Degradation Rate/Vulnerability Potential and Fertility Status of Luvisols in the Mandara Mountains (Far-North Cameroon)

Soil degradation emerges as one of the major problems in the locality of Sir in the Mandara Mountains, Far-North Cameroon. Inappropriate agricultural techniques resulting in land use change affect soil functions and seriously harm forest ecosystems. This study was conducted to analyse the current character of soils and access their degradation and their level of fertility. Twenty soil samples were taken at 15 cm depth. This includes ten in the plot under forest reserve and ten others in the plot under cultivation. Cultivation is responsible for the increase in bulk density (BD) (1.59 to 2.23 g/cm3), Mg (4.76 to 6.40 cmol·kg−1), Ca (10.44 to 11.26 cmol·kg−1), P (7.93 to 9.93 g/kg), and Mg/K (2.28 to 5.84) and decrease in CEC (38 0.15 to 31.46 cmol·kg−1), OM (2.76 to 1.08%), OC (1.66 to 0.62%), total nitrogen (0.08 to 0.05%), K (4.59 to 1.15 cmol·kg−1), Na (1.32 to 0.91 cmol·kg−1), C/N (25.69 to 13.86), and Ca/Mg (2.32 to 1.89). This variability in physicochemical properties reflects progressive soil degradation. Cultivated soils are subject to severe degradation or potential vulnerability (SDR/Vp = 4/2) due to texture, organic carbon, soil aggregate stability, sealing index, and total nitrogen. On the other hand, soils under forest reserve are subject to severe degradation or vulnerability due to the total nitrogen and sodium absorption ratio. The soils of the study area are subject to severe and extreme potential degradation or vulnerability due to BD, respectively, under forest reserve and cultivation. Two classes of fertility were identified: class II (plots under forest reserve) having a good level of fertility, characterized by good physical properties and severe limitations in nitrogen and phosphorus and class IV (cultivated plots) with a low level of fertility due to severe limitations in organic matter, phosphorus, and poor physical characteristics. The best indicator of the good quality of the luvisols of Sir is the pH, while the bulk density is an indicator of severe to very extreme degradation or high to very high vulnerability. The application of organic and mineral amendments is essential for raising the organic matter and nitrogen and phosphorus contents in these soils.


Introduction
Population growth in sub-Saharan Africa has led to an increase in food demand [1].Soil fertility management is fundamental for sustainable agriculture ensuring food security and the standard of living of the population [2,3].However, increasing agricultural production requires good knowledge of the concept of soil degradation and fertility [4,5].Intensive agriculture and the search for new fertile lands result in pressure on the ecosystem, which, in turn, exposes the soil to degradation issues and considerably reduces its fertility [6].Similarly, poor land use and management expose agricultural soils to the risk of degradation.
Like most other areas in the world, the Sudano-Sahelian zone of Africa is sufering from the degradation of its natural resources [7].In Cameroon, particularly in the Far-North region, degradation emerges as one of the major problems in the area, due to the impact of human activity on their dynamics [8].Ignorance of soil heritage, resulting in the change in land use, mainly the passage from forest land to agricultural land, is very frequent [9].Tis practice afects soil functions and seriously harms forest ecosystems, especially since agriculture is identifed as being by far the main cause of tropical deforestation [10].Te degraded soils, with low production potential, when they are not abandoned, no longer allow satisfactory agricultural production, thus exposing the population to malnutrition, starvation, and food insecurity [2].Under these conditions, agro-socio-economic sustainability seems inaccessible and the protection of the environment and natural resources cannot become the major concern of farmers, which is mainly because of their very short-term future [11].It seems necessary and imperative to rethink the management and restoration of agricultural land [12,13] and in particular those from the Sudano-Sahelian zone whose crops contribute directly to the feeding of the population [8].In addition to erosion, identifed by far as the main factor of soil degradation in the Sudano-Sahelian zone [14], overgrazing and the uncontrolled use of pesticides/chemical fertilizers are also other factors responsible for soil degradation [8,15,16].
Inappropriate agricultural techniques resulting in land use change as a consequence of human activities afect soil functions [8,9,14,15].Tis leads to soil fertility degradation problems and seriously harms forest ecosystems.Tis is refected in the Far-North region of Cameroon and more particularly in the Mandara Mountains by the reduction in yields of the main crops [14].Tere is an increase in the need for information likely to improve agricultural production in this part of the country.Te decrease in yields mainly afects crops which directly contribute to feeding populations and therefore to food security.Te objective of the present study is to analyse the current character of soils and access their degradation rate/vulnerability potential and level of fertility.To do this, the locality of Sir in the Mandara Mountains was chosen to conduct the study.Te analysis was based on the comparison of the physicochemical characteristics of soils in two contrasted plots, one is a forest reserve (control) and the other is under cultivation, with diferent management systems.In medium-dated, the results of this study will serve in the development of strategies for the management and restoration of agricultural land, thus promoting an increase in agricultural production in the Sudano-Sahelian zone.

