The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 393629, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/393629

Research Article

R Dump Converter without DC Link Capacitor for an 8/6 SRM: Experimental Investigation

Pasumalaithevan Kavitha1,2 and Bhaskaran Umamaheswari¹

¹Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600025, India
²Department of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, RMK Engineering College, Kavaraipettai, Tamil Nadu 601206, India

Received 22 August 2014; Revised 27 November 2014; Accepted 3 December 2014

Academic Editor: Xiangdang Xue

Copyright © 2015 Pasumalaithevan Kavitha and Bhaskaran Umamaheswari. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The objective of this paper is to investigate the performance of 8/6 switched reluctance motor (SRM) when excited with sinusoidal voltage. The conventional R dump converter provides DC excitation with the help of capacitor. In this paper the converter used is the modified R dump converter without DC link capacitor providing AC or sinusoidal excitation. Torque ripple and speed ripple are investigated based on hysteresis current control. Constant and sinusoidal current references are considered for comparison in both DC and AC excitation. Extensive theoretical and experimental investigations are made to bring out the merits and demerits of AC versus DC excitation. It is shown that the constructionally simple SRM can be favorably controlled with simple R dump converter with direct AC excitation without need for DC link capacitor. A 4-phase 8/6 0.5 kW SRM is used for experimentation.

1. Introduction

The switched reluctance motor (SRM) is the simplest and most efficient variable speed drive. It has high reliability and operates at very high speed. Generally SRM drives are excited with DC supply. AC voltage is rectified and smoothened by the DC link capacitor for DC excitation [1, 2]. The cost and performance of SRM drives are dependent on converter topologies and motor structure. There have been many converter topologies found in literature for the past two decades in order to meet the objectives such as faster excitation, faster demagnetization, high efficiency, and minimizing torque ripple and to draw minimum reactive power [3–8].

The single switch per phase converter like R dump, C dump [9], bifilar, and split DC link is cost effective [10]. In C dump the energy is stored in the capacitor; hence the efficiency is high. But the need for bulky capacitor and inductor makes the converter cost increase and losses are also increased. The conventional asymmetric H bridge converter is also used for independent control of voltage and current but it has disadvantages like high cost, necessity for isolated gate drives, and a requirement for complex control system. The SRM is capable of providing unidirectional torque for bidirectional current; hence it can be excited with matrix converters [11–14]. Sinusoidal excitation with overlapped phase currents is shown to reduce torque ripple and iron losses [15–17]. Single sided matrix converter with unidirectional current is shown to have the advantage of self-commutating in SRM [18]. Torque ripple can be minimized initially at the design stage itself and further by suitable control techniques. An inner current loop is introduced to have control over the torque. Hysteresis current control is the simple method but has the disadvantage of variable switching frequency, high current ripple, and consequent audible noise. PI/PID based fixed switching frequency control provides easier digital implementation with low current ripples and low audible noise, which show poor performance with varying operating conditions. Fuzzy logic, neural network, and adaptive and genetic algorithm based tuning of current shapes is shown to achieve fewer vibrations [19–23].

The objective of this paper is to provide simple converter and control strategies for SRM to be operated with direct AC excitation with minimum number of switching devices and storage elements. SRM can be operated with bidirectional currents with direct AC excitation. This requires bidirectional switches increasing the complexity of the converter. Hence the configuration used in this paper for excitation is a full bridge diode rectifier followed by modified R dump converter without any capacitor at both the DC link and R dump circuit. This facilitates unidirectional sinusoidal excitation. Hysteresis current control is employed with DC and sinusoidal current references. Performance of the machine is analysed in terms of torque ripple, speed ripple, and total harmonic distortion (THD) at the input. Theoretical and experimental investigations are made and the relative merits and demerits of sinusoidal versus DC excitation are brought out.

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 explains the conventional and modified R dump converter topology. Section 3 provides dynamic modeling of the proposed drive system. Performance analysis of the SRM under DC and AC current references is discussed in Section 4. Experimental setup is discussed in Section 5 to show the effectiveness of the proposed converter. Section 6 concludes this paper.

