Occupational Therapy International
Volume 2021 (2021), Article ID 6666203, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6666203

Research Article

Selection of Comprehensive Assessment Categories Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health for Elderly Patients with Heart Failure: A Delphi Survey among Registered Instructors of Cardiac Rehabilitation

Shigehito Shiota,1,2 Makiko Naka,¹ Toshiro Kitagawa,1,3 Takayuki Hidaka,1,3 Naoki Mio,1,2 Kana Kanai,1,2 Mariko Mochizuki,⁴ Hiroaki Kimura,1,5 and Yasuki Kihara1,6

¹Heart Failure Center, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
²Department of Rehabilitation, Division of Clinical Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
³Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
⁴Hiroshima Integrated Community Care System Promotion Center, Hiroshima, Japan
⁵Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
⁶Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Shigehito Shiota; sshiota@hiroshima-u.ac.jp

Received 9 November 2020; Accepted 15 June 2021; Published 28 June 2021

Academic Editor: Claudia Hilton

Copyright © 2021 Shigehito Shiota et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The development of a comprehensive assessment tool based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) for elderly patients with heart failure is urgently required. In this study, we classified the ICF categories relevant to heart failure in the elderly through a Delphi survey (3-step questionnaire survey) of 108 Registered Instructors of Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Hiroshima Prefecture. Questionnaires were conducted using postal mail or a web-based platform. The survey was conducted three times, and the survey results were provided as feedback to the participants in the second and third rounds. More than 80% of the respondents selected categories according to the ICF core set methodology. Data were collected from December 2018 to March 2019, with 67, 54, and 46 participants in the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. A total of 58 ICF items were adopted based on the results: 27 body function items, 4 body structure items, 20 activity and participation items, and 7 environmental factor items. This study is characterised by the inclusion of a large number of ICF items for mental function. This result seems to be influenced by the increasing interest in cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with heart failure. The ICF categories selected for this study allow for a comprehensive assessment of clients for occupational therapy. The findings of this study are expected to provide a basis for an outcome measure to determine the effectiveness of occupational therapy for these patients.

1. Introduction

The elderly population with heart failure is increasing globally with the increase in the aging population, and the number of patients with heart failure is estimated to exceed 1.3 million by 2030 in Japan [1]. Previous studies have shown that approximately 35% of patients with heart failure are rehospitalised within 1 year [2]. Many lifestyle-related factors, such as high salt and water intake, poor medication adherence, overwork, and physical and mental stress, are known to exacerbate heart failure [3]. Furthermore, comprehensive factors that are reported to be associated with readmission include physical functioning, such as exercise tolerance [4] and walking speed [5]; mental functioning, such as cognitive functioning [6], depression [7], and anxiety [8]; personality [9], activity and participation, such as activities of daily living [10], instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) [5], and leisure [11]; and social support [12]. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation that is managed by a multidisciplinary team reduces mortality and readmissions in elderly patients with heart failure [13–19]. In Japan, there is a qualifying program for the provision of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation: the Registered Instructors of Cardiac Rehabilitation (RICRs), issued by the Japanese Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation (JACR). The RICRs are accredited by the JACR and consist of doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, management dietitians, pharmacists, and clinical psychologists. As part of the multidisciplinary team, occupational therapists have the responsibility to promote the quality of life and health of elderly patients with heart failure. In multidisciplinary team management, it is important to share not only disease information but also information on functioning, disability, environmental factors, and personal factors based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework [20]. The ICF is a health and health-related framework, published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2001, which classifies human life into approximately 1500 codes. The ICF is strongly relevant from the perspective of occupational therapy. In Japan, the Japanese Association of Occupational Therapists has developed the Management Tool for Daily Life Performance (MTDLP) by utilising the ICF framework and has reported its effect on quality-adjusted life-year improvement for elderly participants in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) [21–23]. In an RCT of patients with cardiovascular disease, Fukui et al. showed that the MTDLP improves depression and IADL [24].

