Radiology Research and Practice

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 106059, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/106059

Research Article

Assessment of Condylar Changes in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Pain Using Digital Volumetric Tomography

Ujwala Shivarama Shetty,¹ Krishna N. Burde,² Venkatesh G. Naikmasur,² and Atul P. Sattur²

¹A J Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

²SDM College of Dental Science and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

Received 18 June 2014; Revised 19 August 2014; Accepted 7 September 2014; Published 21 September 2014

Academic Editor: Hans-Joachim Mentzel

Copyright © 2014 Ujwala Shivarama Shetty et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Objective. To evaluate the efficiency of DVT in comparison with OPG in the assessment of bony condylar changes in patients of TMJ pain. Methods. 100 temporomandibular joints of 62 patients with the complaint of temporomandibular joint pain were included in the study. DVT and OPG radiographs were taken for all the 100 joints. Three observers interpreted the DVT and OPG radiograph for the bony changes separately for two times with an interval of one week. The bony changes seen in the condyle were given coding from 0 to 6. (0: Normal, 1: Erosion, 2: Flattening, 3: Osteophyte, 4: Sclerosis, 5: Resorption, and 6: other changes). Interobserver and intraobserver variability was assessed with one-way ANOVA statistics. Z test was used to see the significant difference between OPG and DVT. Results. In the present study the interexaminer reliability for OPG and DVT was 0.903 and 0.978, respectively. Intraexaminer reliability for OPG and DVT was 0.908 and 0.980, respectively. The most common condylar bony change seen in OPG and DVT was erosion followed by flattening and osteophyte. There was significant difference between OPG and DVT in detecting erosion and osteophytes. The other changes observed in our study were Ely’s cyst, pointed condyle, and bifid condyle. All the bony changes are more commonly seen in females than males. Conclusion. DVT provides more valid and accurate information on condylar bony changes. The DVT has an added advantage of lesser radiation exposure to the patient and cost effectiveness and could be easily accessible in a dental hospital.

1. Introduction

Temporomandibular joint is one of the most fascinating and complex synovial systems in the body. It is the area in which the mandible articulates with the cranium [1]. The masticatory system is extremely complex, which comprises primarily of bones, muscles, ligaments, and teeth, all of which are responsible for activities like mastication, speech, and deglutition. All these movements are regulated by an intricate neurological controlling mechanism, which is important for the system to function normally and efficiently [1]. Lack of such harmony may lead to disruptive muscle behavior or structural damage to any of the components. The function of the TMJ is unique, in that the condyle both rotates within the fossa and translates anteriorly along the articular eminence. Because of the ability of the condyle to translate, the mandible can have a much higher maximal incisal opening than would be possible with rotation alone. Because of all these features, the TMJ is referred to as “ginglymodiarthrodial,” which means a combination of the terms ginglymoid (rotation) and arthrodial (translation) [2].

