Parkinson's DiseaseVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 362572, 10 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/362572

Clinical Study

Risk of Falls in Parkinson’s Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study of 160 Patients

Ana Contreras¹ and Francisco Grandas1,2

¹Unidad de Investigación en Trastornos del Movimiento, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain²Servicio de Neurología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/ Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain

Received 2 August 2011; Revised 5 September 2011; Accepted 23 September 2011

Academic Editor: Jan O. Aasly

Copyright © 2012 Ana Contreras and Francisco Grandas. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Falls are a major source of disability in Parkinson’s disease. Risk factors for falling in Parkinson’s disease remain unclear. To determine the relevant risk factors for falling in Parkinson’s disease, we screened 160 consecutive patients with Parkinson’s disease for falls and assessed 40 variables. A comparison between fallers and nonfallers was performed using statistical univariate analyses, followed by bivariate and multivariate logistic regression, receiver-operating characteristics analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves. 38.8% of patients experienced falls since the onset of Parkinson’s disease (recurrent in 67%). Tinetti Balance score and Hoehn and Yahr staging were the best independent variables associated with falls. The Tinetti Balance test predicted falls with 71% sensitivity and 79% specificity and Hoehn and Yahr staging with 77% sensitivity and 71% specificity. The risk of falls increased exponentially with age, especially from 70 years onward. Patients aged >70 years at the onset of Parkinson’s disease experienced falls significantly earlier than younger patients.

1. Introduction

Falls are a major source of morbidity and disability in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The risk of falls is increased in patients with PD [1], and the findings of several studies have revealed that 38 to 87% of parkinsonian patients experienced falls [2–5]. Falls are commonly a recurrent phenomenon in PD. One meta-analysis of several prospective studies showed that the rate of recurrent falling over a three-month period was 57% among those patients who had reported previous falls [6].

Direct consequences of falling are fractures, particularly hip fractures, head trauma, contusions and other injuries [5, 7–9], and even death [10]. In addition, falling may induce fear of new falls [11], which can in turn reduce mobility and lead to osteoporosis, loss of independence, social isolation, and depression [12]. Moreover, falls increase the risk of admission of PD patients to hospitals [13] and nursing homes [5]. The economic burden of falls in PD is very high and it is estimated that the direct medical costs of PD fallers double those of nonfallers [14].

Preventing falls has become one of the most important unmet needs in PD, and potential strategies to prevent falls should focus on patients at higher risk for falling. Therefore, identifying risk factors is of paramount importance.

Studies aimed at finding such risk factors have been inconclusive to date. Retrospective studies have brought out inconsistent results. Thus, falls in PD have been related to age [15], disease duration [16, 17], disease severity [3, 17], autonomic dysfunction [15], urinary incontinence [4], increased time in the get-up-and-go test [4], greater postural sway [18, 19], poorer stability in response to pushes and pulls [20], and variability of stride time [17]. Other proposed predictors of falls include poor standing balance [21, 22], dyskinesia, dementia, frontal impairment, freezing of gait [23], orthostatic hypotension, and muscle weakness [24].

The best predictor of falling in PD found in a meta-analysis of prospective studies with follow-up periods of three months [2, 3], six months [25], and twelve months [26] was suffering two or more falls in the previous year [6]. Although this conclusion reinforces the concept of recurrent falls in PD, it does not help to identify PD patients at risk before the first fall. A more recent prospective study with a six-month follow-up in patients with early-stage PD failed to identify risk factors for the first fall apart from increased postural sway when standing on a firm and foam surface with the eyes open in the group of fallers [27]. The follow-up period of these studies might have been insufficient to assess the prospective predictiveness of aging or disease progression on the appearance of falls, if these variables were relevant risk factors for falling in PD.

To try to elucidate the relevant risk factors for falling in PD, we carried out a cross-sectional study of a group of unselected patients of different ages and disease duration, taking into account most of the clinical variables potentially associated with falls.

2. Methods

2.1. Subjects

The study sample comprised consecutive patients with PD who attended the Movement Disorders Clinic of Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón during a nine-month period. These patients were regularly followed up with visits to the clinic every 3-4 months. The diagnosis of PD was confirmed according to the United Kingdom Parkinson’s Disease Brain Bank criteria [28]. Patients who underwent functional stereotactic surgery for PD were excluded. The local ethics committee approved the study and all participants gave their informed consent. All patients were interviewed and examined by the authors.

2.2. Assessment of Falls

A fall was defined as an event which resulted in the patient unintentionally coming to the ground or other lower level not as a result of a major intrinsic event or overwhelming hazard [29, 30]. The patients were questioned about the existence of these events since the onset of PD. Information about the time of the first fall (year, month) was obtained from the patients and checked with relatives, caregivers, and clinical records for accuracy of data. In cases with more than one fall, the number of falls in the last year, and particularly in the last day, week, month, three-month period, and six-month period, was recorded. Fall-related injuries, especially fractures, were also recorded.

