Pulmonary Medicine
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 2987072, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2987072

Research Article

Chronic Pulmonary Silicone Embolism from Breast Augmentation Is Not a Common Finding in Explanted Lungs

Jarmanjeet Singh,¹ Hanine Inaty,² Sanjay Mukhopadhyay,³ and Atul C. Mehta²

¹Internal Medicine Residency Program, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
²Respiratory Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
³Department of Pathology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Atul C. Mehta; mehtaa1@ccf.org

Received 22 September 2017; Accepted 11 February 2018; Published 15 March 2018

Academic Editor: Roberto Walter Dal Negro

Copyright © 2018 Jarmanjeet Singh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Objective. Acute pulmonary silicone embolism (APSE) related to subcutaneous silicone injections is a well-known entity. Recently, a few cases of pathologically confirmed chronic pulmonary silicone embolism (CPSE) from breast implants have been reported. The prevalence of CPSE in women with breast augmentation is unknown. This study was done to determine the prevalence of CPSE in female lung transplant recipients with a history of breast augmentation and to determine whether breast augmentation plays a role in chronic lung diseases requiring lung transplantation. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify female lung transplant recipients with a history of breast augmentation prior to or at the time of lung transplantation. Ten patients meeting these criteria were identified. The pathologic features of the explanted lungs of these patients were reexamined for CPSE by a board-certified pathologist with expertise in lung transplantation and pulmonary embolism. Results. Of 1518 lung transplant recipients at Cleveland Clinic, 578 were females. Of 578 females, 10 (1.73%) had history of breast augmentation. A total of 84 H&E-stained slides from the explanted lungs from 10 cases were examined. No pathologic evidence of chronic silicone embolism was seen in any of the 10 cases. Conclusions. CPSE is not associated with pulmonary disease leading to lung transplantation. Breast augmentation is not a significant contributor to pulmonary disease requiring lung transplantation. Further studies are required to ascertain the prevalence of CPSE in the general breast augmentation populace and to define the relationship between breast augmentation and pulmonary disease.

1. Introduction

The concept of breast implantation was introduced in the 18th century by Vincenz Czerny who used a lipoma for breast augmentation [1]. Since then, breast implantation has evolved considerably, and breast implants are composed of an outer elastomer shell of silicone and an inner filler, which can be either silicone gel or saline. Silicone used in breast implants is polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and is considered safe [2]. Acute pulmonary silicone embolism (APSE) from cosmetic silicone injections is well known to cause lung disease [3–8]. Recently, cases of chronic pulmonary silicone embolism (CPSE) related to silicone and saline breast implants causing dyspnea and pulmonary infiltrates have been reported [9–13] (Table 1). CPSE is embolization of silicone to the lungs in women with breast implantation but with no history of subcutaneous silicone injection. These cases made us wonder whether CPSE is an underrecognized contributor to chronic pulmonary ailments. This study was done to determine the prevalence of CPSE in female lung transplant recipients with a history of breast augmentation and to determine whether breast augmentation plays a role in chronic lung diseases requiring lung transplantation.

Table 1: Reported cases of chronic pulmonary silicone embolism from the breast implants.

Case
Age/sex
Symptoms
Radiographic finding on CT chest
Type of implant (silicone versus saline)
Histopathology
(microscopic and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, EDX)

1
41/F
Dyspnea
Diffuse GGO
Silicone
(i) Clear, nonbirefringent globules characteristic of silicone emboli
(ii) EDX not performed

2
45/F
Dyspnea
Diffuse GGO
Saline
(i) Clear, nonbirefringent globules on microscopy
(ii) Energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) showed silicone emboli

3
72/F
Dyspnea
Diffuse GGO and reticular opacities
Silicone
(i) Clear, nonbirefringent globules on microscopy
(ii) Energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) showed silicone emboli

4
56/F
Chronic illness
Not available
Silicone
(i) Silicone plaques in the lungs on microscopy
(ii) Energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) showed silicone emboli

5
59/F
Dyspnea
Diffuse pulmonary infiltrates and consolidations
Double lumen prosthesis (cohesive gel and saline solution)
(i) Translucent vacuolated globular deposits of silicone

GGO: ground glass opacities; EDX: energy-dispersive X-ray analysis.

2. Methods

Medical records of the lung transplant population at Cleveland Clinic (July 1990–May 2016) were reviewed retrospectively to identify female lung transplant recipients who had undergone breast implantation prior to the lung transplantation. Data was gathered for the following variables: demographics, current status of patient (alive or deceased), smoking history, type of breast implant (saline or silicone), duration of breast augmentation prior to transplantation, history of implant rupture, unilateral versus bilateral lung transplantation, primary diagnosis leading to lung transplantation, radiologic and pathologic findings, and survival of candidate after transplantation.