In UK orofacial pain accounts for approximately 10% of pain in the adult population [3]. The prevalence rates of orofacial pain in the Indian population are not available. Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) is a term given to a heterogeneous group of pathologies affecting the temporomandibular joints, the masticatory muscles, or both. It is the most commonly occurring jaw disorder, with a prevalence rate of 28% to 86% of adults and adolescents showing one or more clinical signs or symptoms [4]. The etiology of the TMD is unknown. Occlusal disharmony and psychological distress are the two hypotheses which have dominated the literature. The psychological hypothesis proposes that the disorder evolves as a consequence of psychological distress that is usually due to the individual’s stressful environment. The psychological distress in turn leads to parafunctional habits (tooth clenching and grinding) that result in muscle pain [5]. There are various signs and symptoms of TMJ dysfunction. It may include one or more of the following: pain in the TMJ or ear or both, headache, muscle tenderness, joint stiffness, clicking or other joint noises, reduced range of motion, locking, and subluxation [4]. TMJ imaging may be necessary to supplement information obtained from the clinical examination. It is useful particularly when an osseous abnormality or infection is suspected; conservative treatment has failed or symptoms are worsening. Screening projection used for TMJ is panoramic projection. It provides an overall view of the teeth and jaws. It also helps in identifying odontogenic diseases and other disorders that may be the source of TMJ symptoms. Specific TMJ programs are available in some of the panoramic machines. They have the disadvantage of thick image layers and the oblique, distorted view of the joint, which severely limits image quality. Hence there is a need for advanced radiographic imaging for TMJ. The main aim for TMJ imaging includes evaluation of the integrity of the structures when disease is suspected, determination of the extent of disease and its progression, and finally evaluation of the effects of treatment [6]. Recent imaging technology for TMJ is digital volumetric tomography (DVT). It was developed for angiography in 1982 and subsequently applied to maxillofacial imaging. It uses a divergent or “cone”-shaped source of ionizing radiation and a two dimensional area detector fixed on a rotating gantry to acquire multiple sequential projection images in one complete scan around the area of interest. It is only since late 1990s that it has become possible to produce clinical systems that are both inexpensive and small enough to be used in the dental office [7]. This technology has been given several names including dental volumetric tomography, cone beam volumetric tomography, cone beam computed tomography, dental computed tomography, cone beam imaging [5], and CB3D [8]. DVT provides high definition three-dimensional digital data on precise anatomical information of all oral and maxillofacial structures at reduced cost and less radiation to patient, in comparison to traditional imaging systems, which are limited by distortion, magnification changes, restricted clarity, lack of accuracy in measurements, and not allowing for 3D reconstruction. TMJ imaging poses a challenge because the bony components are small and superimpositions from the base of the skull often result in a lack of clear delineation of the joint. Different imaging modalities have been used for TMJ but they have disadvantages such as superimpositions, high radiation dose, and long scanning time present severe limitation. These disadvantages have led to an increase in popularity of the use of DVT for TMJ imaging [9].

2. Materials and Methods

62 patients who visited the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, with chief complaint of temporomandibular joint pain were selected for the study. Their age ranged from 15 to 72 years. A total of 100 joints were assessed in these patients. Approval from the ethical board has been obtained for this study.

Inclusion criteria are as follows:

(1)patients willing to participate in the study;(2)patients with a complaint of chronic temporomandibular joint pain.

Exclusion criteria are as follows:

(1)systemic, rheumatic, neurologic/neuropathic, endocrine, and immune/autoimmune disease of widespread pain;(2)TMJ pain associated with another joint pain;(3)previous history of radiation treatment to the head and neck;(4)previous history of TMJ surgery;(5)previous history of trauma to jaw;(6)pregnancy.

All the patients were subjected to conventional (OPG) and digital imaging (DVT) evaluation. KODAK 9000C 3D Extra oral imaging system (Care stream Health, Inc., 150 Verona Street, Rochester, NY 14 608) was used for obtaining both OPG and DVT images (Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1: Patient positioned for DVT in Kodak 9000C 3D Extra oral imaging system.

Figure 2: HP L1910 19-inch LCD Monitor used for interpretation of DVT and OPG images.

Technical specification of the machine is shown in Table 1.

Table 1

X-ray generator

Tube voltage
60–90 kv (max), pulsed mode for 3D modality

Tube current
2–15 mA (max)

Frequency
140 kHz (max)

Tube focal spot
0.5 mm

Total filtration
>2.5 mm eq.Al

Panoramic modality

Technology
Digital volumetric tomography (DVT)

Sensor technology
(i) CCD

(ii) Optical fibre sensor with Csi coating

Sensor matrix
61 × 1244 pixels

Image field
6.3 × 129.4 mm

Gray scale
16384—14 bits

Magnification
1.27

3D modality

Technology
Digital volumetric tomography (DVT)

Sensor technology
(i) CMOS

(ii) Optical fibre sensor with Csi coating

Gray scale
16384—14 bits

Volume size
50 × 37 mm

Voxel size
76.5 × 76.5 × 76.5 µm

2.1. Exposure Parameters

 (i) Panoramic radiography is as follows: 70–74 Kv, 14.3–15.1 mAs with scan time of 13.9–15.1 seconds. (ii) Digital volumetric tomography is as follows: 70–80 kv,  mAs with a scan time of 24 seconds.

The temporomandibular joint was assessed by both panoramic and digital volumetric tomography images. In the DVT images and 200 m tomographic sections were taken in sagittal, axial, and coronal planes. Tomographic sections were taken in the curved planar reformation (panorex), a series of multiplanar reconstructions (cross-sections) and oblique planar reformation.

