Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Volume 2021 (2021), Article ID 5529256, 19 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5529256

Review Article

The Controversial Role of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency on Cardiovascular Disease: A Narrative Review

Maria Pina Dore,1,2 Guido Parodi,¹ Michele Portoghese,³ and Giovanni Mario Pes1,4

¹Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Sperimentali, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 8, 07100 Sassari, Italy
²Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza Blvd., Houston Texas, USA
³Heart Surgery Unit, AOU Sassari, Via Enrico de Nicola, Sassari, Italy
⁴Sardinia Longevity Blue Zone Observatory, Ogliastra, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Maria Pina Dore; mpdore@uniss.it

Received 8 January 2021; Revised 27 March 2021; Accepted 21 April 2021; Published 3 May 2021

Academic Editor: Jayeeta Ghose

Copyright © 2021 Maria Pina Dore et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Cardiovascular disorders (CVD) are highly prevalent and the leading cause of death worldwide. Atherosclerosis is responsible for most cases of CVD. The plaque formation and subsequent thrombosis in atherosclerosis constitute an ongoing process that is influenced by numerous risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity, smoking, inflammation, and sedentary lifestyle. Among the various risk and protective factors, the role of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, the most common inborn enzyme disorder across populations, is still debated. For decades, it has been considered a protective factor against the development of CVD. However, in the recent years, growing scientific evidence has suggested that this inherited condition may act as a CVD risk factor. The role of G6PD deficiency in the atherogenic process has been investigated using in vitro or ex vivo cellular models, animal models, and epidemiological studies in human cohorts of variable size and across different ethnic groups, with conflicting results. In this review, the impact of G6PD deficiency on CVD was critically reconsidered, taking into account the most recent acquisitions on molecular and biochemical mechanisms, namely, antioxidative mechanisms, glutathione recycling, and nitric oxide production, as well as their mutual interactions, which may be impaired by the enzyme defect in the context of the pentose phosphate pathway. Overall, current evidence supports the notion that G6PD downregulation may favor the onset and evolution of atheroma in subjects at risk of CVD. Given the relatively high frequency of this enzyme deficiency in several regions of the world, this finding might be of practical importance to tailor surveillance guidelines and facilitate risk stratification.

1. Introduction

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a group of disorders that include coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, and aortic atherosclerosis [1]. Cardiovascular disorders are common in the general population worldwide and are the leading cause of mortality, representing 31% of total deaths, the majority due to heart attack and stroke [2, 3]. Atherosclerosis is responsible for almost all cases of CVD, with plaque formation, ulceration, and the consequent thrombotic occlusion forming a slow, continued process that is influenced by several risk factors [4, 5]. Among these, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, smoking, and inflammation may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, erosion, and plaque instability [6]. For these reasons, acting on modifiable risk factors such as tobacco use, diet, obesity, physical inactivity, and addiction to alcohol can prevent premature CVD events.

Among the nonmodifiable determinants, genetic factors play a considerable role, and previous epidemiological studies [7–10] as well as animal models [11–13] have suggested that the deficiency of the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD; EC 1.1.1.49) may act as a protective factor against CVD. However, recent evidence from animal models, ex-vivo studies on cells isolated from deficient subjects, in vitro studies where deficiency was induced by gene silencing, and large human cohorts indicate that G6PD can lead to adverse physiological effects in response to increased oxidative stress [14] acting as a cardiovascular risk factor [15–18].

The purpose of this review is to critically discuss the current knowledge about the metabolic modifications induced into cells by G6PD deficiency and the evidence for and against its possible involvement in atherogenesis and its clinical consequences, with the aim of understanding the extent to which this common enzyme disorder may impact CVD risk.

The sources used in this literature review are original articles published in PubMed, posted on public repositories, or listed in clinical trial databases in addition to databases referring to the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control.

2. Pathophysiology of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency

The G6PD is a cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the first and rate-limiting step in the oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), which converts glucose-6-phosphate into 6-phosphoglucono-δ-lactone. The PPP reactions catalyzed by G6PD and the 6-phospho-gluconate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.44) generate the reduced form of the pyridinic coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH). The NADPH supplies high-energy electrons (i.e., reducing equivalents) to cells to maintain their oxidoreductive balance and feed reductive biosynthesis. The G6PD is fundamental for the cell’s defense against the toxicity of reactive oxygen species (ROSs) (Figure 1). Moreover, the nonoxidative branch of PPP synthesizes the ribose-5-phosphate necessary to sustain the synthesis of the DNA backbone.

Figure 1: Pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) in nucleated cells. The NADPH provides reducing equivalents for antioxidant defense and reductive biosynthesis and NADPH oxidase for generation of superoxide anions. The G6PD is required to maintain a normal NADPH/NADP ratio which in turn regulates the glutathione (γ-L-glutamyl-L-cysteinylglycine, GSH) biosynthesis. The GSH is a sulfhydryl-containing compound present in all mammalian cells. The redox-active thiol group in GSH is essential in the regulation of disulfide bonds of proteins and to detoxify oxidant compounds. The function of GSH as an antioxidant is efficient when the free thiol is maintained. This is accomplished by the reaction catalyzed by the NADPH-dependent glutathione-disulfide reductase (GSR) that reduces glutathione disulfide (GSSG) into the form with a free thiol (GSH). In G6PD deficiency, the decreased supply of NADPH limits the GSH regeneration and in turn the disposal of oxidants. The NADPH produced in the PPP is also a substrate for nitric oxide synthase (NOS) for the release of nitric oxide (NO) and for NADPH oxidase for the release of superoxide anion. In G6PD deficiency, NO depletion leads to the decreased neutralization of superoxide anion and other free radicals.

The evolutionary origin of the PPP is ancient, possibly dating back to the prebiotic world [19]. In cells devoid of mitochondria, such as erythrocytes, PPP is essential since the reaction catalyzed by G6PD is the only source of NADPH. The coenzyme is also important for the elongation and desaturation of fatty acids [20, 21], biosynthesis of cholesterol [22], hydroxylation of steroids and other polycyclic molecules including vitamin D [23], drugs metabolism by the cytochrome P450 [24], and ROS generation in phagocytic and inflammatory cell to counteract pathogens [25]. The gene coding for G6PD maps to long arm of the X chromosome [26]; therefore, its inheritance is X-linked. The human G6PD gene was cloned by Takizawa et al. from a human hepatoma cDNA library [27]; it spans 18 kb, divided into 13 exons [28], and the gene product encompasses 515 amino acids with a molecular mass of 58 kD [29]. The transcribed region from the initiation site to the poly(A) addition site covers 15,860 bp [30].

The human G6PD gene is remarkable for its allelic variability, and some gene variants can be considered as loss-of-function mutations causing a lower catalytic activity and, in turn, global PPP downregulation. In reality, G6PD deficiency can be due to genetic (primary) or secondary causes [31, 32]. Clinical manifestations of primary G6PD deficiency, based on the severity of the mutation, may result in nonimmune hemolytic anemia in response to bacterial or viral infections, or the ingestion of certain drugs or plants such as Vicia faba (favism). Favism was known in antiquity, as evidenced by the ban on eating or even naming beans during the time of Pythagoras [33] and among Roman priests [34]. In cases of severe deficiency, intravascular hemolysis may occur, causing hemoglobin release and resulting in kidney failure [35]. The clinical outcomes are mainly related to the impaired antioxidant activity due to NADPH depletion in red blood cells, which are exclusively dependent on PPP for glutathione regeneration [36].

Due to X-chromosome inheritance, males carrying the mutant allele are hemizygotes with total enzyme deficiency; female carriers can be, rarely, homozygotes or more frequently, heterozygotes with a milder form of deficiency. However, due to the random inactivation of the X chromosome (mosaicism), the degree of deficiency can be variable in females [36]. The enzyme deficiency occurs most frequently in those parts of the world where endemic malaria was prevalent in the past, such as sub Saharian Africa, Southeast Asia, the Mediterranean basin, and the Middle East, including Israel [37]. In the United States, it affects about 10% of African-American males [38]. In North Europe, it is rare, even though it has been reported in newborns [39]. Although the geographic distribution of G6PD deficiency suggests a protective role against malaria, this hypothesis has been questioned (as reviewed in the meta-analysis by Mbanefo et al. [40]).

In populations where G6PD deficiency is widespread, the condition is usually diagnosed in childhood, but clinical manifestations may appear throughout a person’s lifetime under conditions of oxidative stress. In addition to hemolytic disorders, G6PD deficiency may predispose to a wide range of conditions including neonatal jaundice [41]. In a small subset of patients with severe G6PD deficiency, a chronic nonspherocytic hemolytic anemia may occur [42].

According to the World Health Organization, mutant enzymes have been classified into five classes in the order of descending severity [43]. The G6PD B is the normal (wild type) isoenzyme. The G6PD A– (point mutations at nucleotides 202A/376G) is the most common variant among African-Americans and is associated with mild to moderate enzyme activity (class III) [44]. The G6PD Mediterranean variant (C → T transition at nucleotide 563 of the coding gene, amino acids Ser¹⁸⁸Phe) is the most common variant in Caucasians entailing enzyme instability and classically associated with favism. There is no known null mutant among the more than 200 spontaneous G6PD mutants found in humans (Table 1). In addition to the common mutations listed in Table 1, more than 400 different variants have been described [45], making G6PD deficiency the most polymorphic common inherited error of metabolism.

Table 1: Most common mutations causing G6PD deficiency worldwide.

Exon/intron location
Nucleotidic substitution in cDNA
Aminoacid substitution
Designation
Class
KM NADP⁺ (μM)
Reference

Exon 5, nt 376

N126D
G6PD A
III
12.97
[29]

Exon 4, nt 202
Exon 5, nt 376

V68M
N126D
G6PD A–
III
15
[155]

Exon 6, nt 563

S188F
G6PD Med
II
2.43
[29]

Exon 8, nt 844

D282H
G6PD Seattle
III
2.4–2.8
[29]

Exon 11, nt 1260

R454C
G6PD Union
II
8.6
[40]

Exon 12, nt 1376

R459L
G6PD Canton
II
14.7
[40]

A lower level of enzyme activity in the erythrocytes of genetically deficient individuals might be due to a normal rate of synthesis of an enzyme of low catalytic efficiency, a decreased rate of synthesis of a normally active enzyme, an increased lability of the variant enzyme or a combined mechanism. The clinical phenotype depends on the mutation location in the 3D structure of the protein. G6PD A– is a more labile enzyme with normal rate of synthesis.

3. The Role of G6PD in the Antioxidant Defense

For a long time, G6PD was considered only a component of the mechanisms that counteract ROS toxicity. Recently, it has been hypothesized that, under specific conditions, inefficient G6PD can generate free radicals, making its overall action more complex than previously understood [14, 46]. The first two PPP redox reactions (catalyzed by G6PD and 6GPD) generate NADPH that provides high-energy electrons for glutathione (GSH) recycling. The importance of this mechanism is underscored by the heavy membrane damage and subsequent hemolysis upon oxidative stress in cells that depend solely on PPP as a NADPH source. In cells harboring mitochondria with active tricarboxylic acid cycle (including platelets), the situation is more complex because mitochondria are themselves a source of endogenous ROS as byproducts of the electron transport chain [47]. ROS can damage cell membranes, lipoproteins, and DNA, leading to cell death. However, the cytoplasm contains isocitrate dehydrogenase, and the mitochondria contain the malic enzyme and other enzymes that also yields NADPH to cope with oxidative stress.