Study Area. Te study area was located in the Mandara
Mountains, precisely at Sir in the Kapsiki plateau (Figure 1) in the Mayo-Tsanaga Division, between latitudes 10 °22′-10 °44′ North and longitudes 13 °31′-13 °47′ East.Tis Kapsiki Plateau represents the northernmost volcanic zone of the Cameroon Volcanic Line [17].It was an asymmetrical horst that covered an area of 150 km 2 , located along the Cameroon-Nigeria border.Tis locality was infuenced by a Sudano-Sahelian mountain type climate [18], with a long dry season from October to June and a short rainy season from July to September, with a mean annual rainfall and temperature of 1074 mm and 26 °C, respectively [19].Te geologic substratum consisted mainly of gneisses, migmatites, and granites [20][21][22].Locally, it was covered by Lower Cretaceous continental sediments cut by trachytic and rhyolitic dykes and numerous basaltic dykes and fows [20].

Experimental Plots.
Te study was carried out in two plots, including one under natural forest reserve (control) and another under cultivation.Te current surface state of each plot of about 9 km 2 is shown in Table 1.Diferent land management practices included ploughing, removal of crop residues, uncontrolled use of chemicals products (fertilizers and pesticides), application of organic manure, fallow, mulching, crop rotation, crop association, weeding, ridging, burning and direct seeding in the cultivated plot, as well as increased grazing in forest reserves.Tese diferent modes of land use have already been reported by several authors [7,8,23].Te main crops grown in the cultivated plot were millet (Pennisetum glaucum), sorrel (Rumex acetosa), maize 2 Te Scientifc World Journal (Zea mays), Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), sesame (Sesamum indicum), potato (Ipomoea batatas), rice (Oryza sativa), and soybean (Glycine max) (Table 1).Te forest reserve, in addition to grazing, was subjected to uncontrolled cutting of trees as a consequence of the growing needs of wood by expanding urban populations, as already noted in the Zamai savannah by Tsozué et al. [23].Tere was an important biological activity, characterized by the presence of many termite mounds.
Te studied soil profle has a thickness of 1.5 m (Figure 2).It is composed of three horizons which are, from top to bottom, a yellowish-red humiferous horizon with sandy-clayey texture and fne lumpy structure, a reddish-yellow horizon with loamyclayey texture and weakly developed blocky structure, and a weathering polychrome horizon with sandy-loamy texture and massive structure.Mineralogically, it was constituted of kaolinite (3695.34cm −1 , 3623.10 cm −1 , 909.31 cm −1 ), quartz (999.96cm −1 , 774.76 cm −1 , 684.11 cm −1 , 465.98 cm −1 , 423.49 cm −1 ), smectites (1627.42cm −1 ), goethite (640 cm −1 , 684 cm −1 ), and sepiolite (535.39 cm −1 ) (Figure 3).It was marked by a subsurface horizon (50 to 75 cm) with higher clay content than the overlying horizon.Tis horizon was characterized by a fne to massive blocky structure, with a sandy clay-loam texture, high chroma, and a reddishyellow colour (5 YR 6/8).Cation exchange capacity and base saturation rate in this horizon were high.All of these observed properties were characteristics of an argic horizon.Referring to the World Reference Base for Soil Resources, these properties were those of luvisols.No particular character was noted along the soil profle, which allowed them to be classifed as haplic luvisols.Troughout the soil profle, cation exchange capacity was generally high due to the strong activities of the 2/1 type clays, in particular those of montmorillonites and sepiolites (35.74 ± 13.18 cmol•kg −1 ; CV � 37%).Base saturation was moderate (51.49± 19.53%; CV � 38%) (Table 2).Te studied soil thus belonged to the epidystric haplic luvisol groups.