The ICF is an effective tool for the management of occupational therapy for elderly patients with heart failure; however, the ICF has not been used sufficiently in clinical practice in Japan. To address the complexity of the ICF codes, the WHO developed the ICF core set [25], which is a short list of evidence-based ICF categories that reflect the spectrum of typical problems that are experienced by patients with a particular health condition. The ICF core set is a collection of information based on the literature, expert opinion, and empirical information that will be further developed by using information from research and patient qualitative studies. Thus far, several ICF core sets have been developed [26–28]; however, there is no ICF core set that is specific to heart failure in elderly patients. In addition, due to the differences in medical systems in each country, evaluation tools developed in other countries may not be suitable for the Japanese medical and social systems. Therefore, it is necessary to develop assessment tools by using the ICF adapted to the Japanese culture and medical system.

This study was conducted with the aim to collect expert (RICR) opinions to select ICF categories for the comprehensive assessment of elderly patients with heart failure.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

We conducted a prospective questionnaire survey by using the Delphi method to select ICF categories for the comprehensive assessment of elderly patients with heart failure. Three rounds of mail and web-based questionnaires were administered to RICRs in accordance with the Delphi method, which is a structured consensus-building method with four characteristics: anonymity, repetition with controlled feedback, statistical group responses, and input from experts [29–31]. Figure 1 shows a flowchart describing the research process.

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the research process.

2.2. Participants

The study participants were 108 RICRs from the Hiroshima Prefecture. The participants were listed with their names and affiliations on the JACR website and were registered by the Heart Failure Center (HFC).

2.3. Data Collection and Measures

2.3.1. Preparation of the Questionnaire

The ICF checklist is a tool designed for the clinical use of the ICF and consists of a face sheet, listening item assessment, health information, general questions about activity and participation, and guidelines for use. We prepared a questionnaire based on the ICF checklist by following the methodology of the ICF core set [28]. An expert panel comprising multidisciplinary heart failure team members (two cardiologists: T.K. and T.H.; two nurses: M.N. and H.T.; two physiotherapists: K.K. and N.M.; one occupational therapist: S.S.; and one care manager: M.M.) discussed the ICF categories specific to heart failure that were to be added to the ICF checklist. The expert panel members had sufficient experience in medical care and rehabilitation of elderly patients with heart failure. The expert panel conducted round-table and e-mail discussions until they all agreed on the survey items.

2.3.2. Delphi Survey among RICRs

In the first round, we sent general information, instructions, and questionnaires to 108 RICRs. The RICRs responded to the HFC with a selection of ICF categories deemed necessary for intervention in elderly patients with heart failure. The HFC calculated the selection rate of ICF categories.

In the second round, we sent again the same questionnaire as that in the first round to the participants along with the results of the first-round survey. The participants selected the ICF categories relevant to elderly patients with heart failure, and they responded through Google Forms or a reply envelope. The HFC calculated the selection rate of ICF categories.

In the third round, the HFC sent the same questionnaire again along with the results of the second-round survey. Based on the results of the second round, the RICRs selected the ICF categories required for intervention in elderly patients with heart failure. Thus, in this study, three surveys were conducted using the same questionnaire.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We computed the percentage score after a simple tabulation of the collected data. In reference to a previous report [32], we adopted an ICF item as an assessment item if at least 80% of the respondents answered that it was “necessary.”

2.5. Ethical Considerations

This research was approved by the Hiroshima University Epidemiological Research Ethics Review Board (approval number: E-1176). Moreover, we explained to the participants that there were no disadvantages if they did not take part in the surveys, how we would handle their personal information on the survey sheets, and that responding to the survey implied consent for participation in the study.

3. Results

3.1. Preparation of the Questionnaire

The expert panel prepared the questionnaire and added ICF categories specific to heart failure to the ICF checklist. A total of 143 categories were included in the questionnaire—namely, 39 body function categories (categories specific to heart failure: b126, b172, b250, b45, b455, b460, b545, and b740), 18 body structure categories (categories specific to heart failure: s140 and s150), 54 activity and participation categories (categories specific to heart failure: d155, d177, d230, d240, d420, and d855), and 32 environmental factor categories.

3.2. Delphi Survey among RICRs

Data were collected from December 2018 to March 2019. There were 67, 54, and 46 respondents in the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of participants who responded in all Delphi survey rounds. With respect to profession, 56.5% of the participants were physiotherapists, 28.3% were doctors, and 10.9% were occupational therapists. Acute care wards accounted for 71.7% of facilities, followed by the rehabilitation wards and clinics.

