Stem Cells International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 838950, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/838950

Clinical Study

Prognostic Value of Glioma Cancer Stem Cell Isolation in Survival of Primary Glioblastoma Patients

Byung Ho Kong,¹ Ju Hyung Moon,² Yong-Min Huh,³ Jin-Kyoung Shim,² Ji-Hyun Lee,² Eui-Hyun Kim,² Jong Hee Chang,² Dong-Seok Kim,² Yong-Kil Hong,⁴ Sun Ho Kim,² Su-Jae Lee,⁵ and Seok-Gu Kang²

¹Department of Medical Science, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea
²Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea
³Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea
⁴Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea
⁵Department of Life Science, Hanyang University, 17 Haendang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 133-791, Republic of Korea

Received 30 July 2014; Revised 16 November 2014; Accepted 23 November 2014; Published 11 December 2014

Academic Editor: Ren-Ke Li

Copyright © 2014 Byung Ho Kong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been reported to be critical in the initiation, maintenance, and progression of cancers. The expression of stem cell markers, such as podoplanin (PDPN), CD133, and nestin, may have been correlated with malignant progression. However, the effects of CSCs and stem cell markers on clinical outcomes in cancer patients remain unclear. In this study, we assessed the prognostic roles of glioma CSCs (gCSCs) isolation and stem cell markers in patients with primary glioblastoma (pGBM). A cohort of 39 patients with pGBM was separated into two groups, those positive or negative for gCSCs, and the correlation between gCSC and patient survival was evaluated. We observed significantly different cumulative survival () when comparing patients positive for gCSCs patients and negative for gCSC. Among the patients positive for gCSCs, we observed no significant differences in survival between those whose gCSCs were each positive or negative for PDPN, CD133, or nestin. This study strongly supports the prognostic value of gCSCs isolation on the survival of patients with pGBM.

1. Introduction

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are critical in the initiation, maintenance, and progression of tumors and in the development of resistance to therapy [1], although the tumor microenvironment is also important to these processes [2–5]. The accumulation of evidence suggesting a strong association between CSCs and malignancy [6, 7] has led to considerable research on the prognostic role of CSCs in cancer patients [8]. Close associations have been observed between clinical outcomes and the presence of CSC features in various tumors, such as the expression of stem cell markers, genetic features, and the formation of tumor spheres [9–13]. Similar findings have been observed in patients with glioma in that neurosphere formation and the expression of stem cell markers, such as podoplanin (PDPN), CD133, and nestin, were found to be prognostic markers of clinical outcomes [14–16]. In contrast, other studies have found that the presence of CSC features, such as expression of stem cell markers, was not prognostically significant [8, 17, 18], bringing into question the prognostic value of CSC features.

In this study, we assessed the prognostic role of the isolation of glioma CSCs (gCSCs) and expression of stem cell markers (PDPN, CD133, and nestin). These two factors are supposed to be strongly associated with tumor malignancy, in patients with pGBM [15]. We evaluated previously defined populations of gCSCs, with properties that included the ability to form gliomaspheres, to undergo neural differentiation, and to induce tumorigenesis in vivo [6]. In this study, a cohort of 39 patients with pGBM was separated into two groups, those positive or negative for gCSCs, and the correlation between gCSC and patient survival was evaluated. We also assessed the expression of stem cell markers (PDPN, CD133, and nestin) in gCSCs and its relationships with patient survival to address the possible prognostic value of these markers in pGBM.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Population

Patients with pGBM treated at two institutions between 2009 and 2013 were included in this study (Table 1); patients with secondary GBM were excluded. All patients were histologically diagnosed by neuropathologists and graded according to the 2007 WHO classification [20]. All patients provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the two institutions (KC10SNSI0466 and 4-2012-0212).

Table 1: Cohorts of primary glioblastoma patients who were positive or negative for glioma cancer stem cells (gCSCs) [6].

Patients
gCSC candidates
Age (years)
Sex
Podoplanin
CD133
Nestin

gCSC positive
gCSC0315
57
F
−
+
+

gCSC0426
44
F
−
+
+

gCSC0520
72
F
−
+
+

gCSC0713
55
F
−
−
−

gCSC0504
39
M
+
+
+

gCSC1120
48
F
+
+
+

gCSC0503
64
M
+
+
+

gCSC0114
53
M
−
+
+

gCSC0213
51
F
−
+
+

gCSC0228
68
M
+
+
+

gCSC0308
61
M
+
+
+

gCSC0924
11
M
+
+
+

gCSC0510
49
F
+
+
+

gCSC0627
61
M
+
+
+

gCSC0520
34
M
+
+
+

gCSC negative
gCSC0406
38
F

gCSC08241
71
F

gCSC1005
59
F

gCSC1124
63
F

gCSC0226
28
M

gCSC0309
59
M

gCSC0803
60
F

gCSC08242
65
F

gCSC0620
66
F

gCSC0928
46
M

gCSC1108
82
M

gCSC0219
60
M

gCSC0528
66
F

gCSC0610
49
M

gCSC0702
63
M

gCSC0709
24
M

gCSC0816
57
M

gCSC0822
62
F

gCSC1118
57
F

gCSC1218
44
M

gCSC0102
68
M

gCSC0106
57
F

gCSC0529
60
F

gCSC1102
57
M

gCSC: glioma cancer stem cell; M: male; F: female; +: positive for expression as assessed using immunocytochemical methods [6]; −: negative for expression, as assessed using immunocytochemical methods [6].