2. Converter Topology

The conventional and modified R dump converters are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The only difference is the absence of two capacitors and . Capacitor provides filtered DC to the conventional controller and capacitor helps in utilizing the regenerative power from the phases. The converter has one transistor and one diode per phase of the SRM drive. The converter is fed from an AC supply with full bridge rectifier along with a DC link capacitor. When switches are turned on, the phase windings are excited. When switch () is turned off, the current freewheels through , charging the DC link capacitor () as well as the dump capacitor (), and later flows through the external resistor R. This resistor partially dissipates the energy stored in phase A. However, it has the disadvantage that, the current in phases will take longer time to extinguish when compared to recharging the source. The energy, in addition, is dissipated in a resistor; hence overall efficiency of the motor drive reduced.

Figure 1: Conventional R dump converter for DC excitation.

Figure 2: Modified R dump converter for AC or sinusoidal excitation.

The performance of SRM is investigated with a full bridge rectifier and a utility AC supply which is shown in Figure 2. The bulkier DC link capacitor is removed. The utility sinusoidal supply is rectified and applied to the converter. The converter is now compact and weighs less.

3. Dynamic Model of the Proposed Drive Topology

The functional block diagram of the proposer SRM drive is shown in Figure 3. At any given instant of time one of the phases will be excited based on the and specifications. The excited switching device of the preceding phase will be put to off condition. This leads to the situation where both the incoming and outgoing phases will carry current. The dynamic model of the drive can be derived based on the equivalent circuits shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b).

Figure 3: Block diagram of SRM drive.

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: (a) Equivalent circuit of the incoming phase. (b) Equivalent circuit of the outgoing phase.

Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the incoming and outgoing phases with modified converter. Dotted line represents the conventional R dump model. The dynamic model can be presented as given in the following equations. Let be the current of the th phase which is incoming and let be the current of the th phase which is outgoing. Then the corresponding voltage equations are given by

where is the phase voltage, is the resistance of the modified R dump converter, and represent the resistances of the respective phases, and is the source resistance. Let and represent the flux linkages of the two phases as given by

where represents the self-inductance of the phases and represents the mutual inductance between the phases. Since SRM are characterized by concentrated winding, the mutual inductance is negligible. The developed torque equation and torque balance equations are given by

where is the developed torque, is the load torque, is the angular speed, is the moment of inertia, and is the frictional coefficient. The self-inductance of the machine phases is assumed to take the cosine form which is considered along with saturation as defined by

where and are functions of average and difference of aligned and unaligned inductances, respectively, is the number of rotor poles, is the phase shift between the phases, and is a constant chosen to represent saturation. Additional equations to be described in the presence of capacitors of the R dump are given by

Let the supply voltage be defined as follows:

where mag() means the magnitude of the variable. Using equations (1)–(6) the switching model of the SRM is simulated for the converters with and without DC link capacitor.

4. Performance Analysis

The simplest control for SRM can be the fixing of and at constant value with hysteresis current control. The fixing of and constant can be easily implemented with the help of optical sensors used for switching the phases. This will ensure continuous torque development from the phases consecutively one after the other. Hysteresis current control can be easily implemented with the help of hysteresis comparator.

The specification of the machine and the drive is given in Table 1. Control part is implemented through hardware in loop. Commutation pulses are generated based on the information from position sensor which is acquired through a National Instrumentations Data Acquisition (NI DAQ) card PCI 6251. Components of the modified R dump converter with necessary isolation and gate drivers used to commutate the phase current are given in Table 1. Hall effect current and voltage sensors are used for measuring the active phase voltage and current, respectively. The experimental setup is discussed in Section 5 based on which the performance analysis is done.

Table 1: Switched reluctance motor, its hardware, and data acquisition specifications.

Motor specifications
Hardware configuration
Data acquisition specification

Rated power
0.5 kW
Current sensor
LA-100P
DAQ board
NI PCI 6251

Rated current
3 A
Voltage sensor
LV25-P
Real-time interface
Embedded target

Stator poles
8
Optocoupler
MCT2E
Acquisition speed
100 s

Rotor poles
6
MOSFET
IRFP450

Resistance/phase
2.67 
Diodes
IN4007

Capacitor
1000 F

Performance of the SRM is analysed both theoretically and experimentally for two cases, namely, Case (i) DC and AC excitation with constant current reference and Case (ii) DC and AC excitation with sinusoidal current reference. The DC excitation considered in this paper is equivalent to the use of conventional R dump converter shown in Figure 1. The AC excitation referred to is equivalent to the use of modified R dump converter as shown in Figure 2. The rotor position is sensed with two optical sensors providing pulses for every 15-degree mechanical angle which is equal to the shift between the phases. The pulses obtained from the position sensors are used as and which can be chosen as 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 degrees. Detailed results are presented in the following sections.

