Study on Dynamic Performance of Standard Sand Based on KTL Dynamic Triaxial Apparatus

The determination of dynamic properties is of great scientific significance to the constitutive modeling and parameter determination of large deformation for sand liquefaction. For Fujian standard sand, a new high-precision KTL bidirectional dynamic triaxial test system was used to carry out liquefaction tests under equal consolidation and different equal amplitude cyclic stresses. The dynamic characteristics of Fujian standard sand, such as dynamic stress and dynamic strain test results, pore water pressure model, effective stress path, and stress-strain relationship curve, were studied. The main results are as follows: the whole vibration process of the sample could be basically divided into four stages: the greater the dynamic stress is, the easier the sample is to liquefy. With the increasing vibration times, the samples under different dynamic stress amplitudes meet the qualitative analysis of the first three stages of liquefaction; that is, the pore water pressure increases rapidly at the beginning of vibration, and the growth is stable in the middle stage. When the effective pore water pressure increases to 60 kPa, it begins to increase sharply and finally reaches the effective confining pressure, and then, the soil sample liquefies. The axial strain begins to accumulate in the compression direction and gradually increases. After liquefaction, the strain accumulates in the tensile direction in equal amplitude. During the whole vibration process, the axial strain of the sample can develop greatly in the tensile and compressive direction. Under the action of different cyclic stresses, the stress path of the soil sample tends to zero, and the rate of effective stress state varies greatly, indicating that the dynamic stress has a great influence on the dynamic liquefaction process of Fujian standard sand. In the dynamic triaxial test of standard sand, the difference in dynamic stress amplitude will lead to great changes in the stress-strain relationship curve. But it has little effect on the analysis of liquefaction dynamic characteristics of sand.


Introduction
Since the 1964 Niigata earthquake in Japan and the Alaska earthquake in the United States [1], the damage and impact of liquefaction on engineering structures and infrastructure have attracted extensive attention [2,3]. In the Tangshan and Haicheng earthquakes in China, signi cant liquefaction occurred, causing great disasters. In recent years, with the development of soil dynamics theory and test technology, people have done a lot of research on liquefaction discrimination method [4], liquefaction theoretical analysis [5], in uencing factors of liquefaction [6], and liquefaction prevention measures [7], but there are still some important problems that need to be explored. e research on the constitutive characterization of soil mechanical properties during liquefaction is the core of sand liquefaction research [8]. Because of its strict theory and wide application, the elastic-plastic model has great potential for describing the failure mechanism of saturated sand under complex load [9].
ere are many studies on the constitutive model of soil mechanical properties during liquefaction [10]. e Cambridge model proposed by Bigoni and Piccolroaz [11,12] described the basic mechanical properties of saturated remolded soil. Li et al. [13] introduced the concept of initial anisotropy into the model for the rst time to describe the anisotropy of soil. Zhang et al. [14,15] established a cyclic uidity model based on the modi ed Cambridge model, which well explained the physical significance of different mechanical properties of different soil types. Ye et al. [16] presented the ts-cm model based on the transformed stress method, which considered the influence of intermediate principal stress and clarified the different mechanical properties of soil during compression and tension in the dynamic triaxial test. e above work excellently established the elastic-plastic constitutive model framework of large deformation of liquefied sand.
Performance design has become the development direction of engineering seismic design, which puts forward higher requirements for the simulation of seismic damage of liquefaction site. It is necessary to control the development and change of soil dynamic behavior in the process of liquefaction, and the stress-strain relationship of sand and the change law of pore water pressure are some of the key problems. Fu et al. [17] and Feng Dong et al. [18] proposed the incremental model of pore water pressure to calculate the pore water pressure under irregular load, but their models were derived from the theoretical formula. Sun and Yuan [19] proposed the pore water pressure increment model of Harbin sand under unequal consolidation by using the triaxial test, which was greatly limited in application.
In order to meet the requirements of performance design, the change process of soil shear strength under the increase of pore pressure is more and more needed for the problem of soil liquefaction, whether in the analysis of foundation strength and deformation or the calculation of soil ground motion. Based on the current knowledge [20], it can be seen qualitatively that the shear strength of Fujian standard sand would decrease with the increase of pore pressure, but the quantitative results are still few, which could not meet the above requirements. is is mainly due to the limitation of the function and accuracy of instruments and equipment in the previous experimental research, which is difficult to well describe the stress-strain hysteretic curve of soil in the process of liquefaction. e dynamic stress, dynamic strain, and effective stress path of the above soil are equivalent to the dynamic characteristic parameters of the soil. ey are the key to control the dynamic behavior of the soil, which has important engineering significance for seismic design.
In this paper, a new high-precision two-way dynamic triaxial test system was used to carry out liquefaction tests under equal consolidation and different equal amplitude cyclic stresses. e dynamic characteristics of Fujian standard sand, such as dynamic stress and dynamic strain test results, pore water pressure model, effective stress path, and stress-strain relationship curve, were studied, which provides a basis for large deformation constitutive modeling of standard sand liquefaction and site dynamic response analysis under liquefaction.