Soil Sampling and Laboratory
Analysis.Fieldwork took place in two phases.Te frst phase consisted of direct observations, description of environmental settings, and soil survey in order to choose the position of drills and pits.Within each plot, seven transects along which a total of 56 drills of 1.20 m deep were performed to appreciate the morphological organization of soils were opened.Tis permits us to note that the studied soils are homogenous, leading to the choice of the digging point for the representative soil profle in the forest reserve.A representative soil profle was thereafter dug in the forest reserve and described in detail according to the standard procedure, for soil characterization and classifcation.Te main search characters were colour, thickness of horizons, coarse elements, texture, structure, porosity, roots and roolets, consistency, and boundaries between horizons.Te Munsell Soil Colour Chart was used for colour appreciation.Secondly, due to the availability of nutrients and microbiota found mainly in the most superfcial layers [23], surface soil samples (0-15 cm) were taken from the forest reserve and cultivated plot.At each sampling point, approximately 1 kg of soil sample was taken.Tree repetitions were carried out in the feld, which led to the collection of 40 samples per plot.Tese samples subsequently underwent quartering operations.A total of twenty composite samples were taken, including ten from the forest reserve and ten others from the cultivated plot.Te collected soils were placed in polythene bags and labelled for later laboratory analyses.Te history and diferent land management practices of the cultivated plot were obtained from direct interviews with the farmers.Te Scientifc World Journal Te samples were air-dried at room temperature for approximately one week and passed through a 2 mm sieve for physicochemical analyses in the laboratory.Methods used for physicochemical analyses were those already used by Tsozué et al. [23,24] and Issine et al. [25].For soil texture analysis, soil organic matter and carbonates were removed with hydrogen peroxide (30%) and diluted hydrochloric acid (10%), respectively.Sand was separated from silt and clay by wet sieving.Ten, silt and clay were dispersed with sodium hexametaphosphate, and particle size distribution was analysed using the pipette method.Clay and fne silt were separated by wet sieving, and coarse silt was estimated by subtraction [26].Soil pH was determined using a glass electrode in a 1 : 2.5 soil : water suspension for pH H2O and a 1 : 1 soil : KCl (1 M) suspension for pHKCl, using a soil-towater ratio extracts of 1 g : 2.5 ml [27].Bulk density (BD) was measured by the parafn-coated clod method [28].Fieldmoist clod samples were carefully collected at natural breaks to form smaller clods.Each clod was dried in an oven at 105 °C for at least 48 h and weighed.After tying thread around the clods, they were repeatedly dipped in melted parafn until air bubbles were no longer observed to provide a thin waterproof coat.spectrometry for K and Na.Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was also determined using the ammonium acetate method at pH 7, by a direct continuation using a 1 N potassium chloride (KCl) saturation solution [29].Base saturation (V) was determined according to the formula (SBE/CEC) × 100.Total nitrogen was obtained after heat treatment of each sample in a mixture of concentrated sulfuric acid and salicylic acid.Te mineralization was accelerated by a catalyst consisting of iron sulfate, selenium, and potassium sulfate.Te mineralization was followed by distillation via conversion of nitrogen into steam in the form of ammonia (NH 3 ), after alkalinization of mineralized extract with NaOH.Te distillate was fxed in boric acid (H 3 BO 3 ) and then titrated with sulfuric acid or diluted hydrochloric acid   Te Scientifc World Journal (0.01 N).Organic carbon (OC) content was determined by wet oxidation according to Walkley and Black [30] using a mixture of sodium dichromate and concentrated H 2 SO 4 .
Te organic matter (OM) content was calculated from the formula OM � 1.724 × OC and then the C/N ratio.Te available phosphorous content was analysed using the Bray II method, which combines extraction of phosphorus in the acid medium and their complexation with ammonium fuoride (NH 4 F).Te quantity of available phosphorus was obtained by spectrophotometry in the presence of blue molybdenum (MoO 3 ) [31].For mineralogical analysis, difuse refectance infrared spectra were recorded between 4000 and 400 cm −1 , using a FTIR Perkin Elmer 2000 spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a deuterated triglycine sulfate (DTGS) detector.Airdried samples were analysed at room temperature using diamond attenuated total refectance (ATR) accessories (Perkin Elmer).Te spectrum resolution was 4 cm −1 , and the accumulation time was 5 min.For the SDR, the weighting sequence was as follows: 1 � none, 2 � slight, 3 � moderate, 4 � severe, and 5 � extreme.In this way, good soils have the lowest SDR and poor soils the highest value.For the Vp, the weighting was the reverse as follows: 5 � very low, 4 � low, 3 � medium, 2 � high, and 1 � very high [4,12,28].Te cumulative rating index corresponds to the sum of diferent SDR/Vp weighting values [28].

Calculation of Soil Degradation
Te soil aggregate stability index (ISS) related to soil resistance to disturbance from external forces was evaluated using the formula of Pieri [32].It is in fact a measurement of the resistance of the aggregates, therefore of the structural porosities, against agents that can destroy them and in particular against water.Tis formula is defned as follows: with OC as the soil organic carbon, L as the silt fraction, and A as the clay fraction.An ISS > 9% indicates stable structure, 7% < ISS ≤ 9% indicates a low risk of structural degradation, 5% < ISS ≤ 7% indicates a high risk of degradation, and ISS ≤ 5% indicates structurally degraded soil.Te soil sealing or impermeabilization index (IB) related to the risk of soil erosion and compaction was estimated using the Remy formula [33]: with C being equal to 0.2 × (pH-7); Lf, the fne silt; Lg, the coarse silt; A, the clay; and OM, soil organic matter content.An IB < 1.4 indicates soils without a risk of thrust and without a risk of erosion; 1.4 < IB ≤ 1.6 indicates soils with a low risk of erosion; 1.6 < IB ≤ 1.8 indicates soils with a medium risk of erosion; IB ≥ 1.8 indicates soils with a high risk of erosion.Te Forestier index (IF) was assessed using the following formula [34]: with SBE, the sum of exchangeable cations; A, the clay fraction; and Lf, the fne silt fraction.An IF < 1.5 indicates soils with low nutrient reserves, and an IF > 1.5 indicates soils with good nutrient reserves.Te sodium absorption ratio (SAR) was calculated by the following relationship [28]: Fertility classes were obtained based on the criteria for evaluating soil fertility classes of Quemada and Cabrera [35], modifed by Nguemezi et al. [5].Class I: soil characteristics are not present or present only weak limitations; Class II: soil characteristics do not have more than three moderate limitations possibly associated with low limitations; Class III: soil characteristics have more than three moderate limitations possibly associated with a single severe limitation; Class IV: soil characteristics have more than one severe limitation.