Reactive oxygen species production occurs at two additional sites: peroxisomes, where xanthine oxidase (XOD, EC 1.17.3.2) generates superoxide anion as a byproduct of its normal catalytic activity of uric acid formation during purine metabolism [47] and nitric oxide (NO) synthases (NOS, E.C. 1.14.13.39) which produce NO from L-arginine. However, the NADPH produced in the PPP can have the dual effect of regenerating glutathione and being a substrate for NADPH oxidase for the release of ROS [48]. The membrane-bound NOXs enzymes, which under normal circumstances are dormant, may be a significant source of ROS upon stimulation by a variety of triggers including growth factors, proinflammatory cytokines, infections, and hormones [48]. Using cytosolic NADPH as the electron donor, and in the presence of O₂, several NOX isoforms produce H₂O₂ or the radical superoxide anion; the latter one has the dual role of microbial killing and serving as a signaling molecule. It is likely that in the vascular tissue, in case of insufficient availability of NADPH due to G6PD deficiency, the fine-tuned ROS-dependent signaling is altered and can be worsened by decreased bioavailable NO. Thus, the delicate regulation of G6PD implies that any reduction of the catalytic activity may be a double-edged sword that can shift the redox balance in either direction, depending on the specific cell type and overall metabolic setting [49]. Although several published studies have claimed that the G6PD overexpression is associated with increased oxidative stress and vice versa [12, 50, 51], the weight of evidence is in favor of increased stress induced by G6PD deficiency or inhibition [46, 52–55]. In the majority of cases, G6PD knock-out animal models are highly sensitive to ROS, whereas the overexpression of the enzyme protects against oxidative injury and can extend lifespan in insects [56] and mice [57].

3.1. Changes in Glutathione Metabolism in G6PD Deficiency

Figure 1 shows the glutathione biosynthesis and recycling process. In its reduced form (GSH), this antioxidant molecule scavenges ROS to prevent cell damage. The sulfhydryl (-SH) moiety of cysteine is responsible for ROS neutralization. When the GSH monomer reacts with a free radical, it is oxidized to its inactive dimer form (GSSG) and must be regenerated by the coenzyme NADPH through a G6PD-dependent pathway [58]. High levels of GSH inhibit GSH synthesis by blocking glutamate cysteine ligase (GCL) (EC 6.3.2.2) [59]. Therefore, G6PD deficiency causes GSH depletion, leading to recycling inability. The ratio of GSH to GSSG in a cell, normally around 500 : 1, is a reliable measure of the oxidative stress level [60].

The central role of glutathione for endothelial function has been investigated in several experimental models. Using knock-out mice with GSH deficiency, Espinosa-Diez et al. demonstrated increased ROS levels and impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation, indicating endothelial GSH as a major protective mechanism for endothelial function [61].

Using a genetically engineered murine model of G6PD deficiency (i.e., G6PDdef mice carrying a mutation at the 5 untranslated sequence [62]), Jain et al. investigated the role of GSH in ischemia-reperfusion myocardium and observed that tissue injury was inversely proportional to the GSH/GSSG ratio [63]. Consequently, to maintain a reductive environment within myocardial cells during ischemia-reperfusion, it is necessary to counteract myocardial oxidative stress.

Glutathione metabolism has also been investigated in preeclampsia, a disorder characterized by increased oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. In this condition, the GSH/GSSG ratio was found almost twofold lower in pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia than in normotensive pregnant females [64]. Moreover, reduced G6PD activity was associated with impaired redox balance in fetal endothelial cells derived from preeclamptic pregnancies, providing further evidence that a prooxidant status is associated with preeclampsia, and that G6PD deficiency plays a major causative role [65].

Recently, using a novel G6PD-deficient rat model that incorporated the human G6PDS188F (Med) mutation by CRISPR-based genome editing, Kitagawa et al. showed that the GSH/GSSG ratio as well as nucleotide levels significantly decreased, further supporting the role of G6PD in the intracellular redox status [13].

3.2. Changes in Nitric Oxide Metabolism in G6PD Deficiency

Nitric oxide is a major cellular signaling molecule synthesized from L-arginine by the family of enzymes known as NOSs. Despite its role in signaling, NO contains an unpaired electron (NO·) that makes it behave as an antioxidant or a free radical, explaining its two-sided impact on cell metabolism (Figure 2). In endothelial cells, a specific enzyme isoform (eNOS) helps modulate the vascular tone. Leopold et al. investigated NO production in bovine aortic endothelial cells treated with the G6PD inhibitor dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA), or an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to G6PD mRNA, to silence the G6PD gene and expression [46].

Figure 2: Indirect production of prooxidant and antioxidant molecules by the pathway catalyzed by G6PD. The NADPH produced in the reaction catalyzed by G6PD contributes to the formation of both free radicals and antioxidant molecules; hence, the net effect on the cellular redox balance depends on its concentration in vivo. Under normal conditions, and in the presence of oxygen, NADPH generates the anion radical superoxide, which in turn reacts with hydrogen peroxide to form the hydroxyl radical. At the same time, NADPH feeds the NOS reaction to form NO which at low concentrations has an antioxidant action and contributes to the scavenging of the superoxide radical. It can be hypothesized that in the case of G6PD deficiency, the superoxide scavenging by NO is significantly abated which results in increased oxidative stress and damage to a variety of macromolecules.

In these experiments, endothelial cells with deficient G6PD activity generated ROS in abundance, which, in turn, depleted intracellular glutathione stores. Although the main source of cellular ROS production is eNOS, bioactive NO levels were found to be reduced. This is important for the development of vascular lesion because it shows that G6PD deficiency, while reducing the reactive nitrogen species, actually increases the production of ROSs that exert much more deleterious effects than NO itself [46]. On the other hand, the overexpression of G6PD in vascular endothelial cells decreases the accumulation of ROSs in response to exogenous and endogenous stressors, improving bioavailable NO levels [54, 55]. It has been demonstrated that depletion of NO causes and enhances arterial stiffness [66, 67]. In the G6PDS188F animal model developed by Kitagawa, the NO level was only slightly reduced (–10%, ); yet, the artery stiffness was unexpectedly lower than in control rats [13], a finding that cannot be explained by the reduced NADPH, the essential cofactor for eNOS. In this experimental model, although the blood pressure did not differ in the G6PD-deficient and control rats, the blood pressure surge, elicited by a high-fat diet, was abrogated in the deficient rats. Clearly, these findings require a more complex explanation than just a reduced production of NO.

Matsui et al. generated a double-knockout murine model by crossing the G6PD-deficient mice of Pretsch and Charles [62] with the atherosclerosis-prone apo E–/– mouse [12] and observed reduced aortic superoxide production, lower markers of inflammation, and less atheroma development. The apparent antiatherosclerotic effect of the G6PD mutation was considered to be independent of any cholesterol lowering effect and was ascribed to a reduction in NADPH-dependent reactive oxygen formation. Notably, in this experimental model, the lower atherosclerosis in G6PD-deficient mice cannot be attributed to the reduced bioavailability of NO since apoE–/– eNOS double knock-out mice show increased atherosclerosis [68]. Intriguingly, in the Matsui model, the deficient mice had increased blood pressure values compared to the wild type, as reported in deficient humans [15, 16, 69]. Clearly, animal models of G6PD deficiency behave differently than they do in humans as for NO metabolism; in fact, although the Kitagawa model closely reflected a human G6PD mutation, blood pressure values were found to have decreased in the deficient animals compared to the controls [13]. For this reason, it may be questioned whether the apoE–/– mouse model is an appropriate one for studying the NO/G6PD deficiency impact on atherosclerosis [70] since the APOE locus itself modulate NO levels [71]. Finally, NO has been shown to induce the inhibition of low density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation that is implicated in the early stages of atherosclerosis [72]; therefore, it is not unreasonable that G6PD deficiency, causing NO depletion, may facilitate the formation of proatherogenic oxidized LDL. Notably, acquired G6PD deficiency—induced, for instance, using the inhibitor aldosterone—is associated with NOS uncoupling as well, leading to the increased formation of superoxide anion and peroxynitrite despite the reduction of NO [31].

4. Inflammatory Response in G6PD Deficiency

The main pathogenetic mechanism of atherosclerosis is due to a chronic inflammation of the vessel wall, largely driven by the innate immune response [73]. The ROSs are powerful mediators of the inflammatory response, and the increased production or decreased neutralization level of ROS plays an important role in the early stages of atherosclerosis.

The G6PD deficiency has an extensive and adverse impact on the inflammatory response [74, 75], cell adhesion mechanisms [76, 77], and fibrogenesis [78], both in vitro and ex vivo (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Main mechanisms underlying vascular damage in G6PD deficiency. G6PD deficiency may act as a cardiovascular risk factor by activating a number of mechanisms that involve numerous cell types and tissues, such as triggering an inflammatory response in monocytes/macrophages and endothelial cells, causing hemolysis in red blood cells with the release of membrane fragments and free hemoglobin that activate the coagulation cascade and platelets aggregation.

The paradigm of the impaired inflammatory response in G6PD deficiency is the reduced bactericidal killing activity by phagocytic cells due to the inhibition of the respiratory burst [79], resulting in an increased susceptibility for pyogenic infections [80–83]. On the other hand, the alleged reduced ROS production induced by G6PD deficiency is expected to increase the susceptibility to several viral infections including SARS-Cov-2 [84, 85]. Incidentally, a raised incidence of ischemic heart disease and cardiomyopathy was reported as a result of viral infections [86]. Studies on animal models have reported an association between G6PD deficiency and the increased activity of inflammatory markers such as nuclear factor-κB [87]. In vitro models, where the G6PD expression was downregulated through a siRNA-mediated RNA interference, revealed the overexpression of adhesion molecules [76, 77] and a shift in the polarization of monocytes/macrophages towards a profibrotic phenotype [78]. Increased adhesiveness of leukocytes to endothelial cells is also stimulated by hemoglobin/heme released during hemolytic episodes and the NO exhaustion via high-affinity binding to free plasma hemoglobin [88, 89]. Moreover, ex vivo monocytes from individuals with the G6PDA202A/376G variant were found to produce 50% less anti-inflammatory interleukin 10 (IL-10) in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and >90% less IL-10 in response to phorbol esters two days postinjury, when compared with nondeficient patients [38, 90], a finding that was also reported in Sardinian G6PD-deficient patients with the Mediterranean variant [91]. These results are in contrast with those of Wilmanski et al., who observed that activated G6PD-deficient macrophages display an augmented production of cytokines with a prominent impact on IL-10 production [74]. Moreover, macrophages from G6PDmut mice exhibited the attenuated proinflammatory response to LPS stimulation [92]. Clearly, G6PD may exert a proinflammatory as well as anti-inflammatory effect, depending on the model and the tissue involved. Despite the value of experimental animal models, a conclusion on the impact of G6PD deficiency on inflammation deserves some caution. The new animal models incorporating human mutations [13] may be more promising than the old G6PD-deficient models that had different characteristics.

5. The Impact of G6PD Deficiency on Major CV Risk Factors

5.1. Serum Lipid Profile

Early studies on G6PD deficiency speculated about an alleged “statin-like” effect resulting from NADPH shortage [10]. The inhibition of the NADPH-dependent hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase (EC 1.1.1.88) which catalyzes the rate-limiting step of cholesterol biosynthesis in steroidogenic cells [93] may act as a natural statin. Several in vitro and in vivo experimental models have highlighted a decreased cholesterol synthesis in deficient G6PD cells or animals [12, 14, 49] as well as a concomitant increase in lipid peroxidation, which suggests that the impairment of the antioxidant defense prevails over the cholesterol-lowering effect [94]. Notably, mice that are genetically deficient in G6PD show hypertriglyceridemia following a high fructose intake, indicating that the genetic defect can alter fat metabolism [94].

