The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 897159, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/897159

Research Article

Novel Silica-Based Hybrid Adsorbents: Lead(II) Adsorption Isotherms

Junsheng Liu and Xin Wang

Key Laboratory of Membrane Materials & Processes, Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Hefei University, 99 Jinxiu Road, Hefei Economic and Technological Development Zone, Hefei 230601, China

Received 8 August 2013; Accepted 24 September 2013

Academic Editors: H. A. Alegria, M. Y. Arica, and J. L. Zhou

Copyright © 2013 Junsheng Liu and Xin Wang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Water pollution caused by the lead(II) from the spent liquor has caught much attention. The research from the theoretical model to application fundaments is of vital importance. In this study, lead(II) adsorption isotherms are investigated using a series of hybrid membranes containing mercapto groups (–SH groups) as the hybrid adsorbents. To determine the best fitting equation, the experimental data were analyzed using six two-parameter isotherm equations (i.e., Langmuir, Freundlich, Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), Temkin, Harkins-Jura, and Halsey isotherm models). It was found that the lead(II) adsorption on these samples followed the Freundlich, Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), and Halsey isotherm models. Moreover, the mean free energy of adsorption was calculated using Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) isotherm model and it was confirmed that the adsorption process was physical in nature. These findings are very meaningful in the removal of lead(II) ions from water using the hybrid membranes as adsorbents.

1. Introduction

Toxic heavy-metal ions, such as Cu²⁺, Pb²⁺, and Cd²⁺, dumped into water resources from industrial processes and household appliances, have caused a serious threat to the health of human body and organisms [1–3]. Water pollution caused by lead(II) ions from the spent liquor has especially caught increasing public attention. Consequently, the removal of lead(II) ions from water has turned out to be significantly important and highly urgent. To eliminate or reduce lead(II) pollution, various innovative approaches are designed and fabricated [2, 4–6]. Among these approaches, hybrid materials or polymers with functionalized groups disclose excellent adsorption affinities for heavy-metal ions when they are used as the hybrid adsorbents [5, 6]. However, the application of these new hybrids in the removal of heavy-metal ions from water still lacks sufficient theoretical principle. The relevant engineering data for their applications in industrial processes are especially deficient. Thus it will block their further applications in environmental aspects. These previous studies are therefore unsatisfactory. Further exploration from the theoretical model to application fundaments is of vital importance.

Recently, much effort was made to prepare new silica-based hybrids containing functionalized groups as adsorbents and characterize their adsorption properties for the toxic heavy-metal ions [7–9]. Some theoretical models and engineering data for their potential applications in industry are correlated and calculated in these previous jobs. Our continuing interest in these new silica-based hybrid adsorbents stimulates us to do more. Consequently, based on the previous study [9], herein, the isotherm models for lead(II) adsorption on silica-based hybrid membranes will be analyzed as typical toxic heavy-metal ions. The experimental data were correlated using six two-parameter isotherm equations (i.e., Langmuir, Freundlich, Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), Temkin, Harkins-Jura, and Halsey isotherm models) to probe the mechanism of lead(II) adsorption on hybrid membranes. We hope this investigation will be helpful in the effective disposal of heavy-metal ions from water using hybrid adsorbents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

3-Mercaptopropyl trimethoxysilane (MPTMS, purity: ≥95.0%) was purchased from Silicone New Material Co. Ltd. of Wuhan University (Wuhan, China) and used as received. Polyethylene glycol (PEG, MW: 10000) was purchased from National Pharmaceutical Group Corp. of China (Shanghai, China) and used as received. Acetaldehyde (40% wt in aqueous medium) and other reagents were of analytical grade.

2.2. Sample Preparation

The synthesizing procedure of sample A used in this case was described in detail in a previous article [9]. In this work, the samples A–D (the ratio of PEG (g) : MPTMS (mL) for samples A–D is 5.2 : 5, 5.2 : 10, 5.2 : 20, and 5.2 : 40, resp.) were used as adsorbents to investigate the isotherm models of lead(II) adsorption. For the convenience of study, the possible preparation route of these hybrid membranes is also given in Scheme 1.

Scheme 1: The possible preparation route of hybrid membranes used in this case [9].