Case (i) DC and AC Excitation with Constant Current Reference. The AC supply is fixed with peak to peak of 60 V. The supply voltage and current waveforms for the modified converter configuration are shown in Figure 5 for a constant current reference of 0.5 A. is kept at 45° and is kept at 75° with dwell angle of 30°. The supply current is highly discontinuous in the presence of capacitor when compared to without capacitor configuration. It is worth analysing the power factor and total harmonic distortion for various values of current references.

Figure 5: Supply voltage and current of modified converter with constant current reference.

The phase currents and developed torque waveforms for the DC excitation are given in Figure 6. The current reference is set as 0.5 A with a hysteresis band of 10%. Switching is done at this band level. The torque waveform shows discontinuity due to small value of current reference.

Figure 6: Phase currents and developed torque of SRM with 60 V DC excitation and constant current reference of 0.5 A.

Figure 7 shows the phase currents and developed torque waveforms of the modified R dump converter. The current waveform shows dips due to the magnitude variation in the supply voltage. The torque waveforms show less switching and the small peaks are at the zero crossing of the supply. Based on the current profile it may be seen that the DC excitation is having high torque ripple compared with sinusoidal excitation. The torque waveform shows a sharp peak due to which the ripple is higher. However in sinusoidal excitation the torque ripple is less. The smaller peaks are due to the zero crossing of the supply. But the average torque is high for AC excited SRM that can very well be seen in the tabulated values.

Figure 7: Phase currents and developed torque of SRM with 60 V sinusoidal excitation and constant current reference of 0.5 A.

The values of average speed, speed ripple, average torque, and torque ripple are listed in Tables 2 and 3. It is found that the torque ripple is high at lower current reference and it can be reduced by keeping the current as high value. The speed ripple has also shown large value for smaller current reference. It is also observed that compared to DC excitation the sinusoidal excitation provides high average values for the torque and speed. In sinusoidal excitation ripples are also less significant when compared with the DC excitation. This is mainly due to the continuous excitation from the supply.

Table 2: Comparison of speed with DC and sinusoidal excitation with DC current reference.

Constant current
reference (A)
Experimental analysis
Theoretical analysis

DC excitation (with capacitor)
Sinusoidal excitation (without capacitor)
DC excitation (with capacitor)
Sinusoidal excitation (without capacitor)

Average speed (RPM)
Speed ripple %
Average speed (RPM)
Speed ripple %
Average speed (RPM)
Speed ripple %
Average speed (RPM)
Speed ripple %

0.4
215
2.79
345
2.90
208
2.65
328
2.47

0.5
706
1.27
1829
1.20
659
1.17
1810
1.14

0.6
1518
0.46
2353
0.76
1478
0.41
2286
0.82

0.7
1973
0.35
2553
0.86
1952
0.32
2458
0.80

0.8
2307
1.52
2764
0.90
2295
1.57
2714
0.92

0.9
2469
0.81
2798
0.64
2423
0.88
2782
0.84

1.0
2510
0.84
2816
0.96
2498
0.85
2793
0.92

1.2
2620
0.88
2830
1.41
2601
0.83
2822
0.86

1.5
2934
1.29
2975
0.85
2896
0.81
2965
0.78

Table 3: Comparison of torque with DC and sinusoidal excitation with DC current reference.

Constant current
reference (A)
Experimental analysis
Theoretical analysis

DC excitation (with capacitor)
Sinusoidal excitation
(without capacitor)
DC excitation
(with capacitor)
Sinusoidal excitation
(without capacitor)

Torque average
Torque ripple %
Torque average
Torque ripple %
Torque average
Torque ripple %
Torque average
Torque ripple %