2.3. Variables

We recorded gender, age, age at onset of PD, initial predominant symptom (tremor or akinetic-rigid syndrome), disease duration, and the presence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia.

We also recorded treatments with antiparkinsonian drugs including L-dopa (L-dopa/carbidopa, L-dopa/benserazide, controlled-release L-dopa formulations), COMT inhibitors (entacapone, tolcapone), MAO-B inhibitors (selegiline, rasagiline), amantadine, anticholinergics, and dopamine agonists (bromocriptine, pergolide, cabergoline, pramipexole, ropinirole, transdermal rotigotine, subcutaneous apomorphine) until the date of the survey (nonfallers) or the date of the first fall. Only sustained treatment for more than two months at recommended doses was considered. Treatment with benzodiazepines, antidepressants, atypical neuroleptics (quetiapine, clozapine), and cholinesterase inhibitors was also recorded in the same manner.

History of syncope and symptoms of orthostatic hypotension (light-headedness, dizziness, weakness on standing from sitting or lying position) [31] were recorded as were past history of stroke, hypertension, and diabetes.

Clinical data were obtained from the patients and checked with relatives, caregivers, and clinical records for accuracy.

All patients underwent neuroimaging studies (cranial-computed tomography, brain magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], or both), which were reviewed by a neuroradiologist to identify cases with moderate/severe leukoaraiosis and infarcts of any size and location. All PD fallers underwent brain MRI after the onset of falls.

The motor function subscale (part III) of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) [32] was administered, as were the Schwab and England activities of daily living [33], Hoehn and Yahr staging [34], Mini Mental State Examination [35], Tinetti’s Gait and Balance functional test [36] (the appendix), and the freezing of gait questionnaire [37].

The timed get-up-and-go test [38] was performed and a ten-meter walk at the preferred speed was timed, videotaped, and used to calculate gait velocity, and step length and cadence.

In fluctuating patients, UPDRS, Schawb-England, and Hoehn and Yahr scales and timed tests were administered in off situation (8–10 hours after patients stopped their usual antiparkinsonian treatment) to evaluate the possible influence of disease severity.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Mean differences between fallers and nonfallers were assessed using the -test for independent samples or the Mann-Withney test for continuous variables with parametric or nonparametric distribution, respectively. The test was used to assess associations between categorical variables.

Variables with statistically significant differences between fallers and nonfallers were entered into bivariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression analyses with the dichotomous criterion of falls as the common regressor to determine the best explanatory independent variables. Several stepwise multivariate logistic regression models were tested, evaluating all possible combinations of the variables. Up to five variables were considered in each model.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of each variable in predicting fallers. The point that simultaneously maximized sensitivity and specificity was selected as the cut-off value. Accuracy was calculated based on the proportion of correctly classified cases using cut-off values.

Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the relationship between time to onset of falls and age and disease duration. The log-rank test stratified by age at onset of PD was performed to evaluate the effect of age at onset on the appearance of falls during the course of the disease. A value was considered significant in all tests.

Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 15.0 for Windows.

3. Results

The study sample comprised 160 patients with PD (72 men, 88 women, mean age years). Demographic and disease characteristics are described in Table 1. Sixty-two patients (38.8%) reported at least one fall since the onset of PD, and 42 of these patients were recurrent fallers (68% of patients with falls). The average frequency of falls in the previous year in recurrent fallers was as follows: one or more falls per day, 4.8%; one fall per week, 9.7%; one fall per month, 25.8%; one fall every six months, 59.7%.

Table 1: Demographic and disease characteristicsa.

All patients ()
Nonfallers ()
Fallers ()
Testb
value

Age ()
72.0 (9.5)
70.6 (9.6)
74.2 (8.9)
1
0.012

Male (%)
52.5
47.9
53.2
2
0.884

Age at onset ()
63.9 (11,2)
64.2 (11,1)
63.5 (11.3)
1
0.682

Disease duration ()
8.1 (6.4)
6.4 (5.4)
10.6 (7.0)
3
<0.001

PD subtype at onset

2
0.012

    TDT (, %)
100 (62.5)
69 (70.5)
31 (50.0)

    ART (, %)
60 (37.5)
29 (29.5)
31 (50.0)

Motor fluctuations (, %)
46 (28.8)
20 (20.4)
26 (41.9)
2
0.003

Dyskinesias (, %)
42 (26.3)
18 (18.3)
24 (38.7)
2
0.004

Hoehn and Yahr
2.6 (1.0)
2.1(0,8)
3.2 (1.0)
1
<0.001

Hoehn and Yahr (, %)
(I) 21 (13.1)(II) 63 (39.4) (III) 44 (27.5) (IV) 23 (14.4) (V) 9 (5.6)
(I) 18 (18.4)(II) 52 (53.1)(III) 21 (21,4)(IV) 5 (5.1)(V) 2 (2.0)
(I) 3 (4.8)(II) 11 (17.7)(III) 23 (37.1)(IV) 18 (29.1)(V) 7 (11.3)