As for studies in humans, the possible decrease in cholesterol synthesis to explain the alleged cardioprotective effect of G6PD deficiency was proposed by Long et al. in a study addressing the relationship between G6PD deficiency and CVD risk; however, the cholesterol levels were not assessed in the cohort analyzed [7]. During the same period, a study of serum cholesterol levels in healthy African-American males had even reported higher values in those individuals with G6PD deficiency than in those with normal enzyme activity [95].

Subsequent studies, mostly performed in Sardinia, Italy, where G6PD deficiency occurs in nearly 10–12% of the population, provided discordant results with significant or no differences in the lipid profile between subjects with and without G6PD deficiency. In a small study (five G6PD-deficient and five normal subjects), Batetta et al. found a significantly reduced levels of both total and LDL cholesterol in G6PD-deficient subjects [96]. Similarly, in a study conducted among 2275 males from Sardinia, including 13.1% of G6PD-deficient individuals, Muntoni et al. found a 6.73% and 8.82% reduction in the total and LDL cholesterol, respectively, but no differences were found in partially deficient females [9]. In contrast, in a study performed on diabetic patients with and without G6PD deficiency, Cappai et al. did not detect any difference between the total and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol [97]. Pinna et al., investigating atherosclerotic retinal disease, claimed to have observed a protective effect of G6PD deficiency, but no difference was reported in the cholesterol levels [98, 99]. More importantly, in the studies conducted in Sardinian subjects with G6PD deficiency, the possible copresence of beta thalassemia —with a prevalence of up to 12% in the general population [100]—was not taken into account. This condition is able to reduce the total and LDL cholesterol levels by 40% [101]. In addition, reticulocytosis in carriers of double defect (beta-thalassemia + G6PD deficiency) may increase the G6PD activity above the threshold, and deficient subjects may be falsely classified as normal [17]. Other studies outside Sardinia have reported a reduction of lipid levels in G6PD-deficient subjects, but the possible interference by uncontrolled confounders has rarely been addressed [18, 102, 103].

5.2. Blood Pressure

Chronic arterial hypertension is one of the main cardiovascular risk factors and may increase the lifetime risk of developing CVD by 20%. Studies on animal models and humans have shown that G6PD deficiency increases blood pressure, potentially contributing to the premature development of arterial lesions [13, 15, 16]. A large-scale study by Zhao et al. showed that pregnant and prepregnant females with G6PD deficiency have higher blood pressure values, especially that of systolic blood pressure, compared with females with a normal enzymatic activity [16]. A study conducted by Thomas et al. among American military personnel has shown that vascular risk was increased in G6PD-deficient subjects in addition to a significant increase in the frequency of hypertension (22.4% vs 15.1%, ) [15]. The mechanisms underlying high blood pressure in G6PD deficiency mostly refer to alterations in NO metabolism. However, in the G6PDS188F-deficient rat model developed by Kitagawa et al., a mild protective effect on the blood pressure levels was observed. Following the administration of a high-fat diet, the basal pressure values did not differ between deficient and wild rats; however, the blood pressure increased significantly only in the wild type and not in the G6PD-deficient rats [13]. Similarly, increased arterial stiffness was observed only in the wild-type rats treated with the high fat diet but not in the G6PD-deficient ones [13]. These findings were explained by the reduction of NO due to the exhaustion of the pyridine coenzyme [13, 66, 67]. Arguably, the inhibition of NO synthase with L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME) was expected to exacerbate hypertension and arterial stiffness in G6PDS188F versus wild-type rats, whereas, actually, the reverse was observed. Therefore, either some compensatory mechanisms are involved or the G6PD deficiency causes smooth muscle relaxation, which is rather unlikely, as explained later. Moreover, other experimental models have shown an increase rather than a decrease in blood pressure in G6PD-deficient animals [11].

5.3. Diabetes

The role of the PPP, and in particular of G6PD, in diabetes and its complications is manifold and varied, as mechanisms favoring or delaying the disease onset (for review, see Ge et al. [104]) exists. There is evidence that an extreme reduction or excess in the G6PD activity can adversely affect glucose metabolism [105]. A recent meta-analysis by Lai et al. pooling the results from seven studies for a total of 893,408 participants observed 2.37 increased odds of developing diabetes in patients with G6PD deficiency compared to individuals with normal enzyme activity [106]. Males were more likely to be affected compared to females according to the X-linked inheritance. In line with the findings of this meta-analysis, increased fasting glucose levels and diabetes were detected among G6PD-deficient subjects from Singapore [107], the western Amazon [108], and Saudi Arabia [109]. In addition to the increased likelihood of developing diabetes, G6PD deficiency accelerates the occurrence of microvascular complications, resulting in long-term detrimental consequences [97]. This can be explained by looking into the basic molecular mechanisms involved: a high NADPH/NADP⁺ ratio within beta cells facilitates the coupling of glucose stimulus with insulin release, as demonstrated by the increased insulin secretion in knock-out mice for NOX2 [110]. Conversely, a decline of NADPH/NADP⁺ ratio induced by G6PD deficiency blocks the glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, triggering oxidative stress and beta-cell apoptosis [111, 112]. Accordingly, a blunted insulin response to glucose was reported in nondiabetic G6PD-deficient subjects from West African descent [113]. On the other hand, the overexpression of G6PD may be detrimental as well since it fuels NOXs (NADPH oxidases) resulting in ROS accumulation and reduced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion [114]. As the virtues lie in the middle, the activity of G6PD must remain within a narrow range to achieve maximum efficiency, and it is highly probable that the presence of a functional genetic defect in G6PD most likely perturbs this delicate balance [115]. Another aspect to take into account is that chronic hyperglycemia may induce a reduction in the G6PD activity by nonenzymatic glycation, creating a self-reinforcing loop [116–118]. In addition, the protein levels of adhesion molecules (ICAM-1 and VCAM-1) and inflammatory cytokines (MCP-1 and TNF) were found significantly increased in G6PD-deficient cells exposed to high levels of glucose when compared to G6PD-normal cells [119, 120].

6. Metabolic Implications of G6PD Deficiency in Various Organs and Tissues

Earlier studies on G6PD deficiency have made it clear that the protein is a ubiquitous “housekeeping” enzyme present in all mammalian cells and tissues [121]. In the human tissues, the G6PD gene expression varies widely, with a maximum in circulating leukocytes, adrenal, thyroid, testis, and ovary [https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000160211-G6PD/tissue] while activity is lower in endothelial and muscle cells. Thus, in principle, its deficiency would have variable metabolic consequences depending on the specific biochemistry of each cell type. However, while in red cells, the reaction catalyzed by G6PD is the only source of NADPH, in mitochondria-containing cells, the coenzyme can originate from at least three additional pathways:

(i)Malic enzyme (ME1, EC.1.1.1.40) [122](ii)NADP⁺-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH2, EC 1.1.1.42) [122](iii)Nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (NNT, EC 1.6.1.3) [123]

In adipose and liver cells, IDH2 is the major source of NADPH [124]. In these cells, NADPH is packaged into cytosol and mitochondria compartments between which a significantly limited crosstalk exists. Using a CRISPR-mediated deletion of NADPH-dependent enzyme, Chen et al. dissected intracellular NADPH sources, finding that PPP is the largest contributor to NADPH production, while ME1 and IDH2 appeared to be “backups” [125]. On the contrary, silencing IDH2 or ME1 was found to have a minimal impact on the cell sensitivity to stressors. However, in the case of G6PD deficiency, the decreased NADPH supply is partially compensated by these alternative pathways providing fuel to the enzymes generating superoxide anion and other free radicals. Therefore, the inability of deficient G6PD to supply enough NADPH has the potential for either increasing (by lowering GSH) or decreasing (by reducing NOS activity) the oxidative stress. The net effect depends on the specific metabolism of the cells and their redox status.

An unexpected finding of Chen et al.’s study was that G6PD knock-out animals have impaired folate metabolism since methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) converts 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate, a cosubstrate for homocysteine remethylation to methionine [125]. Although ME1 and IDH2 may compensate the G6PD deficiency by providing NADPH, this occurs at the expenses of high NADP levels and further inhibition of folate biosynthesis [125]. Several epidemiological studies have reported that folate deficiency might increase the CVD risk by increasing the circulating homocysteine levels [126].

Fatty acid biosynthesis and desaturation are also impaired in G6PD-deficient cells. Earlier studies have reported that deficient red blood cells have a lower concentration of palmitic (C16:0) and stearic (C18:0) saturated fatty acids and an increased concentration of arachidonic acid (C20:4); in animal models of G6PD deficiency, an increase in lipid peroxidation has been demonstrated [94]. However, no differences in fatty acids were detected in the plasma between deficient subjects and those with a fully functional enzyme [127]. In the rat liver, de novo synthesis of fatty acids depends on 50-75% of NADPH produced in the G6PD reaction [128].

It is worth mentioning that G6PD deficiency can downregulate another enzyme that requires NADPH: the thyroid NADPH oxidase necessary for the synthesis of triiodothyronine (T3) [129], whose lower levels could increase cardiovascular risk [130].

6.1. Red Blood Cells and the Coagulation Cascade

The G6PD deficiency, similarly to other hemolytic anemias, may cause a chronic or intermittent low-grade hemolysis, contributing to a prothrombotic state through various plausible pathophysiological mechanisms (see, for reference, Ataga et al. [131]). In erythrocytes, the reduced glutathione exhausted upon exposure to oxidative stressors is regenerated by NADPH. Since these cells have no mitochondria and PPP is the only source of NADPH, they are particularly sensitive to oxidative stressors. Although peroxide formation in erythrocytes may be partially counteracted by the newly identified antioxidant mechanism based on enzyme peroxiredoxin 2 [132], its interaction with G6PD is largely unknown and is unlikely to provide resistance against severe oxidative challenge sufficient to prevent hemolysis [133].

Cell membranes of G6PD-deficient erythrocytes display different distribution of fatty acids [134], increased formation of peroxides [135], and alteration of disulfide bonds between proteins [136]. As the reduced availability of NADPH cannot be surrogated by alternative pathways, red blood cells are easily fragmented with release of polynegative microparticles and free hemoglobin—which is rapidly oxidized to methemoglobin (MetHb)—that can activate the coagulation cascade [137] (Figure 3). Consistently, in fresh frozen plasma of subjects with G6PD deficiency, an increased procoagulant state was documented by metabolomic techniques [138]. The NO depletion induced by G6PD deficiency, and worsened via high-affinity binding to cell-free hemoglobin [139], may trigger vasoconstriction and platelet aggregation [140] facilitating thrombi formation on unstable atherosclerotic plaques.

Although hemolysis of deficient red cells may occur intravascularly, rarely leading to jaundice [141], oxidized red cells are mostly recognized by the macrophages in the spleen and liver and are subsequently removed from circulation. Despite the damaged components of G6PD-deficient red cells that are likely to confer unfavorable rheological properties and increased agglutinability, an early article reported that G6PD-deficient erythrocytes have enhanced flexibility probably due to the higher level of unsaturated fatty acids [134].