Table 1: Characteristics of the participants who answered in all Delphi rounds ().

Characteristics

%

Profession

    Physicians
13
28.3

    Physiotherapists
26
56.5

    Occupational therapists
5
10.9

    Nurses
2
4.3

Type of facilities

    Acute care ward
33
71.7

    Rehabilitation ward
4
8.7

    Clinic
3
6.5

    Long-term care ward
1
2.2

    Visiting nursing station
1
2.2

    Day service center
1
2.2

    Others
3
6.5

Duration of experience of cardiac rehabilitation experts (years)

    1–5
24
52.2

    6–10
18
39.1

    ≥11
4
8.7

Table 2 shows the consensus process for the ICF categories that were selected by more than 80% of participants from the first to the third Delphi rounds. There were 51, 45, and 58 ICF categories with a consensus of ≥80% per component in the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. Therefore, we adopted 27 body function items, 4 body structure items, 20 activity and participation items, and 7 environmental factor items. Tables 3 – 6 present the results for the ICF categories (body function, body structure, activity and participation, and environmental factors) that were selected by ≥50% of participants in the third round; items with ≥80% consensus are shown in bold.

Table 2: The consensus process from the first to the third Delphi rounds.

Characteristics
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3

Number of participants ()
108
67
54

Number of respondents ()
67
54
46

Response rate (%)
62.0
80.6
85.2

ICF categories with a consensus of ≥80% per component

    Components combined ()
51
45
58

    Body function ()
20
19
27

    Body structure ()
3
3
4

    Activity and participation ()
21
17
20

    Environmental factors ()
7
6
7

Table 3: International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) body function categories that were considered relevant by ≥50% of participants in the third round (items in bold with ≥80% consensus).

ICF code
ICF category title
Round 1 (%)
Round 2 (%)
Round 3 (%)

b410
Heart function
99
96
100

b455
Exercise tolerance function
99
98
100

b730
Muscle power function
99
94
100

b440
Respiration function
99
96
98

b710
Mobility of joint function
93
86
96

b114
Orientation function
88
92
94

b415
Blood vessel function
90
94
94

b420
Blood pressure function
97
92
94

b460
Sensations associated with cardiovascular and respiratory functions
94
98
94

b110
Consciousness function
81
90
91

b545
Water, mineral, and electrolyte balance functions
81
86
91

b126
Temperament and personality functions
67
80
89

b430
Haematological system function
84
80
89

b740
Muscle endurance function
88
90
89

b164
Higher-level cognitive functions
85
90
87

b530
Weight maintenance functions
81
80
87

b620
Urination function
91
84
87

b130
Energy and drive function
84
84
85

b140
Attention function
73
76
85

b144
Memory function
81
78
85

b515
Digestive function
72
71
83

b117
Intellectual function
81
86
80

b134
Sleep function
70
78
80

b210
Sight function
73
78
80

b235
Vestibular function
70
65
80

b435
Immunological system function
66
63
80

b525
Defecation function
82
78
80

b152
Emotional function
64
75
78

b280
Sensation of pain
73
75
78

b230
Hearing function
69
71
76

b555
Endocrine gland function
60
61
74

b250
Taste function
48
53
72

b735
Muscle tone function
64
57
67

b167
Mental functions of language
57
63
63

b310
Voice function
46
49
63

b765
Involuntary movement function
54
45
57

b172
Calculation function
42
45
54

Table 4: International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) body structure categories that were considered relevant by ≥50% of participants in the third round (items in bold with ≥80% consensus).

ICF code
ICF category title
Round 1 (%)
Round 2 (%)
Round 3 (%)

s410
Structure of the cardiovascular system
93
92
89

s430
Structure of the respiratory system
88
86
87

s750
Structure of the lower extremity
85
86
83

s760
Structure of the trunk
79
77
80

s140
Structure of the sympathetic nervous system
75
73
78

s150
Structure of the parasympathetic nervous system
72
73
76

s730
Structure of the upper extremities
75
67
76

s740
Structure of the pelvic region
61
65
67

s110
Structure of the brain
66
61
65

s720
Structure of the shoulder region
57
55
63

s610
Structure of the urinary system
69
71
59

s710
Structure of the head and neck region
60
61
57

s120
Spinal cord and related structures
46
51
52

Table 5: International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) activity and participation categories that were considered relevant by ≥50% of participants in the third round (items in bold with ≥80% consensus).