2.1. Pathologic Examination

Histopathologic examination of explanted lungs was performed by a fellowship-trained pulmonary pathologist with expertise in pulmonary silicone embolism [10, 14]. Standard protocol including analysis of 3 sections (peripheral, mid, and central) of alveolated lung per lobe was used. Additional sections were taken if areas of special interest were identified on gross examination such as a nodule, cyst, and cavity. These sections were reexamined specifically for evidence of silicone embolization within pulmonary blood vessels.

3. Results

Of 1518 lung transplant recipients, 578 were females. Of these females, 10 (1.73%) had history of breast augmentation; 3 had silicone implants, 1 had saline implant, and, in 6, the type of implant could not be determined. The mean duration of breast implantation prior to lung transplantation was 29.25 years (4/10). 2 females had evidence of implant rupture on gross examination at the time of surgery. 8 were smokers with a mean of 34.4 pack-years and 2 were nonsmokers. Lung transplantation was unilateral in 7 and bilateral in 3. 8 had emphysema and 2 had bronchiectasis on chest CT. Indication for lung transplantation was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 7 patients, and cystic fibrosis, ciliary dyskinesia, and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in one patient each. 4 patients were alive at the time of this study, with a mean age of 66.25 years (range: 59–77). The mean age at death was 52.2 years (range: 21–70). A total of 84 hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides from the explanted lungs (range: 3–23 slides per case; mean: 8.4) were examined for evidence of silicone emboli. None of the slides showed pathologic evidence of silicone embolism (Table 2).

Table 2: Radiographic and pathologic findings of the explanted lungs.

Case
Duration of breast implantation
before lung transplant (in years)
Radiographic
diagnosis before lung transplantation
Number of slides studied
Pathologic diagnosis
Evidence of breast implant rupture at the time of lung transplantation surgery
Silicone
emboli in explanted lungs

1
Unknown
Bronchiectasis
9
Bronchiectasis
Not available
Absent

2
Unknown
Emphysema
6
Emphysema
Not available
Absent

3
25
Emphysema
5
Emphysema
Not available
Absent

4
Unknown
Emphysema
6
Emphysema
Not available
Absent

5
Unknown
Emphysema
8
Emphysema
Not available
Absent

6
Unknown
Emphysema
8
Emphysema
Not available
Absent

7
25
Emphysema
3
Emphysema
Intracapsular rupture
Absent

8
Unknown
Bronchiectasis
23
Bronchiectasis
Not available
Absent

9
30
Emphysema
9
Emphysema
Not available
Absent

10
35
Emphysema
7
Emphysema
Focal rupture
Absent

4. Discussion

Reported pulmonary complications from silicone breast implants include silicone thorax [15, 16], pleural effusions [17], silicone-related complaints [18–20], siliconosis, autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) [21–23], and anaplastic large cell lymphoma [24, 25]. The presumed pathogenesis behind these complications is the inflammatory response elicited by migration of silicone particles into tissues [26]. Silicone particles and silicone-laden macrophages have been demonstrated at distant sites in affected individuals [12, 27, 28].

Prompted by safety concerns, a moratorium was placed on use of silicone breast implants in the United States between 1992 and 2006 [19]. After reapproval from the FDA in 2006, silicone implants regained their popularity. At present, breast implantation is the most common cosmetic surgery in the United States, with approximately 279,143 cosmetic and 106,338 reconstructive breast implantations performed in 2015 alone [29]. The recent discovery of CPSE related to breast implants has rekindled the controversy regarding the safety of breast augmentation.

Since both cosmetic silicone injections and breast implants contain PDMS, acute pulmonary silicone embolism from silicone injections can help us in understanding the disease spectrum of CPSE due to molecular similarity. Clinicopathological findings in APSE include congestion, pneumonitis, diffuse alveolar damage causing adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and death [3–8]. Schmid et al. showed that acute silicone embolism can have the same critical presentation as fat embolism with a mean Schonfeld score of 9 [8]. Therefore, CPSE also carries the potential of causing grave complications like acute respiratory failure and death. Fortunately, the reported cases of CPSE have presented as a chronic form of lung disease mimicking interstitial lung disease (ILD) [9–13].