6.2. Platelets and Antiplatelet Therapy

After identification of G6PD deficiency as a causal factor of chronic hemolytic anemia, the enzymatic defect was also demonstrated in tissues other than red cells, including platelets [142, 143]. These early studies revealed that, although the G6PD activity in the platelets of deficient subjects was reduced, the ability of platelets to aggregate was apparently intact probably because these cells, unlike red blood cells, contain mitochondria that can supply NADPH [143]. However, more recent analyses of the platelets from subjects with G6PD deficiency have shown that these cellular elements, in response to oxidative stress, can also undergo vesciculation, shedding microparticles with potential procoagulant activity. For example, a study by Nantakomol et al., which measured the number of microparticles in blood samples from normal and G6PD-deficient subjects using flow cytometry analysis, showed significantly increased microparticles in G6PD-deficient subjects compared with controls, as well as a strong inverse correlation between their concentration and the G6PD enzyme activity [144]. Using a double immunofluorescence procedure with antibodies against specific membrane antigens of red blood cells (glycophorin A) and platelets (CD41a), the authors demonstrated that nearly 50% of the microparticles were derived from erythrocytes, 30% from platelets, and the remainder from poorly identified cells [144]. Although the increased number of microparticles derived from red cells could simply reflect the severity of G6PD deficiency, without functional consequences, the increased concentration of platelet-derived microparticles could activate the coagulation cascade through phosphatidylserine exposure in the outer leaflet of the cell membrane [144]. These findings partially contrast with those of Noulsri et al. who did not detect an increase in the platelet-derived microparticles in G6PD-deficient subjects but confirmed the increase in red cell-derived particles [145]. Clearly, these discrepancies may result from the different ethnicities of the investigated cohorts as well as from the residual enzyme activity that depends on the specific molecular defect. Further investigations are, therefore, necessary to understand the clinical significance of the release of microparticles. In any case, the hypothesis that hemolytic disorders can activate the coagulation cascade is well established [146], and an association between G6PD deficiency and thrombosis has been described in some case reports [147, 148].

The potential prothrombotic impact of G6PD-deficient platelets may be particularly relevant in the elderly where an altered redox homeostasis often occurs. A study by Jain et al. examined an aging human cohort with several cardiovascular risk factors and demonstrated that the changes in the platelet redox phenotype with age do not follow a linear trend but rather an inverted U-shaped curve [149]. Compared to young subjects, the platelets from elderly subjects under the age of 80 years are repleted by ROS and show a significant reduction in the GSH/GSSG ratio. After the age of 80, however, the situation is reverted, i.e., the prooxidant load and glutathione depletion decrease, while the endowment of antioxidant mechanisms in platelets is apparently increased. This observation might be explained by a progressive selection of aging subjects with time; the survivors are those who have a genetic makeup that enables them to preserve a high level of biological homeostasis for a long time despite the presence of adverse factors. From this perspective, it can be argued that G6PD deficiency has a maximum negative impact on cardiovascular risk in the elderly who are relatively young [150], whereas the impact would become much lower in the oldest population. In other terms, G6PD deficiency would act similarly to several clotting disorders in centenarians, whose frequency is paradoxically raised despite these individuals have achieved exceptional longevity [151].

Aspirin (ASA) is used as an antiplatelet agent to prevent acute coronary syndromes [152]; however, it has long been believed that this molecule, at high doses, is occasionally capable of triggering a hemolytic crisis in G6PD-deficient subjects [153]. Despite the association between the use of ASA and hemolytic crises in deficient patients has been reported—more often in case reports than in systematic studies—many physicians still hesitate to prescribe ASA to the carriers of the enzymopathy [154]. Nonetheless, for decades, several studies have tried to overturn this common belief among physicians [153, 155].

Moreover, since dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ASA and P2Y12 receptor blockers has become increasingly common in coronary revascularization using drug-eluting stents, it is important to establish the safety of this drug in G6PD-deficient patients. Zuin et al. reviewed the scant literature on this topic and concluded that the individual variability in drugs catabolism, as well as G6PD genetic heterogeneity, make it practically impossible to predict when a hemolytic event may occur [156]. The authors recommend to start a full loading dose of P2Y12 receptor blockers before percutaneous revascularization, immediately followed by 75 mg of ASA, and 100 mg of ASA from the first postoperative day [156].

An aspect of the utmost importance is to establish the maximum dose of ASA compatible with the absence of hemolysis. Eight in 12 studies from 1960 to 1998, examining noncardiac G6PD-deficient patients treated with ASA (reviewed by Li et al. [157]) reported hemolytic crises with doses ranging from 81 mg/day to 12 g/day. In nine further studies from 1991 to 2020, that recruited G6PD-deficient cardiac patients treated with ASA at doses between 75 and 250 mg/day, reviewed by the same authors, three studies reported hemolytic crises. However, the small number of studies does not allow a definitive conclusion about the safety of ASA [157]. Recently, Sanna et al., examining an unselected population of acute coronary syndrome patients from Northern Sardinia with normal or deficient G6PD activity, treated with low doses (100 mg/day) of ASA, did not observe any case of hemolysis [158]. Unfortunately, these results cannot be generalized, as the risk of hemolysis is linked to the severity of the deficient phenotype and, ultimately, to the specific gene variant that caused it [154]. Finally, the use of 100 mg/day ASA for three months in the treatment of ischemic stroke was evaluated by Chen et al. in 81 G6PD-deficient patients finding an increased risk of a moderate-to-severe bleeding and death from all causes [159].

6.3. Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Circulating lymphomononuclear cells display the highest G6PD enzymatic activity [121]. Phagocytic leukocytes have a key role in antimicrobial immune defense through ROS generation against invading microorganisms; this occurs via the NADPH-oxidase enzyme and myeloperoxidase during the oxidative bursts [81, 160] (Figure 3). The mutation causing G6PD deficiency reduces the enzymatic activity in all tissues equally; however, in the case of the Mediterranean variant (S188F), the mutation makes the protein unstable; although, the short half-life of leukocytes (1–2 days) and their ability to synthesize proteins, can maintain reasonably high levels of G6PD [79]. Nevertheless, in the lymphomonocytes of G6PD-deficient male subjects with the Mediterranean mutation, the residual enzyme activity was found to be <10% compared with lymphomonocytes from normal male subjects [96]. Mononuclear cell from G6PD-deficient subjects show an increased DNA damage, e.g., a higher rate of apoptosis after UV irradiation owing to deficient ROS detoxification [161]. In contrast to most evidence, Ham et al., using the G6PD-deficient mouse model (G6PDmut) developed by Matsui et al. [62], demonstrated that G6PDmut deficient macrophages blunt oxidative stress and proinflammatory responses, potentially leading to lower tissue inflammation especially in high fat-fed G6PD-deficient mice [51].

6.4. Endothelium

The difference between blood cells—such as leukocytes and erythrocytes—and endothelial cells is fundamental. The half-life of the former is shorter; therefore, cells containing a mutated, structurally unstable G6PD enzyme are rapidly replaced by younger cells containing a newly synthesized functional enzyme [162]. Unlike proliferating cells, endothelial cells are quiescent for most of the time, except during angiogenesis and atheroma growth. The endothelium depends more on glycolysis than on oxidative metabolism, which has the advantage of maintaining low ROS production in the mitochondria, given the exposure to high concentrations of blood O₂. For all these reasons, quiescent endothelial cells are extremely sensitive to any weakening of antioxidant mechanisms such as glutathione recycling, and oxidant stressors may damage the endothelial barrier with leakage of blood components into the perivascular space. More importantly, the reductant NADPH in the endothelium is used to fuel the eNOS producing NO in the presence of O₂. In this scenario, the crucial point is that a dysfunctional eNOS generates superoxide radical anion (•O₂–) rather than producing NO. Although the exact mechanism for eNOS uncoupling is unknown, S-glutathionylation at specific cysteine residues has been proposed [163]. In a series of elegant experiments, Leopold et al. demonstrated that bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) with deficient G6PD activity, which consequently lowers NADPH levels, exhibit increased oxidative stress in parallel with NO depletion [46]. The same author also showed that G6PD overexpression by gene transfer abrogates the H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress and increases bioavailable NO [54]. These findings strongly suggest that G6PD deficiency in endothelial cells shifts the redox balance towards enhanced oxidative stress coupled with insufficient vasoprotection by NO. Oxidative stress is known to breach the endothelial barrier leading the inflammatory cells to filter into the perivascular space. Therefore, it is not surprising that G6PD mutations in humans are associated with endothelial dysfunction [164].

6.5. Cardiomyocytes and Smooth Muscle Cells

The G6PD enzyme is the major source of NADPH in cardiac myocytes as well. In experimental models, the inhibition of G6PD by epiandrosterone and DHEA has caused contractile dysfunction, probably due to the suppression of Ca²⁺ influx [49]. In adult cardiomyocytes, the role of G6PD as a source of NADPH is critical as the mitochondrial pool of NADPH is not capable of surrogating the cytoplasmic pool [165]. Consequently, the pharmacological inhibition of G6PD in cardiomyocytes is followed by a strong reduction in the GSH/GSSG ratio, increase in ROS production, and attenuated cardiomyocyte contractility via impaired calcium transport [165]. These functional alterations were reverted by treatment with antioxidants (superoxide-dismutase mimetics) thus demonstrating that the contractile dysfunction essentially depends on the weakening of the glutathione system [165].

While the pharmacological inhibition of G6PD clearly shows a detrimental effect on cardiomyocyte function, the effect of a reduction in the enzyme activity due to genetic causes is unknown, although it may presumably be less intense. It can only be hypothesized that a reduced, but not abolished, residual activity is sufficient to impair glutathione recycling but not to attenuate ROS production via uncoupled NOS and NADH/NADPH oxidase that utilize NADPH to generate superoxide [94]. Hecker et al. specifically tested the hypothesis of a protective effect of G6PD deficiency on the development of postischemic heart failure in a mouse genetically deficient in G6PD [94]. Contrary to expectations, the enzyme defect accelerated the onset of heart failure. Notably, peroxide generation was slightly decreased in deficient animals, albeit without attenuating oxidative stress, especially under a fructose challenge test [94]. This mechanism may explain the onset of heart failure in individuals with G6PD deficiency [166]. The injury of cardiomyocytes during experimental myocardial infarction seems to be directly dependent on the activity of G6PD; in a murine model of myocardial ischemia, the administration of benfotiamine, a PPP activator capable of increasing the activity of G6PD and transketolase, improves the vascularization of the peri-infarct area and limits the extension of myocardial damage [167].

Vascular smooth muscle cells represent two thirds of all cells in the atherosclerotic lesions [168], where they play an important pathogenetic role. Their contractility is regulated by G6PD [169]. The molecular mechanisms involved in G6PD-dependent contraction of coronary artery have been studied in detail in bovine hearts, and an increased constriction or relaxation upon G6PD upregulation or downregulation, respectively, was observed [170].

6.6. Adipose Tissue

Adipocytes play a key role both in lipogenesis and lipolysis. The G6PD, together with ME1, participate in the reductive biosynthesis of fatty acids and cholesterol with NADPH as the source of reducing power [171]. Although IDH is a potential source of NADPH, its major function is irrelevant to lipogenesis [172]. The G6PD expression has been found to be increased in animal models of obesity [171], as well as in humans [173], suggesting that the abnormal enzyme overexpression in fat tissues may induce lipid metabolism disorders, and, in particular, an increased lipogenesis/lipolysis ratio. Accordingly, a reduction in the G6PD catalytic activity is expected to increase lipolysis with release of free fatty acids, contributing to aggravate insulin resistance [174].

