Dynamic Response Analysis of Pile Group Foundation of Super-Giant Sewage Treatment Structure on Hydraulic Fill Foundation

In this study, a 3D numerical model, considering the dynamic interaction between soil, pile foundation, and super structure, and the parameter analysis of internal force response of pile group foundation under dierences seismic intensity, was established based on the Bangladesh sewage treatment plant project to investigate the dynamic response of pile group foundation of liquidcontaining structures. e results show that the internal force of pile gradually increases with time, and the horizontal dynamic displacement peak value appears earlier under dierent seismic wave responses and seismic intensity. With the increase of seismic time history, the variation degree of dynamic impedance with frequency and impedance peak will increase. e pile group eect and single pile bearing capacity of foundation in hydraulic ll ne sand and silty clay were veried. By comparing numerical simulation and theoretical calculation, the results show that the pile group foundation exerts the soil squeezing eect after pile construction is completed, and the dynamic elastic modulus of the soil layer can be increased. Simultaneously, the soil layer will have a better integral stiness. e pile group eect coecient obtained by the solid perimeter method is most consistent with the numerical simulation method.


Introduction
In recent years, international super-giant sewage treatment plant projects have been developed quickly in developing countries in Southeast Asia, where the stratum distribution is mostly dominated by silty clay and high liquid limit clay. On the other hand, pile foundation has been widely used by various structures for the characteristics of good stability, large bearing capacity, and small di erential settlement, especially for seismic loading. It can be better adapted to complex geological conditions, which can transfer the load to the soil layer with good bearing performance in the deep underground [1,2].
Under the action of the earthquake, the pile foundation is often a ected by the stratum acceleration, which would result in the deformation and even damage of the main structure and pile top [3]. Exploring the dynamic interaction between pile foundation and soil is an urgent problem to be solved at present [4]. Besides, theoretical test and numerical simulation are the main methods to study the pile-soil interaction. Meanwhile, many scholars have investigated these issues through model tests [4], while researches on seismic response of pile foundation with high cushion cap mainly focus on laboratory quasi-static tests and shaking table or centrifuge model dynamic tests [5]. Wang et al. carried out a cyclic lateral loading test to study the seismic failure mechanism and ductile energy dissipation capacity of elevated RC pile-cap foundations, and the results have shown that plastic hinges were detected rst at the top of the outer piles. [6]. Liu et al. [7] conducted a shake-table test on a 2 × 2 pile group to investigate the behavior of the pile group under the liquefaction-induced lateral spreading and the lique ed soil pressure; meanwhile, the numerical simulation was implemented, and the results showed that permanent pile head displacement is about 31 mm that is far less than the ground surface displacement of 120 mm. Qin and Ma [8] investigated the seismic behaviors of piles under high-raft conditions by centrifuge tests and the finite element method, and the results indicated that the main seismic failure mechanism is the liquefaction of lateral expansion foundation for a pile foundation in sandy soil.
In fact, compared with theoretical analysis and numerical calculation, physical tests are more realistic. However, it has high requirements for device configuration. In this case, due to the influence of site and cost, many full-scale tests cannot be carried out, and this results in inconsistency with the reality [9]. On the other hand, the finite element method (FEM) has been widely developed because of the merits of good repeatability, high efficiency, and parameter analysis [10]. It can consider the linear and nonlinear characteristics of soil and pile and can well simulate the seismic action of the soil. Zhuang et al. analyzed the threedimensional liquefaction large deformation by using numerical simulation and verified the reliability of the model in the ABAQUS development subroutine [11]. In addition, many scholars compared experiment test with numerical simulation to verify the authenticity of the experiment test [12]. erefore, numerical simulation has become an important means to investigate the interaction between pilesoil and the main structure [13,14]. Unfortunately, under the current international engineering background, researches on the structural foundation treatment method of international large-scale sewage treatment plant are rarely carried out [15][16][17], and more works more work should be carried out.
In this study, based on the largest sewage treatment plant in South Asia, the nonlinear dynamic time-history response analysis method is used to comprehensively study the dynamic characteristics and pile-soil interaction mechanism in sewage treatment plant structure [18]. Using MIDAS/GTS NX, a 3D numerical calculation model, focused on the internal force and displacement change of nonlinear time history dynamic response of pile groups under different seismic waves, was established, and peak internal force and relative displacement of pile foundation under different earthquakes were analyzed comprehensively. e numerical simulation results provide theoretical research and technical support for the design scheme.