2.2. Radiation Exposure to the Patient

Radiation exposure to the patient is as follows:

 OPG—0.01 mSv (70–85 mGy cm²) DVT—1.02 mSv to 1.05 mSv (220–235 mGy cm²)

The radiographic exposure for patients in both groups was well below the maximum permissible dose of 2.4 mSv as per the NCRP guidelines. Radiation safety precautions such as thyroid collar and lead apron were used before subjecting the patients for imaging evaluation.

The temporomandibular joints were assessed as follows:

 0: normal; 1: erosion; 2: flattening; 3: osteophytes; 4: sclerosis; 5: resorption; 6: other changes.

2.3. Interpretation of Radiographs

The assessment of both OPG and DVT images was done by three observers blinded to each other. OPG and DVT images were assessed separately. All three observers assessed these images twice with an interval of one week. All the three observers were asked to interpret the images to see the bony changes in the condyle and gave the code ranging from 0 to 6. All three observers interpreted the OPG and DVT images on HP L1910 19-inch square LCD Monitor with screen resolution.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 10 software is used for statistical analysis. One-way ANOVA test was done to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver variation. The two imaging modalities were compared and subjected to statistical analysis with the help of test.

3. Results

A total of 100 TMJ in 62 patients with a complaint of TMJ pain were assessed for the different condylar changes as mentioned in the methodology. All the 100 TMJ was assessed by two radiological methods, one being OPG and the other being DVT. Three observers assessed the diagnostic information for each of the imaging modalities. The three observers assessed the diagnostic information for each of the imaging modalities twice with an interval of one week. Distribution of gender and age in the present study is shown in Table 2. Interpretation of OPG and DVT images done by all the three observers is shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. There was good agreement between all the observers suggestive of no inter- and intraobserver variation (Table 5). Statistically significant difference was observed between two imaging modalities in assessing erosion and osteophytes () which is shown in Table 6.

Table 2: Distribution of gender and age in this study.

Gender
Number
Age (average)
Range

Male
20
25.8 years
(15–49)

Female
42
30.5 years
(16–72)

Total
62
28.15 years
(15–72)

Table 3: Bony changes seen by three observers in OPG.

Condylar changes
Observer 1
Observer 2
Observer 3

Day 1
Day 7
Day 1
Day 7
Day 1
Day 7

Normal
56
55
55
54
58
59

Erosion
21
20
21
21
21
20

Flattening
29
29
30
28
26
25

Osteophytes
7
7
6
6
7
7

Sclerosis
5
5
5
5
6
6

Resorption
1
1
1
1
1
1

Others changes
4
4
4
4
4
4

Table 4: Bony changes seen by three observers in DVT.

Condylar changes
Observer 1
Observer 2
Observer 3

Day 1
Day 7
Day 1
Day 7
Day 1
Day 7

Normal
56
55
55
54
58
59

Erosion
21
20
21
21
21
20

Flattening
29
29
30
28
26
25

Osteophytes
7
7
6
6
7
7

Sclerosis
5
5
5
5
6
6

Resorption
1
1
1
1
1
1

Others changes
4
4
4
4
4
4

Table 5: One-way ANOVA test to see interobserver variation in DVT and OPG.

Mean
Std. deviation
Std. error

value

DVT

    Observer 1
100
1.4900
0.797

0.102
0.903

    Observer 2
100
1.5400
0.845

    Observer 3
100
1.5300
0.846

    Total
300
1.5200
0.827

OPG

    Observer 1
100
1.1300
0.393

0.22
0.978

    Observer 2
100
1.1300
0.393

    Observer 3
100
1.1200
0.383

    Total
300
1.1267
0.388

Table 6: Comparison of DVT and OPG groups.

Test

Comparison of DVT and OPG groups
value

Condylar changes
OPG
DVT

Normal
56
22
0.000*

Erosion
21
61
0.000*

Flattening
29
35
0.449

Osteophytes
4
20
0.001*

Sclerosis
5
10
0.283

Resorption
1
4
0.369

Others changes
3
5
1.000

Statistically significant difference was observed between two imaging modality in assessing erosion and osteophytes as value is less than 0.05.