Statistical Analysis.
To assess the main characteristics of the sampled population, the various physical and chemical properties of soils were subjected to standard statistical analyses (mean, maximum-minimum values, standard deviation, and the coefcient of variation).Te normality of the distribution was studied by the Anderson-Darling normality test.Te signifcance test was applied to the average values of the physicochemical properties in order to measure the variability of the parameters between the two plots, soil under forest reserve and soil under cultivation.Subsequently, correlation analyses (Spearman test) on the diferent variables were also carried out to measure the links between them.Finally, to evaluate the efect of cultivation on the diferent properties and parameters of the soil, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed.Signifcance was considered at p < 0.05.All statistical analyses were performed using XLSTAT software for Excel (version 2014.5.03).

6
Te Scientifc World Journal

Results
3.1.Physicochemical Characteristics of Soils.Sand represents the important particle size fraction both in the forest reserve and in the cultivated plot.Its proportions are between 60.6 and 80.6%, with an average of 73.88 ± 5.89% in the forest reserve and between 68 and 86%, with an average of 77.2 ± 4.52% in the cultivated plot (Table 3).Silt was the second largest grain size fraction in both plots.Its contents vary between 12 and 26%, with an average of 17.67 ± 4.34% in the forest reserve and between 7.6 and 18.6%, with an average of 13.6 ± 2.98% in the cultivated plot.As for clay, its average contents are 8.45 ± 2.07% and 9.2 ± 2.49%, respectively, in the forest reserve and in the cultivated plot.In the cultivated plot, there is a drop in silt content, while the sand and clay contents increase compared to the control (Table 4).Sand and clay contents did not signifcantly difer between the two plots, unlike silt content which difered signifcantly (p � 0.034) (Table 5).Te bulk density (BD) of the plots under forest reserve has an average of 1.59 ± 0.37 g/ cm 3 , ranging between 0.79 and 2.11 g/cm 3 , while that of the cultivated plots varies from 1.49 to 3.44 g/cm 3 , with an average of 2.23 ± 0.71 g/cm 3 (Table 4).Soil BD increases with cultivation but does not difer signifcantly between the two plots (p � 0.256) (Table 5).Te soil aggregate stability index (ISS) of the studied soils difered signifcantly from one plot to another (p � 0.002) (Table 5).Its values calculated in soils under forest reserve are between 2.66 and 17.59%, with an average of 10.48 ± 4.02% (Table 3).In the cultivated plots, the values vary between 0.84 and 8.71%, with an average of 4.62 ± 2.93% (Table 4).Te pH values are similar and do not show any signifcant diference from one plot to another.Te studied soils are slightly acidic, with an average pH value of 6.4 ± 0.5 in the forest reserve and 6.3 ± 0.55 in the cultivated soils (Tables 3 and 5).Te Mg content is high in the reserve and very high in the cultivated soils.Ca has a high content in both cases.For Mg, the levels in the forest reserve evolve unevenly and are between 2.48 and 6.56 cmol•kg −1 of soil, with an average of 4.76 ± 1.39 cmol•kg −1 (Table 3).In the cultivated plot, its values oscillate between 3.12 and 9.36 cmol•kg −1 , with an average of 6.40 ± 1.92 cmol•kg −1 (Table 5).As for the Ca, the average content in the forest reserve is 10.41 ± 2.01 cmol•kg −1 and it varies between 7.68 and 13.52 cmol•kg −1 (Table 3).For the cultivated plots, they vary between 7.76 and 16.56 cmol•kg −1 , with an average of 11.26 ± 2.5 cmol•kg −1 (Table 5).Te Mg and Ca contents showed no statistically signifcant diference between the two plots (Table 4).Te soils under forest reserve have a high content of Na and very high content of K with an average content of 4.59 ± 3.45 cmol•kg −1 and 1.32 ± 0.65 cmol•kg −1 , respectively.In the cultivated plot, the average K content is 1.15 ± 0.29 cmol•kg −1 and that of sodium is 0.91 ± 0.11 cmol•kg −1 (Table 5).Te average K and Na contents in the soils under the forest reserve are higher than those of the cultivated plots (Table 4).Te cation exchange capacity of soils under reserve is high.Its values are between 25.44 and 71.44 cmol•kg −1 , with an average of 38.15 ± 12.39 cmol•kg −1 against an average of 31.46 ± 12.80 cmol•kg −1 in cultivated soils (Table 5).Tese average contents vary signifcantly between the two plots (p � 0.023) (Table 4).Base saturation (V) is higher in cultivated plots than in forest reserve plots.Te average values are 67.14 ± 16.38% in the cultivated soils and 57.07 ± 15.87% in the soils under reserve (Tables 3 and 5).Te OM content is moderate in the forest reserve, while it is low in the cultivated plots.Its values oscillate between 0.59 and 4.63%, with an average of 2.76 ± 1.2% in the reserve (Table 3).In the cultivated plot, the OM content varies between 0.17 and 2.09%, corresponding to an average of 1.08 ± 0.70% (Table 5).A signifcant diference in OM content was noted between the two plots (p � 0.001) (Table 4).With regard to nitrogen, lower average concentrations were measured in the cultivated plot, while in the reserve, the concentrations were higher.Te average concentrations obtained are 0.08 ± 0.03% for the reserve and 0.05 ± 0.02% for the cultivated plot (Table 5).Te nitrogen content, although low, difers signifcantly between the two plots (p � 0.028).Te average C/N ratio varies between 13.86 ± 11.66 and 25.69 ± 17.32 in the studied soils.A higher value was observed under the forest reserve.Te average available phosphorous content is practically low in the two plots.Its average levels are 7.93 ± 2.09 mg/kg in the forest reserve and 9.93 ± 7.01 mg/kg in the cultivated plots (Table 4).Te Mg/K ratio varies signifcantly between the two plots (p � 0.002).Te average values are, respectively, 5.85 ± 2.02 in the cultivated soils and 2.28 ± 1.99 in the forest reserve.For the Ca/Mg ratio, the quotients are low in both plots, with 1.89 ± 0.62 in the cultivated plot and 2.32 ± 0.59 under the forest reserve.No signifcant diference was observed between the two values (Table 4).

Forest Reserve.
Te SDR/VP (degradation rate/vulnerability potential) weighted value for pH H2O , Na, ISS, and IB is 1/5 and 4/2 for BD (Table 6).Tis value refects no soil degradation or vulnerability.Te SDR/VP weighted at 2/4 for V refects a slight degradation or a low vulnerability.Texture and OC, with a SDR/VP of 3/3, indicate moderate degradation or vulnerability of the soils under the reserve.Severe degradation or high vulnerability is explained by the weighted value 4/2 assigned to the SAR and N (Table 6).Te SDR/VP weighted value of 4/1 for BD refects severe degradation or high vulnerability of the soils under the forest reserve.Overall, the sum of the weighting factors of the diferent parameters resulted in a cumulative rating index of 27 based on eleven soil properties.7).

Distribution of Variables and Individuals on the Main
Axes.Te principal component analysis (PCA) of diferent physicochemical properties of soils shows variability in the dataset along the F1 and F2 axes.Tis analysis was carried out separately for the plots under the forest reserve (Figure 4      Te Scientifc World Journal Te Scientifc World Journal

Te Scientifc World Journal
In the forest reserve, the discriminatory factorial analysis explains 64.41% of the variability of the dataset, with 36.15% on the F1 axis and 28.26% on F2.Te F1 axis is strongly and positively represented by Ca, V, SBE, and CEC.It is weakly and positively represented by Na, N, K, and clay and likewise negatively represented by pH H2O , ISS, C/N, and P (Figure 4(a)).Te F2 axis, meanwhile, is strongly and positively represented by sand, BD, and pH KCl .It is strongly negatively correlated with silt but weakly and negatively represented by OM (Figure 4(a)).
Compared to the forest reserve, the variability of the dataset on the main plan is expressed as 56.41%, with 32.20% on the F1 axis and 24.21% on F2 in the cultivated soils.Clay, P, Na, Ca, SBE, and pH H2O represent strongly and positively F1, while BD represents it strongly and negatively (Figure 4(b)).Likewise, K, CEC, nitrogen, and pH KCl represent weakly and positively F1.Te F2 axis is strongly and positively represented by OM and silt.It is weakly represented by ISS, C/N, and Ca/Mg.It is strongly and negatively represented by V and sand but more weakly by Mg and Mg/ K (Figure 4(b)).