7. Role of G6PD Deficiency in CVD: Epidemiological and Clinical Evidence

7.1. Studies Claiming a Protective Role of G6PD Deficiency on CVD

Epidemiological studies claiming that G6PD deficiency has a cardiovascular protective effect date back over half a century, but their results remain largely controversial. To the best of our knowledge, Long et al. provided the first epidemiological report of a significant effect of G6PD deficiency to reduce CVD prevalence [7]. This study recruited 1382 African-Americans from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School in Dallas and 91 patients from the Ben Taub Hospital, Houston. Based on hospital admission records, the authors found that the proportion of coronary artery disease, but not cerebrovascular disease, was significantly less frequent in men with G6PD deficiency (A and A– variants) than in those with normal G6PD (B variant) [7]. They also detected a higher incidence of cardiomyopathy in the G6PD-deficient group, although much less than coronary artery disease. However, G6PD deficiency was assessed by the methemoglobin reduction test [175] which has a reported positive predictive value as low as 61-65% [176], making results and conclusions questionable.

Cocco et al., in a cohort of 1756 Sardinian men with G6PD deficiency, reported a standardized mortality ratio for CVD of 0.28 versus the 1.0 reference value for ischemic heart disease and 0.22 versus 1.0 for cerebrovascular disease [8]. The major limitations of this study were the lack of randomization and underpowered statistics. A second study was conducted in patients admitted to the hospital for CVD (cases) or for non-CVD (controls). After adjusting for family history, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking, a 40% CVD risk reduction associated with G6PD deficiency was detected [9]. However, the disproportionately higher frequency of G6PD deficiency observed in the controls—nearly twofold than usually reported in Sardinia [29]—compared with the cases probably widened the frequency gap between study groups resulting in an artificially inflated effect size.

A third study, conducted in Sardinia by Pinna et al., evaluated the relation between G6PD deficiency, ascertained with a quantitative assay, and retinal vein occlusion [98]. The odds ratio (OR) for the atherosclerotic retinopathy, after adjustment for hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolemia but not for age, was 0.39 (95% CI 0.24–0.64). Unexpectedly, the effect was stronger in heterozygous females (OR 0.35, ) than in hemizygotic males (0.46, ); the opposite would have been expected based on X-chromosome linkage [98]. A subsequent study by the same authors that examined the association between nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and G6PD deficiency found a barely detectable statistically significant association (univariate, ; multivariate, ) with the disease [99].

A study conducted in the Iranian population by Seyedian et al. [102] on 420 patients with coronary artery disease, 28 of whom were G6PD deficient, reported a nonsignificant reduction in the OR (0.87, 95% CI 0.56–1.35). However, the use of the fluorescent spot method, which is qualitative and not quantitative [177], to screen for G6PD deficiency and failure to control for confounders make the interpretation of these results problematic.

7.2. Studies Claiming a Harmful Role of G6PD Deficiency on CVD

More recent surveys in various populations, including Sardinia, seem to support an association of G6PD deficiency with increased CVD risk [15–18]. Thomas et al. analyzed the medical records of 17,338 military personnel, dependents, retirees, and civilians within the North Atlantic Regional Medical Command. A significantly higher incidence (OR 1.396, 95% CI 1.044–1.867) of composite CVD was found in individuals with G6PD deficiency [15]. However, these findings may have been biased due to the relatively higher proportion of subjects with cardiomyopathy, which has a pathogenesis different from that of myocardial ischemia.

In a large series of patients from Sardinia undergoing upper endoscopy with a known G6PD status and a complete clinical history, including established CVD risk factors and H. pylori infection, after adjusting for potential confounders, an overall increased CVD risk in subjects with G6PD deficiency (OR 3.24; 95% CI 2.44–4.30) was confirmed [150]. Notably, the CVD risk was similar in subjects with and without G6PD deficiency before the age of 60, whereas after that age, it was found to be significantly higher () especially in deficient males. Despite the strength of the results, the study design was retrospective—a major limitation per se—and it is preferable to await confirmation from large-scale prospective studies [178]. In line with these results, a recent propensity score-matched study showed a 71% greater risk of developing CVD in patients with G6PD-deficiency compared with controls after adjusting for established risk factors [17]. This finding may be due to the fact that the prevalent mutation in Sardinia (Mediterranean variant, S188F) is more severe (Class II) than the one affecting African-Americans (G6PD A–, 202A/376G) (Class III) and is characterized by a significantly lower residual activity [17]. Although the lack of randomization was circumvented by using the propensity-matched score, in this study there were a number of potential methodological weaknesses such as the observational design and the possibility of uncontrolled confounding factors such as family history, diet, and physical activity [17].

In a multicenter observational study recruiting 1251 patients with acute ischemic stroke in a Southern area of China—where the prevalence of G6PD deficiency varies from 4% to 10%—Ou et al. reported a higher proportion of large-artery atherosclerosis (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.09-2.17) in patients with enzyme deficiency compared with the control group [18]. Among the limitations of this study, however, it should be noted that the G6PD assessment was not standardized across the participating groups, and due to a lack of genetic analysis, there is a non-negligible possibility of false negatives among heterozygous females. Moreover, in a small sample of the Saudi population, currently the one with the highest frequency of the genetic defect in the world, G6PD deficiency was reported to be associated with the risk of stroke (the mutation was found in 47.9% of patients and in 16.7% of controls), and this difference was statistically significant () [179].

According to the strength of scientific evidence listed in Table 2 (OR, hazard ratio, frequency, value ranked according to Hadorn [180]), to date there is not a single epidemiological study conclusively demonstrating that G6PD deficiency is a protective or a risk factor for CVD although a stronger evidence can be found in favor of G6PD deficiency as a CVD risk factor. In accepting the hypothesis of G6PD deficiency as a predisposing factor to coronary atherosclerosis, its role may be outweighed by the other, nonmodifiable (e.g., age) and modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, in relation to the prevalence and clustering of these factors in the different study populations, which justifies the conflicting study results, at least in part.

Table 2: Level of evidence for the association of G6PD deficiency with CVD.

Study
Patients ()
Effect and proposed mechanism
Association#
Evidence
Reference

Long et al. (1967)
1,465
G6PD protective for CVD. OR 0.41 (95% CI 0.24–0.70) “statin-like” effect
Weak
Level 3
[7]

Cocco et al. (1998)
1,756
G6PD protective for ischemic heart disease. SMR 0.28 (0.10–0.62)
Impaired NO metabolism
Moderate
Level 3
[8]

Pinna et al. (2007)
1,344
G6PD protective for retinal vein occlusion. OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.24–0.64)
“Statin-like” effect
Moderate
Level 3
[98].

Pinna et al. (2008)
420
G6PD protective for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. OR 0.40 (95% CI 0.17–0.94) “statin-like” effect and impaired NO metabolism
Weak
Level 3
[99]

Meloni et al. (2008)
738
G6PD protective. OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.38–0.89)
“Statin-like” effect and reduced ROS production by NADPH oxidase downregulation
Moderate
Level 2
[10]

Seyedian et al. (2016)
1484
G6PD protective for coronary artery disease. OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.56-1.35). “Statin-like effect”
Weak
Level 2
[102]

Thomas et al. (2018)
17,338
G6PD detrimental. OR 1.39 (95% CI 1.04–1.87). Impaired glutathione and NO metabolism
Strong
Level 2
[15]

Pes et al. (2019)
9,604
G6PD detrimental. OR 1.71 (95% CI 1.17–2.49). Multiple mechanisms including impaired inflammation, glutathione, and NO metabolism
Moderate
Level 2
[17]

Ou et al. (2020)
1,251
G6PD detrimental. OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.09–2.17)
Impaired vascular redox state
Strong
Level 3
[18]

#The strength of association was reported based on effect size (OR, HR, frequency, value and so on). The level of evidence was ranked according to Hadorn [180] in descending order: (level 1) meta-analyses of randomized studies, (level 2) a single study, (level 3) nonrandomized studies, (level 4) retrospective studies, and (level 5) a series of cases without controls.

8. G6PD Deficiency and the Current COVID-19 Outbreak

The G6PD activity is crucial to the fight against infections [84], including the current COVID-19 pandemic, as underlined by the growing number of articles in the literature [85, 181–185]. A recent article based on artificial intelligence pointed out that G6PD deficiency impairs the immune response to COVID-19 by reducing NO and lowering the GSH level [184]. More interestingly, an article by Littera et al., examined 182 Sardinian subjects affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection, unravelling an increased risk for severe illness conferred by G6PD deficiency due to the G6PD Med mutation compared to the paucisymptomatic presentation associated to G6PD-negative status (25.6% vs 9.8%, OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.3-7.9, ) [185].

More importantly, a recent article by Youssef et al., who investigated a small series of normal and G6PD-deficient subjects with COVID-19, highlighted a reduced survival rate among G6PD-deficient patients compared to normal ones; the deficient patients also presented more severe pneumonia (lower ratio of partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired, more days on mechanical ventilation, lower hematocrit, and hemoglobin levels) [186]. The authors concluded that G6PD deficiency may enhance viral proliferation and induce an uncontrolled hyperinflammatory response owing to the severe redox imbalance. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may develop acute pulmonary hypertension: a recent work by Varghese et al., using a line of mice with 10% reduction in G6PD activity, showed that the enzyme deficiency induces hemoglobin release and activation of various signaling pathways that decrease GSH/GSSG ratio and increases nitration in the lungs leading to a phenotype of pulmonary hypertension [187]. Hence, several clinical conditions, not only CVD, could potentially benefit from interventional approaches based on increasing G6PD activity [185].

9. Conclusion

The role of G6PD deficiency as a protective factor against atherosclerosis and CVD occurrence has been debated over the years. In this review, we summarized the evidence available concerning this issue, with a focus on the recent experimental findings that offer new molecular insights. The results are still conflicting, especially regarding the pro- or anti-inflammatory effect of G6PD deficiency. Although the development of new animal models, which are more similar to the human G6PD mutations, may shed light on the overall effect of G6PD deficiency on the cardiovascular system, the findings obtained in these models cannot always be translated to humans. Throughout their long evolutionary history, human beings have developed molecular mechanisms and cellular mediators more complex than those of lower mammals. The awareness of this diversity recommends a cautious interpretation before generalizing the results obtained in animal models. The dominant paradigm of a protective effect of the enzyme deficiency was based on the results obtained in erythrocytes and leukocytes, without considering that G6PD deficiency may have a different impact in endothelial and vascular muscle cells, which are deeply involved in atherogenesis. The G6PD remains a key enzyme in antioxidant defense and possesses a broader protective role in several tissues and organs irrespective of providing reducing equivalents. Since G6PD plays an essential role in modulating the vascular redox state, the deficiency may result in vascular dysfunction which is crucial for the onset and progression of the atherosclerotic process.

Data Availability

Not Applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

M.P.D., G.P., M.P., and G.M.P. were responsible for conceptualization. M.P.D. and G.M.P. contributed in formal analysis. M.P.D. and G.M.P. contributed in investigation. M.P.D., G.P., M.P., and G.M.P. contributed in writing, review, and editing. G.M.P. contributed in visualization. M.P.D. was responsible for supervision. M.P.D. and G.M.P. were responsible for project administration. M.P.D. was responsible for funding acquisition.

References

R. Ross, “Atherosclerosis — An inflammatory disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 1999.

GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators, “Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013,” The Lancet, vol. 385, pp. 117–171, 2015.