4. Discussion

Imaging is considered as an important diagnostic adjunct to the clinical assessment [10]. Several radiographic methods are used to assess bony changes that affect the TMJ. It is important to obtain a clear and precise image of the region. Superimposition of adjacent structures, different angulations of the condyle, limitation of mouth opening in some patients, presence of artifacts, and mandibular movements during the examination make the TMJ image difficult to obtain [11]. There are many radiographic techniques for TMJ examination. The most recent one is DVT or CBCT.

A recent “effective dose” survey showed that CBCT units delivered a broad range of doses (dependent on machine, field size, resolution, etc.) of between 13 Sv (minimum dose, small volume) and 82 Sv (maximum dose, large volume) which compared favorably with radiation dose inflicted by multislice CT (MSCT) of between 474 Sv and 1,160 Sv for mandibular and full head scans, respectively. To put these measurements into perspective, panoramic doses have recently been found to range between 3 and 24 Sv.

In the present study, we evaluated different bony changes of condyle seen in patient with TMJ pain using DVT and OPG. The diagnostic reliability of OPG and DVT radiographic techniques to see the condylar bony changes were assessed and compared with each other.

In our study, we used KODAK 9000C 3D Extra oral imaging system to obtain both OPG and DVT images. Using of this system can be justified by a study done by Alqerban et al. in which authors compared six different CBCT systems to assess the root resorption [12].

Different bony changes assessed in our study are as follows:

(i)erosion;(ii)flattening;(iii)osteophytes;(iv)sclerosis;(v)resorption;(vi)other changes;

Erosion is defined as an area of decreased density of the cortical bone and the adjacent subcortical bone. Flattening is defined as a flat bony contour deviating from the convex form. Osteophyte is defined as marginal bony outgrowths on the condyle. Sclerosis is defined as an area of increased density of cortical bone extending into the bone marrow. Resorption is defined as a partial loss of the condylar head [11]. All the observers interpreted the images and gave the coding from 0 to 6, where 0 stands for normal (Figure 3), 1 for erosion (Figure 4), 2 for flattening (Figure 5), 3 for osteophytes (Figure 6), 4 for sclerosis (Figure 7), 5 for resorption (Figure 8), and 6 for other changes.

Figure 3: Normal condyle as seen in DVT.

Figure 4: Erosion of condyle as seen in DVT.

Figure 5: Flattening of condyle as seen in DVT.

Figure 6: Osteophyte of condyle as seen in DVT.

Figure 7: Sclerosis of condyle as seen in DVT.

Figure 8: Resorption of condyle as seen in DVT.

In our study, we included 100 TMJ of 62 patients who had complained of TMJ pain. Out of 62 patients, 44 were female (67.75%) and 20 were male (32.25%) (Table 2). All the 100 joints were subjected for OPG and DVT examination and the images were interpreted by the three observers separately.

In our study, we had three observers to interpret the images who were blinded to each other, so that interobserver variations can be assessed. All the three observers interpreted the DVT and OPG images twice with an interval of one week to assess intraobserver’s variations.

Different bony changes as seen by the three observers in DVT and OPG are shown in Tables 3 and 4.

In our study, one-way ANOVA test was done to see interobserver and intraobserver variation (Table 5). According to this test there was no interobserver and intraobserver variation in any of the imaging modality. This presumes that the observers were experienced and well calibrated in interpreting the images. Also, the image quality of OPG and DVT was par adequate not to mislead the observers.

According to available literature bony changes of TMJ are more common in female than male. In our study out of 100 joints 64% were of female and 36% were of male. Results of the present study show that more common bony changes seen like erosion, flattening, osteophytes, and sclerosis are seen more commonly in female than male (Table 7). This is in accordance with the study done by Pontual et al. (2012) [13] in which 78% were female and 22% were male. Another study done by LeResche (1997) found that pain in the temporomandibular joint is twice as common in females as in males [14]. The greater occurrence in women may be explained by the hormonal influences of estrogen and prolactin, which may exacerbate degradation of cartilage and articular bone in addition to stimulating a series of immunological responses in the TMJ [14].

Table 7: Most common bony changes in male and female in OPG and DVT.