2.3. Adsorption Experiment

The adsorption experiment was conducted in a way similar to the experiments described in detail in our previous articles, in which the lead(II) or copper(II) ions were adsorbed by the hybrid adsorbents [7–9]. The adsorption capacity () of lead(II) ions on these adsorbents can be determined using

where (mL) is the volume of aqueous Pb(NO₃)₂ solution, (mol dm⁻³) and (mol dm⁻³) are the concentration of initial and remaining Pb(NO₃)₂, respectively, and (g) is the weight of samples.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Adsorption Capacity versus Initial Concentration

The dependency of Pb²⁺ adsorption capacity on initial solution concentration was presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Lead(II) adsorption capacity versus initial concentration; the sample was immersed in different concentrations of aqueous Pb(NO₃)₂ solutions for 24 h, respectively.

As shown in Figure 1, it can be found that the adsorption capacity of lead(II) on samples A–D increases with an increase in the initial solution concentration. However, for the individual sample, the change trend in adsorption capacity is different. The reason can be assigned to adsorption property of samples.

To have an insight into the adsorption behaviors of lead(II) ions on samples A–D and to gain the optimal fitting of theoretical model, these experimental data were analyzed using six two-parameter isotherm equations (i.e., Langmuir, Freundlich, Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), Temkin, Harkins-Jura, and Halsey isotherm models), in which linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the better or the worse of the fitted theoretical model.

3.2. Langmuir Isotherm Model

Currently, it is well accepted that the Langmuir isotherm model is a typical monolayer adsorption, which can be applied to judge the adsorption properties of metal ions on the interface of a solid material. Generally, Langmuir isotherm equation can be expressed as (2) [5, 10], which is mainly based on the monolayer adsorption on the active reaction sites of the adsorbent:

where (mmol g⁻¹) and (mol dm⁻³) are the equilibrium concentrations of metal ions in the adsorbed and liquid phases, respectively. (mmol g⁻¹) and (dm³ mol⁻¹) are the Langmuir constants, which can be calculated from the intercept and slope of the linear plot based on versus .

Based on the relationship of adsorption capacity of lead(II) ions versus initial concentration illustrated in Figure 1, the Langmuir adsorption isotherms are modeled and presented in Figure 2. According to these isotherm curves, the Langmuir isotherm parameters are calculated and listed in Table 1.

Table 1: The Langmuir, Freundlich, Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), Temkin, Harkins-Jura, and Halsey isotherm parameters for lead(II) adsorption.

Parameter
Values

Sample A
Sample B
Sample C
Sample D

Langmuir isotherm model

(mmol/g)
0.898
5.335
4.106
0.935

b
9.358
1.175
1.379
6.303

0.941
0.722
0.669
0.854

Freundlich isotherm model

3.061
5.380
4.754
2.875

n
1.240
1.030
1.034
1.158

0.983
0.998
0.998
0.984

Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) isotherm model

(mmol )
0.846
1.124
1.007
0.733

(mol²/kJ²)
0.0168
0.020
0.020
0.0181

E (kJ/mol)
5.455
4.990
4.989
5.252

0.997
0.998
0.998
0.997

Temkin isotherm model

(kJ/mol)
18.154
14.125
15.768
21.385

0.143
0.184
0.165
0.121

175.878
136.724
136.521
158.936

0.998
0.946
0.953
0.996

Harkins-Jura isotherm model

0.00402
0.00280
0.00230
0.00216

−1.131
−1.149
−1.144
−1.130

0.920
0.925
0.924
0.920

Halsey isotherm model

4.005
5.659
5.013
3.399

1.240
1.030
1.034
1.158

0.983
0.998
0.998
0.984

Figure 2: Plot of the Langmuir isotherm model for lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D.

As shown in Table 1, it can be found that the values of linear regression coefficient () are located in the range of 0.669–0.941, suggesting that these experimental data fitted worse with the Langmuir isotherm equation. This finding indicates that lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D does not follow the Langmuir monolayer adsorption.

3.3. Freundlich Isotherm Model

Freundlich isotherm model is considered as the adsorption occurred on a heterogeneous surface with uniform energy, which can be expressed as [5, 10]

where (mmol g⁻¹) and (mol dm⁻³) are the equilibrium concentrations of metal ions in the adsorbed and liquid phases, respectively. [(mmol g⁻¹)(mol dm⁻³)−1/n] and are the Freundlich isotherm constants, which can be calculated from the slope and intercept of the linear plot according to   versus  .

Based on the relationship of adsorption capacity of lead(II) ions versus initial concentration (see Figure 1), the Freundlich adsorption isotherms are correlated and given in Figure 3. The Freundlich isotherm parameters are calculated and tabulated in Table 1.

Figure 3: Plot of the Freundlich isotherm model for lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D.