UPDRS III
28.8 (15.6)
23.5 (13.0)
37.2 (15.8)
1
<0.001

FOG (, %)
70 (43.8)
30 (30.6)
40 (64.5)
2
<0.001

FOG questionnaire
4.5 (5.8)
2.7 (4.6)
7.4 (6.4)
1
<0.001

Activities of daily living
73.7 (25.3)
82.1 (19.0)
60.4 (28.3)
1
<0.001

MMSE
26.8 (4.7)
27.6 (3.8)
25.7 (5.8)
3
0.038

Hypertension (, %)
62 (38,8)
38 (38.7)
24 (38.7)
2
0.993

Diabetes (, %)
16 (10.0)
7 (7.1)
9 (14.4)
2
0.130

Stroke (, %)
6 (3.7)
2 (1.9)
4 (6.0)
2
0.208

Neuroimaging of CVD (, %)
35 (21.9)
22 (22.4)
13 (20.9)
2
0.825

Symptomatic orthostasis (, %)
58 (36.2)
33 (33.6)
25 (24.8)
2
0.416

Syncope (, %)
1 (0,6)
0
1 (1.6)
2
0.765

Abbreviations. PD: Parkinson disease; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; FOG: freezing of gait; MMSE: minimental State Examination; TDT: tremor-dominant subtype; ART: akinetic-rigid subtype; CVD: cerebrovascular disease.

aData are mean (SD), absolute numbers, and percentages.

bTest 1 = Mann-Whitney test; test 2 = χ 2 test; test 3 = independent samples -test.

Falls led to fractures in 20 patients (32.2% of fallers) and to bruises, skin lacerations, and other injuries in a further 16 cases (25.8% of fallers).

At the first fall, mean age was years and the mean disease duration when the first fall occurred was years.

Thirty-two patients were unable to perform timed tests because they could not walk unaided (Hoehn and Yahr stages IV and V).

3.1. Comparison between Fallers and Nonfallers

Fallers were older and had longer disease duration and increased disease severity according to the UPDRS (part III), Hoehn and Yahr and Schwab and England activities of daily living scores. In addition, fallers scored worse in the Mini-Mental State Examination and experienced a higher frequency of motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and freezing of gait (Table 1). Tremor as the initial predominant symptom was more frequent in nonfallers. Fallers were treated with higher doses of levodopa and more frequently received COMT inhibitors, central cholinesterase inhibitors, and atypical neuroleptics (quetiapine) than nonfallers (Table 2). Patients treated with central cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) had dementia associated with PD and those treated with quetiapine had hallucinations.

Table 2: Functional tests, gait parameters, and drug treatments a.

All patients ()
Nonfallers ()
Fallers ()
Testb
value

Tinetti

    Balance
10.9 (5.7)
13.4 (3.9)
7.1 (6.0)
1
<0.001

    Gait
8.6 (4,6)
10.3 (3.2)
5.8 (5.2)
1
<0.001

    Total
19.5 (10.2)
23.7 (7.0)
12.9 (11.0)
1
<0.001

Timed up and go (s)
11.4 (8.0)
10.7 (7.9)
13.1 (8.1)
1
0.004

Velocity (m/s)
1.17 (0.31)
1.19 (0.30)
1.10 (0.32)
1
0.293

Step length (m)
0.77 (0.20)
0.79 (0,24)
0.69 (0.22)
1
0.093

Cadence (steps/s)
1.55 (0.70)
1.52 (0.23)
1.61 (0.41)
1
0.253

Levodopa use (, %)
139 (86.8)
84 (85.7)
55 (88.7)
2
0.639

Levodopa dose (mg/d)
557.8 (254.1)
504.1 (208.3)
638.7 (295.8)
1
0.005

Dopamine agonist use (, %)
98 (61.2)
58 (59.2)
40 (64.5)
2
0.511

MAOB-I use (, %)
49 (30.6)
29 (29.5)
20 (32.2)
2
0.728

COMT-I use (, %)
25 (15.6)
10 (10.2)
15 (24.2)
2
0.025

Amantadine use (, %)
13 (8,1)
5 (5.1)
8 (12.9)
2
0.134

Anticholinergic use (, %)
2 (1.2)
2 (2.0)
0

Polytherapy (, %)
83 (51.8)
49 (50.0)
34 (54.8)
2
0.649

Benzodiazepine use (, %)
22 (13.7)
12 (12.2)
10 (16.1)
2
0.490

Antidepressant use (, %)
18 (11.2)
11 (11.2)
7 (11.3)
2
1.000

Neuroleptic use (, %)
8 (5.0)
1 (1.0)
7 (11.3)
2
0.006

Cholinesterase inhibitor use (, %)
7 (4.3)
0
7 (11.3)
2
0.001

Abbreviations. MAOBI: inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B; COMTI: inhibitor of catechol-O-methyl transferase.

aData are mean(SD), absolute numbers, or percentage.

bTest 1 = independent samples -test; test test.