0.4
0.007
300.00
0.013
169.23
0.065
320.00
0.015
164.55

0.5
0.011
272.73
0.018
156.76
0.012
292.73
0.020
160.43

0.6
0.015
220.00
0.022
141.57
0.017
210.00
0.025
145.89

0.7
0.019
173.68
0.027
140.74
0.020
193.68
0.032
143.56

0.8
0.024
145.83
0.036
134.25
0.025
165.83
0.038
140.87

0.9
0.037
116.22
0.045
133.33
0.039
122.22
0.044
138.26

1.0
0.039
135.90
0.052
134.62
0.045
146.90
0.058
136.96

1.2
0.052
132.69
0.081
130.43
0.050
140.69
0.091
132.45

1.5
0.048
143.75
0.089
114.12
0.056
155.75
0.099
120.87

The SRM is tested for various current references, with different voltage magnitudes and the performance factors being tabulated. Table 4 shows the performance parameters of SRM which is excited with 100 V sinusoidal supply. As the reference current value is increased from 0.6 A to 1.5 A, it is observed that the speed ripple, torque ripple, and THD are reducing. At higher voltages the performance of the motor is improved. The power factor is also improved. The large harmonic distortion will lead to high losses and less efficiency. Due to the modified converter, current harmonics decrease with the increase in current reference which has reduced losses. Hence the efficiency of the drive is also improved.

Table 4: 100 V sinusoidal supply with different DC current references.

Constant current
reference (A)
Average speed
(RPM)
Speed ripple %
Torque ripple %
Power factor
THD for current

0.6
1283
4.45
85.51
0.44
89.2

0.7
1847
1.18
69.69
0.52
84.7

0.8
2110
1.21
47.06
0.57
82.1

0.9
2343
2.28
37.45
0.62
79.6

1
2520
2.08
32.46
0.64
76.9

1.2
2747
0.96
22.18
0.7
71.6

1.5
2797
0.79
16.32
0.75
65.3

By keeping a single DC current reference and varying the applied voltage the observed motor performance factors are tabulated in Table 5. It is found that the speed ripple, torque ripple, and THD are more as the voltage increased. The power factor is also poor.

Table 5: 1 A constant current reference with different voltage magnitudes.

Applied voltage
Average speed (RPM)
Speed ripple %
Torque ripple %
Power factor
THD for current

30
1364
0.86
61.6
0.814
55.9

60
1768
0.96
134.6
0.746
66.7

75
2301
1.23
142.2
0.684
72.4

100
2587
1.68
156.4
0.648
75.9

125
2827
1.94
172.4
0.616
77.9

150
2961
2.42
184.6
0.587
80.7

175
3261
2.76
192.6
0.572
81.3

200
3547
3.13
204.6
0.564
81.7

Case (ii) DC and AC Excitation with Sinusoidal Current Reference. With the same AC excitation the conventional and modified R dump converter configurations are chosen as given in Figures 1 and 2. The supply voltage and current waveforms for the modified converter configuration are shown in Figure 8. The sinusoidal current reference is fixed at a magnitude of 0.5 A.

Figure 8: Supply voltage and current waveform of modified converter with sinusoidal current reference.

To reduce iron losses it is preferred to have the currents be sinusoidal. Hence the analysis is repeated with sinusoidal current reference at both DC and sinusoidal excitation. The phase currents and developed torque of the SRM, under sine current reference with conventional and modified converter, are shown in Figures 9 and 10. Due to the current profile in DC excited SRM more torque ripples are observed.

Figure 9: Phase currents and torque of SRM with 60 V DC excitation and sinusoidal current reference of 0.5 A.

Figure 10: Phase currents and torque of SRM with 60 V sinusoidal excitation and sinusoidal current reference of 0.5 A.

Tables 6 and 7 present the average speed and average torque of the SRM when excited under DC and sinusoidal supply. It is found that the ripples in DC are high when compared with sinusoidal excitation. At high current reference the machine shows a good performance. Since the applied voltage magnitude is varying, the phase currents are also varying which provides more ripples in the torque profile. In spite of this, the required speed is achieved.

Table 6: Comparison of speed with DC and sinusoidal excitation with sine current reference.

Sine current
reference (A)
Experimental analysis
Theoretical analysis

DC excitation (with capacitor)
Sinusoidal excitation (without capacitor)
DC excitation (with capacitor)
Sinusoidal excitation (without capacitor)

Average speed (RPM)
Speed ripple %
Average speed (RPM)
Speed ripple %
Average speed (RPM)
Speed ripple %
Average speed (RPM)
Speed ripple %

0.4
315
6.79
445
4.90
332
6.43
462
5.60

0.5
816
4.27
1929
3.20
825
4.57
1935
3.70

0.6
1622
3.46
2453
1.76
1640
3.87
2420
1.86

0.7
2023
2.45
2753
0.86
2045
2.25
2732
0.76

0.8
2511
1.52
2864
0.90
2510
1.82
2837
0.80

0.9
2669
0.81
2898
0.64
2690
0.95
2878
0.74

1.0
2710
0.64
2916
0.66
2735
0.54
2903
0.65

1.2
2920
0.43
3254
0.41
2945
0.49
3276
0.48

1.5
3015
0.28
3685
0.25
3030
0.32
3665
0.29

Table 7: Comparison of torque with DC and sinusoidal excitation with sine current reference.

