform for GC-MS analysis.

2.2.3. Determination of FT-IR Spectra

The LBP was mixed with potassium bromide powder and pressed into millimeter-sized sheets, and the FT-IR spectrum of LBP was recorded by using the Fourier transform infrared spectrometer in the frequency range of 4000-500 cm⁻¹.

2.3. Strains and Culture

C. elegans strains (N2 (wild type), BA17 (fem-1(hc17) IV.), VC199 (sir-2.1(ok434) IV.), GR1307 (daf-16(mgDf50) I.), CF1038 (daf-16(mu86) I.), and DR1407 (daf-12(m583) X.)) were obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center which is supported by the National Institutes of Health and from Professor Huairong Luo, Southwest Medical University. E. coli OP50 was provided by Professor Zhengxing Wu, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The other bacterial strains were obtained from Professor Ge Shan, University of Science and Technology of China, and from Professor Huairong Luo. Strains were kept at 25°C according to standard methods, cultured on NGM plates, and seeded with E. coli OP50 [28].

2.4. Lifespan Analysis

The worms synchronized to the L4 stage were picked and provided with enough E. coli OP50 as food on ordinary NGM plates with different concentrations of LBP. These NGM plates had 25 μM 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine (FUdR), and we replaced any NGM plate when eggs were found during the experimental process. Worms were observed every 24 hours until all of them were dead. Worms were scored dead if they did not move when gently touched by the worm picker. Those that disappeared from the plate and died prematurely from internal hatching or vulval rapture were excluded from the analysis.

For lifespan experiments involving RNAi, HT115 bacteria containing an empty vector L4440 or RNAi plasmid were used instead of E. coli OP50 on NGM plates (these NGM plates contained carbenicillin (25 mg/ml) and IPTG (1 mM), excluding FUdR) and the other operations were the same as mentioned above. The bacteria for RNAi were from the Ahringer library.

2.5. Lifespan under Different Stressors

Worm culture for the following assays was the same as in the previous ordinary lifespan assay. After 5 days, respective stress analyses were done as follows: (a) For the heat stress assay, worms were transferred to new corresponding NGM plates. Then, their survival at 37°C was monitored every 2 hours until they were all dead. (b) For the osmotic, metal, and oxidative stress analysis, worms were transferred to S-buffer solutions (0.5 M KH₂PO₄, 0.5 M K₂HPO₄, and 0.1 M NaCl) containing 300 mM NaCl (for osmotic stress), 50 μM CdCl₂ (for metal stress), and 30 mM H₂O₂ (for oxidative stress). Then, the survival was monitored hourly until all of worms died.

2.6. Self-Brood Size and Egg Production Rate

After bleaching, L1 stage worms were placed on the NGM plates seeded with enough E. coli OP50 and with different concentrations of LBP. After worms developed to the L4 stage, they were transferred to their new corresponding NGM plate every day until the cessation of egg production. A single worm was cultured on an individual NGM plate. The number of eggs produced was determined by the progeny size.

2.7. Motility Measurement

Worm culturing was the same as in the ordinary lifespan assay. Motility was measured on day 1 (L4 stage), day 6, day 11, and day 16. The animal’s motile ability is divided into three categories A, B, or C [29]. Worms which can spontaneously move sinusoidally are put in Class A. On stimulation, worms that are unable to move sinusoidally but can still move belong to Class B. Worms that can only move the head or the tail on stimulation are placed in Class C.

2.8. Determination of Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and ROS Content

Worm culturing was the same as in the ordinary lifespan assay (all the NGM plates had 150 μM FUdR). On day 5, the NGM plates were washed with S-buffer and the worms were collected in an EP tube. The worms were washed 3 times with sterile physiological saline, and sterile physiological saline was added. The mixture was homogenized on ice and centrifuged, and the supernatant was taken for use. A portion of the product was mixed with a DCFDA probe solution or according to the SOD/CAT kit instructions, and the fluorescence was measured using a fluorescent plate reader. Simultaneously, the other portion of the product was used for determining protein concentration with the BCA method. The relative values of the control and test groups were determined by calculating the fluorescence values of the unit protein concentration.

2.9. Relative Expression of mRNA Analysis

Worms were cultured in the same way as in the ordinary lifespan assay. On day 5, the NGM plates were washed with S-buffer and the worms were collected in an EP tube. We washed the worms 3 times with S-buffer, and RNA was extracted by the rapid freeze-thaw lysis and TRIzol/chloroform method. Then, RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA. The relative expression levels of the genes were detected using the real-time PCR according to the SYBR green Mix instructions. act-1 gene was used as the internal reference gene. There were three setups for each gene to be tested, and the entire experiment was repeated three or more times. The primers used for PCR are shown in Table 1.

Table 1: qPCR primer sequence.

