Both 5G cellular and IoT technologies are expected to see widespread deployment in the next few years. At the practical level, 5G will see initial deployments in urban areas. This is perhaps fortuitous from an IoT perspective, since many “mainstream” applications of IoT will support Smart Cities, Smart Campuses and Smart Buildings. Bandwidth demand for a number of Smart City applications is the main driver for enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB)-based 5G services in general, and new-generation 5G IoT applications, in particular. In turn, the use of the millimeter wave spectrum is required to enable 5G cellular technologies to support high data rates. Millimeter wave solutions, however, impose a requirement for small cells. Generally, an implementer tries to use one or a small handful of IoT technologies; preferably, and for managerial simplicity, the implementer would want to use a cellular/5G IoT technology for all nodes, whether indoors or outdoors, instead of a heterogenous mix of various IoT technologies that have evolved over the years. This overview paper discusses a number of practical issues related to 5G-based IoT applications, particularly in Smart City environments, including the need for small cells, the transmission issues at millimeter wave frequencies, building penetration issues, the need for Distributed Antenna Systems, and the near term introduction of pre-5G IoT technologies such as NB-IoT and LTE-M, these being possible proxies for the commercial deployment and acceptance of 5G IoT.
As the second decade of the
Livability, infrastructure management, asset management, traffic transportation and mobility, logistics, electric power and other utilities, and physical security are the key aspects of a city’s operation. IoT technologies offer the opportunity to improve resource management of many assets related to city life and urban Quality of Life (QoL), including Intelligent Transportation Systems (vehicular automation and traffic control), energy consumption, the flow of goods, smart buildings, space/occupancy management (indoors and outdoors), pollution monitoring (for example from automobile traffic, factories, incinerators, crematoria), resource monitoring and sensing, immersive services (including wearables and crowdsensing), physical security, sustainability, and the greening of the environment. Smart City IoT applications cover indoor and outdoor applications; they also span stationary and mobile end-nodes and sensors. There is an extensive body of literature on this topic; some references of interest include but are certainly not limited to [
Illustrative example of Smart City resources that can benefit from IoT in general and 5G cellular in particular.
While a large number of definitions and descriptions of the IoT exist, this is one definitional/descriptive quote from the author’s previous work, which we utilize here:
5G (
Smart Cities do not depend on any unique or specific IoT technology per se, but include a panoply of IoT technologies, such as mission-specific sensors, appropriate networks, and function-and-use-efficient analytics, these often in the cloud. Wireless connectivity plays an important role in the utility of this technology, especially at the geographic scope of a large or even medium-size city. For practical reasons wireless is also important in Smart Campus and Smart Building applications. Table
Key Urban Challenges and IoT-supported Solutions.
Smart City Issue and Requirements | IoT support/solutions | Indoors wireless needed | Outdoors wireless needed | 5G applicability | Bandwidth / |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infrastructure and real estate management. |
Networked sensors (possibly including drones) to provide real-time and historical trending data allowing city agencies to provide enhanced visibility into the performance of resources, facilitating environmental and safety sensing, smart parking and smart parking meters, smart electric meters, and smart building functionality. | Y | Y | High | Low/ |
|
|||||
Livability. |
Networked sensors (possibly including drones) to facilitate smart multi-modal transportation, information-rich environments, location-based services, real-time connectivity to health-monitoring resources (e.g.,air quality). | Y | Y | High | Medium/ |
|
|||||
Logistics. |
Networked sensors (possibly including drones) to enable the streamlining of warehousing, transportation, and distribution of goods. Traffic management is a facet of such logistical support. | Y | Y | High | Medium/Medium/ |
|
|||||
Physical security. |
Networked sensors (possibly including drones and gunshot detection systems) to support IP-based surveillance video, license plate reading, gun-shot detection, bio-hazard and radiological contamination monitoring, face recognition, and crowd monitoring and control. | Perhaps | Y | High | High/ |
|
|||||
Power and other city-supporting utilities. |
Smart Grid solutions and sensor-rich utility infrastructure | N | Y | High | Low/ |
|
|||||
Traffic, transportation and mobility. |
Networked sensors to support traffic flow, driverless vehicles including driverless bus transit, and multi-modal transportation systems. For driverless vehicles sensors will allow high-resolution mapping, telemetry data, traffic and hazard avoidance mechanisms | N | Y | High | Medium-to-High/ |
|
|||||
Electric and other utility manhole monitoring. |
Cost-effective and reliable sensors are needed. Technology being investigated by Con Edison in New York city | N | Y | High | Low/ |
|
|||||
Pollution monitoring. |
Networked sensors throughout town (or within 10 km of a point source) to monitor toxic, health-impacting emission from point sources including factories, generation plants (if any) and crematoria (if any) [ |
N | Y | High | Medium/Medium/ |
|
|||||
Environmental Monitoring. |
Sensors to that can be placed in easy-to-deploy locations, e.g., atop existing Smart City light poles to continuously monitor temperature, humidity and other environmental gases | N | Y | High | Low/ |
|
|||||
Flood Abatement. |
Distributed ruggedized sensors to monitor Flood and storm drainage to provide early warning and fault detection | N | Y | High | Low/ |
|
|||||
Smart City Lighting. |
Cities spend large amounts of money yearly for street lighting (usually 1000 street lights per 10,000 inhabitants, and $125 per year per light for 4662 hours of usage yearly and system amortization.) LED lighting requires 1/ |
N | Y | High | Medium/ |
Key Wireless Technologies applicable to IoT.