Main Technical Indicators of KTL
e KTL bidirectional dynamic triaxial system of Binzhou University mainly consists of a dynamic triaxial host, triaxial pressure chamber, back pressure-volume pressure controller, dynamic confining pressure-volume pressure controller, dynamic control, and data acquisition system. Figure 1 shows its detailed composition. e technical indexes of the dynamic three-axis system are shown in Table 1.
e KTL dynamic triaxial apparatus applies axial pressure by using the downloading type, integrates the triaxial pressure chamber with the axial dynamic actuator, and can apply the maximum dynamic load, deformation, and stress of 5 Hz. All equipment modules included in KTL dynamic triaxial system can be connected to the computer through USB. Various conventional geotechnical experiments can be completed by using KTL GeoSmartLab geotechnical comprehensive test software [21].

Test Scheme
e dimensions of soil samples in this test are Φ 50 mm × 100 mm. e soil sample used in the test is Fujian standard sand. e basic physical parameters of standard sand are shown in Table 2. e liquefaction probability of medium dense sand was high, so the soil sample with a relative density of 55% was used at room temperature. ree dynamic stress amplitudes (26 kpa, 33 kpa, and 41 kpa) were taken for the liquefaction test to study the variation law of liquefaction dynamic characteristics of standard sand. e effective consolidation confining pressure of the test was 100 kPa, and the consolidation ratio was 1.0. e stress control mode was used for equal amplitude sine wave loading, and the loading frequency was 1 Hz. e test scheme is shown in Table 3.

Test Method
e test adopted the preparation method on the instrument. e soil sample preparation was carried out in strict accordance with the geotechnical test specification. e test process was divided into four parts: sample loading, saturation, consolidation, and vibration liquefaction test, just as follows.
(1) According to the relative density, the dry density of the sample was calculated to be 1.577 g/cm 3 , and the quality of sand required for each sample was obtained. e sample was prepared by dry method and compacted in five layers with 20 mm for each layer, so as to ensure that the compaction number of each layer was basically the same. (2) After loading, the sample is saturated. Saturation is proposed to be divided into three saturation processes. e sequence was to pass CO 2 gas for 2 hours, then distilled water for 3 hours, and finally saturate through back pressure (the pressure difference of each stage was 30 kPa). When the measured pore water pressure coefficient b ≥ 0.98, it is considered that the soil sample meets the saturation requirements. (3) An effective consolidation confining pressure of 100 kPa is applied to the soil sample. After the consolidation is stable, the saturated sample is loaded through the dynamic test module. e change of pore pressure is monitored in real time during the loading process. When the pore water pressure reaches the effective confining pressure, it is considered that the sand is liquefied and the test is stopped. If the pore pressure does not reach the effective confining pressure, the dynamic stress stops after 1000 times of application. Figure 2 shows the time history curves of stress, strain, and pore pressure U of Fujian standard sand under cyclic load with a dynamic stress amplitude of 33 kPa. It can be seen from Figure 3 that with the increased vibration times, the pore water pressure gradually increased and then stopped rising when reaching the confining pressure, and the strain gradually increased. e whole vibration process could be basically divided into four stages. e first stage was the initial several cycles. In this stage, the amplitude of dynamic stress was stable, and the dynamic strain was from scratch. Some unstable particles moved to a relatively stable position, and the position adjustment occurs. erefore, the growth rate of pore water pressure was fast. At the end of this stage, the effective pore water pressure was about 15 kPa.