E. J. Benjamin, P. Muntner, A. Alonso et al., “Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 139, no. 10, pp. e56–e528, 2019.

J. F. Bentzon, F. Otsuka, R. Virmani, and E. Falk, “Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture,” Circulation Research, vol. 114, no. 12, pp. 1852–1866, 2014.

B. Emini Veseli, P. Perrotta, G. R. A. de Meyer et al., “Animal models of atherosclerosis,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 816, pp. 3–13, 2017.

A. Hafiane, “Vulnerable plaque, characteristics, detection, and potential therapies,” Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 26, 2019.

W. K. Long, S. W. Wilson, and E. P. Frenkel, “Associations between red cell glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase variants and vascular diseases,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 35–53, 1967.

P. Cocco, P. Todde, S. Fornera, M. B. Manca, P. Manca, and A. R. Sias, “Mortality in a cohort of men expressing the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” Blood, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 706–709, 1998.

S. Muntoni, B. Batetta, S. Dessi, S. Muntoni, and P. Pani, “Serum lipoprotein profile in the Mediterranean variant of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 8, no. S1, pp. 48–53, 1992.

L. Meloni, M. R. Manca, I. Loddo et al., “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency protects against coronary heart disease,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Diseases, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 412–417, 2008.

R. Matsui, S. Xu, K. A. Maitland et al., “Glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency decreases the vascular response to angiotensin II,” Circulation, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 257–263, 2005.

R. Matsui, S. Xu, K. A. Maitland et al., “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency decreases vascular superoxide and atherosclerotic lesions in apolipoprotein E-/- mice,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 910–916, 2006.

A. Kitagawa, I. Kizub, C. Jacob et al., “CRISPR-mediated single nucleotide polymorphism modeling in rats reveals insight into reduced cardiovascular risk associated with MediterraneanG6PDVariant,” Hypertension, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 523–532, 2020.

P. A. Hecker, J. A. Leopold, S. A. Gupte, F. A. Recchia, and W. C. Stanley, “Impact of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency on the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 304, no. 4, pp. H491–H500, 2013.

J. E. Thomas, S. Kang, C. J. Wyatt, F. S. Kim, A. D. Mangelsdorff, and F. K. Weigel, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency is associated with cardiovascular disease in U.S. military centers,” Texas Heart Institute Journal, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 144–150, 2018.

J. Zhao, X. Zhang, T. Guan et al., “The association between glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and abnormal blood pressure among prepregnant reproductive-age Chinese females,” Hypertension Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2019.

G. M. Pes, G. Parodi, and M. P. Dore, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and risk of cardiovascular disease: a propensity score-matched study,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 282, pp. 148–153, 2019.

Z. Ou, Y. Chen, J. Li et al., “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and stroke outcomes,” Neurology, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. e1471–e1478, 2020.

A. Stincone, A. Prigione, T. Cramer et al., “The return of metabolism: biochemistry and physiology of the pentose phosphate pathway,” Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 927–963, 2015.

D. B. Jump, “Mammalian fatty acid elongases,” in Lipidomics, D. Armstrong, Ed., vol. 579 of Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), pp. 375–389, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2009.

J. Shen, G. Wu, A.-L. Tsai, and M. Zhou, “Structure and mechanism of a Unique Diiron Center in mammalian stearoyl-CoA desaturase,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 432, no. 18, pp. 5152–5161, 2020.

M. D. Siperstein, I. L. Chaikoff, and S. S. Chernick, “Significance of endogenous cholesterol in arteriosclerosis: synthesis in arterial tissue,” Science, vol. 113, no. 2948, pp. 747–749, 1951.

J. L. Omdahl, H. A. Morris, and B. K. May, “Hydroxylaseenzymes of THEVITAMIND pathway: expression, function, and regulation,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 139–166, 2002.

D. S. Riddick, X. Ding, C. R. Wolf et al., “NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase: roles in physiology, pharmacology, and toxicology,” Drug Metabolism & Disposition, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2013.

D. C. Thomas, “The phagocyte respiratory burst: Historical perspectives and recent advances,” Immunology Letters, vol. 192, pp. 88–96, 2017.

B. Childs, W. Zinkham, E. A. Browne, E. L. Kimbro, and J. V. Torbert, “A genetic study of a defect in glutathione metabolism of the erythrocyte,” Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 21–37, 1958.

T. Takizawa, I.-Y. Huang, T. Ikuta, and A. Yoshida, “Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: primary structure and cDNA cloning,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 83, no. 12, pp. 4157–4161, 1986.

G. Martini, D. Toniolo, T. Vulliamy et al., “Structural analysis of the X-linked gene encoding human glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase,” EMBO Journal, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1849–1855, 1986.

M. D. Cappellini and G. Fiorelli, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” The Lancet, vol. 371, no. 9606, pp. 64–74, 2008.

E. Y. Chen, A. Cheng, A. Lee et al., “Sequence of human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase cloned in plasmids and a yeast artificial chromosome,” Genomics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 792–800, 1991.

J. A. Leopold, A. Dam, B. A. Maron et al., “Aldosterone impairs vascular reactivity by decreasing glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity,” Nature Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 189–197, 2007.

T. A. Gheita, S. A. Kenawy, R. W. el Sisi, H. A. Gheita, and H. Khalil, “Subclinical reduced G6PD activity in rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's Syndrome patients: relation to clinical characteristics, disease activity and metabolic syndrome,” Modern Rheumatology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 612–617, 2014.

D. Laertius, Lives of eminent philosophers, R. D. Hicks, Ed., Oxford University Press, II edition, 2018.

J. Bostock and H. T. Riley, The natural history of Pliny, Alpha Editions, 2019.

D. I. Montasser, Y. Zajjari, A. Alayoud et al., “Acute renal failure in favism revealing familial glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” Indian Journal of Nephrology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 67-68, 2012.

E. Beutler, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a historical perspective,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2008.

L. Luzzatto and R. Notaro, “Malaria: protecting against bad air,” Science, vol. 293, no. 5529, pp. 442-443, 2001.

Z. Spolarics, M. Siddiqi, J. H. Siegel et al., “Increased incidence of sepsis and altered monocyte functions in severely injured type A– glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient African American trauma patients,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 728–736, 2001.

A. Ohlsson, K. Rehnholm, K. Shubham, and U. von Döbeln, “Incidence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency among Swedish newborn infants,” International Journal of Neonatal Screening, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 38, 2019.

E. C. Mbanefo, A. M. Ahmed, A. Titouna et al., “Association of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 45963, 2017.

E. Atay, A. Bozaykut, and I. O. Ipek, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in neonatal indirect hyperbilirubinemia,” Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 56–58, 2006.

L. Luzzatto, A. Mehta, and T. Vulliamy, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” in The metabolic basis of inherited disease, C. R. Scriver, A. L. Beaudet, and W. S. Sly, Eds., vol. 3, pp. 4517–4553, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2001.

K. Betke, E. Beutler, G. H. Brewer et al., Standardization of procedures for the study of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Report of a WHO scientific group, WHO Technical Report Series, 1967.

E. T. Nkhoma, C. Poole, V. Vannappagari, S. A. Hall, and E. Beutler, “The global prevalence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Blood Cells, Molecules and Diseases, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 267–278, 2009.

L. Luzzatto and G. Battistuzzi, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase,” in Advances in Human Genetics, H. Harris and K. Hirschhorn, Eds., vol. 14, pp. 217–329, Springer, Boston, MA, 1985.

J. A. Leopold, A. Cap, A. W. Scribner, R. C. Stanton, and J. Loscalzo, “Glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency promotes endothelial oxidant stress and decreases endothelial nitric oxide bioavailability,” FASEB Journal, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1771–1773, 2001.

A. V. Snezhkina, A. V. Kudryavtseva, O. L. Kardymon et al., “ROS generation and antioxidant defense systems in normal and malignant cells,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2019, Article ID 6175804, 17 pages, 2019.

C. Peiró, T. Romacho, V. Azcutia et al., “Inflammation, glucose, and vascular cell damage: the role of the pentose phosphate pathway,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 15, no. 1, 2016.

D. K. Rawat, P. Hecker, M. Watanabe et al., “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and NADPH redox regulates cardiac myocyte L-type calcium channel activity and myocardial contractile function,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 10, article e45365, 2012.

J. Park, H. K. Rho, K. H. Kim, S. S. Choe, Y. S. Lee, and J. B. Kim, “Overexpression of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase is associated with lipid dysregulation and insulin resistance in obesity,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 5146–5157, 2005.

M. Ham, J. W. Lee, A. H. Choi et al., “Macrophage glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase stimulates proinflammatory responses with oxidative stress,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2425–2435, 2013.

Z. Zhang, Z. Yang, B. Zhu et al., “Increasing glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity restores redox balance in vascular endothelial cells exposed to high glucose,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 11, article e49128, 2012.

L. Cao, D. Zhang, J. Chen et al., “G6PD plays a neuroprotective role in brain ischemia through promoting pentose phosphate pathway,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 112, pp. 433–444, 2017.

J. A. Leopold, Y. Y. Zhang, A. W. Scribner, R. C. Stanton, and J. Loscalzo, “Glucose-6-Phosphate dehydrogenase overexpression decreases endothelial cell oxidant stress and increases bioavailable nitric oxide,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 411–417, 2003.

J. A. Leopold, J. Walker, A. W. Scribner et al., “Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Modulates Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-mediated Angiogenesis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 34, pp. 32100–32106, 2003.

S. K. Legan, I. Rebrin, R. J. Mockett et al., “Overexpression of Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Extends the Life Span of Drosophila melanogaster,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 47, pp. 32492–32499, 2008.

S. Nóbrega-Pereira, P. J. Fernandez-Marcos, T. Brioche et al., “G6PD protects from oxidative damage and improves healthspan in mice,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, article 10894, 2016.

M. Kurata, M. Suzuki, and N. Agar, “Glutathione regeneration in mammalian erythrocytes,” Comparative Hematology International, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 59–67, 2000.

S. C. Lu, “Regulation of glutathione synthesis,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 42–59, 2009.

D. Giustarini, D. Tsikas, G. Colombo et al., “Pitfalls in the analysis of the physiological antioxidant glutathione (GSH) and its disulfide (GSSG) in biological samples: an elephant in the room,” Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, vol. 1019, pp. 21–28, 2016.

C. Espinosa-Díez, V. Miguel, S. Vallejo et al., “Role of glutathione biosynthesis in endothelial dysfunction and fibrosis,” Redox Biology, vol. 14, pp. 88–99, 2018.

W. Pretsch, D. J. Charles, and S. Merkle, “X-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency inMus musculus,” Biochemical Genetics, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 89–103, 1988.

M. Jain, L. Cui, D. A. Brenner et al., “Increased myocardial dysfunction after ischemia-reperfusion in mice lacking glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase,” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 898–903, 2004.

I. Németh, H. Orvos, and D. Boda, “Blood glutathione redox status in gestational hypertension,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 715–721, 2001.

I. Afzal-Ahmed, G. E. Mann, A. H. Shennan, L. Poston, and R. J. Naftalin, “Preeclampsia inactivates glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and impairs the redox status of erythrocytes and fetal endothelial cells,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1781–1790, 2007.

R. M. Fitch, R. Vergona, M. E. Sullivan, and Y. X. Wang, “Nitric oxide synthase inhibition increases aortic stiffness measured by pulse wave velocity in rats,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 351–358, 2001.