No differences were observed between fallers and nonfallers in other drug treatments, age at onset of PD, symptoms of orthostatic hypotension and cerebrovascular disease (clinical, neuroimaging, and risk factors).

Fallers scored worse in the Balance and Gait subscales of the Tinetti functional test and were slower in the timed get-up-and-go test (Table 2). There were no statistically significant differences in gait velocity, step length, and cadence between fallers and nonfallers.

3.2. Regression Analysis

The independent variables identified as significantly associated with falls in the bivariate logistic regression were the same as those that had been found to be statistically different in the previous approach, except for the timed get-up-and-go test, which lost its statistical significance (Table 3).

Table 3: Logistic regression analysis.

Bivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis

Odds ratio
95% CI
P value
Odds ratio
95% CI
value

Age
1.04
0.99–1.08
0.025
1.04
0.95–1.14
0.381

Disease duration
1.12
1.05–1.19
<0.001
0.96
0.89–1.03
0.326

PD subtype
2.37
1.22–4.60
0.010
2.07
0.89–4.80
0.090

Motor fluctuations
2.81
1.39–5.69
0.004
1.91
0.75–5.62
0.200

Dyskinesia
2.80
1.36–5.78
0.005
0.98
0.33–2.87
0.972

Hoehn and Yahr
3.06
2.04–4.60
<0.001
1.59
0.72–3.50
0.247

UPDRS
1.06
1.03–1.09
<0.001
0.98
0.94–1.04
0.658

FOG
4.42
2.24–8.72
<0.001
1.65
0.67–4.03
0.274

FOG questionnaire
1.15
1.08–1.22
<0.001
1.01
0.89–1.22
0.131

Activities of daily living*
0.96
0.94–0.97
<0.001
1.02
0.92–1.14
0.807

MMSE*
0.91
0.85–0.98
0.017
1.02
0.93–1.13
0.640

Tinetti Balance*
0.80
0.74–0.86
<0.001
0.84
0.74–0.97
0.017

Tinetti Gait*
0.80
0.73–0.87
<0.001
1.13
0.95–1.43
0.256

Tinetti total*
0.89
0.85–0.93
<0.001
0.93
0.87–1.01
0.690

Get-up-and-go
0.95
0.90–1.01
0.189

Levodopa dose
1.002
1.001–1.004
0.005
1.02
0.94–1.19
0.944

COMT-I use
2.80
1.17–6.74
0.021
3.41
1.06–11.37
0.052

Neuroleptic use
12.34
1.48–102.98
0.020
1.25
0.16–12.67
0.854

Cholinesterase inhibitor use
11.92
2.12–12.34
0.002
1.11
0.23–11.78
0.756

Abbreviations. PD: Parkinson disease; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; FOG: freezing of gait; MMSE: Minimental State Examination.

* Functional tests: higher scores means normality.

When these variables were included in stepwise multivariate models of logistic regression, only the Tinetti Balance functional test was independently associated with falls (, 95%  0.740–0.971, ). The rest of the variables lost their statistical significance once Tinetti Balance subscale entered into the regression model. In Table 3 appear the most favorable OR obtained for the other variables, which did not reach in any case the threshold of statistical significance.

3.3. ROC Analysis

Table 4 shows the outcomes of the ROC analysis for the nondichotomous variables associated with falls in the bivariate logistic regression. Again the Tinetti Balance functional test showed the highest combination of sensitivity and specificity (71% and 79% resp.) for predicting falls followed by Hoehn and Yahr staging (77% and 71%), with an accuracy of 76% and 74%, respectively, (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The combination of these two variables increased specificity to 80% and accuracy to 77%. Seventy-seven per cent of fallers were in Hoehn and Yahr stage ≥3 whereas 72% of nonfallers were in stages 1 and 2 (Table 1).

Table 4: Receiver operating characteristic analyses.

AUC
Sensitivity
Specificity
Accuracy %
Cut-off value

Tinetti Balance
0.81
0.71
0.79
0.76
11.5

Tinetti total
0.81
0.60
0.86
0.52
17.5

Hoehn and Yahr
0.78
0.77
0.71
0.74
2.5

Tinetti Gait
0.77
0.71
0.74
0.76
10.5

UPDRS III
0.76
0.77
0.70
0.72
26.5

Activities of daily living
0.74
0.73
0.66
0.69
85

Disease duration
0.70
0.71
0.70
0.70
7.5

FOG questionnaire
0.70
0.55
0.84
0.74
8.5

Levodopa dose
0.66
0.79
0.49
0.61
425

Age
0.62
0.52
0.69
0.54
76.5

MMSE
0.60
0.23
0.89
0.63
22.5

Abbreviations. AUC: area under the curve; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; FOG: freezing of Gait; MMSE: Minimental State Examination.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: Receiver operating characteristic curves of the Tinetti Balance score (Figure 1(a)) and Hoehn and Yahr staging (Figure 1(b)). AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are shown in Table 4.