Primer name
Primer sequence

act-1
F
5-CTACGAACTTCCTGACGGACAAG-3

R
5-CCGGCGGACTCCATACC-3

sir-2.1
F
5-GCAACGATTCAGAAGTTGCG-3

R
5-TGTGCATAGAACCGATTTCTGG-3

daf-16
F
5-ATCGTGTGCTCAGAATCC-3

R
5-ATGAATAGCTGCCCTCC-3

daf-12
F
5-AAACGAAGAACAACTGCGGC-3

R
5-TGTGGTGACTGCTGATTCCC-3

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All tests were repeated at least three times. Mean lifespan was defined as the average lifespan, and the error was the standard deviation from multiple results. Log-rank test was used to obtain the mean lifespan and the corresponding values. Maximum lifespan was the average lifespan of 10% longest worms, and the error was the standard deviation of multiple results. The number of eggs was the average of multiple outcomes with an error of the standard deviation from each individual. Others were multiple experimental means and standard deviations. Softwares Origin8, SPSS-22, and GraphPad Prism 8.1.2 were used for statistical analysis and plotting of the experimental data. for significant differences, and for extremely significant differences in hypothesis test analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition of LBP

LBP had a carbohydrate content of , a protein content of , uronic acid content of , and iodization reaction without starch (Table 2). After hydrolysis, it is found by GC-MS analysis that the monosaccharide composition of LBP consisted of mannose, glucose, and galactose in a molar ratio of 1.5 : 118 : 1. The HPLC-GPC chromatogram of LBP revealed that the molecular weight of LBP is composed of 4310 Da, 1910 Da, and less than 1000 Da, with a respective retention time of 16.15, 16.95, and 18.07 minutes (Figure 1(a), Table 3).

Table 2: Chemical compositions of LBP.

No.
Compositions
Percentage of quality (%)

1
Carbohydrate

2
Uronic acid

3
Protein content

4
Starch
(-)

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: Characterization of LBP. (a) HPLC-GPC detection chromatogram of LBP. (b) Infrared spectra of LBP.

Table 3: Mw of main component peaks of LBP.

No.
Retention times (mins)
Mw (Da)

1
16.15
4.31E+03

2
16.95
1.91E+03

3
18.07
<1000

The FT-IR spectra of LBP demonstrate that LBP has a predominant carbohydrate composition (Figure 1(b)). Among the spectra, one peak (gently broad) approximately at 3370 cm⁻¹ may be a characteristic vibration peak of the hydroxyl group. There is a peak caused by C-H vibration at about 2930 cm⁻¹. A weak peak at around 2400 cm⁻¹ is caused by CO₂ in the air. 1630 cm⁻¹ has a relatively sharp peak caused by carboxyl groups. A weak peak at around 1410 cm⁻¹ is caused by C-H. A series of peaks in the range of 1000-1250 cm⁻¹ might be the (C-O-C) glycosidic band vibrations and ring vibrations overlapped with the C-OH. There are a series of peaks in the range of 820-950 cm⁻¹ that can be the small amount of β-configuration sugar, small amount of mannose, and α-D-glucose.

3.2. LBP Can Extend the Lifespan of C. elegans

Lifespan is a very important indicator for measuring aging. Our study shows that for wild-type (N2) and BA17 worm strains, 300 μg/ml LBP is the best concentration for lifespan extension which is temperature independent (Figures 2(a)–2(d), Table 4). At 25°C, the mean lifespan of N2 (control group) was days and the maximum lifespan was days, while the mean lifespan of N2 cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP was days and the maximum lifespan was days. The results (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)) show that when feeding 300 μg/ml LBP, the average lifespan expectancy and maximum lifespan of N2 are significantly extended by 20.72% and 21.69%, respectively. Under different concentrations of LBP, it can be seen that the best concentration for extending lifespan was 300 μg/ml, while the extensions were not linearly related to the concentration (Figure 2(a)). BA17 worms were temperature-sensitive mutant, and they will develop into sterile adults at 25°C. Since egg production complicates survival analysis, sterile BA17 worms are also used here. Survival curves of BA17 worms cultured with or without LBP were displayed in Figure 2(c). It is shown that 300 μg/ml LBP can prolong the lifespan of BA17 worms significantly (Table 4). Therefore, LBP can extend lifespan regardless whether reproductive function is minimized or not. Temperature is important for the survival of organisms; therefore, worms were also cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP at 20°C (Figure 2(d), Table 4). Regardless of varying temperatures at 20°C or 25°C, cultures with 300 μg/ml LBP significantly extended lifespan, so this suggests that the effect of LBP on extending lifespan is independent of temperature.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2: LBP can extend the lifespan of C. elegans. (a) At 25°C, C. elegans longevity was cultured at different concentrations of LBP and survival was monitored. (b) At 25°C, the mean lifespan and maximum lifespan of C. elegans were cultured at different concentrations of LBP. (c) At 25°C, BA17 mutant longevity was cultured with or without LBP and survival was monitored. (d) At 20°C, the survival of C. elegans was cultured with or without LBP. Not significant was abbreviated as N.S., .