Constant current reference (A)
Experimental analysis
Theoretical analysis

DC excitation (with capacitor)
Sinusoidal excitation (without capacitor)
DC excitation (with capacitor)
Sinusoidal excitation (without capacitor)

Torque average
Torque ripple %
Torque average
Torque ripple %
Torque average
Torque ripple %
Torque average
Torque ripple %

0.4
0.01
320.00
0.018
189.23
0.013
302.00
0.016
189.23

0.5
0.016
292.73
0.022
176.76
0.015
272.73
0.024
176.76

0.6
0.018
245.00
0.025
161.57
0.019
255.00
0.026
161.57

0.7
0.021
203.68
0.027
150.74
0.023
223.28
0.028
150.74

0.8
0.026
165.83
0.039
144.25
0.029
155.38
0.043
144.25

0.9
0.037
136.22
0.045
133.33
0.040
127.73
0.049
133.33

1.0
0.041
125.90
0.057
122.62
0.046
112.45
0.061
122.62

1.2
0.046
102.69
0.085
100.43
0.049
99.86
0.082
100.43

1.5
0.048
83.75
0.089
88.12
0.052
76.88
0.093
88.12

The machine performance based on power factor and THD is also obtained by exciting it with 100 V supply and various current references which are tabulated in Table 8. It is found that power factor is improved as the current reference is increased. It has also been observed that the current harmonics are reduced; hence the iron losses are reduced. The acoustic noise was also observed to be less in sinusoidal excitation which is not quantified.

Table 8: 100 V sinusoidal supply with various constant current references.

Sine current
reference (A)
Average speed (RPM)
Speed ripple %
Torque ripple %
Power factor
THD for current %

0.6
2385
6.45
185.25
0.74
69.2

0.7
2567
4.19
169.69
0.78
64.7

0.8
2683
3.23
147.16
0.81
52.1

0.9
2891
2.78
137.25
0.83
48.6

1
3245
2.38
132.86
0.85
39.9

1.2
3675
1.96
122.28
0.87
35.6

1.5
3797
1.79
116.32
0.92
32.3

The supply current is highly distorted due to the switching of the converter switches. Because of this the power factor is becoming poor and produces high harmonics. The supply current contains only third harmonics; hence lower iron loss is expected. The phase current waveform for a constant current reference of 0.5 A is shown in Figure 11. To have more understanding over the phase currents the phase B current alone is shown in Figure 12.

Figure 11: Phase currents for 0.5 A reference 60 V DC.

Figure 12: Phase B current waveform for 0.5 A reference 60 V DC.

5. Experimental Setup

5.1. Design of Converter

The rating of transistor is chosen to withstand the turnoff of transient voltage also. The current rating of the switch is chosen to withstand maximum phase current during turnon. The diodes of R dump are chosen to withstand freewheeling current. The dump resistor is chosen to limit the freewheeling current. The power dissipated on the dump resistor is high at lower speeds of the drive. Suitable circuits are presented in the literature to retrieve the power. The choice of power components is listed in Table 1.

5.2. System Configuration

Control part is organized through hardware in loop model. Commutations pulses are generated based on the information from position sensor which is acquired through a National Instrumentations Data Acquisition (NI DAQ) card PCI 6251. An R dump converter with necessary isolation and gate drivers are used to commutate the phase current. Hall effect current and voltage sensors are used for measuring the active phase voltage and current, respectively.

Hardware implementation of the modified R dump converter and its components are shown in Figures 13 and 14, respectively. The storage oscilloscope is used to capture the various waveforms. The current probe is used to measure the phase currents as well as the supply currents.

Figure 13: DAQ terminator, R dump converter, 8/6 SRM, and sensors.

Figure 14: Hardware of modified R dump converter.