ICF code
ICF category title
Round 1 (%)
Round 2 (%)
Round 3 (%)

d450
Walking
99
94
100

d530
Toileting
96
90
96

d550
Eating
97
94
96

d560
Drinking
97
94
94

d710
Basic interpersonal interactions
90
90
94

d230
Carrying out daily routine
91
92
91

d420
Transferring oneself
94
86
91

d570
Looking after one’s health
93
88
91

d175
Solving problems
84
80
89

d177
Making decisions
85
88
89

d310
Communicating and receiving spoken messages
88
86
89

d540
Dressing
93
86
89

d330
Speaking
76
78
87

d620
Acquisition of goods and services
76
76
87

d760
Family relationships
88
90
87

d510
Washing oneself
88
84
85

d210
Undertaking a single task
79
73
83

d470
Using transportation
82
78
80

d520
Caring for body parts
84
80
80

d920
Recreation and leisure
82
78
80

d115
Listening
78
78
78

d350
Conversation
81
78
78

d430
Lifting and carrying objects
70
63
78

d240
Handling stress and other psychological demands
81
80
76

d630
Preparing meals
81
77
76

d640
Doing housework
81
80
76

d740
Formal relationships
66
65
76

d110
Watching
69
65
74

d440
Fine hand use
64
61
74

d910
Community life
52
59
67

d860
Basic economic transactions
69
61
65

d140
Learning to read
55
57
63

d315
Communicating and receiving nonverbal messages
55
61
63

d335
Producing nonverbal messages
52
49
63

d720
Complex interpersonal interactions
54
51
63

d770
Intimate relationships
64
61
63

d220
Undertaking multiple tasks
63
55
61

d750
Informal social relationships
60
51
61

d870
Economic self-sufficiency
61
57
61

d155
Acquiring skills
58
49
59

d475
Driving
64
53
59

d850
Remunerative employment
51
49
57

d660
Assisting others
58
51
50

d940
Human rights
46
43
50

Table 6: International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) environmental factor categories that were considered relevant by ≥50% of participants in the third round (items in bold with ≥80% consensus).

ICF code
ICF category title
Round 1 (%)
Round 2 (%)
Round 3 (%)

e310
Immediate family
93
94
93

e410
Individual attitudes of immediate family members
93
84
93

e580
Health services, systems, and policies
85
86
85

e315
Extended family
84
71
84

e355
Health professionals
82
78
82

e575
General social support services, systems, and policies
82
84
82

e570
Social security services, systems, and policies
81
80
81

e325
Acquaintances, peers, colleagues, neighbours, and community members
79
73
79

e320
Friends
78
71
78

e340
Personal care providers and personal assistants
76
80
76

e540
Transportation services, systems, and policies
72
73
72

e115
Products and technology for personal use in daily living
70
77
70

e120
Products and technology for personal indoor and outdoor mobility and transportation
70
77
70

e450
Individual attitudes of health professionals
63
65
63

e525
Housing services, systems, and policies
63
73
63

e440
Individual attitudes of personal care providers and personal assistants
61
67
61

e125
Products and technology for communication
60
61
60

e535
Communication services, systems, and policies
58
63
58

e110
Products or substances for personal consumption
57
57
57

e420
Individual attitudes of friends
54
53
54

e455
Individual attitudes of other professionals
54
53
54

e330
People in positions of authority
52
57
52

4. Discussion

In this study, through a survey of RICRs, we selected 58 ICF categories for a comprehensive assessment of elderly patients with heart failure. The 58 ICF categories consisted of 27 body function items, 4 body structure items, 20 activity and participation items, and 7 environmental factor items.