As shown in Table 1, it can be seen that the values of linear regression coefficient () are situated within the range of 0.983–0.998, demonstrating that the experimental data fitted well with the Freundlich isotherm equation. Moreover, it was reported [5, 10] that the Freundlich isotherm constant can be used to explore the favourability of adsorption process. When the value of n is within , it is favorable adsorption. If not, it is unfavorable adsorption. For the adsorption of lead(II) ions on samples A–D, it can also be seen in Table 1 that the values of n are situated in the range of 1–10, demonstrating that it is favorable for the adsorption process.

These outcomes evidence that the lead(II) adsorption on the samples A–D followed the Freundlich isotherm model and such adsorption mainly occurred on the heterogeneous surface of the samples.

3.4. Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) Isotherm Model

To predict the adsorption effect, that is, physical or chemical adsorption, the mean free energy of adsorption was calculated by the Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) isotherm equation, which can be expressed as [11, 12]

where (mmol g⁻¹) is the amount of metal ions adsorbed, (mmol g⁻¹) is the maximum adsorption capacity of metal ions, (mol²/kJ²) is the Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm constant, (mol dm⁻³) is the equilibrium concentration of metal ions, is the gas constant (8.314 J/mol K), and (K) is absolute temperature in Kelvin.

The Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) isotherm constant, , is related to the mean free energy of adsorption, (kJ/mol), which can be obtained using the following expression [11]:

Making the linear plot according to lead(II) adsorption capacity versus initial concentration (as illustrated in Figure 1), the Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) adsorption isotherms can be obtained and are presented in Figure 4. Corresponding to these linear plots, the Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) isotherm parameters are calculated and summarized in Table 1.

Figure 4: Plot of the D-R isotherm model for lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D.

As summarized in Table 1, it can be observed that the values of linear regression coefficient () are in the range of 0.997–0.998, revealing that the experimental data fitted well with the Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) isotherm model. Moreover, it is reported in some articles [3, 11–13] that, when the value of is below 8 kJ/mol, the adsorption process can be considered as the physical adsorption. In contrast, if the value of is located in the range of 8–16 kJ/mol, it is the chemical adsorption. From Table 1, it can be observed that the obtained values of mean free energy, , are limited within the range of 4.98–5.45 kJ/mol. Based on these data, it can thus be concluded that the effect of physical adsorption will play a dominating role in the adsorption process of lead(II) ions on samples A–D.

3.5. Temkin Isotherm Model

Temkin isotherm model is a useful tool to estimate the adsorption heat, which can be calculated using the following equation [13, 14]:

where constant , which is related to the adsorption heat, is the gas constant (8.314 J/mol K), (K) is absolute temperature in Kelvin, (J/mol) is the Temkin isotherm constant, which is the variation of adsorption energy and is the equilibrium binding constant corresponding to the maximum binding energy. Both and can be calculated from the slope and the intercept of the linear plot based on   versus  , respectively.

Figure 5 illustrates the Temkin isotherm model for lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D. The relevant isotherm parameters are listed in Table 1.

Figure 5: Plot of the Temkin isotherm model for lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D.

It can be discovered in Table 1 that the values of are positioned within 0.946–0.998, which gave a close fit to the lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D. This outcome suggests that the experimental data fitted better with the Temkin isotherm model. Furthermore, it can also be discovered in Table 1 that the adsorption heat of lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D was restricted within 14–22 kJ/mol.

3.6. Harkins-Jura Isotherm Model

It is reported [3, 13] that Harkins-Jura isotherm model mainly describes the multilayer adsorption and the existence of the heterogeneous pore distribution in the surface of adsorbents, which can be expressed as

where and are the Harkins-Jura constants. Both and can be achieved from the slope and the intercept of the linear plot based on   versus  , respectively.

The Harkins-Jura isotherm model for lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D is presented in Figure 6 and the relevant isotherm parameters are calculated and summarized in Table 1.

Figure 6: Plot of the Harkins-Jura isotherm model for lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D.

It can be noted in Table 1 that the values of are located in the range of 0.920–0.925, which indicate the worse fits to the lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D. This result reveals that lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D is against the rule of multilayer adsorption.

3.7. Halsey Isotherm Model

Halsey isotherm model can be used to evaluate the multilayer adsorption system for metal ions adsorption at a relatively large distance from the surface [3, 13], which can be calculated using

where and are the Halsey constants, which can be obtained from the slope and the intercept of the linear plot based on   versus  , respectively.

Figure 7 gives the Halsey isotherm model for lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D. The related Halsey isotherm parameters are calculated and tabulated in Table 1.

Figure 7: Plot of the Halsey isotherm model for lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D.