Fertility Level of the Studied Luvisols.
Te statistical analysis of the diferent physicochemical properties and fertility parameters as well as the balances between these diferent parameters permits to determine the current level of fertility of the luvisols in the locality of Sir.Te studied soils had no limitations in K, V, SBE, CEC, and IF (Table 10).Available phosphorus (P) shows a moderate limitation in both cases.Tere is no limitation in OM in forest reserve soils, while it is moderate in cultivated soils.Te limitation in nitrogen (N) is moderate in the soils under cultivation, while it is weak in the forest reserve.Tere is a severe limitation in ISS and IB in the cultivated soils but not in the forest reserve.Soils under the forest reserve have a stable structure contrary to cultivated soils which have a degraded structure.Table 10 summarizes two main soil classes corresponding to the level of fertility in the studied area: (i) Class II groups together soils with a good level of fertility.Tis class characterized the fertility of soils under forest reserves.Tese soils have a moderate phosphorous limitation; (ii) Class IV includes soils with a poor level of fertility (low fertility).Tis class corresponds to that of soils under cultivation.Tey present severe limitations in ISS and IB, moderate limitations in OM and P, and weak limitations in N (Table 10).[36] and Sung [37] who show that most soils in the dry tropical zone have a low soil aggregate stability index.In addition to being strongly and positively correlated with OM as many authors have observed in other parts of the world [38], the soil aggregate stability index is also positively correlated with the C/N ratio.Carbon is therefore an aggregate stabilizer [38].Similarly, Razafmbelo [39] notes that the soil aggregate stability index increases with OM content.Te low value of the soil aggregate stability index in cultivated soils can be explained, on the one hand, by the low OM content in these soils and, on the other hand, by the increase in the base saturation.Te total content of exchangeable bases (SBE) in the cultivated plot was greater than that in the control soil.Its evolution is dependent on the Ca and Mg contents.Te increase in the base saturation and the total content of exchangeable bases implies a decrease in the soil aggregate stability index [38].Tis is confrmed by the negative correlations between the soil aggregate stability index and the total content of exchangeable bases on the one hand and with the base saturation on the other in soils under the forest reserve.Te bulk density of cultivated soils is higher than that of soils under the forest reserve (2.2 against 1.59 g/cm 3 ), in line with the observations already made by Getachew et al. [40].Conversion of the forest reserve to agricultural land increases soil bulk densities, likely due to increased soil compaction.Higher bulk density means that less water is held in the soil, while lower bulk density means that soils are less compacted and can hold more water [7].
4.1.2.Organic Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus.Te OM content is generally low for all the studied soils.Tis result is consistent with the work of Koull and Halilat [41] which shows that in the Sudano-Sahelian region, OM exists but in very low quantity.Its content in cultivated soils has dropped considerably (1%).Similar results were obtained from Tsozué et al. [23] in Zamai soils, at the base of the Mandara Mountains.Te decrease in OM content is due on the one hand to the continuous exploitation of the plots and on the other hand to the climatic conditions of the study area such as the high temperature and the humidity, which can lead to a rapid mineralization of the OM [42,43].Nitrogen contents in cultivated soils, although very low [44], decreased by 38.27%, with an average value of 0.081% in the forest reserve against 0.05% in cultivated soils.Most studies on the efects of cultivation and/or change in land use on the physicochemical properties of soils in the Sudano-Sahelian zone have come to the conclusion that tillage contributes to the loss of nutrients and reduces soil carbon sequestration [45].
Te shift from natural vegetation to agricultural land has led to the loss of nitrogen [45].Te average C/N values of 13.86 and 24.30 were obtained in soils under cultivation and forest reserve.Tese results are consistent with those obtained from Tsozué et al. [23] under similar climate conditions.It can be seen that the C/N ratio increases considerably with the OM content, hence a signifcantly positive correlation between these two soil parameters.C/N ratios >12 under forest reserve (control) are an indicator of poorly decomposed OM which could be due either to the quality of OM or to the low activity of soil microorganisms [46].[44].Similarly, Na content follows the same evolution as potassium, hence a positive and signifcant correlation between these two elements.Te high content of these elements in the study area can be explained by the presence of parent rocks very rich in this element and the mineral inputs by rain and wind which are also very variable and the estimation of which is imprecise [47].On the other hand, the decrease in their content in the cultivated plots would be linked to the poor texture which is dominated by the sandy fraction and therefore exposes the soil to relatively high leaching [48].
Te CEC is generally high throughout the study site.Nevertheless, its value under forest reserve is higher than that of cultivated soils, with 39.25 cmol•kg −1 against 31.46cmol•kg −1 respectively.High CEC values were on the contrary obtained in cultivated soils compared to the controls in Zouana and Zamai, also under Sudano-Sahelian climate [23,49].In general, the evolution of the CEC depends on the OM content and the particle size distribution.Te high value of the CEC in the study area would be linked to the high activities of 2/1 type clays, in particular those of montmorillonites and sepiolites.Te phosphorous content is low in all the studied plots.A decrease of 1.65 g/kg was observed in the forest reserve soils compared with the cultivated soils.When the clay content increases, phosphorous retention also increases.Te low phosphorous content in the study area can be explained by the low clay content, hence the positive correlation with clay on both plots.Te slight increase in the content of this element in cultivated soils could be explained by the addition of fertilizers or application of organic manure.[53].Te pH of the studied soils varies between 5.20 and 7.10.Tis corresponds, respectively, to slightly acidic and neutral pH.Tis indicates that the chemical (bioavailability of nutrients) and microbiological reactions in these soils are proceeding properly [54].Similar results were obtained in the Damara region of the Central African Republic [55].Even more, Delaunois et al. [56] also showed that a pH of 5.5 to 7.5 is a minimum for the development of all crops.Te average values of CEC obtained both in the forest reserve and in cultivated plots are high (greater than 25 cmol•kg −1 ).Tis does not constitute a limitation, leading to the conclusion that the level of fertility is good with regard to the CEC in all the studied areas, in line with the observations already made by Nguemezi et al. [5] in the dystric vitric andosols at Tombel area in the south-west part of Cameroon.Te average Ca contents of 10.44 cmol•kg −1 in the forest reserve and 11.25 cmol•kg −1 in the cultivated plots are considered to be quite good in all the plots.Indeed, the majority of plants develop normally with a critical threshold of 5 cmol•kg −1 of soil, thus excluding the hypothesis of a low Ca content in the studied soil [57].K, which averages of 12.67 cmol•kg −1 in the forest reserve and 1.15 cmol•kg −1 in cultivated plots, is a vital element in the formation of chlorophyll and the translocation of starch in plants and is essential for the formation of lipids [58].Magnesium content values are high both in forest reserve soils (4.93 cmol•kg −1 ) and in cultivated soils (6.4 cmol•kg −1 ).Te absence of limitations indicates a level of fertility favorable to the development of plants in the study area.