Technology | Indoor usability | Outdoor usability | Basic aspects |
---|---|---|---|
5G | Yes, perhaps with Distributed Antenna Systems (DASs) | Yes, about 10-15 miles | (i) Evolving, not yet widely deployed |
|
|||
NB-IoT (Narrowband IoT) | Yes | Yes, up to about 20miles | (i) Several bands, licensed spectrum |
|
|||
LTE-M (Long-Term Evolution Machine Type Communications) Rel 13 (Cat M1/Cat M) | Yes | Yes, about 10-20 miles | (i) Cellular network architecture, LTE compatible, easy to deploy, new cellular antennas not required |
|
|||
LoRa | Yes | Yes (6-15 miles with LOS) | (i) Band below 1 GHz |
|
|||
Sigfox | Somewhat limited | Yes (30 miles in rural environments; 1-6 miles in city environments) | (i) Band below 1 GHz |
|
|||
Wi-Fi | Yes, 300 feet | To some degree, requires inter-spot connectivity backbone (wired or wireless) (e.g., 802.11ah: distance range up to about 1/2 mile) | (i) Several bands |
|
|||
Bluetooth | Yes, 30 feet | No (or for Personal Area only) | (i) Low bandwidth (2 Mbps) |
|
|||
Zigbee | Yes (30-300 feet) | No (or for Personal Area only) | (i) Low data rate |
Note: A few other legacy IoT wireless technologies exist (e.g., Cat 0, Cat 1, EC-GSM, Weightless) but are not included in this table
Figure
The pre-5G and the 5G IoT connectivity ecosystem.
This review, position and assessment paper provides an overview of salient 5G features and then discusses some practical design issues applicable to the IoT. A lot of the important 5G IoT information is included in the figures and tables. This paper is not intended to be a full 5G overview per se, nor a discussion of IoT, for both of which there are many references (e.g., [
5G cellular networks are now starting to be deployed around the world, as the underlying standards and the system-wide technology become more mature (the term “
The 5G system expands the 4G environment by adding New Radio (NR) capabilities, but doing so in such a manner that LTE and NR can evolve in complementary ways. As it might be envisioned, a 5G system entails devices connected to a 5G access network, which in turn is connected to a 5G core network. The 5G access network may include 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project) radio base stations and/or a non-3GPP access network. The 5G core network offers major improvements compared with a 4G system in the area of network slicing and service-based architectures (SBAs); in particular, the core is designed to support cloud implementation and the IoT. 5G systems subsume important 4G system concepts such as the energy saving capabilities of narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) radios, secure low latency small data transmission for low-power devices -- low latency is a requirement for making autonomous vehicles safe -- and devices using energy-preserving dormant states when possible. Network slicing allows service providers to deliver “Network as a Service (NaaS)” to large/institutional users affording them the flexibility to manage their own services and devices on the 5G provider’s network.