It can be detected in Table 1 that the values of are centered in the region of 0.983–998, which show the best fits to the lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D. This finding implies that lead(II) adsorption on samples A–D obeys the Halsey isotherm model.

Notice that, by comparing the values of linear regression coefficient () of the examined six isotherm models, it can be concluded that the Freundlich, Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), and Halsey isotherm models gave much better fitting than the other three isotherm models. Consequently, the adsorption behaviors of lead(II) ions on samples A–D can be well described using these three isotherm models.

4. Conclusions

The lead(II) adsorption isotherms are modeled using six two-parameter isotherm equations. The following results can be achieved.

(1)The adsorption of lead(II) ions on these samples followed the Freundlich, Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), and Halsey isotherm models.(2)The mean free energy of adsorption, , calculated from Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) isotherm equation, was in the range of 4.98–5.45 kJ/mol. This result suggested that it is physical adsorption process.(3)The adsorption heat calculated from the Temkin isotherm equation was restricted within 14–22 kJ/mol.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of financial interests.

Acknowledgments

This project was financially supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21076055), the Significant Foundation of Educational Committee of Anhui Province (no. ZD2008002-1), and the Science and Technology Innovation Fund for Students of Hefei University (no. 11XSKY02).

References

J. Li, S. W. Zhang, C. L. Chen et al., “Removal of Cu(II) and fulvic acid by graphene oxide nanosheets decorated with Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 4, pp. 4991–5000, 2012.

S. Vasudevan, J. Lakshmi, R. Kamaraj, and G. Sozhan, “A critical study on the removal of copper by an electrochemically assisted coagulation: equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 162–171, 2013.

B. Singha and S. K. Das, “Adsorptive removal of Cu(II) from aqueous solution and industrial effluent using natural/agricultural wastes,” Colloids and Surfaces B, vol. 107, pp. 97–106, 2013.

C. Dulcy Evangelin, S. G. Gunasekaran, and M. Dharmendirakumar, “Removal of lead ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto chemically modified silk cotton hulls by different oxidizing agents,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 189–201, 2013.

A. A. Atia, A. M. Donia, and A. M. Yousif, “Removal of some hazardous heavy metals from aqueous solution using magnetic chelating resin with iminodiacetate functionality,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 348–357, 2008.

S. Mahdavi, M. Jalali, and A. Afkhami, “Heavy metals removal from aqueous solutions using TiO₂, MgO, and Al₂O₃ nanoparticles,” Chemical Engineering Communications, vol. 200, pp. 448–470, 2013.

J. S. Liu, L. Song, and G. Q. Shao, “Novel zwitterionic inorganic-organic hybrids: kinetic and equilibrium model studies on Pb²⁺ removal from aqueous solution,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2119–2127, 2011.

X. Wang, W. X. Zhang, J. S. Liu, and L. L. Wu, “Removal of Lead (II) from aqueous solution by adsorption using zwitterionic hybrid copolymers,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, pp. 6575–6578, 2013.

Y. P. Zhang, X. Wang, J. S. Liu, and L. L. Wu, “Removal of copper (Cu²⁺) from water using novel hybrid adsorbents: kinetics and isotherms,” Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, vol. 58, pp. 1141–1150, 2013.

A. Ramesh, H. Hasegawa, T. Maki, and K. Ueda, “Adsorption of inorganic and organic arsenic from aqueous solutions by polymeric Al/Fe modified montmorillonite,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 90–100, 2007.

Y. S. Ho, J. F. Porter, and G. McKay, “Equilibrium isotherm studies for the sorption of divalent metal ions onto peat: copper, nickel and lead single component systems,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 141, no. 1–4, pp. 1–33, 2002.

A.-H. Chen, C.-Y. Yang, C.-Y. Chen, C.-Y. Chen, and C.-W. Chen, “The chemically crosslinked metal-complexed chitosans for comparative adsorptions of Cu(II), Zn(II), Ni(II) and Pb(II) ions in aqueous medium,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 163, no. 2-3, pp. 1068–1075, 2009.

A. Kausar, H. N. Bhatti, and G. MacKinnon, “Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies on the removalof U(VI) by low cost agricultural waste,” Colloids and Surfaces B, vol. 111, pp. 124–133, 2013.

D. H. K. Reddy, K. Seshaiah, A. V. R. Reddy, M. M. Rao, and M. C. Wang, “Biosorption of Pb²⁺ from aqueous solutions by Moringa oleifera bark: equilibrium and kinetic studies,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 174, no. 1–3, pp. 831–838, 2010.