3.4. Kaplan-Meier Curves

Survival curves show that the risk of falls increased exponentially with age, particularly from the age of 70 years (Figure 2). In addition, the prevalence of falls increased with the duration of PD (Figure 3). The combined effect of age at onset of PD and disease duration is illustrated in Figure 4. Patients who developed PD after the age of 70 years experienced falls significantly earlier than younger patients (log rank, ).

Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier curve showing that the risk of falls increases exponentially with age, mainly from the age 70 onward.

Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier curve showing that the risk of falls increases with the duration of Parkinson’s disease.

Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier curve showing the effect of age at onset of Parkinson’s disease on the appearance of falls. Patients with age at onset >70 years fall earlier than younger patients (log rank ).

4. Discussion

The first fall is a milestone in the life of patients with PD, and it is usually recalled with reasonable accuracy by patients and relatives. In the present survey, the prevalence and frequency of falls and the morbidity they caused were similar to those of other reported series [5, 39]. In short, we confirmed that falls are frequent and recurrent in patients with PD and responsible for fractures in about one-third of fallers and for other relevant injuries in a further 25% of patients.

Using a series of statistical methods, we found that the independent variables most associated with falls were the Tinetti Balance score and Hoehn and Yahr staging. The Tinetti Balance test predicted falls in our patients with 71% sensitivity and 79% specificity, and Hoehn and Yahr staging predicted falls with 77% sensitivity and 71% specificity.

The Tinetti test is a simple, widely used, qualitative test comprising two subscales, one to assess clinical balance and another to assess gait [36]. The balance subscale consists of nine items, where lower scores indicate poor balance. The Tinetti test is a reliable and valid clinical test to measure balance and gait in elderly people and in patients with PD [40]. We found the Tinetti Balance subscale to be a useful tool for assessing the risk of falls in PD with even higher accuracy than the total Tinetti test score.

In our study, most PD fallers were Hoehn and Yahr stage III or more. Thus, the transition from stage II to III, with the emergence of postural instability, plays a crucial role in the appearance of falls and is related to increased disability in many gait-dependent activities [41]. As expected, balance dysfunction seems to be the main cause of falls in patients with PD. Postural instability in PD is caused by deficits in several components of postural control, such as hypometric preparatory adjustments, delayed reaction time, abnormal automatic postural reactions, and abnormal axial kinesthesia [39, 42, 43]. Postural instability occurs in the course of PD as a consequence of disease progression. Therefore, fallers had longer disease duration and increased disease severity based on the UPDRS, Hoehn and Yahr and Schwab-England activities of daily living scores, and more frequently experienced motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. For the same reasons, fallers were treated with higher doses of levodopa and more frequently used COMT inhibitors. These results are in keeping with similar findings from other studies [3, 5, 17, 25].

Freezing of gait was more frequent among fallers, although its statistical relevance was overcome by postural instability. Freezing of gait can precipitate falls in unstable patients [12] and could be the principal cause of falls in a subgroup of patients with PD.

Tremor as the initial predominant motor symptom was more frequent among nonfallers. This finding is consistent with the slower clinical progression to Hoehn and Yahr stages III to V found in parkinsonian patients with a tremor-dominant clinical subtype in prospective clinicopathological studies [44].

MMSE scores were worse in fallers. This may reflect the interaction between cognitive function and gait and posture abnormalities [45, 46], although executive function and attention were not specifically assessed in our study. On the other hand, cognitive decline might be an epiphenomenon related to more advanced disease in PD fallers.

In our series, there was no statistical significant difference in history of symptoms of orthostatic hypotension between fallers and nonfallers, although blood pressure measurements in supine and standing positions were not performed.

An interesting finding was that the risk of falls in PD increased exponentially with age, especially from 70 years onward. Thus, ageing seems to play an important role in advanced PD, perhaps by hastening the underlying disease process, thus allowing neuropathological changes to spread rapidly to neural structures related to gait and balance control in the late stages of the disease [47]. Furthermore, in our survey, patients who developed clinical symptoms of PD after the age of 70 experienced falls significantly earlier than those with a younger onset, illustrating the combined effect of ageing and disease progression. In fact, age at onset of PD should be taken into account when considering early falls as a red flag that may question the clinical diagnosis of PD.

A limitation of this study is the retrospective assessment of falls. It has been suggested that elderly people tend to forget previous falls [48]. However, the accuracy of dating past falls may depend on how subjects are interviewed. We managed to date falls, particularly the first one, with the combined information of patients, relatives, caregivers, and clinical records. In addition, the survival curve for time to the first fall after the onset of PD in our analysis was similar to that of the only long-term study of patients with PD in which falls were prospectively assessed [5], although it was not designed to investigate risk factors of falling. This implies that our survey, despite its cross-sectional design, does not present important biases in the assessment of falls.