4.1. Validity of the Research Method

First, we examined the appropriateness of the sample size in this study. The response rate for all rounds of this study was 42.6%, which was higher than that of previous studies where the average response rate for the ICF core set was 20.3 (6–73%) [25]. Second, we examined the validity of the study population. The study participants were RICRs living in a limited area within the Hiroshima Prefecture. Therefore, they had similar knowledge and attitudes, which possibly contributed to their ability to build consensus smoothly during the study. However, limiting the geographical area of the study participants would undeniably have fostered a bias in the responses. Furthermore, there was a bias with regard to the occupation and affiliation of the respondents; therefore, the results need to be interpreted with caution.

4.2. Characteristics of ICF Categories Extracted in This Study

The ICF core set for cardiovascular disease includes a core set for chronic ischemic heart disease (CIHD) in patients receiving long-term care [27]. The ICF core set for CIHD consisted of 61 ICF categories: 14 for body function, 1 for body structure, 17 for activity and participation, and 29 for environmental factors. A comparison of the categories in this study with those in the ICF core set for CIHD shows that the assessment set in this study has more body function categories and fewer environmental factors. In particular, the number of mental function items was nine as compared to the three items of the ICF core set of CIHD. A systematic review reported that approximately 43% of patients with heart failure have cognitive disability [33]. Furthermore, if the cognitive disability of heart failure patients is missed during hospitalisation, the risk of rehospitalisation may increase fivefold [6]. The prognostic factors for heart failure (b152: emotional function (depression and anxiety)) were also selected in this study, although their selection did not exceed 80% (78%) of consensus. These results indicate that RICRs consider mental function to be important in clinical practice.

This study is unique in that we selected “d177: decision making” from the activity and participation set. The Japanese Society of Cardiology’s 2018 Guidelines for the Management of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure [34] recommend palliative care and advanced care planning (ACP) as a way to facilitate decisions by patients on how to spend the rest of their lives.

Furthermore, the results of this study showed the selection of items “d5: self-care,” “d6: home life,” and “d920: recreation and leisure,” which is similar to the results of the ICF core set for CIHD. Heart failure in elderly patients is often associated with problems such as living alone and caregiving by an elderly caregiver. Previous studies have reported that IADL (e.g., cooking, shopping, and medication management) in heart failure patients is associated with life prognosis and rehospitalisation [35, 36]. In addition, recreation and leisure have been associated with cardiovascular risk and the degree of independence in IADL [11]. Therefore, we think that it was appropriate to choose these ICF codes.

Significantly fewer environmental factors were selected in our study, 9 compared with the 27 items of the ICF core set for CIHD. We infer ICF categories unrelated to elderly patients (e.g., work and friends) because the study questionnaire focused on elderly patients. The ICF items selected by Japanese cardiac rehabilitation experts differed in some categories from the ICF core set developed in other countries. Therefore, we need to develop an evaluation tool that is customised for Japanese cultural and social systems.

4.3. Implication for Occupational Therapy Practice

The ICF categories selected for this study allow for a comprehensive assessment of clients for occupational therapy. We can use these ICF categories as a common medium for sharing information among multiple professionals and caregivers. In addition, a comprehensive assessment based on the ICF combined with the MTDLP can provide effective occupational therapy for elderly patients with heart failure. The findings of this study are expected to provide a basis for an outcome measure to determine the effectiveness of occupational therapy for these patients.

4.4. Limitations of This Study

This study had some limitations. First, the study participants were RICRs from Hiroshima Prefecture, with physiotherapists accounting for approximately 60% of the study population. Therefore, one should be cautious in generalising the results because there exists the possibility of bias with regard to area and profession. Second, problems with the Delphi method have been identified with respect to the validity of the questionnaire and the risk of inducing consensus. To increase the validity of the questionnaire, we included multidisciplinary teams comprising professionals who are engaged in the provision of comprehensive care for heart failure. In addition, we tried to provide as much fair feedback as possible; however, it is unknown whether the abovementioned factors affected the outcome of the ICF selection. Third, we did not include categories related to personal factors in this study. As personal factors are essential for understanding the health process, they need to be assessed in future studies. Fourth, because we set a cut-off value of 80% consensus for ICF categories in this study, we had to exclude categories with a very similar agreement of 79% or 78%. Fifth, because the purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive assessment tool for the elderly with heart failure, we did not adhere to the steps prescribed in the development of the ICF core set. These issues suggest the need for careful attention in the development of ICF-based assessment tools. Additionally, further studies are necessary in the future to develop a comprehensive framework for functioning and disability evaluation in elderly patients with heart failure based on the results of this research, to confirm their reliability and effectiveness.