2.2. Treatments

All patients received combined therapy, consisting of surgery, followed by concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (Table 2) [19]. The aim of surgery was gross total tumor resection, defined as macroscopic removal of 100% of the tumor mass. Patients not suitable for total resection underwent subtotal resection, defined as removal of <100% but ≥90% of the macroscopic tumor mass, or partial resection, defined as removal of <90% of the macroscopic tumor [21]. The extent of tumor resection was estimated by the neurosurgeons and confirmed by postoperative review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. All patients received postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ), as described previously [19]. Recurrent tumors were treated with salvage temozolomide (200 mg/m²) [22] in 16 patients and radiotherapy in one patient and not treated in six patients.

Table 2: Demographic characteristics of the pGBM patient.

Characteristics
gCSCs positive
gCSCs negative
value*

Age (years)

0.188

    Median

    Range
11–72
28–82

Sex (number [%])

0.653

    Male
8 (53%)
11 (46%)

    Female
7 (47%)
13 (54%)

Mean follow-up (months)

0.225

Pathological diagnosis
Primary glioblastoma
Primary glioblastoma

Treatment
Surgery + Stupp’s regimen [19]
Surgery + Stupp’s regimen [19]

Extent of surgery (number [%])

    Total resection
10 (67%)
14 (58%)
0.636

    Subtotal resection
4 (27%)
8 (33%)

    Partial resection
1 (7%)
2 (8%)

Recurrences (number [%])
11 (73%)
12 (50%)
0.192

Treatment of recurrences (number [%])

    Radiation therapy
1 (9%)
0 (0%)

    Adjuvant temozolomide
6 (55%)
10 (83%)

    None
4 (36%)
2 (17%)

1p 19q codeletion by FISH
1 (7%)
0 (0%)
0.385

MGMT methylation by PCR
7 (47%)
11 (45%)
1.000

pGBM: primary glioblastoma; gCSCs: glioma cancer stem cells; MGMT: O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. By Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and by Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.

2.3. Isolation of gCSCs

Tumor specimens had been collected in the operating room from glioblastoma patients undergoing surgery, followed by isolation of gCSCs within 1 hour using a previously described mechanical dissociation method [6]. Only cells that showed the ability to form gliomaspheres, undergo neural differentiation, and induce in vivo tumorigenesis, as described in our previous report [6], had been defined as gCSCs. The isolated gCSC preparations had been assayed for the expression of PDPN, CD133, and nestin by immunocytochemistry (Table 1) [6]. These selection procedures and immunocytochemical analyses had been performed using protocols described in our previous report [6]. The survival outcomes of the patients with confirmed pGBM were followed up.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The primary study outcome was overall survival (OS), measured from the date of surgery confirming the diagnosis of pGBM to the date of the last follow-up visit or death. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Patients’ demographic characteristics were compared using the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and by Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 18.0KO software (SPSS Korea, Seoul, Korea), with considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patients

Of the 39 pGBM patients treated at our institution from April 2009 to December 2013, fifteen were categorized as positive and twenty-four as negative for gCSCs (Table 1). These patients included 19 males and 20 females, ranging in age from 11 to 82 years. In 15 of the 39 pGBM patients, gCSCs were isolated. Immunocytochemical analysis had showed that [6], of the 15 patients positive for gCSCs, nine had PDPN⁺, fourteen had CD133⁺, and fourteen had nestin⁺ gCSCs (Table 1).

3.2. Patient Survival

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 39 pGBM patients are shown in Table 2. The mean survival time of all 39 pGBM patients was 725 days. The mean survival time of the twenty-four gCSC negative patients (855 days) was much longer than that of the 15 gCSC positive patients (520 days). There were no statistically significant differences in age (), gender (), mean follow-up (), extent of surgery (), recurrence rate (), 1p 19q codeletion (), and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation () between the gCSC positive and gCSC negative groups of patients. Kaplan-Meier curves displaying the proportion of OS are demonstrated in Figure 1, showing statistically significant difference in cumulative survival () between the two groups.

Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier survival curves of pGBM patients positive and negative for gCSCs ( as calculated by the log-rank test).