Although the predictive value for falls in PD of the Tinetti test and Hoehn and Yahr staging is limited, and other more refined tests of balance deficits in PD should be developed, the use of these simple and rapid clinical tests may help identify high-risk patients.

In elderly people without PD, exercise programs specifically targeting balance have proven to be particularly effective in preventing falls [49]. Targeted exercise improves balance in PD [50], and cueing training can improve freezing of gait [51]. In addition, a recent study has suggested that the treatment with central cholinesterase inhibitors may reduce falls in nondemented PD patients [52].

Research efforts should be directed toward finding better predictors of falls in PD— perhaps using posturography [53] or other electrophysiological devices for testing postural stability [54]—and toward developing therapeutic strategies to improve balance and prevent falls in these patients.

APPENDIX

Tinetti Functional Test [36]

Balance Tests: Subject is seated in hard, armless chair. The following maneuvers are tested.(a)Sitting balance(i)Leans or slides in chair  (0)(ii)Steady, safe  (1)(b)Arises(i)Unable without help  (0)(ii)Able, uses arms to help  (1)(iii)Able, without using arms  (2)(c)Attempts to arise(i)Unable without help  (0)(ii)Able, requires >1 attempt  (1)(iii)Able to rise, 1 attempt  (2)(d)Immediate standing balance  (first 5 seconds)(i)Unsteady  (swaggers, moves feet, trunk sway)   (0)(ii)Steady but uses walker or other support  (1)(iii)Steady without walker or other support  (2)(e)Standing balance(i)Unsteady  (0)(ii)Steady but wide stance  (heels >10.16 cm [4 inc] apart and uses cane or other support  (1)(iii)Narrow stance without support  (2)(f)Nudged  (subject with feet as close together as possible, examiner pushes lightly on subject’s sternum 3 times)(i)Begins to fall  (0)(ii)Staggers, grabs, catches self  (1)(iii)Steady  (2)(g)Eyes closed  (subject with feet as close together as possible)(i)Unsteady  (0)(ii)Steady  (1)(h)Turning 360°(i)Discontinuous steps  (0)(ii)Continuous  (1)(iii)Unsteady  (grabs, staggers)   (2)(iv)Steady  (3)(i)Sitting down(i)Unsafe  (misjudged distance, falls into chair)   (0)(ii)Uses arms or not a smooth motion  (1)(iii)Safe, smooth motion  (2)

Gait Tests: Subject stands with examiner, walks down hallway or across room, first at “usual pace”, then back at “rapid, but safe pace” (using usual walking aids).(a)Initiation of gait(i)Any hesitancy or multiple attempts to start  (0)(ii)No hesitancy  (1)(b)Step length and height(i)Right swing foot does not pass right stance foot with step  (0)(ii)Passes left stance foot  (1)(iii)Left swing foot does not pass right stance foot with step  (0)(iv)Passes right stance foot  (1)(v)Right foot does not clear floor completely with step  (0)(vi)Right floor completely clears floor  (1)(vii)Left foot does not clear floor completely with step  (0)(viii)Left floor completely clears floor  (1)(c)Step symmetry(i)Right and left step lengths not equal  (estimate)   (0)(ii)Right and left steps appear equal  (1)(d)Step continuity(i)Stopping or discontinuing between steps  (0)(ii)Steps appear continuous  (1)(e)Path (estimated in relation to floor tiles, 30.48 cm [12 in] diameter; observed excursion of 1 foot over about 3 m [10 ft] of the course)(i)Marked deviation  (0)(ii)Mild/moderate deviation or uses walking aid  (1)(iii)Straight without walking aid  (2)(f)Trunk(i)Marked sway or uses walking aid  (0)(ii)No sway but flexion of knees or back or spread arms  (1)(iii)No sway, no flexion, no use of arms, and no use of walking aid  (2)(g)Walking stance(i)Heels apart  (0)(ii)Heels almost touching while walking  (1)

Balance score …/16

Gait score …/12

Balance score + gait score …/28

Modified from: Tinetti ME. Performed-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1986; 34 : 119–126.

Acknowledgments

A. Contreras holds a fellowship grant in Movement Disorders from the Fundación de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Gregorio Marañón (Madrid, Spain) and the Spanish Society of Neurology. F. Grandas is partially supported by the Programa de Intensificación de la Actividad Investigadora en el Sistema Nacional de Salud (Programa I3SNS).

References

D. J. Thurman, J. A. Stevens, and J. K. Rao, “Practice parameter: assessing patients in a neurology practice for risk of falls (an evidence-based review). Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology,” Neurology, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 473–479, 2008.

P. Gray and K. Hildebrand, “Fall risk factors in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 222–228, 2000.

A. Ashburn, E. Stack, R. M. Pickering, and C. D. Ward, “Predicting fallers in a community-based sample of people with Parkinson's disease,” Gerontology, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 277–281, 2001.