Table 4: Summary of all lifespan experiments shown in this work.

No.
Strains
Bacteria
LBP (μg/ml)
Temperature (°C)
Mean lifespan (days)
Max. lifespan (days)
Compared with no.
(log-rank test)

1
N2
E. coli OP50
0
25

/
/

2
N2
E. coli OP50
50
25

1
0.1393

3
N2
E. coli OP50
100
25

1
0.0368

4
N2
E. coli OP50
200
25

1
0.0013

5
N2
E. coli OP50
300
25

1
<0.0001

6
N2
E. coli OP50
400
25

1
<0.0001

7
N2
E. coli OP50
500
25

1
0.1592

8
BA17
E. coli OP50
0
25

/
/

9
BA17
E. coli OP50
300
25

8
0.0006

10
N2
E. coli OP50
0
20

/
/

11
N2
E. coli OP50
300
20

10
<0.0001

12
N2
E. coli OP50
0 (mother worms: 0)
25

/
/

13
N2
E. coli OP50
0 (mother worms: 300)
25

12
0.6266

14
N2
E. coli OP50
0
25

/
/

15
N2
E. coli OP50
L1-L4: 300
L4: 0
25

14
0.9505

16
N2
E. coli OP50
L1-L4: 0
L4: 300
25

14
<0.0001

17
N2
E. coli OP50
300
25

16
0.8412

18
sir-2.1
E. coli OP50
0
25

/
/

19
sir-2.1
E. coli OP50
300
25

18
<0.0001

20
daf-16 (mu86)
E. coli OP50
0
25

/
/

21
daf-16 (mu86)
E. coli OP50
300
25

20
0.0126

22
daf-16 (Df50)
E. coli OP50
0
25

/
/

23
daf-16 (Df50)
E. coli OP50
300
25

22
0.001

24
N2
daf-16 RNAi
0
25

/
/

25
N2
daf-16 RNAi
300
25

24
0.0095

26
sir-2.1
daf-16 RNAi
300
25

25
0.4269

27
daf-12
E. coli OP50
0
25

/
/

28
daf-12
E. coli OP50
300
25

27
0.0033

29
daf-16
daf-12 RNAi
0
25

/
/

30
daf-16
daf-12 RNAi
300
25

29
0.7915

31
daf-12
daf-16 RNAi
0
25

/
/

32
daf-12
daf-16 RNAi
300
25

31
0.1554

The F1 offspring of N2 from plates with 300 μg/ml LBP was transferred to new NGM plates without LBP, and their lifespan is compared with that of control N2. As shown in Figures 3(a) and 3(b), their lifespans were essentially the same and this implies that the effects of LBP lifespan extension cannot be inherited. In order to investigate whether LBP affects the lifespan on a particular stage of development, worms were divided into four groups (Figure 3(c), Table 4). We found that no matter whether the N2 worms were grown on plates with or without LBP before L4, there was no significant effect on the lifespan (Figures 3(c) and 3(d), Table 4).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3: In C. elegans, LBP lifespan extension effects are not inheritable and do not depend on a particular stage of development. (a) Survival of offspring of N2 produced on plates with 300 μg/ml LBP to standard NGM plates without LBP and the control. (b) The mean lifespan and maximum lifespan of F1 offspring of N2 produced on plates with 300 μg/ml LBP to standard NGM plates without LBP and the control. (c) Survival of the worms before or after L4 as they were fed or not with LBP. (d) The mean lifespan and maximum lifespan of the worms before or after L4 as they were fed or not with LBP. Not significant was abbreviated as N.S. N2 (NN): culture without LBP; N2 (YN): culture with 300 μg/ml LBP before the L4 stage but without LBP after the L4 stage; N2 (NY): culture without LBP before the L4 stage but with 300 μg/ml LBP after the L4 stage; N2 (YY): culture with 300 μg/ml.