Condylar changes
OPG
DVT

Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total

Erosion
8
13
21
21
40
61

Flattening
11
18
29
15
20
35

Osteophytes
3
4
7
9
11
20

Sclerosis
2
3
5
3
7
10

In our study most common bony change seen by all the three observers was erosion followed by flattening and osteophytes. The results of our study are consistent with other studies done by Alexiou et al. (2009) [15] and Martínez Blanco et al. (2004) [16]. Objective of the present was to evaluate the efficiency of DVT in comparison with OPG in the assessment of bony condylar changes in patients of TMJ pain. Comparison of both imaging modalities was done using the test. Results of the test are shown in Table 6.

Most common bony change seen in our study is erosion. According to the results of our study there was a significant difference between DVT and OPG in assessing erosion of the condyle . Erosion is the initial stage of degenerative changes, indicating that the TMJ is unstable and changes in bone surfaces will occur, probably resulting in changes in occlusion [11]. In our study, 61% of erosion could be identified in DVT whereas OPG was able to detect only 21%. Hence DVT has proved to be more superior than OPG in detecting early bony changes like erosion. This can be explained by the fact that DVT is a three-dimensional imaging technique in which the images can be viewed in all the three sections, that is, axial, coronal, and sagittal. The thickness section is 200 μm. Hence minor changes can be well appreciated by this technique. Our results are in accordance with a study done by Lee et al. who compared the panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomographic images in detecting bony changes in patients with temporomandibular joint disorder and they found that CBCT was able to detect more percentage of erosion compared with OPG [17].

Second most common change observed in our study is flattening. Flattening is considered a degenerative alteration resulting from overload on the TMJ and it may be related to the involvement of the masseter and temporal muscles [11]. In our study, though DVT could detect more number of flattening than OPG, there was no statistically significant difference between two modalities in detecting this bony change. This can be explained by the fact that flattening is a gross change which can be easily detected by two-dimensional imaging like OPG. In a study done by Lee et al., they also found that OPG was able to detect more percentage of flattening [17].

Next common bony change detected in the present study was the presence of osteophytes.

Osteophytes occur in an advanced stage of degenerative change when the body adapts itself to repair the joint. The osteophytes appear to stabilize and widen the surface in an attempt to improve the overload resulting from occlusal forces, representing areas of neoformed cartilage [11]. There was statistically significant difference between DVT and OPG in detecting osteophytes. These results are similar to a study by Lee et al. in which out of 212 joints CBCT was able to detect 2.1% of osteophytes whereas OPG detected only 0.9% and hence proving that CBCT is superior to OPG [17].

Sclerosis and resorption are the other two bony changes seen in our study. DVT was able to detect more number of sclerosis and resorption compared to OPG. But there was no statistically significant results between the two imaging modality. Reason for no significant difference can be attributed to the small percentage of these changes observed in our study.

In our study, we also found other changes like Ely’s cyst of the mandibular condyle (Figure 9), pointed shape of condylar head (Figure 10) and bifid condyle (Figure 11). Ely’s cysts are also called subcortical cysts. These are rounded radiolucent areas that may be just below the cortical plate or deep in trabecular bone. There was no significant difference between DVT and OPG to detect Ely’s cysts. Out of 100 joints we found 2 joints having Ely’s cysts. In a cross-sectional study done by Mathew et al. to see condylar changes and its association with age, TMD, and dentition status, they found 5 Ely’s cysts out of 75 subjects [18].

Figure 9: Ely’s cyst of condyle as seen in DVT.

Figure 10: Pointed shape of condyle as seen in DVT.

Figure 11: Bifid condyle as seen in DVT.

In our study there were 2 joints with a pointed condylar head which was seen in both DVT and OPG. In a study done by Christiano Oliveira et al. 22.9% (129 condyles out of 566 condyles) of condyle had pointed condylar head [19]. A smaller amount of occurrence of pointed condylar head in our study may be due to a smaller number of sample sizes.

Bifid condyle is a rare anatomic variation of mandibular condyle. It can be symptomatic or diagnosed incidentally on routine radiographic examination. They appear to be more common on the left side in unilateral cases [20]. In a study done by Cağlayan and Tozoğlu in the year 2012 they found 2 bifid condyles out of 45 subjects [21]. In our study, we found one bifid mandibular condyle in left TMJ which was detected on DVT and not in OPG. This difference may have been due to the superiority of DVT for analyzing the TMJ region because of the absence of superimposition of anatomical structures.