5. Conclusions

The ICF categories relevant to elderly patients with heart failure included a total of 58 categories consisting of 27 body function items, 4 body structure items, 20 activity and participation items, and 7 environmental factor items. The development of a functioning and disability evaluation tool that utilises the ICF categories based on this research is necessary. The ICF categories selected for this study allow for a comprehensive assessment of clients for occupational therapy. The findings of this study are expected to provide a basis for an outcome measure to determine the effectiveness of occupational therapy for these patients.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as a part of the Hiroshima Heart Health Promotion Project. This work was supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (grant number: JPMH20AB1002).

References

Y. Okura, M. M. Ramadan, Y. Ohno et al., “Impending epidemic: future projection of heart failure in Japan to the year 2055,” Circulation Journal, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 489–491, 2008.

H. Tsutsui, M. Tsuchihashi Makaya, S. Kinugawa, D. Goto, A. Takeshita, and The JCARE-CARD Investigators, “Clinical characteristics and outcome of hospitalized patients with heart failure in Japan. Rationale and design of Japanese Cardiac Registry of Heart Failure in Cardiology (JCARE-CARD),” Circulation Journal, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 1617–1623, 2006.

M. Tsuchihashi, H. Tsutsui, K. Kodama, F. Kasagi, and A. Takeshita, “Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients With Congestive Heart Failure,” Japanese Circulation Journal, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 953–959, 2000.

C. M. O'Connor, V. Hasselblad, R. H. Mehta et al., “Triage After Hospitalization With Advanced Heart Failure,” Journal of American College of Cardiology, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 872–878, 2010.

A. X. Lo, J. P. Donnelly, G. McGwin, V. Bittner, A. Ahmed, and C. J. Brown, “Impact of gait speed and instrumental activities of daily living on all-cause mortality in adults ≥65 years with heart failure,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 797–801, 2015.

Q. L. Huynh, K. Negishi, L. Blizzard et al., “Mild cognitive impairment predicts death and readmission within 30days of discharge for heart failure,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 221, pp. 212–217, 2016.

R. Faris, H. Purcell, M. Y. Henein, and A. J. S. Coats, “Clinical depression is common and significantly associated with reduced survival in patients with non-ischaemic heart failure,” European Journal of Heart Failure, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 541–551, 2002.

T. Suzuki, T. Shiga, K. Kuwahara et al., “Impact of clustered depression and anxiety on mortality and rehospitalization in patients with heart failure,” Journal of Cardiology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 456–462, 2014.

J. Denollet, H. Rombouts, T. C. Gillebert et al., “Personality as independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease,” The Lancet, vol. 347, no. 8999, pp. 417–421, 1996.

K. Takabayashi, S. Kitaguchi, K. Iwatsu et al., “A decline in activities of daily living due to acute heart failure is an independent risk factor of hospitalization for heart failure and mortality,” Journal of Cardiology, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 522–529, 2019.

P. FJG, M. SMA, A. MDC, S. M. Barreto, and A. EML, “Leisure-time physical activity, but not commuting physical activity, is associated with cardiovascular risk among ELSA-Brasil participants,” Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 2018.

C. Löfvenmark, A.-C. Mattiasson, E. Billing, and M. Edner, “Perceived loneliness and social support in patients with chronic heart failure,” European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 251–258, 2009.

European Society of Cardiology, “2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure,” European Heart Journal, vol. 37, pp. 2129–2200, 2016.

C. M. O’Connor, D. J. Whellan, K. L. Lee et al., “Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Training in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure,” JAMA, vol. 301, no. 14, pp. 1439–1450, 2009.

R. S. Taylor, V. A. Sagar, E. J. Davies et al., “Exercise-based rehabilitation for heart failure,” Cochrane Database Systematic Review, vol. 4, p. CD003331, 2014.