3.3. LBP Can Improve the Health of C. elegans

Animals are considered to be healthy if they have the ability to withstand environmental stresses. As can be seen from Figure 4, the lifespan of N2 cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP was longer than that of the control group in heat stress, oxidative stress, and heavy metal stress, while it was almost the same as that of the control group under osmotic stress. In other words, LBP can improve the ability of C. elegans to resist high environmental temperature, enhance antioxidation responses, and boost heavy metal stress resistance, but with no impact on osmotic stress. We also measured the ROS, SOD, and CAT levels in the worm, and the consistent results suggested that LBP can enhance antioxidation responses of C. elegans. ROS is the most important factor causing oxidative damage, so the lower the total ROS level in the body, the stronger the antioxidant activity. As the main antioxidant in the body, the enzyme SOD mainly removes excess superoxide radicals from the body. CAT acts as a major peroxidase to promote the breakdown of H₂O₂ into molecular oxygen and water and get rid of hydrogen peroxide from the body, thereby protecting cells from H₂O₂ toxicity. Levels of both CAT and SOD represent the antioxidative capacities of the organism, i.e., the higher their levels, the stronger the antioxidation capacity. We found that N2 cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP had lower ROS levels and higher levels of SOD and CAT (Figure 4(e)). These results were consistent with earlier results that revealed enhanced resistant to different environmental stresses.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 4: LBP improved the health of C. elegans. (a) Survival curves of N2 at 37°C for heat stress at different concentrations of LBP. (b) Survival of N2 cultured with or without LBP in S-buffer containing 30 mM H₂O₂ for oxidative stress. (c) Survival of N2 cultured with or without LBP in S-buffer containing 50 mM CdCl₂ for metal stress. (d) Survival of N2 cultured with or without LBP in S-buffer containing 300 mM NaCl for osmotic stress. (e) The relative fluorescence values of SOD, CAT, and ROS in the unit protein concentration of worms. Not significant was abbreviated as N.S., .

Self-brood size and egg production rate are the embodiments of reproductive ability which is a key parameter to quantify health. We evaluated the progeny size and egg production rate of the worms at 25°C and 20°C. We found that N2 cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP had a higher egg production rate than those of the control group at 25°C and 20°C (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). At 25°C, the self-brood size was against for the control group, while at 20°C, the self-brood size was against for the control group, reflecting an improvement by 11.99% and 14.34%, respectively. Motility is a measure of muscle integrity, and its measurement has a direct implication on quality living. We found that N2 cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP were able to maintain a better motile state than the control group (Figure 5(c)). At day 16, there were still 46.5% of N2 cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP that belong to Class A but only 18.6% of the control group was still in Class A. All these results indicate that LBP can enhance the worms’ ability to reproduce and maintain considerably high muscle integrity.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 5: LBP enhances the worms’ ability to reproduce and maintain a considerably high muscle integrity. (a) At 25°C, the progeny size and egg production rate of N2 cultured at different concentrations of LBP. (b) At 20°C, the progeny size and egg production rate of N2 cultured with or without LBP. (c) Percent of per motility class of N2 cultured with or without LBP on day 1, day 6, day 11, and day 16. , , and .

3.4. LBP Lifespan Extension Requires daf-16 and sir-2.1

The insulin/IGF-1 signaling (IIS) pathway is undoubtedly a key regulator of longevity in a variety of animals, where the genes daf-16 and sir-2.1 play cardinal roles [30]. Our study showed that VC199 (ok434) mutants for sir-2.1 deletion exhibited a significantly longer lifespan when cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP but the proportion of prolonged lifespan was significantly shorter than that of the wild-type N2 (Figure 6(a), Table 4). At 25°C, the mean and maximum lifespans of worms on NGM with 25 μM FUdR were days and days, respectively, for the VC199 mutants. However, when cultured with 300 μg/ml, the mean and maximum lifespans were days and days, respectively. It implies that the mean and maximum lifespans were extended by 13.23% and 8.52%, respectively. LBP cannot cause such a tremendous effect on the proportion of extended lifespan in VC199 mutants compared with the N2, so LBP-induced lifespan extension requires sir-2.1. By RT-PCR in Figure 6(f), we obtained a sir-2.1 fold expression of of N2 cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP relative to the control group, which further proves this result.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 6: LBP lifespan extension requires daf-16 and sir-2.1. (a) Survival of sir-2.1 mutants cultured with or without LBP. (b) Survival of daf-16 (mu86) mutants cultured with or without LBP. (c) Survival of daf-16 (mgDf50) mutants cultured with or without LBP. (d) Survival of N2 (daf-16 RNAi) cultured with or without LBP. (e) Survival of N2 (daf-16 RNAi) and sir-2.1 (daf-16 RNAi) cultured with LBP. (f) The relative expression of sir-2.1 and daf-16 in N2 cultured with LBP to that of N2 cultured without LBP. .

Similarly, at 25°C, we cultured two different worm mutants, in which daf-16 has been deleted, GR1307 (Df50) and CF1038 (mu86) (Figures 6(b) and 6(c)). We found that the lifespan of these strains cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP was longer than that of the control group, but still, the proportion of the extended lifespan was significantly shorter than that of the N2, therefore implying that daf-16 is vital in LBP lifespan extension. We also obtained similar results through daf-16 RNAi gene silencing experiment as shown in Figure 6(d). To further confirm the importance of daf-16 expression, we performed RT-PCR of daf-16 (Figure 6(f)). We found that 300 μg/ml LBP treatment significantly upregulates this gene in C. elegans, confirming that the lifespan-extending effect of LBP is mediated by the DAF-16 pathway.