Applications driving wireless traffic include but are not limited to on-demand mobile information and high-resolution entertainment, augmented reality, virtual reality and immersive services, e-health, and ubiquitous IoT rollouts. While 5G technology could still take several distinct service directions, it appears at this juncture that the view favoring a super-fast mobile network, where densely-clustered small cells provide contiguous urban coverage to mobile as well as stationary users, is the approach envisioned by the standards development bodies and by the implementers. It should be noted that in the U.S., upwards of 55 percent of residential users now utilize cellular-services-only at home in place of a landline, and about 30 percent of residential users utilize both, with the trend favoring an eventual transition to the former. Therefore, the evolving 5G systems will have to properly support this growing segment of the market. A goal of 5G networks is to be five times as fast as compared to the highest current speed of existing 4G networks, with download speeds as high as 5 Gbps – 4G offering only up to a maximum of 1 Gbps. Deployment of 5G networks started in 2018 in some advanced countries, although further developments on fundamentals will continue; naturally, the current 4G/LTE and 5G are expected to coexist for many years. However, it is fair to say that like many other technologies before 5G, this technology is probably going through a “hype-cycle”, where a technology is supposed to be “all things to all people” and be the “be-all-and-end-all technology”; both claims will be abrogated in time. Proponents argue that 5G will “maximize the satisfaction of end-users by providing immersiveness, intelligence, omnipresence, and autonomy”.
Standardization work for 5G systems has been undertaken by several international bodies with the goal of achieving one unified global standard. Many well-known research centers, universities, standards bodies, carriers and technology providers have been involved in advancing the development of the technology for a 2020 rollout, including the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the Open Network Automation Platform (ONAP), the GSMA, and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute Network Function Virtualization (ETSI NFV). In particular, work on 5G requirements, services and technical specifications has been undertaken in the past few years by three key entities: (i) International Telecommunication Union-Radio Communication Sector (ITU-R) [ Tight latency, availability, and reliability requirements to facilitate applications related to video delivery, healthcare, surveillance and physical security, logistics, automotive locomotion, and mission-critical control, among others, particularly in an IoT context; A panoply of data rates, up to multiple Gbps, and tens of Mbps to facilitate existing and evolving applications, particularly in an IoT context; Network scalability and cost-effectiveness to support both clustered users with very high data rate requirements as well a large number of distributed devices with low complexity and limited power resources, particularly in an IoT context, where, as noted, a rapid increase in the number of connected devices is anticipated; and, Pragmatic deployment cost metrics, along with acceptable service price points across the gamut of applications and data rates, particularly in an IoT context.
Specifically, some of the design details are a latency below 5 msec. (as low as 1 msec.), support for device densities of up to 100 devices/m2, reliable coverage area, integration of telecommunications services including mobile, fixed, optical and MEO/GEO satellite, and seamless support for the IoT ecosystem. For example, the technical objective 5G as envisioned of METIS ( 1000 x higher mobile data volume per area than current systems; 10 to 100 x higher number of devices than current systems (i.e., dense coverage); 10 to 100 x higher user data rate than current systems (e.g., 1-20 Gbps); 10 x longer battery life for low power IoT devices than current systems (up to a 10-year battery life for machine type communications); and, 5 x reduced end-to-end latency than current systems.
Table
Radio interface goals as defined in IMT-2020.
(i) MR for downlink peak data rate is 20 Gbps |
(ii) MR for uplink peak data rate is 10 Gbps |
(iii) Target downlink “user experienced data rate” is 100 Mbps |
(iv) Target uplink “user experienced data rate” is 50 Mbps |
(v) Downlink peak spectral efficiency is 30 bps/Hz |
(vi) Uplink peak spectral efficiency is 15 bps/Hz |
(vii) MR for user plane latency for eMBB is 4ms |
(viii) MR for user plane latency for URLLC is 1ms |
(ix) MR for control plane latency is 20ms (a lower control plane latency of around 10ms is encouraged) |
(x) Minimum requirement for connection density is 1,000,000 devices per km2 |
(xi) Requirement for bandwidth is at least 100 MHz |
(xii) Bandwidths up to 1 GHz are required for higher frequencies (above 6 GHz) |
MR = Minimal Requirement
Source: ITU-R SG05 Contribution 40, “Minimum requirements related to technical performance for IMT-2020 radio interface(s)”, Feb 2017.
As a point of observation, 3GPP/TR 22.891 has defined and/or described the following service groups: eMBB, Critical Communication, mMTC, Network Operations, and Enhancement of Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X). NGMN has defined and/or described the following service groups: Broadband access in dense area, Indoor ultra-high broadband access, Broadband access in a crowd, 50+ Mbps everywhere, Ultra low-cost broadband access for low ARPU areas, Mobile broadband in vehicles, Airplanes connectivity, Massive low-cost Low long-range/low-power MTC, Broadband MTC, Ultra low latency, Resilience and traffic surge, Ultra-high reliability and Ultra low latency, Ultra-high availability and reliability, and Broadcast-like services.
Figure
5G services that can be utilized for the IoT in Smart Cities.
Figure
Some technical features of 5G services that can be utilized for the IoT in Smart Cities.
3GPP has specified new 5G radio access technology, 5G enhancements of 4G (fourth generation) networks, and new 5G core networks. Specifically, it has defined a new 5G Core network (5GC) and a new radio access technology called 5G “New Radio” (NR). The new 5GC architecture has several new capabilities built inherently into it as native capabilities: multi-Gbps support, ultra-low latency, Network Slicing, Control and User Plane Separation (CUPS), and virtualization. To deploy the 5GC new infrastructure will be needed. There is a firm goal to support for “forward compatibility”. The 5G NR modulation technique and frame structure are designed to be compatible with LTE. The 5G NR duplex frequency configuration will allow 5G NR, NB-IoT and LTE-M subcarrier grids to be aligned. This will enable the 5G NR user equipment (UE) to coexist with NB-IoT and LTE-M signals. As might be expected, however, it is possible to integrate into 5G elements of different generations and different access technologies– two modes are allowed: the SA (standalone) configuration and the NSA (non-standalone) configuration (see Figure 5G Standalone (SA) Solution: in 5G SA an all new 5G packet core is introduced. SA scenarios utilize only one radio access technology (5G NR or the evolved LTE radio cells); the core networks are operated independently. 5G Non-Standalone Solution (NSA): in 5G NSA Operators can leverage their existing Evolved Packet Core (EPC)/LTE packet core to anchor the 5G NR using 3GPP Release 12 Dual Connectivity feature. This will enable operators to launch 5G more quickly and at a lower cost. This solution might suffice for some initial use cases. However, 5G NSA has a number of limitations, thus these Operators will eventually be expected to migrate to 5G Standalone solution. NSA scenario combines NR radio cells and LTE radio cells using dual-connectivity to provide radio access and the core network may be either EPC or 5GC.
5G Transition Options and IoT support.
Multiple evolution/deployment paths may be employed by service providers (service providers of various services, including IoT services) to reach the final target configuration; this migration could well take a decade, and may also have different timetables in various parts of a country, e.g., top urban areas, top suburban areas, secondary urban areas, secondary suburban areas, exurbian areas, rural areas. Figure
Detailed 5G Transition Options and IoT support.
3GPP approved the 5G NSA standard at the end of 2017 and the 5G SA standard in early 2018 in the context of its Release 15. Release 15 also included the support eMBB, URLLC, and mMTC in a single network to facilitate the deployment of IoT services; Release 15 also supports 28 GHz millimeter-wave (mmWave) spectrum and multi-antenna technologies for access.
Focusing on the radio technology, there are number of spectrum bands that can be used in 5G; these bands can be grouped into three macro categories: sub-1 GHz, 1-6 GHz and above 6 GHz. The more advanced features, especially higher data rates require the use of the millimeter wave spectrum. New mobile generations are typically assigned new frequency bands and wider spectral bandwidth per frequency channel (1G up to 30 kHz, 2G up to 200 kHz, 3G up to 5 MHz, and 4G up to 20 MHz). Up to now cellular networks have used frequencies below 6 GHz. Generally, without advanced MIMO (Multiple In Multiple Out) antenna technologies one can obtain about 10 bits-per-Hertz-of-channel bandwidth. But the integration of new radio concepts such as Massive MIMO, Ultra Dense Networks, Device-to-Device, and mMTC will allow 5G to support the expected increase in the data volume in mobile environments and facilitate new IoT applications. Implementable standards for 5G are being incorporated in 3GPP Release 15 onwards. As noted, 3GPP Rel 15 defines New 5G Radio and Packet Core evolution to facilitate interoperable deployment of the technology.
The millimeter wave spectrum, also known as Extremely High Frequency (EHF), or more colloquially mmWave, is the band of electromagnetic spectrum running between 30 GHz and 300 GHz. Bands within this spectrum are being considered by the ITU and the Federal Communications Commission in the U.S. as a mechanism to facilitate 5G by supporting higher bandwidth. The use of a 3.5 GHz frequency to support 5G networks is also gaining some popularity, but he higher speeds networks will use other frequency bands, including millimeter-wave frequencies (these bands ranging from 28 GHz to 73 GHz, specifically the 28, 37, 39, 60 and 72–73 GHz bands). In the U.S., recently the FCC approved spectrum for 5G, including millimeter-wave frequencies in the 28 GHz, 37 GHz and 39 GHz bands, although these targeted cellular frequencies may nominally overlap with other pre-existing users of the spectrum, for example point-to-point microwave paths, Direct Broadcast satellite TV, and high throughput satellite (HTS) systems (Ka-band transmissions).
Initially 5G will, in many cases, use the 28 GHz band, but higher bands will very likely be utilized later on; initial implementations, will support a maximum speed of 1 Gbps. Lower frequencies (at the so-called C band) are less subject to weather impairments, can travel longer distances, and penetrate building walls more easily. Waves at higher frequencies (Ku, Ka and E/V bands) do not naturally travel as far or penetrate walls or objects as easily. However, a lot more channel bandwidth is available in millimeter-wave bands. Furthermore, developers see the need for “an innovative utilization of spectrum”; “small cell" approaches are required to address the scarcity of the spectrum, but at the same time covering the geography. V band spectrum covers 57-71 GHz, which in many countries is an “unlicensed" band, and E band spectrum covers 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz.
In the U.S., in 2018 the FCC also opened up, as an “interim” step for 5G, a “mid-band” radio spectrum at 3.5 GHz which was previously reserved for naval radar use. The 3.5 GHz band provides a combination of signal propagation distance, acceptable building penetration, and increased bandwidth. The FCC created 15 channels within the 3.550-3.700 GHz band, auctioning seven channels to “priority access licenses” and making eight channels available for general access -- the U.S. Navy still getting priority across the band when and as needed. With this approval, 5G devices can be built to support the same 3.5GHz ranges across North America, Europe, and Asia [
In addition to new bands, 5G technology is expected to use beam-forming and beam-tracking, where a cell’s antenna can focus its signal to reach a specific mobile device and then track that device as it moves. Beamforming utilizes a large number (hundreds) of antennas at a base station to achieve highly directional antenna beams that can be “steered” in a desired direction to optimize transmission and throughput performance. Massive MIMO is a system where a transmission node (base station) is equipped with a large number (hundreds) of antennas that simultaneously serve multiple users; with this technology multiple messages for several terminals can be transmitted on the same time-frequency resource.
Due to RF propagation phenomena that are more pronounced at the higher frequencies, such as multipath propagation due to outdoor and indoor obstacles, free space path loss, atmospheric attenuation due to rain, fog, and air composition (e.g., oxygen), small cells will almost invariably be needed in 5G environments, especially in dense urban environments. Additionally, Line of Sight (LOS) will typically be required. ITU-R P series of recommendations has useful information on radio wave propagation including ITU-R P.838-3, 2005; ITU-R P.840-3, 2013; ITU-R P.676-10, 2013; and ITU-R P.525-2, 1994. Figures
Path loss as a function of distance and frequency.
Attenuation a function of precipitation and frequency.
Attenuation a function of fog density and frequency.
In addition to the broad service requirements briefly highlighted in Table
Example of IoT nodal considerations for 5G systems.
IoT device issue | 5G Support |
---|---|
Low complexity devices | Broad standardization leads to simplification e.g., SOC (System on a Chip) and/or ASIC (Application Specific IC) development |
|
|
Limited on-board power | Technology allows a battery life ~10 years |
|
|
Device mobility | Good mobility support in a cellular/5G system |
|
|
Open environment | Broad standardization leads to broad acceptance of the technology |
|
|
Devices universe by type and by cardinality | Standardized air interfaces can reduce certain aspects of the end-node, just like Ethernet simplified connectivity to a network, regardless of the functionality of the processor per se |
|
|
Always connected/always on mode of operation | Cost-effective connectivity services allow the always on mode of operation |
|
|
IoT security (IoTSec) concerns [ |
Security capabilities are being added. The use of 256-bit symmetric cryptography mechanisms is expected to be fully incorporated. The encryption algorithms are based on SNOW 3G, AES-CTR, and ZUC; and integrity algorithms are based on SNOW 3G, AES-CMAC, and ZUC. The main key derivation function is based on HMAC-SHA-256. Identity management (e.g., via the 5G authentication and key agreement [5G AKA] protocol and/or the Extensible Authentication Protocol [EAP]), Privacy (conforming to the General Data Protection Regulation [GDPR]), and Security assurance (e.g., using Network Equipment Security Assurance Scheme [NESAS]) are supported. Some of these mechanisms are described [ |
|
|
Lack of agreed-upon end-to-end standards | Broad standardization possible with 5G if the technology is broadly deployed and is cost-effective |
|
|
Lack of agreed-upon end-to-end architecture | Standardization at the lower layers (Data Link Control and Physical) can drive the development of a more inclusive multi-layer multi-application architecture |
As expected, communications at mmWave frequencies have attracted a lot of interest, due to the large available spectrum bandwidth that can potentially result in multiple gigabit per second transmissions per user. This follows a similar trend in satellite communications with the introduction of Ka services, especially HTSs. High bandwidth will typically require a wide spectrum. Millimeter wave frequencies (signals with wavelength ranging from 1 millimeter to 10 millimeters) support a wide usable spectrum. The millimeter wave spectrum includes licensed, lightly licensed and unlicensed portions. Bandwidth demand and goals are the main driver for the need to use the millimeter wave spectrum, particularly for eMBB-based applications, allowing users to receive 100 Mbps as a bare minimum and 20 Gbps as a theoretical maximum. The use of millimeter wave frequencies, however, will imply the use of a much smaller tessellation of cells and supportive towers or rooftop transmitters due, as noted, to transmission characteristics, such as high attenuation and directionality. This is an important design consideration for 5G, especially in dense city/urban environments. The aggregation of these towers will by itself require a significant backbone network, whether a mesh based on some point-to-point microwave links, an fiber network or a set of “wireless fiber” links. Millimeter wave system utilize smaller antennas compared to systems operating at lower frequencies: the higher frequencies, in conjunction with MIMO techniques, can achieve sensible antenna size and cost. The millimeter wave technology can be utilized both for indoors and outdoors high-capacity fixed or mobile communication applications. The term “densification” is also used to describe the massive deployment of small cells in the near future.
MmWave products used for backhauling typically operate at 60 GHz (V Band) and 70/80 GHz (E Band) and offer solutions in both Point to Point and Point to Multipoint (PtMP) configurations providing end to end multi-gigabit wireless networks, for example, 1 Gbps up to 10 Gbps symmetric performance. Very small directional antennas, typically less than a half-square foot in area, are used to transmit and/or receive signals which are highly focused beams. stationary radio systems are often installed on rooftops or towers. MmWave products are now appearing on the market targeting high capacity Smart City applications, 5G Fixed, Gigabit Wireless Access solutions, and Business Broadband. Urban canyons, however, may limit the utility of this technology to very short LOS paths. Mobile applications of mmWave technology are more challenging. On the other hand, one advantage of this technology is that short transmission paths (high propagation losses) and high directionality allow for spectrum reuse by limiting the amount of interference between transmitters and/or adjacent cells. Near LOS (NLOS) applications may be possible in some cases (especially for short distances).
Currently, mm wave frequencies are being utilized for high-bandwidth indoor applications, for example streaming (“miracasting”) of HD or UHD video and VR support (e.g., using 802.11ad Wi-Fi). Traditionally, these frequencies have not been used for outdoor broadband applications due to high propagation loss, multipath interference, and atmospheric absorption (gases, rain, fog and humidity) cited above; in addition, the practical transmission range is a few kilometers in open space [ 7 GHz of spectrum in total in the band 57 GHz to 64 GHz unlicensed. 3.4 GHz of spectrum in total in the 28 GHz/38 GHz licensed but underutilized region. 12.9 GHz of spectrum in total 71 GHz/81 GHz/92 GHz light-licensed band
Following the most recent World Radiocommunications Conference, the ITU also identified a list of proposed globally-usable frequencies between 24 GHz and 86 GHz, as follows: 24.25–27.5 GHz, 31.8–33.4 GHz, 37–40.5 GHz, 40.5–42.5 GHz, 45.5–50.2 GHz, 50.4–52.6 GHz, 66–76 GHz, and 81–86 GHz.