In our study, we did not see any evidence of pulmonary silicone embolism from breast implants in the explanted lungs of the lung transplant recipients. Due to small sample size of 10 patients, we cannot entirely exclude the occurrence of CPSE in the studied population but the data is strongly convincing towards lack of association. Moreover, only 10 females (1.73%) had history of breast implantation among a total of 578 female lung transplant recipients, suggesting no significant association between the two. This lack of association does underline the rarity of CPSE.

To our knowledge, this is the first original study that has attempted to identify CPSE in women with breast implants by pathologic analysis of the explanted lungs. We acknowledge that female lung transplant recipients with breast augmentation constitute an extremely small fraction of the general population that undergoes breast augmentation. The absence of CPSE in this small sample should not be generalizable to regular breast implant recipients in general. However, the absence of CPSE in this large female lung transplant population at our hospital shows its rarity and insignificance in lung transplantation epidemiology. Nevertheless, pulmonologists should be aware of this rare but potentially grave complication and should consider CPSE in the differential of pulmonary pathology in patients with breast implants. Larger studies are required to ascertain the extent to which CPSE might cause occult or symptomatic lung disease not necessarily requiring lung transplantation in general breast implant population.

5. Summary/Conclusion

Our study did not show any evidence of CPSE in female lung transplant recipients who had undergone breast augmentation prior to lung transplantation. We conclude that breast augmentation is not a significant contributor to pulmonary diseases requiring lung transplantation. Based upon reported cases, CPSE can cause significant pulmonary morbidity. Further studies are required to determine the prevalence of CPSE in the general breast implant population and to define the relationship between breast augmentation, CPSE, and pulmonary diseases.

Disclosure

An abstract/poster from this study has been presented at (1) Fleischner Society (Atul C. Mehta, “Chronic Pulmonary Silicon Embolism from Breast Augmentation Is Not a Common Finding in Explanted Lungs”), 48th Annual Meeting of the Fleischner Society, Beverly, MA, June 15-16, 2017; (2) American Thoracic Society (Jarmanjeet Singh, Hanine Inaty, Sanjay Mukhopadhyay, and Atul C. Mehta, “Chronic Pulmonary Silicon Embolism from Breast Augmentation Is Not a Common Finding in Explanted Lungs”), American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2017, 195:A3584. All the authors approve of this version to be final and ready for publication. All the authors are in agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Jarmanjeet Singh, M.B.B.S., M.D., prepared research protocol, carried out data collection, and wrote the manuscript. Hanine Inaty, M.D., carried out data collection and took part in manuscript writing. Sanjay Mukhopadhyay, M.D., prepared research protocol, performed pathological specimen testing (board-certified pathologist), and took part in manuscript writing. Atul C. Mehta, M.B.B.S., F.C.C.P., and F.A.C.P., prepared research protocol, carried out data collection, took part in manuscript writing, and provided guidance and supervision.

References

M. C. Champaneria, W. W. Wong, M. E. Hill, and S. C. Gupta, “The evolution of breast reconstruction: A historical perspective,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 730–742, 2012.

D. C. C. França, A. L. de Castro, A. M. P. Soubhia, S. M. H. C. Á. de Aguiar, and M. C. Goiato, “Evaluation of the biocompatibility of silicone gel implants - histomorphometric study,” Acta Informatica Medica, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 93–97, 2013.

K. Y. Chung, S. H. Kim, I. H. Kwon et al., “Clinicopathologic review of pulmonary silicone embolism with special emphasis on the resultant histologic diversity in the lung—a review of five cases,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 152–159, 2002.

K. Lyapichev, F. M. Chinea, J. Poveda, J. Pereda, P. A. Bejarano, and M. T. Garcia-Buitrago, “Pulmonary empty spaces: silicone embolism—a decade of increased incidence and its histological diagnosis,” Case Reports in Pathology, vol. 2016, Article ID 3741291, pp. 1–5, 2016.

C. S. Restrepo, M. Artunduaga, J. A. Carrillo et al., “Silicone pulmonary embolism: report of 10 cases and review of the literature,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 233–237, 2009.

J. Chastre, P. Brun, and P. Soler, “Acute and latent pneumonitis after subcutaneous injections of silicone intranssexual men,” The American Review of Respiratory Disease, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 236–240, 1987.

P. Gopie, S. Sakhamuri, A. Sharma, S. Solomon, and S. Teelucksingh, “Acute pneumonitis secondary to subcutaneous silicone injection,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 4, pp. 477–479, 2011.