In 2006, Berdichevsky et al. [31] reported that sir-2.1 can activate daf-16 to prolong the lifespan, which means sir-2.1 plays a role dependent on daf-16. The daf-16 RNAi experiments were performed on N2 and VC199 worm strains. We found that the results of the daf-16 RNAi experiment were basically the same for the N2 and VC199 worm strains in cultures with 300 μg/ml LBP. In the case of daf-16 RNAi, LBP does not promote longevity of N2 or VC199 worm strains (Figure 6(e)). This suggests that the LBP’s ability to extend the lifespan is through sir-2.1 whose effect can be dependent of daf-16.

3.5. LBP Lifespan Extension Requires daf-12

The daf-12 gene plays an important role in regulating somatic and reproductive development, fat metabolism, and prolonging survival [32]. The function of daf-12 in the process of extending lifespan relies on daf-16 or acts independently [32]. Our study shows that DR1407 (m583) mutants for daf-12 deletion cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP lived significantly longer but the proportion of extended lifespan was remarkably shorter than that of N2 (Figure 7(a), Table 4). At 25°C, the mean and maximum lifespans of DR1407 mutants were days and days, respectively. When cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP, the mean and maximum lifespans of DR1407 were days and days, respectively, thereby exhibiting a 10.53% increase and a 15.35% increase, respectively, in lifespan. The role of LBP in prolonging the lifespan of worms of DR1407 strain is not as significant as that in N2, which indicates that the LBF lifespan extension effect requires daf-12. RT-PCR results in Figure 7(b) show that there was an increase in the daf-12 mRNA level in the 300 μg/ml LBP-treated N2 worms when compared to the control, which further proves the formidable role of daf-12 in LBP lifespan extension.

(a)

(b)

Figure 7: LBP lifespan extension requires daf-12. (a) Survival of daf-12 mutants cultured with or without LBP. (b) The relative expression of daf-12 in N2 cultured with LBP to that of N2 cultured without LBP. .

3.6. LBP Extend Lifespan by daf-12/daf-16

The effects of LBP on extended lifespan require daf-16 and daf-12. To understand the relationship between daf-16 and daf-12 in the extended lifespan by LBP, we performed the RNAi treatment to silence daf-16 in the DR1407 mutants and daf-12 in the GR1307 mutants. We found that strains cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP had almost the same lifespan as the control and there was no significant difference in lifespan between the RNAi groups (Figure 8). LBP cannot have impact on the lifespan of worms in which daf-12 and daf-16 were not expressed; therefore, LBP extends lifespan by daf-12/daf-16. The corresponding relationship among daf-12/daf-16 and other genes with lifespan is shown in Figure 8(c).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 8: LBP lifespan extension requires daf-16 and daf-12. (a) Survival of daf-16 (daf-12 RNAi) mutants cultured with or without LBP. (b) Survival of daf-12 (daf-16 RNAi) mutants cultured with or without LBP. (c) Pathway of LBP lifespan extension.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

Aging is a process regulated by many factors and is characterized by a gradual impairment of the body’s response to stress and general deterioration of the main metabolic pathways [33]. Studies in various animal models, including worms, mice, and monkeys, have found that many factors, such as limiting food intake, slowing mitochondrial respiration, reducing germ cell function, or lowering temperature, can extend lifespan [34–39]. As the global aging population increases, it is one of the current research hotspots to find drugs or foods that can safely and effectively delay aging [40, 41]. We extracted a polysaccharide with a relatively stable composition from the Ningxia Lycium barbarum. LBP mainly consists of carbohydrates, most of which being glucose obtained after hydrolysis. We used C. elegans to examine the function of LBP in extending lifespan and maintaining health.

We studied the lifespan of C. elegans cultured at different concentrations of LBP and found that LBP can extend lifespan. The extended lifespan was not simply linearly dependent on the dose of LBP, and it was very interesting that there was an optimal concentration of 300 μg/ml. The lifespan extension effect of LBP on worms was independent of temperature and nonheritable. LBP was also found to enhance the viability of N2 under high temperature, strong oxidation, and heavy metals. LBP promotes the antioxidant capacity of the worms, significantly increases the activity of CAT and SOD to scavenge oxidative free radicals, and suppresses the detrimental effect of ROS, thereby reducing oxidative damage of cells and improving the health. LBP can also enhance the reproductive potentials and muscle integrity of C. elegans. In a word, LBP did not only extend the lifespan but also improved the health status of the nematodes.