MmWave transmission will drive the requirement for small cells [
Signal penetration indoors may represent a challenge, just as is the case even at present with 3G/4G LTE, even for traditional voice and internet access and data services. This has driven the need for DAS systems, especially in densely-constructed downtown districts. Free space attenuation at the higher frequency, power budgets, directionality requirements, and weather, all impact 5G and 5G IoT. Outdoor small cells and building-resident Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) systems utilize high-speed fiber optic lines or “wireless fiber” to interconnect the sites to the backbone and the Internet cloud.
Figure
The 5G IoT ecosystems.
Microcells for 5G/5G IoT.
Reference [ METIS 3GPPP MiWEBA (Millimetre-Wave Evolution for Backhaul and Access) ITU-R M COST2100 IEEE 802.11 NYU WIRELESS: interdisciplinary academic research center IEEE 802.11 ad/ay QuaDRiGa (Fraunhofer HHI) 5th Generation Channel Model (5GCM) 5G mmWave Channel Model Alliance (NIST initiated, North America based) mmMAGIC (Millimetre-Wave Based Mobile Radio Access Network for Fifth Generation Integrated Communications) (Europe based) IMT-2020 5G promotion association (China based)
(also including firms and academic centers such as, but not limited to AT&T, Nokia, Ericsson, Huawei, Intel/Fraunhofer HHI, NTT DOCOMO, Qualcomm, CATT, ETRI, ITRI/CCU, ZTE, Aalto University, and CMCC.)
Diffraction loss (DL) and frequency drop (FD) are just two of the path quality issues to be addressed. Although greater gain antennas will likely be used to overcome path loss, diffuse scattering from various surfaces may introduce large signal variations over travel distances of just a few centimeters, with fade depths of up to 20 dB as a receiver moved by a few centimeters. These large variations of the channel must be taken into consideration for reliable design of channel performance, including beam-forming/tracking algorithms, link adaptation schemes, and state feedback algorithms. Furthermore, multipath interference from coincident signals can give rise to critical small-scale variations in the channel frequency response. In particular, wave reflection from rough surfaces will cause high depolarization. For LOS environment Rician fading of multipath components, exponential decaying trends and quick decorrelation in the range of 2.5 wavelengths have been demonstrated. Furthermore, received power of wideband mmWave signals has a stationary value for slight receiver movements but average power can change by 25 dB as the mobile transitions around a building corner from NLOS to LOS in an UMi setting. Additionally, human body blockage causes more than 40 dB of fading at the mmWave frequencies. Figure
Path Loss simulations for 5G by various entities.
The main parameter of the radio propagation model is the Path Loss Exponent (PLE), which is an attenuation exponent for the received signal. PLE has a significant impact on the quality of the transmission links. In the far field region of the transmitter, if
n = PLE
See Figure
PLE.
Table PLE values are in the 1.9 and 2.2 range for LOS and at the 28 GHz and 60 GHz bands; PLE is approximately 4.5 and 4.2 range for NLOS in the 28 GHz and 60 GHz bands. Rain attenuation of 2-20 dB/km can be anticipated for rain events ranging from light rain (12.5 mm/hr) to downpours (50 mm/hr) at 60 GHz (higher for tropical events). For 200-meter cells, the attenuation will be around 0.2 db for 5mm/hr rain at 28 GHz and 0.9 dB for 25mm/hr rain at 28 GHz. The attenuation will be around 0.5 db for 5mm/hr rain at 60 GHz and 2 dB for 25mm/hr rain at 60 GHz. Atmospheric absorption of 1-10 dB/km occurs at the mmWave frequencies. For 200-meter cells the absorption will be 0.04 dB at 28 GHz and 3.2 dB at 60 GHz.
Path Loss Equations for mmWave 5G/5G IoT.
|
||||
|
||||
Scenario | LOS/NLOS | Pathloss [dB], ( |
Shadow fading std [dB] | Applicability range, antenna height default values |
|
||||
UMi - Street Canyon | LOS |
|
|
|
|
||||
NLOS |
|
|
|
|
Optional |
|
|||
|
||||
InH - Office | LOS |
|
|
|
NLOS |
|
|
|
|
Optional |
|
|
Note 1: Breakpoint distance
3GPP TR 38.901 version 14.0.0 Release 14
ETSI TR 138 901 V14.0.0 (2017-05).