Y. Balash, C. Peretz, G. Leibovich, T. Herman, J. M. Hausdorff, and N. Giladi, “Falls in outpatients with Parkinson's disease: frequency, impact and identifying factors,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 252, no. 11, pp. 1310–1315, 2005.

M. A. Hely, W. G. J. Reid, M. A. Adena, G. M. Halliday, and J. G. L. Morris, “The Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson's disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years,” Movement Disorders, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 837–844, 2008.

R. M. Pickering, Y. A. M. Grimbergen, U. Rigney et al., “A meta-analysis of six prospective studies of falling in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 1892–1900, 2007.

O. Johnell, L. J. Melton, E. J. Atkinson, W. M. O'Fallon, and L. T. Kurland, “Fracture risk in patients with parkinsonism: a population based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota,” Age and Ageing, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 1992.

L. J. Melton III, C. L. Leibson, S. J. Achenbach et al., “Fracture risk after the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease: influence of concomitant dementia,” Movement Disorders, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1361–1367, 2006.

P. Vestergaard, L. Rejnmark, and L. Mosekilde, “Fracture risk associated with parkinsonism and anti-Parkinson drugs,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 153–161, 2007.

G. K. Wenning, G. Ebersbach, M. Verny et al., “Progression of falls in postmortem-confirmed parkinsonian disorders,” Movement Disorders, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 947–950, 1999.

A. L. Adkin, J. S. Frank, and M. S. Jog, “Fear of falling and postural control in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 496–502, 2003.

B. R. Bloem, J. M. Hausdorff, J. E. Visser, and N. Giladi, “Falls and freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: a review of two interconnected, episodic phenomena,” Movement Disorders, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 871–884, 2004.

J. A. Temlett and P. D. Thompson, “Reasons for admission to hospital for Parkinson's disease,” Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 524–526, 2006.

A. E. Spottke, M. Reuter, O. Machat et al., “Cost of illness and its predictors for Parkinson's disease in Germany,” PharmacoEconomics, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 817–836, 2005.

D. R. Williams, H. C. Watt, and A. J. Lees, “Predictors of falls and fractures in bradykinetic rigid syndromes: a retrospective study,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 468–473, 2006.

W. C. Koller, S. Glatt, B. Vetere-Overfield, and R. Hassanein, “Falls and Parkinson's disease,” Clinical Neuropharmacology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 98–105, 1989.

J. D. Schaafsma, N. Giladi, Y. Balash, A. L. Bartels, T. Gurevich, and J. M. Hausdorff, “Gait dynamics in Parkinson's disease: relationship to Parkinsonian features, falls and response to levodopa,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 212, no. 1-2, pp. 47–53, 2003.

M. Matinolly, J. T. Korpelainen, R. Korpelainen, K. A. Sotaniemi, M. Virranniemi, and V. V. Myllyla, “Postural sway and falls in Parkinson's disease: a regression approach,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 1927–1935, 2007.

A. Frenklach, S. Louie, M. M. Koop, and H. Bronte-Stewart, “Excessive postural sway and the risk of falls at different stages of Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 377–385, 2008.

P. Valkovic, H. Brozova, K. Botzel, E. Ruzicka, and J. Benetin, “Push and release test predicts better Parkinson fallers and nonfallers than the pull test: comparison in OFF and ON medication states,” Movement Disorders, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1453–1457, 2008.

M. Morris, R. Iansek, F. Smithson, and F. Huxham, “Postural instability in Parkinson's disease: a comparison with and without a concurrent task,” Gait and Posture, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 205–216, 2000.

M. R. Landers, A. Backlund, J. Davenport, J. Fortune, S. Schuerman, and P. Altenburger, “Postural instability in idiopathic parkinson's disease: discriminating fallers from nonfallers based on standardized clinical measures,” Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 56–61, 2008.

M. D. Latt, S. R. Lord, J. G. L. Morris, and V. S. C. Fung, “Clinical and physiological assessments for elucidating falls risk in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1280–1289, 2009.

K. Robinson, A. Dennison, D. Roalf et al., “Falling risk factors in Parkinson's disease,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 169–182, 2005.

B. R. Bloem, Y. A. Grimbergen, M. Cramer, M. Willemsen, and A. H. Wwinderman, “Prospective assessment of falls in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 248, no. 11, pp. 950–958, 2001.

B. H. Wood, J. A. Bilclough, A. Bowron, and R. W. Walker, “Incidence and prediction of falls in Parkinson's disease: a prospective multidisciplinary study,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 721–725, 2002.

G. K. Kerr, C. J. Worringham, M. H. Cole, P. F. Lacherez, J. M. Wood, and P. A. Silburn, “Predictors of future falls in Parkinson disease,” Neurology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 116–124, 2010.