Organic Matter and Phosphorus
. OM allows the longterm maintenance of soil fertility and therefore sustainable agricultural production, due to its physical, chemical, and biological efects [59,60].Its mineralization is a potential source of N and P to plants.In the study area, the OM content is low (1%) in soils under cultivation against 2.86% in the soils under the forest reserve.Its average content close to 3% in the forest reserve soils testifes a very good level of fertility, similar to results obtained by Nguemezi et al. [5] with OM content greater than 2% in the diferent soil groups.Te low OM content (1%) in the cultivated plots in the study area would refect a poor state of soil fertility [13].Te phosphorous contents of 8.272 g/ kg under the forest reserve and 9.93 g/kg in the cultivated plots are severely limited and refect defciencies as fertilizing elements.Tese defciencies in available phosphorus were already noted in the evolution of soil fertility in the Sudano-Sahelian zone of northern Cameroon [61].Nevertheless, in many cases, phosphorus can be abundant in the soil, but defciencies can be observed in crops due to 14 Te Scientifc World Journal regression forms.Tese soils require thus fertilizer inputs and a short-term correction to support good agricultural development.

Soil Aggregate Stability Index, Forest Index, and Sealing
Index.Aggregate distributions and soil aggregate stability index are indicators of soil fertility [62].Soil aggregate stability mainly reduces the risks of soil erosion and compaction [50].Te diference in the soil aggregate stability index observed in the two plots is related to the OM rate and the C/N ratio, confrmed by the signifcant and positive correlations noted between these soil parameters.Te Forest index (FI) is a parameter which helps evaluate the nutrient content in the soil.Its value is 2.17 under the forest reserve against 2.79 in cultivated soils, indicating good nutrient reserves in the studied soils [1,5].Te sealing index value in the forest reserve is −0.608 against 305.07 in the cultivated soils.Tis parameter determines the degree of soil sealing linked to the risk of erosion and the process of compaction [33].However, it measures the resistance of soils to root growth and stem expansion [1].It appears that the luvisols under the forest reserve are not subjected to the risk of erosion or compaction.Te very high value of the sealing index obtained in the cultivated plots testifes their waterproofng which might be linked to the processes of erosion and compaction as the result of ploughing and/or climatic conditions.In order to enhance the current agricultural potential of soil under cultivation, organic matter content should be restored through the management of crop residue spreading, compost, green manure, and farmyard manure.Nutrient levels could be increased by combining mineral and organic fertilization.Te low phosphorous content should be improved by the application of phosphorous fertilizers.

Conclusion
Te present study was designed to analyse the current character of luvisols in the locality of Sir in the Mandara Mountains and evaluate their degradation rate/vulnerability potential and fertility status.Te analysis was based on the comparison of the physicochemical characteristics of soils in two contrasted plots, one under forest reserve and the other under cultivation, with diferent management systems.Soils under the forest reserve are subjected to severe degradation or high vulnerability potential due to bulk density, nitrogen, and sodium absorption ratio.Soils under cultivation are characterized by severe degradation or high vulnerability potential due to texture, OM, soil aggregate stability index, sealing index, nitrogen, and bulk density.Te best indicator of the good quality of the luvisols of Sir is the pH.Soils under the forest reserve have a very good level of fertility, while the soils under cultivation are characterized by a low level of fertility.Te results of this study will serve in the development of strategies for the management and restoration of agricultural land in the Sudano-Sahelian zone.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Location of the study area.

Figure 2 :
Figure 2: Macroscopic organization of the soil in the study area.