A. Schmid, A. Tzur, L. Leshko, and B. P. Krieger, “Silicone embolism syndrome: a case report, review of the literature, and comparison with fat embolism syndrome,” CHEST, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 2276–2281, 2005.

P. P. Gopinath, A. Ali, F. Van Tornout, A. Kamath, M. Crawford, and A. G. Nicholson, “Chronic silicone embolism syndrome due to PIP breast implant leakage - a new entity?” Histopathology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 904–906, 2015.

A. Arora, H. Inaty, S. Mukhopadhyay, M. Abu-Hijleh, and A. C. Mehta, “Chronic pulmonary silicone embolism related to saline breast implants,” Annals of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 139–141, 2016.

M. C. Bois, X. Hu, A. C. Roden, E. S. Yi, J. H. Ryu, and M. P. Alexander, “Increasing pulmonary infiltrates in a 72-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer,” CHEST, vol. 146, no. 6, pp. e208–e211, 2014.

R. M. Kappel, L. L. Boer, and H. Dijkman, “Gel bleed and rupture of silicone breast implants investigated by light-, electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis of internal organs and nervous tissue,” Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports, vol. 3, no. 6, article 087, 2016.

S. Paredes Vila, F. J. Gonzalez Barcala, J. Suarez Antelo, M. Moldes Rodriguez, I. Abdulkader Nallib, and L. Valdes Cuadrado, “Pneumonitis caused by silicone gel following breast implant rupture,” Irish Journal of Medical Science, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 141–145, 2010.

S. Mukhopadhyay, Non-Neoplastic Pulmonary Pathology: An Algorithmic Approach to Histologic Findings in the Lung, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2016.

R. L. Levine, T. C. Allen, J. Cartwright Jr., and P. T. Cagle, “Silicone thorax due to a ruptured breast implant,” CHEST, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 1854–1857, 2005.

J. B. Sykes and P. A. Rosella, “Intrathoracic migration of a silicone breast implant 5 months after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 306-307, 2012.

I. H. Shaik, B. Gandrapu, F. Gonzalez-Ibarra, D. Flores, J. Matta, and A. K. Syed, “Silicone Breast Implants: A Rare Cause of Pleural Effusion,” Case Reports in Pulmonology, vol. 2015, pp. 1–3, 2015.

A. E. Brawer, “Bones, groans, and silicone.,” Lupus, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1155–1157, 2012.

A. K. Brawer, “Chronology of systemic disease development in 300 symptomatic recipients of silicone gel-filled breast implants,” ournal of Clean Technology, Environmental Toxicology and Occupational Medicine, vol. 5, pp. 223–233, 1996.

A. E. Brawer, “Silicon and matrix macromolecules: New research opportunities for old diseases from analysis of potential mechanisms of breast implant toxicity,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 1998.

Y. Shoenfeld and N. Agmon-Levin, “‘ASIA’—autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 4–8, 2011.

M. J. L. Colaris, M. de Boer, R. R. van der Hulst, and J. W. Cohen Tervaert, “Two hundreds cases of ASIA syndrome following silicone implants: a comparative study of 30 years and a review of current literature,” Immunologic Research, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 120–128, 2017.

C. Perricone, S. Colafrancesco, R. D. Mazor, A. Soriano, N. Agmon-Levin, and Y. Shoenfeld, “Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) 2013: Unveiling the pathogenic, clinical and diagnostic aspects,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 47, pp. 1–16, 2013.

O. Moling, A. Piccin, M. Tauber et al., “Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma associated with silicone breast implant, HLA-DRB1∗11:01, and HLA-DQB1∗03:01 manifesting as macrophage activation syndrome and with severe neurological symptoms: A case report,” Journal of Medical Case Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, article 254, 2016.

G. Ramos-Gallardo, J. Cuenca-Pardo, E. Rodríguez-Olivares et al., “Breast implant and anaplastic large cell lymphoma meta-analysis,” Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 56–65, 2016.

N. Kossovsky and C. J. Freiman, “Silicone breast implant pathology. Clinical data and immunologic consequences,” Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 686–693, 1994.

W. H. Beekman, R. Feitz, P. J. Van Diest, and J. J. Hage, “Migration of silicone through the fibrous capsules of mammary prostheses,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 441–445, 1997.

W. Greene, D. Raso, L. Walsh, R. Harley, and R. Silver, “Electron probe microanalysis of silicon and the role of the macrophage in proximal (Capsule) and distant sites in augmentation mammaplasty patients,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 513–519, 1995.

American Society of Plastic Surgeons, “Complete plastic surgery statistics report 2015,” https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics.