The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2020 (2020), Article ID 7321873, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7321873

Research Article

Prevalence of Dental Trauma and Receipt of Its Treatment among Male School Children in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia

Asim Al-Ansari and Muhammad Nazir

Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P. O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence should be addressed to Asim Al-Ansari; aaalansari@iau.edu.sa

Received 25 June 2020; Revised 3 August 2020; Accepted 17 August 2020; Published 1 September 2020

Academic Editor: Samir Nammour

Copyright © 2020 Asim Al-Ansari and Muhammad Nazir. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Dental trauma is a common dental public health problem, and it affects 20% to 30% of permanent dentition worldwide. Objective. To evaluate self-reported dental trauma to permanent anterior teeth and the receipt of dental treatment among male school children. Materials and Methods. This cross-sectional study included grade 7 to 9 school children in Dammam/Al-Khobar, the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The participants responded to a pilot-tested self-completion questionnaire which contained questions about experience, types, place, and reasons for dental trauma and the receipt of dental treatment. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. Results. There were 258 students in the study with a mean age of 14.29 ± 1.11 years. Dental trauma was experienced by 39.5% of the participants. Tooth fracture (22.7%) was the most common type of dental trauma followed by tooth displacement (8.7%) and complete tooth removal (8%). The most common reason of dental trauma included fall (9.3%) and accidental hit by some objects (8.9). Home (19.8%), school (5%), and playground (4.2%) were reported as common places of dental trauma. Dental treatment was received by 20.5% of the samples. Most participants visited a dental clinic (10.8%) and used self-care at home (7.2%) after dental trauma. Nearly 4.7% of the participants received dental treatment immediately, 5% on the next day, and 2.7% after a month. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed a significant association of monthly family income (odds ratio = 0.44) with dental trauma (). Conclusion. Dental trauma was highly prevalent among school children; however, few of them received care/dental treatment. Participants frequently experienced dental trauma due to a fall in their homes. Preventive measures should be taken to prevent dental trauma, reduce its burden, and improve quality of life.

1. Introduction

Traumatic dental injuries occur in preschool children, adolescents, and adults, and they affect about 20–30% of permanent dentition worldwide [1]. Nearly 80% of dental trauma occurs under the age of 20 years making childhood and adolescence highly vulnerable periods for traumatic dental injuries [2]. Depending upon the severity, type, and duration of dental trauma, various complications such as the fracture of the crown, discoloration of the tooth, necrosis of the pulp, apical periodontitis, root resorption, and fistulas can occur [3]. Evidence shows that children who experienced trauma to their anterior teeth were more likely to avoid smiling, laughing, and were more concerned with their personality than children without dental trauma [4].

Similarly, children with untreated dental trauma face embarrassment and social isolation and known to have a poor oral health-related quality of life [5]. It is documented that adolescents with fractured teeth have an impact on their daily living 20 times more than those without dental trauma [6]. Likewise, untreated dental trauma in adolescents negatively impacts eating and smiling [7]. Besides the functional, physical, and psychological impacts of dental trauma, treating dental trauma can be expensive. For example, the results of a study showed that the annual treatment cost of dental injuries was between US $ 3.3 and 4.4 million per one million individuals in Sweden [8]. Another study also reported that the treatment cost of dental injuries ranged from US $ 2 to 5 million per one million people per year in Denmark [9].

The maxillary central incisors are the most commonly affected teeth with dental trauma, and the fracture of tooth enamel is the most frequent type of dental injury followed by enamel dentine fracture [10, 11]. Various factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and environmental influences play an important role in the etiology of dental trauma. Researchers have shown that adolescents who experienced adverse life events such as low socioeconomic status and poor environmental conditions were more likely to experience dental trauma than those who had positive and economically favorable life experiences [12, 13].

In Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Al-Majed et al. reported that 34% of boys aged 12–14 years had dental trauma [14]. Also, Al-Majed reported that the prevalence of dental trauma was 31.4% among 12–15-year-old school girls [15]. Al-Malik conducted a study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and observed the highest number of dental injuries in 9–11-year-old children [16]. However, the literature study is limited to dental trauma among school children in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Therefore, it was important to investigate various aspects related to dental trauma and the receipt of its treatment. Evaluation of factors associated with the occurrence of dental trauma and receipt of treatment can guide the development of effective preventive strategies. The objective of the study was to evaluate self-reported dental trauma among male school children in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia. The study also assessed the type and place of dental trauma, reasons for dental trauma, and receipt of dental treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study included middle school children (aged 12 to 15 years) from Al-Khobar, Dammam, and Dhahran, Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. A sample of 318 participants was calculated based on 95% confidence level, response proportion (30%), the margin of error (5%), and population (N = 20,000). The permission to conduct the study was obtained from the school authorities. Any child with erupted permanent anterior teeth was eligible to participate in the study. Children with cleft lip and cleft palate, dental developmental abnormalities, unerupted permanent anterior teeth, and those who lost their anterior teeth due to dental caries or other than dental trauma were excluded from the study. The purpose, objective, and details of the present study were provided to the parents/legal guardians of children in the consent form. The children were included in the study if their parents/legal guardians provided written consent, and they showed willingness to participate in the study. A convenience sampling method was used for the selection of participants. The study was approved by the institutional review board by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam. Ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed during the study.

The first version of the questionnaire was developed in the English language [14, 15, 17–20]. This was then circulated among two faculty members in the College of Dentistry to assess the appropriateness of its content and structure. This review process helped to confirm the content validity of the questionnaire. The final version of the questionnaire was then translated into the Arabic language. Prior to data collection, pilot testing of the questionnaire was carried out on 30 children to assess the comprehension, clarity, and format of the questions and the duration to complete the survey.

The questionnaire consisted of two parts: the first part included demographic information, and the second part contained questions specific to dental trauma. Demographic data included age, paternal education, monthly family income, and previous academic grades. Dental trauma questions were about the experience of dental trauma to permanent anterior teeth, types and place of dental trauma, reasons for dental trauma, and the receipt and timing of dental treatment.

The study participants (N = 318) were provided with a paper-based self-administrated questionnaire in their classrooms. Their queries about questionnaire items and the study were addressed during the questionnaire administration. The questionnaires were collected immediately after the session which was on average about 30 minutes long. The questionnaires with incomplete and/or illegible responses were discarded (N = 60).

Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA), was used to perform descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. Frequencies and proportions of categorical variables such as class, paternal education, monthly family income, and previous academic grades were calculated. Means and standard deviations of the continuous variable such as age were calculated. Chi-square test was performed to determine the association between sociodemographic factors and dental trauma and receipt of dental treatment. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between sociodemographic factors and dental trauma and receipt of dental treatment after controlling for confounding factors. Statistical significance was set at a value of less than 0.05.

3. Results

Two-hundred and fifty-eight (258) male students from grade 7–9 participated in the study with the mean age of 14.29 ± 1.11 years. About half of the participants (51.2%) belonged to middle-income families (monthly family income equal to 10,000–20,000 SAR; one 1000 SAR is equivalent to $US 267). Having dental trauma was reported by 39.5% of the participants. However, 20.5% of the participants received dental treatment (Table 1).

Table 1: Demographic profile of study participants.

Study variables
Frequency (%), N = 258

Class/grade

7th
90 (34.9)

8th
61 (23.6)

9th
107 (41.5)

Monthly family income

Low (less than 10,000 SAR)
13 (5.0)

Middle (10,000–20,000 SAR)
132 (51.2)

High (more than 20,000 SAR)
113 (43.8)

Paternal education

No school education
118 (45.7)

School education
70 (27.1)

College/university education
70 (27.1)

Academic score

Poor (<70% grades)
10 (3.9)

Average (70%–89% grades)
47 (18.2)

Good (≥90% grades)
201 (77.9)

Experienced dental trauma in the past

Yes
102 (39.5)

No
156 (60.5)

Treatment received

Yes
53 (20.5)

No
205 (79.5)

Age
Mean ± SD

14.29 ± 1.11

Regarding the types of dental trauma, participants reported tooth fracture (22.7%), tooth displacement (8.7%), and complete tooth removal (8%). Oral injuries included bleeding from mouth (5%), injury to lips (3.5%), injury to tongue (2.3%), and injury to cheek (1.2%) (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Distribution of participants’ responses about the types of dental trauma and oral injuries.

Fall on the ground was the most common reason for dental trauma (9.3%) followed by an accidental hit by some objects (8.9). On the other hand, intentional hitting by someone in fight or violence was the least common (4.2%) reason for dental trauma. Most participants reported home as a place of dental trauma (19.8%) followed by the school (5%) and playground (4.2%). Dental treatment was received immediately by 4.7% and on the next day by 5% of the participants. Nearly 2.7% of the participants received dental treatment after more than a month of dental trauma. Regarding treatment/care received after dental trauma, 10.8% visited a public/private dental clinic and 7.2% used self-care/self-medication. Visiting a physician for dental treatment was reported by 1.3% of the participants (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Distribution of participants’ responses about dental treatment/care received after trauma.

In bivariate analysis, being a 9th grader was significantly associated with increased likelihood of having dental trauma (OR = 1.69, ). On the other hand, high family income was significantly associated with lower odds (OR = 0.48, ) of having dental trauma. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, high family income remained significantly associated with lower odds of having dental trauma (OR = 0.44, ). Paternal education and the academic score of participants had no significant association with dental trauma in both bivariate and multivariate analyses (Table 2).

Table 2: Association between sociodemographic factors and dental trauma.

Variables
Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
value
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
value

Class/grade

7th
1.69 (1.01, 2.85)
0.047
1.33 (0.72, 2.46)
0.361

8th
0.62 (0.34, 1.15)
0.125
0.58 (0.28, 1.2)
0.145

9th

Family income

Low
1.84 (0.6, 5.65)
0.279
0.80 (0.21, 3.07)
0.746

Middle
0.48 (0.28, 0.8)
0.004
0.44 (0.24, 0.81)
0.008

High

Paternal education

No school education
1.33 (0.81, 2.19)
0.266
0.99 (0.51, 1.91)
0.983

School education
0.67 (0.38, 1.2)2
0.181
0.73 (0.35, 1.54)
0.41

College/university education

Academic score

Poor

Average
1.44 (0.76, 2.72)
0.259
2.27 (0.45, 11.43)
0.322

Good
0.79 (0.44, 1.44)
0.449
1.19 (0.26, 5.39)
0.820

Reference category.

Table 3 shows the association of sociodemographic factors with the receipt of treatment for dental trauma. Being a 9th grader (OR = 0.43, ) and high family income (OR = 0.41, ) were significantly associated with lower likelihood of receiving dental treatment for trauma in bivariate analysis. However, high family income remained a significant factor associated with lower odds of receiving dental treatment (OR = 0.41, ) in multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Table 3: Association between sociodemographic factors and receipt of treatment for dental trauma.

Variables
Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
value
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
value

Class/grade

7th
1.74 (0.94, 3.22)
0.075
1.3 (0.63, 2.66)
0.472

8th
0.43 (0.18, 1.10)
0.045
0.43 (0.16, 1.16)
0.096

9th

Family income

Low
1.78 (0.53, 6.01)
0.349
0.4 (0.07, 2.23)
0.297

Middle
0.41 (0.22, 0.77)
0.005
0.41 (0.2, 0.85)
0.017

High

Paternal education

No school education
1.18 (0.65, 2.17)
0.586
0.87 (0.4, 1.9)
0.734

School education
0.74 (0.36, 1.51)
0.409
0.8 (0.33, 1.95)
0.624

College/university education

Academic score

Poor

0.62 (0.09, 4.17)
0.620

Average
0.76 (0.33, 1.73)
0.045
0.81 (0.14, 4.51)
0.808

Good
1.28 (0.60, 2.74)
0.526

Reference category.

4. Discussion

The study identified that 39.5% of adolescents had dental trauma to their permanent anterior teeth. This finding is higher than what was reported in previous studies in Saudi Arabia which showed that the prevalence of dental trauma ranged from 31.4% to 34% in adolescents [14, 15]. Globally, the distribution of dental trauma among adolescents varies in different countries. For instance, dental trauma was reported in 9.1% of Nigerian [21], 10.9%–14.4% of Indian [18, 22], 16.5%–34.79% of Brazilian [11, 23], 35.0% of Thai [24], 36% of Iranian [25], 18.5% of Canadian [26], and 43.8% of British school children [27]. These dental trauma inequalities in different parts of the world can be explained by the differences in study designs, sample size estimates, sampling techniques, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and measurement methods. In addition, variations in behavioral, cultural, and environmental factors in different geographic locations predispose children to varying degrees of dental trauma [10].

In the present study, only 20.5% of the participants received dental care for dental trauma. A previous study of Brazilian school children reported that 27.6% of teeth with dental trauma received dental care [28]. Another study from Brazil showed that 26% of teeth with dental trauma were restored [11]. On the other hand, Hamdan and Rajab observed that only 3.1% of traumatized teeth were treated in Jordanian school children [29]. Al-Majed et al. reported dental treatment in 2.4% of 12–14-year-old boys in Saudi Arabia [14]. Our study also showed that only 10.8% of the participants visited a dental clinic, and 4.7% received dental treatment immediately. In addition to various aspects of poor quality of life, dental trauma can lead to clinical complications such as external root resorption, ankylosis, and pulp necrosis [30]. Nevertheless, a low prevalence of treatment for dental trauma in our study could be related to low priority for oral health, lack of awareness about the availability of dental care, and expensive dental trauma treatment in addition to sociodemographic variables.

Fall was the most common reason for dental trauma in the present study. Several previous studies locally and globally reported similar findings [16, 18, 19, 22, 30, 31]. In addition, accidental hit by an object was the second most common reason for dental trauma in the present study. In agreement with other studies [19, 28, 31], the home was the most frequently reported place of dental trauma in the present study. It is known that there is a significant association between overcrowded household and dental trauma in school children [27]. Therefore, dental trauma in crowded houses may occur due to fall and accidental hitting. These findings highlight the importance of establishing collaboration among different government departments to develop guidelines to prevent falls and dental trauma in households.

The analysis of sociodemographic factors on dental trauma and the receipt of dental treatment was performed in the present study. The multiple logistic regression analysis showed lower odds of dental trauma among children from high-income families than low- and middle-income families. Similarly, Årtun and Al-Azemi demonstrated a reduced risk of dental trauma among adolescents from high-income families in Kuwait [32]. Our study also demonstrated reduced odds of dental trauma among children with high paternal education, though the relationship was not significant. Damé-Teixeira demonstrated significantly greater likelihood of dental trauma to at least one tooth among children from low socioeconomic status [23]. Low and middle socioeconomic status school children most likely live in crowded houses which increase their chances of experiencing dental trauma. Conversely, high parental education results in increased awareness about the prevention of dental trauma and reduced incidence of dental trauma [23, 27]. These explain the reasons behind reduced likelihood of dental trauma among adolescents from high-income and high-educated families in the present study. On the contrary, Hamdan and Rajab showed no significant association between socioeconomic factors and dental trauma [29].

Patient compliance and cooperation, commonly encountered problems during childhood and adolescence, present challenges for the management of dental trauma [2]. The present study demonstrated significantly lower odds of receiving dental treatment for dental trauma among children from high-income families. In addition, children from university-educated families showed reduced chances of dental treatment after trauma. Low risk of dental trauma among adolescents of high socioeconomic status may account for the reduced likelihood of receiving treatment for dental trauma. However, the interplay of behavioral, psychological, environmental, and socioeconomic factors in the etiology of dental trauma should be considered while evaluating the influence of factors on the receipt of dental treatment.

The study evaluated different factors related to dental trauma and the receipt of dental treatment in adolescents and added valuable information to the available body of evidence on this topic. However, there are certain limitations to this study. Despite the measures to obtain valid data in the present survey, self-reported responses are subject to biases such as recall bias and social desirability bias. In addition, clinical examination of dental traumatic injuries provides more accurate information than self-reported data [25]. Furthermore, a cross-sectional study design cannot be used to infer the associations reported in the present study as causal relationships. Children were recruited from public schools in few cities of the Eastern Province, and the conclusions regarding generalizability should be drawn carefully. Large prospective studies are required to understand various epidemiological features related to dental trauma.

5. Conclusion

This study indicated that dental trauma was very common among school children. However, few with dental trauma received dental treatment. Immediate care of dental trauma was uncommon among children. Many children with dental trauma used self-care at home and visited a private dental clinic. The most common reasons for dental trauma were the fall on the ground and accidentally hit by some objects. Monthly family income was significantly associated with dental trauma and the receipt of dental treatment. Collaborative preventive measures should be taken at the community level to reduce the burden of dental trauma and promote necessary dental care after trauma.

Data Availability

The SPSS data file of this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

C. Bourguignon and A. Sigurdsson, “Preventive strategies for traumatic dental injuries,” Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 729–749, 2009.

J. Y. Lee and K. Divaris, “Hidden consequences of dental trauma: the social and psychological effects,” Pediatr Dent, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 96–101, 2009.

V. Zaleckiene, V Peciuliene, V Brukiene, and S Drukteinis, “Traumatic dental injuries: etiology, prevalence and possible outcomes,” Stomatologija, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2014.

C. B. Bendo, S. M. Paiva, C. S. Torres et al., “Association between treated/untreated traumatic dental injuries and impact on quality of life of Brazilian schoolchildren,” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 114, 2010.

L. D. Rajab and D. Abu Al Huda, “Impact of treated and untreated traumatic dental injuries on oral health-related quality of life among 12-year-old schoolchildren in amman,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 153–162, 2019.

M. I. Cortes, W. Marcenes, and A. Sheiham, “Impact of traumatic injuries to the permanent teeth on the oral health-related quality of life in 12–14-year-old children,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 193–198, 2002.

J. Ramos-Jorge, S. M. Paiva, J. Tataounoff, I. A. Pordeus, L. S. Marques, and M. L. Ramos-Jorge, “Impact of treated/untreated traumatic dental injuries on quality of life among brazilian schoolchildren,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2014.

U. Glendor, “On dental trauma in children and adolescents. incidence, risk, treatment, time and costs,” Swedish Dental Journal. Supplement, vol. 140, pp. 1–52, 2000.

M. K. Borum and J. O. Andreasen, “Therapeutic and economic implications of traumatic dental injuries in Denmark: an estimate based on 7549 patients treated at a major trauma centre,” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 249–258, 2001.

M. Eltair, V. Pitchika, M. Standl et al., “Prevalence of traumatic crown injuries in German adolescents,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 867–874, 2020.

S. S. Francisco, F. J Filho, E. T Pinheiro, R. D Murrer, and A de Jesus Soares, “Prevalence of traumatic dental injuries and associated factors among brazilian schoolchildren,” Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2013.

C. Bendo, M. Vale, L. Figueiredo, I. Pordeus, and S. Paiva, “Social vulnerability and traumatic dental injury among brazilian schoolchildren: a population-based study,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 4278–4291, 2012.

K. O. Jorge, P. M. Oliveira Filho, E. F. Ferreira, A. C. Oliveira, M. P. Vale, and P. M. Zarzar, “Prevalence and association of dental injuries with socioeconomic conditions and alcohol/drug use in adolescents between 15 and 19 years of age,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 136–141, 2012.

I. Al-Majed, J. J. Murray, and A. Maguire, “Prevalence of dental trauma in 5-6- and 12–14-year-old boys in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 153–158, 2001.

I. Al-Majed, “Dental trauma among 12–15 year-old schoolgirls in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,” Journal of Pakistan Dental Association, vol. 20, pp. 29–34, 2011.

M. Al-Malik, “Oral injuries in children attending a hospital in Saudi Arabia,” Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2009.

L. Andersson, “Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. S2–S5, 2013.

A. Kumar, “revalence of traumatic dental injuries among 12- to 15-year-old schoolchildren in Ambala district, Haryana, India,” Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 301–305, 2011.

L. D. Rajab, “Traumatic dental injuries among 12-year-old schoolchildren in Jordan: prevalence, risk factors and treatment need,” Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 2013.

R. Lam, “Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic dental injuries: a review of the literature,” Australian Dental Journal, vol. 61, pp. 4–20, 2016.

C. A. Adekoya-Sofowora, R. Bruimah, and E. Ogunbodede, “Traumatic dental injuries experience in suburban Nigerian adolescents,” The Internet Journal of Dental Science, vol. 3, pp. 1–10, 2005.

R. Nagarajappa, G. Ramesh, R. Uthappa, S. P. K. Kannan, and S. Shaikh, “Risk factors and patterns of traumatic dental injuries among Indian adolescents,” Journal of Dental Sciences, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 96–103, 2020.

N. Damé-Teixeira, L. S. Alves, C. Susin, and M. Maltz, “Traumatic dental injury among 12-year-old South Brazilian schoolchildren: prevalence, severity, and risk indicators,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 2013.

P. Malikaew, R. G. Watt, and A. Sheiham, “Prevalence and factors associated with traumatic dental injuries (TDI) to anterior teeth of 11–13 year old Thai children,” Community Dental Health, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 222–227, 2006.

F. Eslamipour, P. Iranmanesh, and A. Borzabadi-Farahani, “Cross-sectional study of dental trauma and associated factors among 9- to 14-year-old schoolchildren in isfahan, Iran,” Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 451–457, 2016.

D. Locker, “Prevalence of traumatic dental injury in grade 8 children in six ontario communities,” Canadian Journal of Public Health, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 73–76, 2005.

W. Marcenes and S. Murray, “Changes in prevalence and treatment need for traumatic dental injuries among 14-year-old children in Newham, London: a deprived area,” Community Dental Health, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 104–108, 2002.

J. Traebert, D. D. Bittencourt, K. G. Peres, M. A. Peres, J. T. de Lacerda, and W. Marcenes, “Aetiology and rates of treatment of traumatic dental injuries among 12-year-old school children in a town in southern Brazil,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 173–178, 2006.

M. A. Hamdan and L. D. Rajab, “Traumatic injuries to permanent anterior teeth among 12-year-old schoolchildren in Jordan,” Community Dental Health, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 89–93, 2003.

I. Kallel, “The incidence of complications of dental trauma and associated factors: a retrospective study,” International Journal of Dentistry, vol. 2020, Article ID 2968174, p. 8, 2020.

C. A. Adekoya-Sofowora, O. A. Adesina, W. O. Nasir, A. O. Oginni, and V. I. Ugboko, “Prevalence and causes of fractured permanent incisors in 12-year-old suburban Nigerian school children,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 314–317, 2009.

J. Årtun and R. Al-Azemi, “Social and behavioral risk factors for maxillary incisor trauma in an adolescent Arab population,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 589–593, 2009.