Numerical Model.
Considering the situation of the project and the boundary effect, the upper boundary is free, and the vertical surrounding surface is constrained by a free field, while the lower surface is fixed constraint. e geometric dimensions of the model are 120 m in length and width, and the total height of the stratum is 45.6 m ( Figure 3). e model includes 46192 3D soil units, 3696 2D sewage structure plate units, and 3234 1D pile foundation units. Moreover, the Mohr-Coulomb model is adopted for soil mass, while the sewage structure and pile foundation are established by the concrete unit which considered the elastic deformation. e calculation conditions are mainly divided into three parts: the original ground settlement (completed), the completion of the construction period, and the input of seismic acceleration.
In the calculation of the original ground settlement, as soon as the construction period was completed, pile foundation and structure units were activated. During the earthquake period, the stress conditions mainly include the ground acceleration, while the soil around the structure is usually a semi-infinite medium. When analysing the dynamic interaction between soil and structure, the finite soil cannot be simply intercepted for the dynamic analysis of soil structure. As a result, it made lateral soil adopts a viscoelastic boundary to absorb seismic wave energy.

Calculation Parameters.
e soil layer from top to bottom is high liquid limit clay, medium-high liquid limit clay, fine sand (medium dense), and medium-high liquid limit clay fine sand (medium dense-dense) layer, respectively. e cast-in-place concrete piles were distributed at the bottom slab of the structure. e tank walls, bottom slabs, and piles are simulated by plate element and beam element, respectively. Considering that the pile foundation may rotate greatly under the action of the earthquake, the Ry rotation constraint is released at the joint between the pile top and the bottom slab of the structure. e soil layer parameters are tabulated in Table 1.

Seismic Waves Parameters.
During the dynamic time history analysis, factors such as peak acceleration, spectrum characteristics, and duration of vibration should be considered to select the seismic wave [19]. According to the site category of the project, four types of seismic waves are selected. e seismic wave is input from the bedrock [20], the time interval is 0.01 s, the total calculation time is 30 s, and the peak acceleration is 0.15-0.25 g. e time history curves of seismic waves are shown in Figures 5-8.
In order to fully obtain the relative deformation effect of the structure, it is assumed that the site is composed of multiple horizontal infinite strata, the vibration is caused by shear wave, the vibration is only horizontal vibration, and the shear wave can be transmitted and reflected vertically between the strata [21]. erefore, the lateral boundary of the model foundation adopts the free field boundary. Moreover, it is assumed that the sandy soil layer is the undrained boundary, and the other soil layers are the free vertical drainage boundary.

Nonlinear Dynamic Time History Analysis
eory. e nonlinear analysis includes geometric nonlinear and material nonlinear calculations [22]. e whole analysis is based on implicit integration theory. e dynamic balance       e specific expression is as follows [21]:

Shock and Vibration
where M is the mass matrix, a n+1 and v n+1 are the acceleration and speed of n + 1 time step. a H is the damping effect coefficient; meanwhile, f int,n and f ext,n are the internal force and external force obtained through element displacement, velocity, and acceleration in the n-th time step, respectively.
In the nonlinear analysis, the influence of the rotational mass matrix caused by geometric nonlinearity is considered. erefore, the moment of inertia of the mass matrix must be corrected in each iterative calculation according to the limited rotation of the reference node. In addition, the inertial force generated by the change rate of the mass stiffness matrix also needs to be considered [23]. C is the damping effect in the time history analysis, which considers the stiffness matrix and mass matrix at the boundary of the model, and is presented by the following matrix.
where a e j is the mass proportional damping coefficient of the j-th element, the M e j is the mass matrix of unit j. Meanwhile, the a e j is the stiffness proportional damping coefficient of the j-th element, the K e j is the stiffness matrix of the j-th element, and the B is the damping matrix of the damping element.
As per the time step equation of the Newmark method [24], the expressions of velocity, displacement, and acceleration in the n-th and n + 1 time step are as follows: Shock and Vibration v n+1 � v n + Δt ca n+1 +(1 − c)a n , u n+1 � u n + Δtv n + 1 2 Δt 2 2βa n+1 +(1 − 2β)a n , where

Pile Foundation Internal
Force. It can be seen from Figures 9 and 10 that under the action of different types of seismic waves, the change law of the time-history response of the pile top acceleration is different; meanwhile, the amplitude, acceleration peak value, and the time of occurrence are significantly different [25].
Since the ground motion load is a cyclic load, positive and negative values in the time history curve only represent the seismic direction. For the analysis of the internal force for the pile foundation, the peak value plays a dominant role, so the absolute value is used to analyze the variation law of the acceleration peak value. Figures 11-16 extract the absolute maximum values of internal force and displacement of pile group foundation.