A. J. Hughes, Y. Ben-Shlomo, S. E. Daniel, and A. J. Lees, “What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson's disease: a clinicopathologic study,” Neurology, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1142–1146, 1992.

M. E. Tinetti, M. Speechley, and S. F. Ginter, “Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 319, no. 26, pp. 1701–1707, 1988.

M. E. Tinetti and C. S. Williams, “Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 337, no. 18, pp. 1279–1284, 1997.

K. R. Chaudhuri, P. Martinez-Martin, R. G. Brown et al., “The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson's disease: results from an international pilot study,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 1901–1911, 2007.

S. Fahn and R. L. Elton, “Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale,” in Recent Developments in Parkinson’s Disease, S. Fahn, C. D. Marsden, M. Goldstein, and D. B. Calne, Eds., pp. 153–163, Macmillan Healthcare Information, Florham Park, NJ, USA, 1987.

R. S. Schwab, A. C. England, and E. Peterson, “Akinesia in Parkinson’s disease,” Neurology, vol. 9, pp. 65–72, 1959.

M. M. Hoehn and M. D. Yahr, “Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality,” Neurology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 427–442, 1967.

M. F. Folstein, S. E. Folstein, and P. R. McHugh, “‘Mini mental state’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–198, 1975.

M. E. Tinetti, “Performance-orientated assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 119–126, 1986.

N. Giladi, H. Shabtai, E. S. Simon, S. Biran, J. Tal, and A. D. Korczyn, “Construction of freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with parkinsonism,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 165–170, 2000.

D. Podsiadlo and S. Richardson, “The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 142–148, 1991.

T. Boonstra, H. Van der Kooij, M. Munneke, and B. R. Bloem, “Gait disorders and balance disturbances in Parkinson's disease. Clinical update and pathophysiology,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 461–471, 2008.

D. A. Kegelmeyer, A. D. Kloos, K. M. Thomas, and S. K. Kostyk, “Reliability and validity of the Tinetti mobility test for individuals with Parkinson disease,” Physical Therapy, vol. 87, no. 10, pp. 1369–1378, 2007.

L. M. Shulman, A. L. Gruber-Baldini, K. E. Anderson et al., “The evolution of disability in Parkinson’s disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 790–796, 2008.

F. B. Horak, D. Dimitrova, and J. G. Nutt, “Direction-specific postural instability in subjects with Parkinson's disease,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 193, no. 2, pp. 504–521, 2005.

W. G. Wright, V. S. Gurfinkel, L. A. King, J. G. Nutt, P. J. Cordo, and F. B. Horak, “Axial kinesthesia is impaired in Parkinson's disease: effects of levodopa,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 202–209, 2010.

A. H. Rajput, A. Voll, M. L. Rajput, C. A. Robinson, and A. Rajput, “Course in parkinson disease subtypes: a 39-year clinicopathologic study,” Neurology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 206–212, 2009.

G. Yogev-Seligmann, J. M. Hausdorff, and N. Giladi, “The role of executive function and attention in gait,” Movement Disorders, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 329–342, 2008.

J. D. Holmes, M. E. Jenkins, A. M. Johnson, S. G. Adams, and S. J. Spaulding, “Dual-task interference: the effects of verbal cognitive tasks on upright postural instability in Parkinson’s disease,” Parkinson's Disease, vol. 2010, Article ID 696492, 5 pages, 2010.

P. A. Kempster, S. S. O'Sullivan, J. L. Holton, T. Revesz, and A. J. Lees, “Relationships between age and late progression of Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study,” Brain, vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 1755–1762, 2010.

S. R. Cummings, M. C. Nevitt, and S. Kidd, “Forgetting falls. The limited accuracy of recall of falls in the elderly,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 613–616, 1988.

C. Sherrington, J. C. Whitney, S. R. Lord, R. D. Herbert, R. G. Cumming, and J. C. T. Close, “Effective exercise for the prevention of falls—a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 2234–2243, 2008.

A. Ashburn, L. Fazakarley, C. A. Ballinger, R. Pickering, L. D. McLellan, and C. A. Fitton, “A randomised controlled trial of a home based exercise programme to reduce the risk of falling among people with Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 678–684, 2007.

A. Nieuwboer, G. Kwakkel, L. Rochester et al., “Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson's disease: the RESCUE trial,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 134–140, 2007.

K. A. Chung, B. M. Lobb, J. G. Nutt, and F. B. Horak, “Effects of a central cholinesterase inhibitor on reducing falls in Parkinson disease,” Neurology, vol. 75, no. 14, pp. 1263–1269, 2010.

M. Ganesan, P. K. Pal, A. Gupta, and T. Sathyaprabha, “Dynamic posturography in evaluation of balance in patients of Parkinson's disease with normal pull test: concept of a diagonal pull test,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 595–599, 2010.

A. L. Adkin, B. R. Bloem, and J. H. J. Allum, “Trunk sway measurements during stance and gait tasks in Parkinson's disease,” Gait and Posture, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 240–249, 2005.