6. Conclusion

The electromagnetic performance of an 8/6 SRM with DC and sinusoidal excitation is investigated in terms of torque capability, torque ripple, average speed, and speed ripple. The standard single phase full bridge is employed to make unidirectional current flow in SRM phases. The DC link capacitance is removed which makes the converter weigh less and be cost effective. Lower torque and speed are observed in DC excitation. The iron loss with sinusoidal excitation is significantly reduced due to less current harmonics at high current reference. Thus the efficiency will be high at high speed. The modified converter can be used for fan type loads.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

R. Krishnan, Switched Reluctance Motor Drive: Modeling, Simulation, Analysis, Design and Application, Magna Physics Publishing, 2001.

T. J. Miller, Switch Reluctance Motor Drive, Intertec Communications, Ventura, Calif, USA, 1988.

R. Krishnan and P. Materu, “Analysis and design of a low-cost converter for switched reluctance motor drives,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 320–327, 1993.

R. Krishnan, S.-Y. Park, and K. S. Ha, “Theory and operation of a four-quadrant switched reluctance motor drive with a single controllable switch—The lowest cost brushless motor drive,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1047–1055, 2005.

M. Ehsani, I. Husain, K. R. Ramani, and J. H. Galloway, “Dual-decay converter for switched reluctance motor drives in low-voltage applications,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 224–230, 1993.

T. J. E. Miller, “Converter volt–ampere requirements of the switched reluctance motor drive,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1136–1144, 1985.

M. Ehsani, J. T. Bass, T. J. E. Miller, and R. L. Steigerwald, “Development of a unipolar converter for variable reluctance motor drives,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 545–553, 1987.

T. J. E. Miller et al., “Regenerative unipolar converter for switched reluctance motors using one switching device per phase,” U.S.Patent, No. 4, 684,867, August 1987

S. Mir, I. Husain, and M. E. Elbuluk, “Energy-efficient C-dump converters for switched reluctance motors,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 912–921, 1997.

E. Afjei, “A new resonant converter circuit for reluctance motor,” International Journal of Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 69–80, 1999.

N. Taïb, B. Metidji, T. Rekioua, and B. Francois, “Novel low-cost self-powered supply solution of bidirectional switch gate driver for matrix converters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 211–219, 2012.

J. Wang, B. Wu, D. Xu, and N. R. Zargari, “Multimodular matrix converters with sinusoidal input and output waveforms,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2012.

E. P. Wiechmann, R. P. Burgos, and J. Rodríguez, “Continuously motor-synchronized ride-through capability for matrix-converter adjustable-speed drives,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 390–400, 2002.

P. W. Wheeler, J. Rodríguez, J. C. Clare, L. Empringham, and A. Weinstein, “Matrix converters: a technology review,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 276–288, 2002.

C. Y. Wu and C. Pollock, “Analysis and reduction of vibration and acoustic noise in the switched reluctance drive,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 1995.

F.-C. Lin and S.-M. Yang, “Instantaneous shaft radial force control with sinusoidal excitations for switched reluctance motors,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 629–636, 2007.

X. Liu, Z. Q. Zhu, M. Hasegawa et al., “Performance comparison between unipolar and bipolar excitations in switched reluctance machine with sinusoidal and rectangular waveforms,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Annual IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE '11), pp. 1590–1595, Phoenix, Ariz, USA, September 2011.

A. S. Goodman, K. J. Bradley, and P. W. Wheeler, “Evaluation of the single sided matrix converter driven switched reluctance motor,” in Proceedings of the 39th IAS Annual Meeting Conference Record of the Industry Applications Conference, pp. 1847–1851, October 2004.

F.-C. Lin and S.-M. Yang, “Self-bearing control of a switched reluctance motor using sinusoidal currents,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2518–2526, 2007.

Z. Q. Liu, Z. Q. Zhu, M. Hasegawa et al., “Dc-link capacitance requirement and noise and vibration reduction in 6/4 switched reluctance machine with sinusoidal bipolar excitation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE '11), pp. 1596–1603, Phoenix, Ariz, USA, September 2011.

X. Ojeda, X. Mininger, M. Gabni, and M. Lecivain, “Sinusoidal feeding for SRM: application to vibration damping,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Machines, 2008.

S.-C. Wang and Y.-H. Liu, “A modified PI-like fuzzy logic controller for switched reluctance motor drives,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1812–1825, 2011.

J. Xiu and C. Xia, “An application of adaptive fuzzy logic controller for switched reluctance motor drive,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD '07), pp. 154–158, August 2007.