Reproduction of C. elegans was also significantly increased when worms were cultured with 300 μg/ml LBP. This result seems somewhat contradictory to previous studies, which suggest that there is a tradeoff between longevity and reproduction. It has been found that long-lived C. elegans (caused by genetic mutations or nutritional disturbances) can reduce egg production. For example, reduced fertility of mutant animals, such as age-1, eat-2, and daf-2, is accompanied by the extension of the lifespan [42–44]. Hsin and Kenyon showed that the lifespan of germlineless C. elegans will be 60% longer than that of the wild-type animals [45]. The tradeoff relationship between longevity and reproduction may result from the energy competition between these two processes. Energy and resources used for one process come at the cost of another. However, there may be other tradeoff relationships for longevity, such as the tradeoff between lifespan extension and the decline of the pharyngeal pumping rate [46] when worms were cultured with blueberry polyphenols. In addition, recent works by Sang-Kyu Park’s group [47, 48] show that N-acetyl-L-cysteine and extracts from Tenebrio molitor can extend the lifespan and increase the fertility of C. elegans at the same time. Therefore, it seems reasonable that LBP extend C. elegans lifespan without reducing fertility. There can be other tradeoffs that need further examination in future studies.

Many genetic pathways have been shown to be conserved, and it is necessary to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which LBP extends lifespan [49–52]. sir-2.1 and daf-16 are extremely outstanding genes in the IIS pathway; as well, DAF-16/FOXO transcription factors are also key components of the IIS pathway associating with aging and metabolism [30, 31]. We found that LBP has a shorter extending lifespan effect on mutants of sir-2.1 and daf-16 than on N2. This means that the LBP-extended lifespan effect requires sir-2.1 and daf-16. For daf-16 RNAi, there is no difference in the effect of LBP on N2 and sir-2.1 mutants, which implies that sir-2.1 may play a role dependent on daf-16. The daf-12 gene plays an important role in aging, immunity, and antioxidation [32]. We found that LBP had a shorter lifespan extension effect on daf-12 mutants than on N2, implying that the LBP-extended lifespan requires daf-12. daf-16 RNAi was done to the daf-12 mutants, and daf-12 RNAi was done to the daf-16 mutants, and it was shown that LBP lost the function of prolonging the lifespan, which suggests the effects of LBP on the aging of C. elegans depend on daf-12 and daf-16.

In summary, a polysaccharide was obtained from Lycium barbarum, which has the functions of prolonging the lifespan and maintaining the environmental adaptability, reproductive capacity, and motility of C. elegans. The effects of LBP on the health and aging of C. elegans are regulated by sir-2.1, daf-12, and daf-16. Our study presented the preparation, basic chemical properties, and composition of LBP; its role in aging and health; and its molecular mechanism. It also provided a basis for further research on LBP and LBP as a food or drug for intervention of aging.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential competing interests and conflicts to declare.

Authors’ Contributions

Z.Z., L.Y., and Y.J. designed the research, contributed to the interpretation of the results, drafted the manuscript, and approved the final version. Z.Z., Y.Z., H.F., K.J.B., X.Z., Y.Z., L.Y., and Y.J. contributed to the conducted the research, performed the statistical analysis, reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Professor Ruohuai Luo, Professor Ge Shan, Professor Zhengxing Wu, and the CGC which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440) for their support and help in worm strains and bacteria. We are also very grateful to Professor Zhiyong Gong from Wuhan Polytechnic University and his support in real-time PCR. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant nos. 11775091 (Y.J.), 11474117 (Y.J.), and 11704140 (Y.Z.); the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province under no. 2017CFB116 (Y.Z.); in part by the Thousand Talents Plan under no. 31103201603 (Y.Z.); and the self-determined research funds of CCNU from the colleges’ basic research and operation of MOE under nos. CCNU18TS032 (X.Z.) and CCNU18QN035 (L.Y.).

References

J. Tigges, J. Krutmann, E. Fritsche et al., “The hallmarks of fibroblast ageing,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 26–44, 2014.

T. Flatt, “A new definition of aging?” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 148, 2012.

A. J. Ding, S. Q. Zheng, X. B. Huang et al., “Current perspective in the discovery of anti-aging agents from natural products,” Natural Products and Bioprospecting, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 335–404, 2017.

E. L. Greer, T. J. Maures, A. G. Hauswirth et al., “Members of the H3K4 trimethylation complex regulate lifespan in a germline-dependent manner in C. elegans,” Nature, vol. 466, no. 7304, pp. 383–387, 2010.

L. Wu, B. Zhou, N. Oshiro-Rapley et al., “An ancient, unified mechanism for metformin growth inhibition in C. elegans and cancer,” Cell, vol. 167, no. 7, pp. 1705–1718.e13, 2016.