To conclude, OPG alone can be used to detect gross bony changes of condyle like flattening and pointed condyle and DVT is helpful in detecting changes of condyle like erosion and osteophytes and Common bony changes seen in our study are erosion followed by flattening and osteophytes both in OPG and DVT. All the bony changes are seen more commonly in female than male. Other bony changes observed in our study are Ely’s cyst, pointed condyle, and bifid condyle.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

J. P. Okeson, Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion, Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 5th edition, 2003.

K. Herb, S. Cho, and M. A. Stiles, “Temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction,” Current Pain and Headache Reports, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 408–414, 2006.

J. P. Okeson, Bell’s Orofacial Pain’s the Clinical Management of Orofacial Pain, Chicago Quintessence, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2005.

S. P. Springer, S. M. Greenberg, and M. Glick, “Temporomandibular disorders,” in Burket's Oral Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment, S. M. Greenberg and M. Glick, Eds., pp. 230–232, BC Decker, Ontario, Canada, 9th edition, 2003.

W. C. Scarfe and A. G. Farman, “Diagnostic imaging of the temporomandibular joint,” in Oral Radiology, Principles and Interpretation, S. C. White and M. J. Pharoah, Eds., pp. 473–478, Elsevier, Noida, India, 6th edition, 2010.

E. L. Lewis, M. F. Dolwick, S. Abramowicz, and S. L. Reeder, “Contemporary imaging of the temporomandibular joint,” Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 875–890, 2008.

W. C. Scarfe and A. G. Farman, “Cone beam computed tomography,” in Oral Radiology, Principles and Interpretation, S. C. White and M. J. Pharoah, Eds., pp. 225–243, Elsevier, Noida, India, 6th edition, 2010.

R. Molteni, “The so-called cone beam computed tomography technology (or CB3D, rather!),” Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 477–478, 2008.

J. B. Ludlow, K. L. Davies, and D. A. Tyndall, “Temporomandibular joint imaging: a comparative study of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of bone change with biplanar multidirectional tomography and panoramic images,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 735–743, 1995.

W. C. Scarfe and A. G. Farman, “What is cone-Beam CT and how does it work?” Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 707–730, 2008.

M. L. Dos Anjos Pontual, J. S. L. Freire, J. M. N. Barbosa, M. A. G. Frazão, and A. Dos Anjos Pontual, “Evaluation of bone changes in the temporomandibular joint using cone beam CT,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2012.

A. Alqerban, R. Jacobs, S. Fieuws, O. Nackaerts, and G. Willems, “Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors,” The American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. e129–e139, 2011.

M. L. Pontual, J. S. L. Freire, J. M. N. Barbosa, M. A. G. Frazão, and A. Pontual, “Evaluation of bone changes in the temporomandibular joint using cone beam CT,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2012.

L. LeResche, “Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors,” Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 291–305, 1997.

K. E. Alexiou, H. C. Stamatakis, and K. Tsiklakis, “Evaluation of the severity of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritic changes related to age using cone beam computed tomography,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 141–147, 2009.

M. Martínez Blanco, J. V. Bagán, A. Fons, and R. Poveda Roda, “Osteoarthrosis of the temporomandibular joint. A clinical and radiological study of 16 patients,” Medicina Oral, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 106–115, 2004.

D.-Y. Lee, Y.-J. Kim, Y.-H. Song et al., “Comparison of bony changes between panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomographic images in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders,” Korean Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 364–372, 2010.

A. L. Mathew, A. A. Sholapurkar, and K. M. Pai, “Condylar changes and its association with age, TMD, and dentition status: a cross-sectional study,” International Journal of Dentistry, vol. 2011, Article ID 413639, 7 pages, 2011.

C. Christiano Oliveira, R. T. Bernardo, and A. Capelozza, “Mandibular condyle morphology on panoramic radiographs of asymptomatic temporomandibular joints,” International Journal of Dentistry, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 114–118, 2009.

A. Faizal, I. Ali, U. S. Pai, and K. Bannerjee, “Bifid mandibular condyle-report of two cases of varied aetiology,” National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 78–80, 2010.

F. Cağlayan and U. Tozoğlu, “Incidental findings in the maxillofacial region detected by cone beam CT,” Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, vol. 18, pp. 159–163, 2012.