Among the patients positive for gCSCs, we observed no significant differences in survival between those whose gCSCs were positive (nine patients) or negative (six patients) for PDPN expression (), positive (14 patients) or negative (one patient) for CD133 (), and positive (14 patients) or negative (one patient) for nestin ().

4. Discussion

We observed statistically significant difference in OS between gCSC positive and gCSC negative patients with pGBM. As CSCs may influence tumor growth and resistance to treatment [1], gCSCs are supposed to have a prognostic role in predicting the clinical outcome in pGBM patients. CSC features are reported to have been associated with poorer prognosis in various types of cancers [9–13]. Similar findings were reported in patients with a glioma in that the formation of neurosphere correlated with poorer clinical outcomes [14, 23, 24]. Our findings of the statistical analyses present reliable evidence that the isolation of gCSC is an independent prognostic factor for the clinical outcome of patients with pGBM.

To identify further candidate prognostic markers in patients with pGBM, we analyzed the relationship between the presence of PDPN⁺, CD133⁺, and nestin⁺ gCSCs and survival in pGBM patients. Some studies have reported that PDPN, CD133, and nestin expression are prognostic in glioma patients. Ernst et al. [25] and Mishima et al. [15] reported that PDPN expression was prognostic in patients with astrocytomas. Expression of CD133 [26] and nestin [27] was associated with poorer outcomes in many cancers, including brain cancers. In this series, however, there were no statistically significant differences in overall survivals between PDPN⁺, CD133⁺, and nestin⁺ gCSCs and PDPN⁻, CD133⁻, and nestin⁻ gCSCs. The mean survival times of PDPN-expressing gCSCs positive and negative groups were similar, 400 days and 408 days, respectively, and there was no significant difference in OS between two groups (). CD133 and nestin were expressed in most of the patients positive for gCSCs and there was only one case of CD133⁻ and nestin⁻ gCSC, so it was impossible to compare the two groups statistically. These findings indicate that the presence of PDPN-, CD133-, and nestin-expressing gCSCs was not prognostic indicators for survival in pGBM patient. This conclusion is supported by data from other studies, which reported that expression of stem cell markers did not have prognostic significance in glioma patients [8, 18, 28].

In this study, only pGBM patients were included for adjusting the grade of glioma. We previously reported that the rates of existence of gCSC increase proportionally as the WHO grades of glioma rise [6]. In the study including samples from various grades of gliomas, the poorer prognosis correlated with the isolation of gCSC should be affected by the grade of glioma because of the close correlation of the gCSC isolation rates and the grade of glioma. Because of the trend of step-by-step increase of gCSC isolation rate according to the WHO grades of gliomas, the stem cell markers should be expressed more in the patients with higher grade gliomas. We showed that most of the gCSCs expressed the stem cell markers, such as CD133 and nestin, in this study.

There are some limitations in this study. The in vitro assay for the isolation of gCSC takes length duration and requires the technical expertise to perform it. So, it may not be suitable for predicting the prognosis of the pGBM patients with short survival periods. We investigated the expression of stemness surface antigens only in the neurospheres and not in the parent tumors. Regarding the duration and technical needs of this in vitro assay, investigation of the expression of stemness surface antigens in the parent tumors may be more proper for evaluation of the prognosis. These suggest the need for additional studies assessing the associations between the stemness surface antigens in the parent tumor and clinical outcomes in pGBM patients.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, we showed that the presence of gCSCs alone was significantly prognostic of OS in patient with pGBM. Although we found that the presence of PDPN⁺, CD133⁺, and nestin⁺ gCSCs was not prognostic of OS, our findings suggest that this issue warrants further investigation. We are currently performing a continued study in a larger numbers of patients to further address the detailed role of gCSCs in pGBM patients.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Byung Ho Kong, Ju Hyung Moon, and Yong-Min Huh contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2013R1A1A2006427) and by a Grant of the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI13C1509). It was also supported by the National Research Foundation and Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korean Government, through its National Nuclear Technology Program (2012M2B2B1055639).

References

E. Sulman, K. Aldape, and H. Colman, “Brain tumor stem cells,” Current Problems in Cancer, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 124–142, 2008.

Y. G. Kim, S. Jeon, G.-Y. Sin et al., “Existence of glioma stroma mesenchymal stemlike cells in Korean glioma specimens,” Child's Nervous System, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 549–563, 2013.

B. H. Kong, H.-D. Shin, S.-H. Kim et al., “Increased in vivo angiogenic effect of glioma stromal mesenchymal stem-like cells on glioma cancer stem cells from patients with glioblastoma,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1754–1762, 2013.

J. Kwak, H. J. Shin, S. H. Kim et al., “Isolation of tumor spheres and mesenchymal stem-like cells from a single primitive neuroectodermal tumor specimen,” Child's Nervous System, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2229–2239, 2013.