C. O. Phillips, S. M. Wright, D. E. Kern, R. M. Singa, S. Shepperd, and H. R. Rubin, “The Journal of the American Medical Association,” JAMA, vol. 291, no. 11, pp. 1358–1367, 2004.

S. Stewart, A. J. Vandenbroek, S. Pearson, and J. D. Horowitz, “Prolonged beneficial effects of a home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and mortality among patients with congestive heart failure,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 257–561, 1999.

M. A. FA, S. Stewart, S. Ferrua, and M. M. JJ, “Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 810–819, 2004.

C. Feltner, C. D. Jones, C. W. Cené et al., “Transitional Care Interventions to Prevent Readmissions for Persons With Heart Failure,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 160, no. 11, pp. 774–784, 2014.

Japan Heart Failure Society Guidelines Committee, “Statement on the treatment of elderly heart failure patients,” 2016, http://www.asas.or.jp/jhfs/pdf/Statement_HeartFailurel.pdf, [cited 2020 September 30].

The Japanese Association of Occupational Therapists, “Management tool for daily life performance,” 2020, https://www.jaot.or.jp/files/page/MTDLP/%28A4%20%29MTDLP-english.pdf.

S. Noto, C. Murai, S. Takeuchi, Y. Iwase, and H. Nakamura, “Effect of occupational therapy using “the management tool for daily life performance” for dependent community-dwelling elderly: a randomized controlled multi-center trial,” Japanese occupationai therapy research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 259–269, 2014.

K. Iokawa, K. Hasegawa, and T. Ishikawa, “Usefulness of the daily life performance transfer sheet in care management of people with stroke,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 73, no. 4, p. 7304205080p1, 2019.

M. Fukui, Y. Yoshida, and K. Hgaki, “Effect of the management tool for daily life performance on patients with cardiovascular disease: a randomized controlled trial,” Progress in Rehabilitation Medicene, vol. 5, no. 4, 2019.

T. Ewert, T. B. ÜstÜn, S. Chatterji, N. Kostanjsek, G. Stucki, and A. Cieza, “Development of ICF Core Sets for patients with chronic conditions,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 44, pp. 9–11, 2004.

A. Cieza, G. Stucki, M. Weigl et al., “ICF Core Sets for chronic widespread pain,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 44, pp. 63–68, 2004.

A. Cieza, A. Stucki, S. Geyh et al., “ICF Core Sets for chronic ischaemic heart disease,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 44, pp. 94–99, 2004.

R. Escorpizo, J. Ekholm, H.-P. Gmünder, A. Cieza, N. Kostanjsek, and G. Stucki, “Developing a Core Set to describe functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF),” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 502–511, 2010.

C. M. Goodman, “The Delphi technique: a critique,” Journal of Advance Nursing, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 729–734, 1987.

F. Hasson, S. Keeney, and H. Mckenna, “Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique,” Journal of Advance Nursing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1008–1015, 2000.

S. Shoji, S. Kohsaka, Y. Shiraishi et al., “Appropriateness rating for the application of optimal medical therapy and multidisciplinary care among heart failure patients,” ESC Heart Fail, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 300–308, 2020.

M. Weigl, A. Cieza, C. Andersen, B. Kollerits, E. Amann, and G. Stucki, “Identification of relevant ICF categories in patients with chronic health conditions: a Delphi excise,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 44, pp. 12–21, 2004.

J. A. Cannon, P. Moffitt, A. C. Perez-Moreno et al., “Cognitive impairment and heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Cardiac Failure, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 464–475, 2017.

The Japanese Circulation Society and Heart Failure Society guideline, “The guidelines for the management of acute and chronic heart failure,” pp. 111–115, 2018, http://asas.or.jp/jhfs/pdf/topics20180323.pdf, [cited 2020. August 25].

M. L. Alosco, M. B. Spitznagel, R. Cohen et al., “Cognitive impairment is independently associated with reduced instrumental activities of daily living in persons with heart failure,” Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 44–50, 2012.

M. L. Alosco, M. B. Spitznagel, N. Raz et al., “Executive dysfunction is independently associated with reduced functional independence in heart failure,” Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 23, no. 5-6, pp. 829–836, 2014.