Q. L. Wan, X. Shi, J. Liu et al., “Metabolomic signature associated with reproduction-regulated aging in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Aging, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 447–474, 2017.

A. Masci, S. Carradori, M. A. Casadei et al., “Lycium barbarum polysaccharides: extraction, purification, structural characterisation and evidence about hypoglycaemic and hypolipidaemic effects. A review,” Food Chemistry, vol. 254, pp. 377–389, 2018.

J. Z. Dong, J. J. Yang, and Y. Wang, “Resources of Lycium species and related research progress,” China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, vol. 33, no. 18, pp. 2020–2027, 2008.

H. Amagase and N. R. Farnsworth, “A review of botanical characteristics, phytochemistry, clinical relevance in efficacy and safety of Lycium barbarum fruit (Goji),” Food Research International, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1702–1717, 2011.

R. Bo, S. Zheng, J. Xing et al., “The immunological activity of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides liposome in vitro and adjuvanticity against PCV2 in vivo,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 85, pp. 294–301, 2016.

I. Bondia-Pons, O. Savolainen, R. Törrönen, J. A. Martinez, K. Poutanen, and K. Hanhineva, “Metabolic profiling of Goji berry extracts for discrimination of geographical origin by non-targeted liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry,” Food Research International, vol. 63, pp. 132–138, 2014.

S. J. Wu, L. T. Ng, and C. C. Lin, “Antioxidant activities of some common ingredients of traditional Chinese medicine, Angelica sinensis, Lycium barbarum and Poria cocos,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1008–1012, 2004.

R. C.-C. Chang and K.-F. So, “Use of anti-aging herbal medicine, Lycium barbarum, against aging-associated diseases. What do we know so far?” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 643–652, 2008.

G. Yin and Y. Dang, “Optimization of extraction technology of the Lycium barbarum polysaccharides by Box–Behnken statistical design,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 603–610, 2008.

L. Gan, S. H. Zhang, Q. Liu, and H. B. Xu, “A polysaccharide-protein complex from Lycium barbarum upregulates cytokine expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 471, no. 3, pp. 217–222, 2003.

Z. Chen, J. Lu, N. Srinivasan, B. K. H. Tan, and S. H. Chan, “Polysaccharide-protein complex from Lycium barbarum L. is a novel stimulus of dendritic cell immunogenicity,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 6, pp. 3503–3509, 2009.

M. Ming, L. Guanhua, Y. Zhanhai, C. Guang, and Z. Xuan, “Effect of the Lycium barbarum polysaccharides administration on blood lipid metabolism and oxidative stress of mice fed high-fat diet in vivo,” Food Chemistry, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 872–877, 2009.

L. Gan, S. Hua Zhang, X. Liang Yang, and H. Bi Xu, “Immunomodulation and antitumor activity by a polysaccharide–protein complex from Lycium barbarum,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 563–569, 2004.

Q. Luo, Z. Li, J. Yan, F. Zhu, R. J. Xu, and Y. Z. Cai, “Lycium barbarum polysaccharides induce apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells and inhibits prostate cancer growth in a xenograft mouse model of human prostate cancer,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 695–703, 2009.

X. M. Li, X. L. Li, and A. G. Zhou, “Evaluation of antioxidant activity of the polysaccharides extracted from Lycium barbarum fruits in vitro,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 488–497, 2007.

C. L. Lin, C. C. Wang, S. C. Chang, B. S. Inbaraj, and B. H. Chen, “Antioxidative activity of polysaccharide fractions isolated from Lycium barbarum Linnaeus,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 146–151, 2009.

W. J. Tian, J. L. Qin, C. J. Yue, R. R. Hou, K. H. Liu, and Y. L. Hu, “Effects of three kinds of polysaccharides on antioxidative ability of chicken embryo liver cells,” Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1517–1523, 2018.

G. E. Liang and C. W. Zhang, “Experimental research on the skin aging function of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides,” Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, vol. 6, pp. 734–736, 2007.

R. Yi, X. Liu, and Q. Dong, “A study of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides (LBP) extraction technology and its anti-aging effect,” African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, vol. 10, no. 4, 2013.

T. Tang and B. He, “Treatment of D-galactose induced mouse aging with Lycium barbarum polysaccharides and its mechanism study,” African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, vol. 10, no. 4, 2013.

M. Dubois, K. A. Gilles, J. K. Hamilton, P. A. Rebers, and F. Smith, “Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 350–356, 1956.

N. Blumenkrantz and G. Asboe-Hansen, “New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 484–489, 1973.

T. Stiernagle, “Maintenance of C. elegans,” in WormBook, pp. 1–11, University of Minnesota, 1999.

L. A. Herndon, P. J. Schmeissner, J. M. Dudaronek et al., “Stochastic and genetic factors influence tissue-specific decline in ageing C. elegans,” Nature, vol. 419, no. 6909, pp. 808–814, 2002.