H.-Y. Lim, K. M. Kim, B. K. Kim et al., “Isolation of mesenchymal stem-like cells in meningioma specimens,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1260–1268, 2013.

B. H. Kong, N.-R. Park, J.-K. Shim et al., “Isolation of glioma cancer stem cells in relation to histological grades in glioma specimens,” Child's Nervous System, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 217–229, 2013.

G.-Y. Shin, J.-K. Shim, J.-H. Lee et al., “Changes in the biological characteristics of glioma cancer stem cells after serial in vivo subtransplantation,” Child's Nervous System, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 55–64, 2013.

K.-J. Kim, K.-H. Lee, H.-S. Kim et al., “The presence of stem cell marker-expressing cells is not prognostically significant in glioblastomas,” Neuropathology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 494–502, 2011.

G. Pirozzi, V. Tirino, R. Camerlingo et al., “Prognostic value of cancer stem cells, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and circulating tumor cells in lung cancer,” Oncology Reports, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1763–1768, 2013.

X. Wang, H. Ren, T. Zhao et al., “Stem cell factor is a novel independent prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 2283–2290, 2014.

M. Kok, R. H. Koornstra, T. C. Margarido et al., “Mammosphere-derived gene set predicts outcome in patients with ER-positive breast cancer,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 316–326, 2009.

H. S. Kim, S. Y. Yoo, K. T. Kim, J. T. Park, H. J. Kim, and J. C. Kim, “Expression of the stem cell markers CD133 and nestin in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and clinical relevance,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 754–761, 2012.

B. Bao, S. Ali, A. Ahmad et al., “Differentially expressed miRNAs in cancer-stem-like cells: markers for tumor cell aggressiveness of pancreatic cancer,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 1947–1958, 2014.

D. R. Laks, M. Masterman-Smith, K. Visnyei et al., “Neurosphere formation is an independent predictor of clinical outcome in malignant glioma,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 980–987, 2009.

K. Mishima, Y. Kato, M. K. Kaneko, R. Nishikawa, T. Hirose, and M. Matsutani, “Increased expression of podoplanin in malignant astrocytic tumors as a novel molecular marker of malignant progression,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 483–488, 2006.

R. H. Dahlrot, S. K. Hermansen, S. Hansen, and B. W. Kristensen, “What is the clinical value of cancer stem cell markers in gliomas?” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 334–348, 2013.

S. F. Schoppmann, A. S. Berghoff, B. Jesch et al., “Expression of podoplanin is a rare event in sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors and does not influence prognosis,” Future Oncology, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 859–866, 2012.

K. Christensen, H. D. Schrøder, and B. W. Kristensen, “CD133 identifies perivascular niches in grade II-IV astrocytomas,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 157–170, 2008.

R. Stupp, W. P. Mason, M. J. van den Bent et al., “Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 10, pp. 987–996, 2005.

D. N. Louis, H. Ohgaki, O. D. Wiestler et al., “The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 97–109, 2007.

C. M. Kramm, S. Wagner, S. van Gool et al., “Improved survival after gross total resection of malignant gliomas in pediatric patients from the HIT-GBM studies,” Anticancer Research, vol. 26, no. 5B, pp. 3773–3779, 2006.

M. G. Hart, R. Garside, G. Rogers, K. Stein, and R. Grant, “Temozolomide for high grade glioma,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 4, Article ID CD007415, 2013.

E. H. Panosyan, D. R. Laks, M. Masterman-Smith et al., “Clinical outcome in pediatric glial and embryonal brain tumors correlates with in vitro multi-passageable neurosphere formation,” Pediatric Blood and Cancer, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 644–651, 2010.

D. Beier, J. Wischhusen, W. Dietmaier et al., “CD133 expression and cancer stem cells predict prognosis in high-grade oligodendroglial tumors,” Brain Pathology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 370–377, 2008.

A. Ernst, S. Hofmann, R. Ahmadi et al., “Genomic and expression profiling of glioblastoma stem cell-like spheroid cultures identifies novel tumor-relevant genes associated with survival,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 6541–6550, 2009.

R. Pallini, L. Ricci-Vitiani, G. L. Banna et al., “Cancer stem cell analysis and clinical outcome in patients with glioblastoma multiforme,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 24, pp. 8205–8212, 2008.

T. Strojnik, G. V. Røsland, P. O. Sakariassen, R. Kavalar, and T. Lah, “Neural stem cell markers, nestin and musashi proteins, in the progression of human glioma: correlation of nestin with prognosis of patient survival,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 133–143, 2007.

P. Chinnaiyan, M. Wang, A. M. Rojiani et al., “The prognostic value of nestin expression in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: report from the radiation therapy oncology group,” Radiation Oncology, vol. 3, no. 1, article 32, 2008.