Typical Test Results and Dynamic Strength Test Results.
is stage was called the particle adjustment stage. e second stage was the most important stage of the experiment. In this stage, the dynamic stress amplitude remained stable, the axial strain began to accumulate in the compression direction, and the growth rate of pore water pressure was stable. At the end of this stage, the effective pore water pressure was about 60 kPa. e stable accumulation of axial strain in this stage leads to the stable growth of pore water pressure, which was called the strain accumulation stage. e third stage occurs in the later stage of the vibration process. In this stage, the number of cycles was small, the strain amplitude suddenly increased, and the axial strain also increased rapidly. At this time, the pore pressure also increased rapidly to equal the confining pressure, reaching liquefaction, and the soil basically lost its shear capacity. is stage was called the liquefaction stage. It should be noted that if the applied dynamic stress was large, the first and second stages would disappear, and the sample would directly enter the third stage (liquefaction stage), which was the case for the sample with a dynamic stress amplitude of 41 kPa. e fourth stage was that after liquefaction, the axial stress tends to zero, the pore water pressure remained basically unchanged after being equal to the effective confining pressure, the strain accumulates in the tensile direction in an equal amplitude, and the shear strength was basically lost.
is stage was called the postliquefaction stage.

Axial Dynamic Stress Test
Results. e time history curve of axial dynamic stress under different dynamic stress loads is shown in Figure 2. For the convenience of comparison, the dynamic stress time history curve within 10 s is given in the figure. It can be seen from the figure that under the action of the three kinds of dynamic stresses, except for the small deviation of the zero position, the dynamic stress waveform and phase were good, and the small deviation of the zero position did not affect the final results obtained from the subsequent test data analysis. erefore, the influence of the error caused by the axial dynamic stress on the test results could be ignored.

Axial Dynamic Strain Test Results.
e time history curve of axial strain under different dynamic stress loads is shown in Figure 4. It can be seen from the figure that under the action of three dynamic stresses of 26 kPa, 33 kPa, and 41 kPa, the dynamic strain started from scratch at first, and then, the axial strain began to accumulate in the compression direction and gradually increases. After liquefaction, the strain accumulated in the tension direction in equal amplitude. During the whole vibration process, the axial strain of Fujian standard sand could develop greatly in the tension and compression direction.

Pore Water Pressure Test Results.
Under the action of cyclic dynamic load, the soil sample would deform and stimulate the pore water pressure in the sample. e rise of pore water pressure would reduce the shear strength of the sample and promote the further development of shear deformation. e dynamic response of the sample was the result of the joint action of external load and pore water pressure on the soil. In engineering application and subject research, the growth model of pore water pressure was a necessary parameter model for the seismic design of liquefaction site.
Under the action of three dynamic stress amplitudes of 26 kPa, 33 kPa, and 41 kPa, the time history curve of effective pore water pressure of the sample is shown in Figure 5. It can be seen from the figure that the greater the dynamic stress was, the easier the sample was to liquefy. With the increase in vibration times, the three groups of samples met the qualitative analysis of the first three stages of liquefaction of pore water pressure growth mode in Section 5.1. at is, the pore water pressure increased rapidly at the beginning of vibration, and the growth was stable in the middle stage. When the effective pore water pressure increased to 60 kPa, it began to increase sharply and finally reached the effective confining pressure, and the sample is liquefied.