I. B. Wilkinson, S. S. Franklin, and J. R. Cockcroft, “Nitric oxide and the regulation of large artery Stiffness,” Hypertension, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 112–116, 2004.

J. W. Knowles, R. L. Reddick, J. C. Jennette, E. G. Shesely, O. Smithies, and N. Maeda, “Enhanced atherosclerosis and kidney dysfunction in eNOS–/–Apoe–/– mice are ameliorated by enalapril treatment,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 451–458, 2000.

S. L. Wiesenfeld, N. L. Petrakis, B. J. Sams, M. F. Collen, and J. L. Cutler, “Elevated blood pressure, pulse rate and serum creatinine in negro males deficient in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 282, no. 18, pp. 1001-1002, 1970.

S. Oppi, T. F. Lüscher, and S. Stein, “Mouse models for atherosclerosis research-which is my line?” Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 6, p. 46, 2019.

C. M. Brown, E. Wright, C. A. Colton, P. M. Sullivan, D. T. Laskowitz, and M. P. Vitek, “Apolipoprotein E isoform mediated regulation of nitric oxide release1, 2,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1071–1075, 2002.

N. Hogg, B. Kalyanaraman, J. Joseph, A. Struck, and S. Parthasarathy, “Inhibition of low-density lipoprotein oxidation by nitric oxide Potential role in atherogenesis,” FEBS Letters, vol. 334, no. 2, pp. 170–174, 1993.

D. Wolf and K. Le, “Immunity and inflammation in atherosclerosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 315–327, 2019.

J. Wilmanski, E. Villanueva, E. A. Deitcha, and Z. Spolarics, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and the inflammatory response to endotoxin and polymicrobial sepsis,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 510–518, 2007.

H. C. Yang, M. L. Cheng, Y. S. Hua et al., “Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase knockdown enhances IL-8 expression in HepG2 cells via oxidative stress and NF-κB signaling pathway,” Journal of Inflammation, vol. 12, no. 1, 2015.

R. Parsanathan and S. K. Jain, “L-Cysteine in vitro can restore cellular glutathione and inhibits the expression of cell adhesion molecules in G6PD-deficient monocytes,” Amino Acids, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 909–921, 2018.

R. Parsanathan and S. K. Jain, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency increases cell adhesion molecules and activates human monocyte-endothelial cell adhesion: Protective role of l-cysteine,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 663, pp. 11–21, 2019.

R. Parsanathan and S. K. Jain, “G6PD deficiency shifts polarization of monocytes/macrophages towards a proinflammatory and profibrotic phenotype,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 770–772, 2021.

B. Wolach, M. Ashkenazi, R. Grossmann et al., “Diurnal fluctuation of leukocyte G6PD activity. A possible explanation for the normal neutrophil bactericidal activity and the low incidence of pyogenic infections in patients with severe G6PD deficiency in Israel,” Pediatric Research, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 807–813, 2004.

D. Kwiatkowski, “Science, medicine, and the future: susceptibility to infection,” British Medical Journal, vol. 321, no. 7268, pp. 1061–1065, 2000.

Z. Rostami-Far, K. Ghadiri, M. Rostami-Far, F. Shaveisi-Zadeh, A. Amiri, and B. Rahimian Zarif, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD) as a risk factor of male neonatal sepsis,” The Journal of Medicine and Life, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 34–38, 2016.

U. Siler, S. Romao, E. Tejera et al., “Severe glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency leads to susceptibility to infection and absent NETosis,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 212–219.e3, 2017.

S. Zamani, A. Z. Hoseini, and A. M. Namin, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity can modulate macrophage response to Leishmania major infection,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 69, pp. 178–183, 2019.

A. Peretz, M. Azrad, and A. Blum, “Influenza virus and atherosclerosis,” QJM, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 749–755, 2019.

D. J. Vick, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and COVID-19 infection,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 1803-1804, 2020.

J. C. Kwong, K. L. Schwartz, M. A. Campitelli et al., “Acute myocardial infarction after laboratory-confirmed influenza infection,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 378, no. 4, pp. 345–353, 2018.

Y. Xu, Z. Zhang, and J. Hu, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient mice have increased renal oxidative stress and increased albuminuria,” FASEB Journal, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 609–616, 2010.

G. Balla, H. S. Jacob, J. W. Eaton, J. D. Belcher, and G. M. Vercellotti, “Hemin: a possible physiological mediator of low density lipoprotein oxidation and endothelial injury,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1700–1711, 1991.

J. D. Belcher, J. D. Beckman, G. Balla, J. Balla, and G. Vercellotti, “Heme degradation and vascular injury,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 233–248, 2010.

A. M. Liese, M. Q. Siddiqi, J. H. Siegel, E. A. Deitch, and Z. Spolarics, “Attenuated monocyte IL-10 production in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient trauma patients,” Shock, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2002.

B. Mordmuller, F. Turrini, H. Long, P. G. Kremsner, and P. Arese, “Neutrophils and monocytes from subjects with the Mediterranean G6PD variant: effect of plasmodium falciparum hemozoin on G6PD activity, oxidative burst and cytokine production,” European Cytokine Network, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 239–245, 1998.

J. Wilmanski, M. Siddiqi, E. A. Deitch, and Z. Spolarics, “Augmented IL-10 production and redox-dependent signaling pathways in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient mouse peritoneal macrophages,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 85–94, 2005.

E. S. Istvan and J. Deisenhofer, “Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase,” Science, vol. 292, no. 5519, pp. 1160–1164, 2001.

P. A. Hecker, V. Lionetti, R. F. Ribeiro et al., “Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency increases redox stress and moderately accelerates the development of heart failure,” Circulation: Heart Failure, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 118–126, 2013.

A. R. Tarlov, G. J. Brewer, P. E. Carson, and A. S. Alving, “Primaquine sensitivity,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 209–234, 1962.

B. Batetta, R. R. Bonatesta, F. Sanna et al., “Cell growth and cholesterol metabolism in human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficient lymphomononuclear cells,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 143–154, 2002.

G. Cappai, M. Songini, A. Doria, J. D. Cavallerano, and M. Lorenzi, “Increased prevalence of proliferative retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes who are deficient in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase,” Diabetologia, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1539–1542, 2011.

A. Pinna, C. Carru, G. Solinas, A. Zinellu, and F. Carta, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in retinal vein occlusion,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 2747–2752, 2007.

A. Pinna, G. Solinas, C. Masia, A. Zinellu, C. Carru, and A. Carta, “Glucose-6-Phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in a Sardinian population, Italy,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1328–1332, 2008.

A. Cao, R. Galanello, M. Furbetta et al., “Thalassaemia types and their incidence in Sardinia,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 443–447, 1978.

M. Maioli, S. Pettinato, G. M. Cherchi et al., “Plasma lipids in beta-thalassemia minor,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 75, no. 2-3, pp. 245–248, 1989.

S. M. Seyedian, F. Ahmadi, P. Ghorbani, S. M. H. Adeland, and S. M. H. Aletayeb, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and coronary artery disease,” International Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 186–188, 2016.

M. K. Kwok, G. M. Leung, S. L. A. Yeung, and C. M. Schooling, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and metabolic profiling in adolescence from the Chinese birth cohort: ‘children of 1997’,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 281, pp. 146–149, 2019.

T. Ge, J. Yang, S. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y. Li, and X. Tong, “The role of the pentose phosphate pathway in diabetes and cancer,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 11, p. 365, 2020.

M. B. Adinortey, R. K. Owusu, I. K. A. Galyuon, W. Ekloh, I. N. Owusu, and D. Larbi, “G-6-PD deficiency - a potential risk factor for development of diabetes mellitus,” Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1017–1021, 2011.

Y. K. Lai, N. M. Lai, and S. W. Lee, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and risk of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 839–845, 2017.

N. Saha, “Association of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency with diabetes mellitus in ethnic groups of Singapore,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 431–434, 1979.

M. A. M. Brito, V. S. Sampaio, W. M. Monteiro et al., “High frequency of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in the Western brazilian Amazon,” American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 74–76, 2014.

G. A. Niazi, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and diabetes mellitus,” International Journal of Hematology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 295–298, 1991.

N. Li, B. Li, T. Brun et al., “NADPH oxidase NOX2 defines a new antagonistic role for reactive oxygen species and cAMP/PKA in the regulation of insulin secretion,” Diabetes, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 2842–2850, 2012.

P. Spégel, V. V. Sharoyko, I. Goehring et al., “Time-resolved metabolomics analysis of β-cells implicates the pentose phosphate pathway in the control of insulin release,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 450, no. 3, pp. 595–605, 2013.

Z. Zhang, C. W. Liew, D. E. Handy et al., “High glucose inhibits glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, leading to increased oxidative stress and beta-cell apoptosis,” FASEB Journal, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1497–1505, 2010.

S. Monte Alegre, S. T. Saad, E. Delatre, and M. J. Saad, “Insulin secretion in patients deficient in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 171–173, 1991.

J. W. Lee, A. H. Choi, M. Ham et al., “G6PD up-regulation promotes pancreatic β-Cell dysfunction,” Endocrinology, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 793–803, 2011.

E. Sobngwi, J. F. Gautier, J. P. Kevorkian et al., “High prevalence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency without gene mutation suggests a novel genetic mechanism predisposing to ketosis-prone diabetes,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 4446–4451, 2005.

A. Leong, V. J. Y. Lim, and C. Wang, “Association of G6PD variants with hemoglobin A1c and impact on diabetes diagnosis in East Asian individuals,” BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, vol. 8, no. 1, article e001091, 2020.

S. K. Jain, “Glutathione and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency can increase protein glycosylation,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 197–201, 1998.

S. K. Jain and M. Palmer, “Effect of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency on reduced and oxidized glutathione and lipid peroxide levels in the blood of African-Americans,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 253, no. 1-2, pp. 181–183, 1996.

R. Parsanathan and S. K. Jain, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency activates endothelial cell and leukocyte adhesion mediated via the TGFβ/NADPH oxidases/ROS signaling pathway,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 20, article 7474, 2020.

R. Parsanathan and S. K. Jain, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is linked with cardiovascular disease,” Hypertension Research, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 582–584, 2020.

G. Battistuzzi, M. D'Urso, D. Toniolo, G. M. Persico, and L. Luzzatto, “Tissue-specific levels of human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase correlate with methylation of specific sites at the 3' end of the gene,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1465–1469, 1985.

F. Corpas and J. B. Barroso, “NADPH-generating dehydrogenases: their role in the mechanism of protection against nitro-oxidative stress induced by adverse environmental conditions,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 2, 2014.

L. A. Metherell, J. A. Guerra-Assunção, M. J. Sternberg, and A. David, “Three‐dimensional model of human nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (NNT) and sequence‐structure analysis of its disease‐causing variations,” Human Mutation, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1074–1084, 2016.

H. J. Koh, S. M. Lee, B. G. Son et al., “Cytosolic NADP⁺-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase plays a key role in lipid metabolism,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 38, pp. 39968–39974, 2004.

L. Chen, Z. Zhang, A. Hoshino et al., “NADPH production by the oxidative pentose-phosphate pathway supports folate metabolism,” Nature Metabolism, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 404–415, 2019.

P. Durand, M. Prost, and D. Blache, “Folate deficiencies and cardiovascular pathologies,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 419–429, 1998.