Figure 3 :
Figure 3: Infrared spectra of the studied soil.
Plots.Te various parameters that refect the state of degradation/vulnerability potential of soils under cultivation show that fve soil quality parameters indicate severe degradation or high vulnerability potential of soils (SDR/VP � 4/2).Tese parameters are texture, OC, ISS, N, and IB.Tese soil parameters (except for N), in the forest reserve, on the contrary, indicate no degradation/vulnerability (ISS, IB) and slight degradation/vulnerability (texture, OC).P, with a weighted value of SDR/VP � 3/3, refects moderate degradation or vulnerability of cultivated soils.V, Te Scientifc World Journal Na, and SAR have SDR/VP � 2/4, testifying a slight degradation or a low potential vulnerability of cultivated plots due to these parameters.Unlike the pH H2O with SDR/VP � 1/5, which indicates that the soils run no risk of degradation/ vulnerability, BD has a SDR/VP � 5/1, refecting an extreme degradation or very high vulnerable potential of soils under cultivation, as already noted in soils under the forest reserve.Te cumulative rating index estimated by the sum of the (a)) and plots under cultivation (Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4 :
Figure 4: Principal component analysis of soil properties: ((a) circle of correlation under reserve; (b) circle of correlation of cultivated plot).SBE: sum of exchangeable bases; ISS: soil aggregate stability index; BD: bulk density.

Table 1 :
Historical characteristics of plots.

emission Soil profile Soil description Te
soil profle, approximately 150 cm deep, is located at the top of an elongated and gently sloping interfuve, at 981±5 m a.s.l., 10°35'44.8''N and 13°37'02.3''E. Te environment of the pit is marked by the presence of natural vegetation and few boulders.Te biological activity is very important, characterized by the presence of several termite mounds.the contact between the litter and the A1 horizon is characteristic of mull-type humus.On the geological level, the bedrock is a gneiss, consisting essentially of quartz, mica and feldspar.
Te volume of the clods was determined by the displacement of water in graduated cylinders.Exchangeable cations were extracted by a solution of ammonium acetate (1 N NH 4 OAc) at pH 7, and their concentrations were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry for Ca and Mg and by fame

Table 2 :
Physicochemical characteristics and summary statistics of the soil profle.

Table 4 :
Physicochemical characteristics and summary statistics of the soils in the cultivated plot.

Table 6 :
Rating scheme for soil degradation rates (SDR) and vulnerability potential (Vp) of selected soil quality indicators under the forest reserve.

Table 7 :
Rating scheme for soil degradation rates (SDR) and vulnerability potential (Vp) of selected soil quality indicators in the cultivated plot.

Table 5 :
Mean soil characteristics variability of in the study area.Signifcant at p < 0.05.Numbers followed by diferent lowercase letters within the same line have signifcant diferences (p < 0.05); SBE: sum of exchangeable bases; ISS: soil aggregate stability index; BD: bulk density. *

Table 9 :
Spearman correlation matrix for linear relationships between soil properties in the cultivated plot.

Table 10 :
Physicochemical limitation degree and fertility level of soils.
.1.3.Te Absorbent Complex.Te average Ca and Mg contents are slightly higher in the cultivated plots, respectively 11.26 and 6.4 cmol•kg −1 against 10.44 and 4.93 cmol•kg −1 under forest reserve.Tese levels of Ca and Mg might be due to the pedogenetic processes involved or to the original material of this soil itself.K content evolves from very high under reserve (4.59 cmol•kg −1 ) to a low content in the cultivated plot (1.15 cmol•kg −1 ) according to the interpretation interval of Tabi et al.
[51]d on the selected physicochemical properties, soils of cultivated plots are subjected to severe degradation or vulnerability (SDR/Vp = 4/2), while those under the forest reserve, on contrary, are moderately degraded (SDR/Vp = 3/3) due to soil texture.Te severe degradation and high vulnerability of soils related to the texture in cultivated soils were also noted by Ufot Akpan[12]in soils in the coastal plains of Nigeria, characterized by a sandy loam texture.In the same direction, Tellen and Yerima[7], by evaluating the efects of tillage, fallowing, and burning on the physicochemical properties of soils in the north-west region of Cameroon, conclude that tillage leads to signifcant destruction of soil macroaggregates and therefore degradation of the soil structure marked by compaction.Te soil aggregate stability and sealing indexes indicate no degradation of soils under the forest reserve (SDR/Vp = 1/5) and extreme degradation in cultivated soils (SDR/Vp = 5/1).Te extreme degradation in cultivated soils would be linked to the erosion process which limits the development of the soil structure[50]and to the low OM content.However, these soils might have undergone the process of compaction, mainly due to erosion and human activities.Te bulk density refects severe degradation (SDR/ Vp = 4/2) and very high vulnerability of luvisols both in forest reserves and extreme degradation (SDR/Vp = 5/1) and very high vulnerability in cultivated soils.Te SAR values obtained in this study are, respectively, 17.77% in the forest reserve soils and 10.52% in the cultivated soils.Tese values between 10 and 26 are indicative of moderate to severe limitations, thus refecting a high risk of soil degradation[51].element in the humid tropical mountainous zone of the western zone of Cameroon.Te low content of phosphorus in the studied soils would be linked to the erosion process and the poor management of crop residues or even the low retention capacity of soil in this element.Te best quality indicator of the luvisols in the locality of Sir is pH, while bulk density is the parameter refecting the poor quality of these soils.Te cumulative rating index of the soils under the forest reserve is 27/27 against 35/35 for the soils under cultivation, refecting a more accentuated physical and chemical degradation in the cultivated soils.