M. Viswanathan and L. Guarente, “Regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans lifespan by sir-2.1 transgenes,” Nature, vol. 477, no. 7365, pp. E1–E2, 2011.

A. Berdichevsky, M. Viswanathan, H. R. Horvitz, and L. Guarente, “C. elegans SIR-2.1 interacts with 14-3-3 proteins to activate DAF-16 and extend life span,” Cell, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 1165–1177, 2006.

D. L. Motola, C. L. Cummins, V. Rottiers et al., “Identification of ligands for DAF-12 that govern dauer formation and reproduction in C. elegans,” Cell, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 1209–1223, 2006.

M. H. Lee, B. Hook, L. B. Lamont, M. Wickens, and J. Kimble, “LIP-1 phosphatase controls the extent of germline proliferation in Caenorhabditis elegans,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 88–96, 2006.

A. Ghazi, S. Henis-Korenblit, and C. Kenyon, “A transcription elongation factor that links signals from the reproductive system to lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 5, no. 9, article e1000639, 2009.

S. H. Bae, S. H. Sung, S. Y. Oh et al., “Sestrins activate Nrf2 by promoting p62-dependent autophagic degradation of Keap1 and prevent oxidative liver damage,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 2013.

D. E. Harrison, R. Strong, Z. D. Sharp et al., “Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7253, pp. 392–395, 2009.

A. San-Miguel, P. T. Kurshan, M. M. Crane et al., “Deep phenotyping unveils hidden traits and genetic relations in subtle mutants,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, article 12990, 2016.

D. S. Williams, A. Cash, L. Hamadani, and T. Diemer, “Oxaloacetate supplementation increases lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans through an AMPK/FOXO-dependent pathway,” Aging Cell, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 765–768, 2009.

N. A. Bishop and L. Guarente, “Genetic links between diet and lifespan: shared mechanisms from yeast to humans,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 835–844, 2007.

N. Sudharsanan, M. K. Ali, N. K. Mehta, and K. M. V. Narayan, “Population aging, macroeconomic changes, and global diabetes prevalence, 1990–2008,” Population Health Metrics, vol. 13, no. 1, 2015.

R. W. Powers III, M. Kaeberlein, S. D. Caldwell, B. K. Kennedy, and S. Fields, “Extension of chronological life span in yeast by decreased TOR pathway signaling,” Genes & Development, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 174–184, 2006.

S. Yanase, K. Yasuda, and N. Ishii, “Adaptive responses to oxidative damage in three mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans (age-1, mev-1 and daf-16) that affect life span,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 123, no. 12, pp. 1579–1587, 2002.

J. M. van Raamsdonk and S. Hekimi, “Deletion of the mitochondrial superoxide dismutase sod-2 extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 5, no. 2, article e1000361, 2009.

J. M. Van Raamsdonk and S. Hekimi, “Reactive oxygen species and aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: causal or casual relationship?” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1911–1953, 2010.

H. Hsin and C. Kenyon, “Signals from the reproductive system regulate the lifespan of C. elegans,” Nature, vol. 399, no. 6734, pp. 362–366, 1999.

J. A. Joseph, B. Shukitt-Hale, N. A. Denisova et al., “Reversals of age-related declines in neuronal signal transduction, cognitive, and motor behavioral deficits with blueberry, spinach, or strawberry dietary supplementation,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 8114–8121, 1999.

S.-M. Won, H.-U. Cha, S. S. Yi, S.-J. Kim, and S.-K. Park, “Tenebrio molitor extracts modulate the response to environmental stressors and extend lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 938–944, 2016.

S. I. Oh, J. K. Park, and S. K. Park, “Lifespan extension and increased resistance to environmental stressors by N-acetyl-L-cysteine in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Clinics, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 380–386, 2015.

S. Q. Zheng, X. B. Huang, T. K. Xing, A. J. Ding, G. S. Wu, and H. R. Luo, “Chlorogenic acid extends the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans via insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway,” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 464–472, 2017.

H. A. Tissenbaum and L. Guarente, “Increased dosage of a sir-2 gene extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Nature, vol. 410, no. 6825, pp. 227–230, 2001.

G. Kwon, J. Lee, J. H. Koh, and Y. H. Lim, “Lifespan extension of Caenorhabditis elegans by Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum and Megasphaera elsdenii with probiotic potential,” Current Microbiology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 557–564, 2018.

A. Bansal, E. S. Kwon, D. Conte et al., “Transcriptional regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans FOXO/DAF-16 modulates lifespan,” Longevity & Healthspan, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 5, 2014.