M. R. Clemens, H. Einsele, and H. D. Waller, “The fatty acid composition of red cells deficient in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and their susceptibility to lipid peroxidation,” Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 63, no. 13, pp. 578–582, 1985.

D. L. Hodge and L. M. Salati, “Nutritional regulation of the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene is mediated by a nuclear posttranscriptional mechanism,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 348, no. 2, pp. 303–312, 1997.

K. Hashizume, T. Onaya, and A. Sato, “The role of the pentose phosphate shunt in thyrotropin-induced thyroid hormone secretion:in vivoandin vitrostudies with 6-aminonicotinamide in mouse thyroids,” Endocrinology, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 962–968, 1975.

M. von Hafe, J. S. Neves, C. Vale, M. Borges-Canha, and A. Leite-Moreira, “The impact of thyroid hormone dysfunction on ischemic heart disease,” Endocrine Connections, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. R76–R90, 2019.

K. I. Ataga, “Hypercoagulability and thrombotic complications in hemolytic anemias,” Haematologica, vol. 94, no. 11, pp. 1481–1484, 2009.

F. M. Low, M. B. Hampton, and C. C. Winterbourn, “Peroxiredoxin 2 and peroxide metabolism in the erythrocyte,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1621–1630, 2008.

L. Luzzatto and P. Arese, “Favism and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 378, no. 1, pp. 60–71, 2018.

W. Tillmann, M. Gahr, N. Labitzke, and W. Schröter, “Membrane deformability of erythrocytes with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase,” Acta Haematologica, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 162–167, 1977.

D. T. Chiu and T. Z. Liu, “Free radical and oxidative damage in human blood cells,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 256–259, 1997.

D. C. McMillan, L. J. Bolchoz, and D. J. Jollow, “Favism: effect of divicine on rat erythrocyte sulfhydryl status, hexose monophosphate shunt activity, morphology, and membrane skeletal proteins,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 353–359, 2001.

M. D. Cappellini, “Coagulation in the pathophysiology of hemolytic anemias,” Hematology, pp. 74–78, 2007.

V. L. Tzounakas, F. Gevi, H. T. Georgatzakou et al., “Redox status, procoagulant activity, and metabolome of fresh frozen plasma in glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 5, p. 16, 2018.

C. Donadee, N. J. Raat, T. Kanias et al., “Nitric oxide scavenging by red blood cell microparticles and cell-free hemoglobin as a mechanism for the red cell storage lesion,” Circulation, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 465–476, 2011.

Y. Y. Chirkov, N. N. Belushkina, I. A. Tyshchuk, I. S. Severina, and J. D. Horowitz, “Increase in reactivity of human platelet guanylate cyclase during aggregation potentiates the disaggregating capacity of sodium nitroprusside,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 517–524, 1991.

Z. M. Ezz El-Deen, N. F. Hussin, T. A. Abdel Hamid, O. R. Abdel Migeed, and R. M. Samy, “G6PD deficiency and G6PD (Mediterranean and silent) polymorphisms in Egyptian infants with neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia,” Laboratory Medicine, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 228–234, 2013.

B. Ramot, A. Szeinberg, A. Adam, C. Sheba, and D. Gafni, “A study of subjects with erythrocyte glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: investigation of platelet enzymes,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1659–1661, 1959.

J. C. Doery, J. Hirsh, and G. C. de Gruchy, “Erythrocyte and platelet glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase in normal and mutant Caucasians,” Scandinavian Journal of Haematology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 1969.

D. Nantakomol, A. Palasuwan, M. Chaowanathikhom, S. Soogarun, and M. Imwong, “Red cell and platelet-derived microparticles are increased in G6PD-deficient subjects,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 423–429, 2012.

E. Noulsri, S. Lerdwana, D. Palasuwan, and A. Palasuwan, “Cell-derived microparticles in blood products from blood donors deficient in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase,” Laboratory Medicine, vol. 7, 2021.

C. L'Acqua and E. Hod, “New perspectives on the thrombotic complications of haemolysis,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 175–185, 2015.

P. A. Thompson, E. Chew, and J. Szer, “Deep vein thrombosis in association with acute intravascular haemolysis in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a unique case,” Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1164-1165, 2013.

J. Albertsen, H. B. Ommen, A. Wandler, and K. Munk, “Fatal haemolytic crisis with microvascular pulmonary obstruction mimicking a pulmonary embolism in a young African man with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2014, 2014.

K. Jain, T. Tyagi, K. Patell et al., “Age associated non-linear regulation of redox homeostasis in the anucleate platelet: Implications for CVD risk patients,” EBioMedicine, vol. 44, pp. 28–40, 2019.

M. P. Dore, M. Portoghese, and G. M. Pes, “The Elderly with Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency Are More Susceptible to Cardiovascular Disease,” Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 28, no. 6, 2021.

D. Mari, P. M. Mannucci, R. Coppola, B. Bottasso, K. A. Bauer, and R. D. Rosenberg, “Hypercoagulability in centenarians: the paradox of successful aging,” Blood, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 3144–3149, 1995.

B. Ibanez, S. James, S. Agewall et al., “2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC),” European Heart Journal, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 119–177, 2018.

O. Shalev, “Long-term, low-dose aspirin is safe in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” DICP, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1074-1075, 1991.

N. V. Kafkas, C. I. Liakos, and A. G. Mouzarou, “Antiplatelet and invasive treatment in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency and acute coronary syndrome. The safety of aspirin,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 349–352, 2015.

E. Beutler, “Glucose-6-Phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 324, no. 3, pp. 169–174, 1991.

M. Zuin, G. Rigatelli, M. Carraro et al., “Antiplatelet therapy in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenases deficiency after percutaneous coronary intervention: a reappraisal for clinical and interventional cardiologists,” Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 226–229, 2017.

J. Li, Y. Chen, Z. Ou et al., “Aspirin therapy in cardiovascular disease with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, safe or not?” American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2020.

G. D. Sanna, S. Deriu, M. Uras et al., “Aspirin adherence in subjects with glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase deficiency having an acute coronary syndrome,” European Heart Journal-Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, 2020.

Y. Chen, J. Li, Z. Ou et al., “Safety and efficacy of low-dose aspirin in ischemic stroke patients with different G6PD conditions,” International Journal of Stroke, 2020.

K. Bedard, B. Lardy, and K. Krause, “NOX family NADPH oxidases: not just in mammals,” Biochimie, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 1107–1112, 2007.

T. Efferth, U. Fabry, and R. Osieka, “DNA damage and apoptosis in mononuclear cells from glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient patients (G6PD Aachen variant) after UV irradiation,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 340–342, 2001.

X. Li, X. Sun, and P. Carmeliet, “Hallmarks of endothelial cell metabolism in health and disease,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 414–433, 2019.

D. M. Townsend, “S-Glutathionylation: indicator of cell stress and regulator of the unfolded protein response,” Molecular Interventions, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 313–324, 2007.

M. A. Forgione, J. Loscalzo, M. Holbrook et al., “The A376G(A+) variant of the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene is associated with endothelial dysfunction in African Americans,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 41, no. 6, p. 249, 2003.

M. Jain, D. A. Brenner, L. Cui et al., “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase modulates cytosolic redox status and contractile phenotype in adult cardiomyocytes,” Circulation Research, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. e9–16, 2003.

M. Drent, A. P. Gorgels, and A. Bast, “Cardiac failure associated with G6PD deficiency,” Circulation Research, vol. 93, no. 8, p. e75, 2003.

R. Katare, A. Caporali, C. Emanueli, and P. Madeddu, “Benfotiamine improves functional recovery of the infarcted heart via activation of pro-survival G6PD/Akt signaling pathway and modulation of neurohormonal response,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 625–638, 2010.

A. Misra, Z. Feng, R. R. Chandran et al., “Integrin beta3 regulates clonality and fate of smooth muscle-derived atherosclerotic plaque cells,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, article 2073, 2018.

R. S. Gupte, H. Ata, D. Rawat et al., “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase is a regulator of vascular smooth muscle contraction,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 543–558, 2011.

H. Ata, D. K. Rawat, T. Lincoln, and S. A. Gupte, “Mechanism of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-mediated regulation of coronary artery contractility,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 300, no. 6, pp. H2054–H2063, 2011.

J. Park, S. S. Choe, A. H. Choi et al., “Increase in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in adipocytes stimulates oxidative stress and inflammatory signals,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 2939–2949, 2006.

L. M. Salati and B. Amir-Ahmady, “Dietary regulation of expression of glucose-6-phosphated dehydrogenase,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 121–140, 2001.

T. Takamura, H. Misu, N. Matsuzawa-Nagata et al., “Obesity upregulates genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation in livers of diabetic patients,” Obesity, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2601–2609, 2008.

M. Ham, S. S. Choe, K. C. Shin et al., “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency improves insulin resistance with reduced adipose tissue inflammation in obesity,” Diabetes, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 2624–2638, 2016.

C. J. Brewer, A. R. Tarlov, and A. S. Alving, “The methemoglobin reduction test for primaquine-type sensitivity of erythrocytes,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 386–388, 1962.

S. Sanpavat, I. Nuchprayoon, A. Kittikalayawong, and W. Ungbumnet, “The value of methemoglobin reduction test as a screening test for neonatal glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, vol. 84, Supplement 1, pp. S91–S98, 2001.

L. Thielemans, G. Gornsawun, B. Hanboonkunupakarn et al., “Diagnostic performances of the fluorescent spot test for G6PD deficiency in newborns along the Thailand-Myanmar border: a cohort study,” Wellcome Open Research, vol. 3, article 1, 2018.

Y. Arai, “G6PD deficiency: a possible cardiovascular risk factor in older people,” Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, 2020.

A. Hellani, S. Al-Akoum, and K. K. Abu-Amero, “G6PD Mediterranean S188F codon mutation is common among Saudi sickle cell patients and increases the risk of stroke,” Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 449–452, 2009.

D. C. Hadorn, D. Baker, J. S. Hodges, and N. Hicks, “Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 749–754, 1996.

B. D. Jamerson, T. H. Haryadi, and A. Bohannon, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: an actionable risk factor for patients with COVID-19?” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 743-744, 2020.

S. K. Jain, R. Parsanathan, S. N. Levine, J. A. Bocchini, M. F. Holick, and J. A. Vanchiere, “The potential link between inherited G6PD deficiency, oxidative stress, and vitamin D deficiency and the racial inequities in mortality associated with COVID-19,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 161, pp. 84–91, 2020.

D. Aydemir, G. Dağlıoğlu, A. Candevir et al., “COVID-19 may enhance risk of thrombosis and hemolysis in the G6PD deficient patients,” Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, pp. 1–12, 2021.

Y. Buinitskaya, R. Gurinovich, C. G. Wlodaver, and S. Kastsiuchenka, “Centrality of G6PD in COVID-19: the biochemical rationale and clinical implications,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 7, article 584112, 2020.

R. Littera, M. Campagna, S. Deidda et al., “Human leukocyte antigen complex and other immunogenetic and clinical factors influence susceptibility or protection to SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity of the disease course. The Sardinian Experience,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 11, article 605688, 2020.

J. G. Youssef, F. Zahiruddin, G. Youssef et al., “G6PD deficiency and severity of COVID19 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome: tip of the iceberg?” Annals of Hematology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 667–673, 2021.

M. V. Varghese, J. James, O. Rafikova, and R. Rafikov, “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency contributes to metabolic abnormality and pulmonary hypertension,” American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular, vol. 320, no. 4, pp. L508–L521, 2021.