A RESTUDY OF TWO ANTS FROM THE SICILIAN AMBER BY WILLIAM

The ants of the (presumably Miocene) Sicilian Amber were monographed by Emery (1891), and, except for corrections published by Emery himself (1913), this faunule has not again been subjected to critical study. Since 1891, of course, formicid taxonomy has undergone radical changes, some of them affecting genera found in this amber. Ectatomma gracile, for example, was described from a male specimen that would not today be placed in Ectatomma, but instead, as based on Emery's description (1 89 1 :%'I) and figures (PI. 1, fig. 1, 2) is assignable to Gnamptogenys (Kugler and Brown, in prep.). It is not our purpose here, however, to review all of Emery's Sicilian Amber ants. Rather, we want to present the results of our study of just two of his type specimens that are particularly significant for ant taxonomy. The specimens, in two separate pieces of amber belonging to the Museo Mineralogico dell'universita degli Studi, Bologna, Italy, were lent through the kindness of Prof. Gianfranco Simboli, Director of the Museo Mineralogico, who has our thanks. The new preparation of the specimens and their photographs were done by FMC, while WLB is responsible for the taxonomic interpretation of the material.


INTRODUCTION
The ants of the (presumably Miocene) Sicilian Amber were mono- graphed by Emery (1891), and, except for corrections published by Emery himself (1913), this faunule has not again been subjected to critical study.Since 1891, of course, formicid taxonomy has under- gone radical changes, some of them affecting genera found in this amber.Ectatornrna gracile, for example, was described from a male specimen that would not today be placed in Ectatornrna, but in- stead, as based on Emery's description (1.891:571) and figures (P1. 1, fig. 1, 2) is assignable to Gnarnptogenys (Kugler and Brown, in prep.).
It is not our purpose here, however, to review all of Emery's Sicilian Amber ants.Rather, we want to present the results of our study of just two of his type specimens that are particularly signifi- cant for ant taxonomy.The specimens, in two separate pieces of amber belonging to the Museo Mineralogico dell'UniversitY, degli Studi, Bologna, Italy, were lent through the kindness of Prof.
Gianfranco Simboli, Director of the Museo Mineralogico, who has our thanks.The new preparation of the specimens and their photo- graphs were done by FMC, while WLB is responsible for the taxonomic interpretation of the material.
Manuscript received by the editor May 30, 1979.

Psyche
[December ual; a small eye is shown arising from beneath a scrobe-like head groove, and elongate mandibles are suggested in vague outline.The 10-segmented antenna is depicted by Emery with a clearly 2-merous club and an apically thickened and sharply bent scape.
The amber piece has now been cleaned, partly re-ground, and somewhat cleared by injection of a small amount of Canada balsam.
Figures and 2 are photographs of the Hypopomyrmex bombiccii type, a winged queen, in the new preparation.The specimen is badly shrivelled and compressed, especially from side to side, and the petiolar and postpetiolar nodes are strongly compressed anteropos- teriorly.It can now be seen that the Strumigenys-like cranial shape portrayed by Emery is really only his free interpretation of the crumpled head; the deformed left eye protrudes from the dorso- lateral margin of the head, not from any scrobe, and the mandibles do not extend as Emery's figure 11 vaguely suggests they do.The right side view (fig.2) of the head now available shows the right compound eye also distorted, but larger, more elliptical and less protruding than the left eye.The right antennal scape has its apex flattened, but not sharply bent like that of the left scape, indicating that the latter was distorted after death.
Hypopomyrmex is clearly not a member of tribe Dacetini.Habi- tus, wing venation and the form of the waist do place it in the subfamily Myrmicinae.The 10-merous antennae with 2-merous club, the forewing venation and the propodeal teeth make it most likely a member of the group of genera near Pheidologeton, and it may be regarded as a doubtful synonym of Oligomyrmex.The taxonomy of the living forms of this group is still so poorly known, and the fossil is in such poor condition that formal synonymy here would be premature.
It may be noted, however, that Oligomyrmex sophiae (=Aeromyrma sophiae), based on male specimens, was described by Emery from the Sicilian Amber in the same (1891) paper.
With the removal of Hypopomyrmex from the Dacetini, that tribe loses its entire known fossil history.Unfortunately, the new genus name was one of several misspelled in this German wartime publication, which Wheeler apparently did not see in proof.He published the name in the emended form Sicilomyrmex in 1926, and again in 1928, but by 1929 he had reverted, perhaps absent-mindedly, to the spelling Sicelomyrmex, and even suggested for it a new tribe, Sicelomyrmicini.The tribal name was in any case improperly coined, since the stem involved is myrmec-, not myrmic-.

Sicilomyrmex corniger
It would seem proper to recognize the emended spelling Sicilo- myrmex of 1926 and 1928, since it is clear that Wheeler in 1915 was alluding to the provenience of the specimen from the Sicilian Amber, and that the original spelling Sicelomyrmex was therefore either a lapsus calami or a printer's error, according to Article 33(a)(ii) of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.The necessary emendation of the tribal name thus results in Sicilo- myrmecini.Whether this tribe is worth retaining can only be de- cided after full revisionary study of the tribal classification of sub- family Formicinae.
Emery's original drawings of S. corniger were good ones, but we think that the first photographs of the type specimen (figs.3 and 4)

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Hypopomyrmex bombiccii, type queen viewed from left side.Dark mass below queen is the curled type of Cataulacus planiceps.The view is essentially the same as portrayed by Emery (1891" pl. 1, fig.10).Length of fore wing, 3.7 mm.
genus, as W.M. Wheeler realized in 1915, when he applied a new generic name in the combination Sicelomyrmex corniger. separate