Relative Displacement of Pile Top.
Since the top of the pile is fixed with upper structure, the boundary conditions are assumed to be 0 for the rotation angle and displacement at the pile end, the relative displacement X of the pile body displacement is calculated, and the time history response of the pile foundation at different depths is obtained by extracting the time history. e pile-soil relative displacement is obtained by the difference between the displacement of the pile and the displacement of the soil [26].
By analysing the distribution of bending moment, the internal force of a typical pile foundation, and the results of relative displacement of pile foundation, we found that the maximum horizontal deformation displacement of the pile foundation is the connection with the bottom slab at the outer edge of the structure, and the bending moment stress here is also the largest, while the structure set on the upper part of the foundation is subjected to uniformly distributed load, and the vertical support stiffness distribution of foundation or pile group changes in location distribution due to the interaction between soil and pile foundation. Figure 17 shows that the settlement deformation appears as a dished distribution with large inside and small outside, while the base reaction appears as a saddle distribution with small inside and large outside. According to the load distribution law, the piles should be relatively concentrated in the center of the structure, and the external area should be appropriately weakened. While the length should be reduced for the outer piles. Figure 18 shows the relative displacement curve of pile top under seismic period, while Figure 19 shows the spectrum curves of pile foundation moment response after FFT transformation under different seismic waves. It can be seen that with the action of the earthquake, multiple peaks appear in the spectrum of pile internal force in the range of 0.2-8.0 Hz, and the frequency corresponding to the maximum amplitude is near 0.3 Hz.
After the pile foundation construction is completed, the overall stiffness of the foundation increased to a certain extent, while the pile foundation compaction foundation is formed successfully, which improves the structural safety and foundation stability under seismic conditions. e peak frequency of the internal force of the pile body is mainly distributed in the range of 0.2-5.0 Hz, which is smaller than that before the pile foundation construction. Within a certain range, the resonance frequency range generated by the seismic wave can be avoided, which is more favorable for the internal force response under the action of the seismic wave.

Study on Effect Coefficient of Pile Groups
Under the vertical load, the interaction between the pile group foundation and the surrounding soil causes the superposition of the foundation stress, which makes the stress mechanism of pile-soil more complicated [27]. e deformation and failure characteristics of the pile group are obviously different from those of single piles, and the bearing capacity of the pile group is not equal to the result of the addition of the bearing capacities of all single foundation piles [28].
is phenomenon is so-called the "pile group effect." e strength of the pile group effect is generally measured by the pile group effect coefficient, which is defined as where P u is the ultimate bearing capacity of a single pile. W u is the ultimate bearing capacity of the pile group; n is the number of piles (the number of foundation piles in the pile group). In this project, the main characteristics of the pile group effect are the vertical bearing capacity. At this stage, there are mainly the following five calculation methods for determining the pile group effect coefficient. Seiler Keeney method is suitable for high pile-cap foundation [29], and the factors considered are relatively single. e partial coefficient rule is based on a large number of field true tests for research and analysis, which requires a large amount of resources. e stress superposition law comprehensively considers the influence of pile spacing, pile number, pile length, soil characteristics, and other factors [30] and has a certain degree of rationality, which is in line with the actual situation of the pile group pile foundation studied in this paper. Although the calculation formulas given by the solid perimeter method only consider the influence of pile distance, it can still be compared with the calculation results of the numerical simulation method in this paper. erefore, the established pile group foundation is used for comparative analysis in this section.
When analysing the relationship between pile group effect coefficient and pile spacing, the vertical bearing 6 Shock and Vibration          capacity of the pile group takes the limit value of numerical simulation under different pile spacing. Figure 20 shows the relationship curve of pile group effect coefficient of numerical simulation method under compressive load with pile spacing and compared with various methods. It can be seen that the pile group is calculated by each method.

Conclusion
In order to study the reliability of pile group foundation for large structures, in the present study, the engineering site of Bangladesh silty clay is selected for pile group dynamic nonlinear time history analysis, and the numerical simulation analysis is carried out. e main conclusions are as follows.
(1) Under different seismic conditions, the load bending moment curve of the pile group belongs to slow variation, and the axial force of the pile body increases with the load. As a result, while the natural foundation meets the requirement of bearing capacity, the edge area of the structure with high load concentration and the middle area of the structure with large settlement should be strengthened partly. Simultaneously, based on the design requirements of the code, it is particularly critical to carry out the joint analysis and calculation of the overall soil, pile foundation, and structure, which can further optimize the pile foundation arrangement. (2) e displacement curve of time obtained is basically consistent with the field measured curve, and the results of numerical simulation are reliable. e response displacement method can be used for comparison and calculation in future research. e change of the pile group effect coefficient is studied by changing the pile spacing. It is suggested that the pile spacing in the preliminary design should be 4D∼5D.
(3) e strain response amplitude of the corner pile is significantly greater than that of the middle pile foundation, meaning that the corner pile is more prone to seismic damage at the top of the pile. Before foundation liquefaction, the maximum bending moment amplitude of the pile group foundation appears in the middle and upper part of the pile body at the corner, but the bending moment amplitude of the pile top increases sharply after foundation liquefaction. Compared with the model test and numerical calculation results of existing soil-pile structure dynamic interaction, the rotation effect of the foundation of seismic isolation structure increases sharply after foundation liquefaction. e main reason is related to the dynamic interaction of soil pile isolation layer upper structure; meanwhile, the findings above need to be further verified by numerical simulation and theoretical analysis.

Data Availability
e data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article.

Conflicts of Interest
e authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this study.