Stem Cells International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2489041, 2 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2489041

Editorial

Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Actions

Bruno Christ,¹ Marcella Franquesa,² Mustapha Najimi,³ Luc J. W. van der Laan,⁴ and Marc Hendrik Dahlke⁵

¹University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
²REMAR Group, Health Science Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Badalona, Spain
³Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
⁴Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
⁵University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Bruno Christ; bruno.christ@medizin.uni-leipzig.de

Received 25 September 2017; Accepted 26 September 2017; Published 6 December 2017

Copyright © 2017 Bruno Christ et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The clinical interest in the therapeutic use of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSC) is further increasing as their versatility in animal trial settings becomes more and more obvious. Indeed, screening the official review site for clinical trials (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) using the search term “Mesenchymal Stem Cells” reveals 611 records (September, 2017). The large diversity of medical indications for treatment with MSC comprises hematological malignancies, diabetes type 1, neurologic diseases, joint and bone diseases, organ transplantation, or liver diseases, just to mention a small selection. This indicates the big potential of MSC to act beneficially both on chronic and acute diseases of either local or systemic origin. However, albeit we are only starting to understand the mode of action of MSC in certain disease conditions, there is still hesitation on the safety, upscale feasibility and, effectiveness of clinical MSC application.

MSC from different tissues and organs feature rather similar phenotypic characteristics when put in culture. These include the capacity of plastic adherence, multiple differentiation potential, and surface marker profiles, which comprise the minimal definition criteria for MSC [1]. But gaining knowledge of molecular signatures by global gene expression analyses currently reveals that heterogeneity exists between different MSC populations depending on their origin, isolation and propagation procedures, and on their status of differentiation [2–5]. The actions mediated by MSC may comprise two principally different mechanisms. The one is based on the functional integration of differentiated MSC into diseased host tissue after transplantation as has been shown for liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy or toxic injury [6, 7]. The second mechanism comprises paracrine or cellular support of self-restoration of the diseased tissue or organ [8, 9]. The impact of MSC on the regulation of both the innate and the acquired immune system was intensively investigated and sparked the application in the setting of organ transplantation, where immunosuppression of alloreactivity is essential to prevent rejection [10, 11]. It is mainly the involvement of key molecules like prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, cytokines, and other growth factors, which act on cells of the immune system to activate or modulate their activity state and thus to impact on the immune status of the organ or organism as a whole.

Knowledge on the cellular targets of MSC actions is emerging. Yet, gain of knowledge still remains limited. Especially, effects on cell cycle and metabolism remain elusive which however are essential to predict potential adverse effects in the treatment of tumorigenic diseases like hepatitis [12] or diseases associated with the metabolic syndrome like diabetes type 2. Facing the pleiotropic properties of MSC like modulation of immune responses and alleviation of inflammation and tissue damage, as well as stimulation of tissue regeneration, it will be the goal of future efforts using relevant cell or animal model systems to unequivocally elucidate the molecular and cellular impact of a defined MSC population on a specified disease environment before their clinical application. In this special issue of Stem Cells International on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of MSC actions (CMMM), we provide a collection of work stepping towards this goal in order to complement gaps of knowledge before unequivocal use of MSC in clinical settings

Bruno Christ
Marcella Franquesa
Mustapha Najimi
Luc J. W. van der Laan
Marc Hendrik Dahlke

References

M. Dominici, K. Le Blanc, I. Mueller et al., “Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement,” Cytotherapy, vol. 8, pp. 315–317, 2006.

N. Saidi, M. Ghalavand, M. S. Hashemzadeh, R. Dorostkar, H. Mohammadi, and A. Mahdian-Shakib, “Dynamic changes of epigenetic signatures during chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells,” Biomed & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 89, pp. 719–731, 2017.

F. Collino, M. Pomatto, S. Bruno et al., “Exosome and microvesicle-enriched fractions isolated from mesenchymal stem cells by gradient separation showed different molecular signatures and functions on renal tubular epithelial cells,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 13, pp. 226–243, 2017.

B. Roson-Burgo, F. Sanchez-Guijo, C. Del Canizo, and J. De Las Rivas, “Insights into the human mesenchymal stromal/stem cell identity through integrative transcriptomic profiling,” BMC Genomics, vol. 17, p. 944, 2016.

R. M. Samsonraj, B. Rai, P. Sathiyanathan et al., “Establishing criteria for human mesenchymal stem cell potency,” Stem Cells, vol. 33, pp. 1878–1891, 2015.

H. Aurich, M. Sgodda, P. Kaltwasser et al., “Hepatocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from human adipose tissue in vitro promotes hepatic integration in vivo,” Gut, vol. 58, pp. 570–581, 2009.

T. K. Kuo, S. P. Hung, C. H. Chuang et al., “Stem cell therapy for liver disease: parameters governing the success of using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells,” Gastroenterology, vol. 134, pp. 2111–2121.e3, 2008.

S. Bruno, M. C. Deregibus, and G. Camussi, “The secretome of mesenchymal stromal cells: role of extracellular vesicles in immunomodulation,” Immunology Letters, vol. 168, pp. 154–158, 2015.

V. B. Konala, M. K. Mamidi, R. Bhonde, A. K. Das, R. Pochampally, and R. Pal, “The current landscape of the mesenchymal stromal cell secretome: A new paradigm for cell-free regeneration,” Cytotherapy, vol. 18, pp. 13–24, 2016.

M. J. Hoogduijn, F. C. Popp, A. Grohnert et al., “Advancement of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in solid organ transplantation (MISOT),” Transplantation Journal, vol. 90, pp. 124–126, 2010.

E. L. de Mare-Bredemeijer, S. Mancham, M. M. Verstegen et al., “Human graft-derived mesenchymal stromal cells potently suppress alloreactive T-cell responses,” Stem Cells Development, vol. 24, pp. 1436–1447, 2015.

P. Y. Hernanda, A. Pedroza-Gonzalez, L. J. van der Laan et al., “Tumor promotion through the mesenchymal stem cell compartment in human hepatocellular carcinoma,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 34, pp. 2330–2340, 2013.