Effective Stress
Path. e average effective stress deviator stress (p′-q) curve under different dynamic stress loads is shown in Figure 6. In order to facilitate comparative analysis, the three groups of results were put into one figure, as shown in Figure 7. It can be seen from Figures 6 and 7 that the effective stress paths of the three groups of tests are constrained within the same range. After liquefaction, the critical state line provided natural constraints. Under the action of different dynamic stress amplitudes, the stress path tends to zero effective stress state at a relatively different rate, indicating that the dynamic stress had a great impact on the dynamic liquefaction process of Fujian standard sand.

Stress-Strain Relationship.
e stress-strain relationship curve of the sample under different dynamic stress cyclic loads is shown in Figure 8. For the convenience of observation, put the stress-strain relationship data of the sample under the action of three dynamic stresses of 26 kPa, 33 kPa, and 41 kPa into a figure, as shown in Figure 9. It can be seen from the figure that under the action of different dynamic stress     amplitudes, the stress-strain relationship curves of Fujian standard sand were quite different, but there were certain rules. It can be seen from Figure 8 that under the action of three dynamic stresses, the shear stress was relatively stable before liquefaction. e amplitude and the shear strain were small. In the liquefaction stage, the stress decreased sharply until it approaches zero, and the strain increased rapidly until the specimen lost its shear strength. After liquefaction, the stress change was small and close to zero, the strain continued to increase in the tension and compression direction, the cumulative strain developed greatly, and the maximum shear strain reached 6%.
When the dynamic stress amplitude is large, the stressstrain curve of Fujian standard sand is easier to deviate to the tensile side before liquefaction, but the deformation of the compression side will develop greatly after liquefaction. When the dynamic stress amplitude is small, the stress-strain curve of Fujian standard sand is easier to lean to the compression side before liquefaction. But the deformation of the tensile side will develop greatly after liquefaction.

Shock and Vibration
It can be seen that in the dynamic triaxial test of standard sand, the difference in dynamic stress amplitude will lead to great changes in the stress-strain relationship curve, but it has little effect on the analysis of the liquefaction dynamic characteristics of sand.

Conclusion
In this paper, the dynamic liquefaction test of standard sand was carried out based on KTL two-way dynamic triaxial system. e test results of dynamic stress and dynamic strain of standard sand were analyzed. e dynamic characteristics of the sample such as the pore water pressure model, effective stress path, and stress-strain relationship curve were studied. e main conclusions are as follows.
(1) With the increasing vibration times, the pore pressure increases gradually and stops rising when reaching the confining pressure, and the strain increases gradually. e whole vibration process can be basically divided into four stages. (2) e greater the dynamic stress is, the easier the sample is to liquefy. With the increasing vibration times, the samples under different dynamic stress amplitudes meet the qualitative analysis of the first three stages of liquefaction. at is, the pore water pressure increases rapidly at the beginning of vibration, and the growth is stable in the middle stage. When the effective pore water pressure increases to 60 kPa, it begins to increase sharply and finally reaches the effective confining pressure, and then, the sample liquefies. (3) Under the action of different dynamic stress amplitudes, the effective stress paths of the samples are constrained in the same range. After liquefaction, the critical state line provides natural constraints, but the stress path tends to zero, and the rate of effective stress state varies greatly, indicating that the dynamic stress has a great impact on the dynamic liquefaction process of Fujian standard sand. (4) In the dynamic triaxial test of standard sand, the difference in dynamic stress amplitude will lead to great changes in the stress-strain relationship curve, but it has little effect on the analysis of the liquefaction dynamic characteristics of sand.
Data Availability e basic data supporting the research results have been provided in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest
e authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.