Penetration into buildings is an issue for mmWave communication, this being a lesser concern for contemporary sub 1 GHz systems and even systems operating up to 6 GHz. O2I (Outdoor-to- Indoor) losses have to be taken into account. Actual measurements (e.g., at 38 GHz) demonstrated a penetration loss of 40 dB for brick pillars, 37 dB for a glass door, and 25 dB for a tinted glass window (indoor clear glass and drywall only had 3.6 and 6.8 dB of loss) [
3GPP and ETSI propose that the pathloss incorporating O2I building penetration loss be modelled as in the following [
In consideration of these propagation characteristics, many municipalities in the U.S. are concerned about the possible massive proliferation of small cells needed to support 5G. For example, a filing to the FCC was made in the U.S. late in 2018 by a consortium of towns known as the Communities and Special Districts Coalition in response to the Commission’s September 5, 2018, Draft Declaratory Ruling and 3rd Report and Order where the FCC asserted the claim that “small cell” deployment is a federal undertaking; furthermore the filing states that “
The previous section discussed propagation issues at the higher frequencies. However, even the sub-6 GHz bands have issues penetrating buildings with the new building materials and infrared reflecting (IRR) glass. Indoor solutions are needed for IoT even at standard 3G/4G LTE frequencies and much more so at mmWave if cellular-based (5G) IoT transmission services for in-building applications are contemplated; outdoor 5G IoT applications do not.
Although it is in principle possible to support multiple access technologies in an IoT sensor (chipset), end-point IoT devices tend to have low complexity in order to achieve an established target price point and on-board power (battery) budget. Therefore a (large) number of applications will have devices that have a single implemented wireless uplink. It follows that -- either because of the goal of mobility support (for example, a wearable that works seamlessly indoors and in open spaces around town) or because of the designer’s goal to utilize a single, consistent IoT nodal and access technology – an all-sites wireless service for a Smart City application, is preferred. DASs may support such a goal (while city-wide Wi-Fi and/or Sigfox/LoRa could be an alternative, the ubiquity, standardization and cost-effectiveness of 5G cellular and IoT services, may well favor the latter in the future).
A DAS is network of a (large) number of (small) (indoor or on-location) antennas connected to a common cellular source via fiber optic channel, providing cellular/wireless service within a given structure. DAS (sometimes also called in-building cellular) refers to the technology that enables the distribution and rebroadcasting of cellular, LTE, AWS, 5G and other RF frequencies within a building or confined/defined structural environment. While DAS is often used in large urban office buildings, DAS can also be used in open spaces such as campuses, conference centers, stadiums, hospitals, airports, train stations, tunnels, hotels, cruise ships, and so on. DASs can and will support cellular-based IoT (e.g., LTE-M, NB-IoT, and 5G IoT.) Elements of a DAS include (see Figure (Small) Broadband antennas and amplifiers in the indoor space (typically one or more per floor) that shape the coverage. These antennas typically cover the entire spectrum of the cellular service (for/from multiple service providers; Coax or fiberoptic cabling to connect the structure antennas to a local Base Station; Remote Radio Head, a local Base Station, (“small cell”), typically in the basement; and, Fiberoptic connection to an aggregation point (typically in a carrier colocation space) (or the use of an outdoor donor antenna to a specific cellular provider). The former supports carrier-neutral applications, the latter typically supports only one carrier. Physical connectivity from the colocation space to each of the wireless providers is needed, typically in the form of fiber connectivity or other telecom service. Business relationships with the wireless providers are needed.
Elements of a DAS.
Current typical drivers include the fact that during anticipated peak times (whether in a building or in some public venue as a stadium) users will experience: coverage deficiencies, blocked connections, reduced data speeds, among other service deficiencies. Current systems support CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, UMTS, among others. Future systems will support 5G and become even more prevalent.
Given the mmWave transmission issues mentioned above (the small cells, the directionality, the free space loss and other attenuation factors) DASs will likely play a big role in 5G, both for regular voice and data services and for IoT. The large number of “small cells” cited earlier (8.4 million in 2025, with about 70% of these being considered to be indoors) supports the thesis that DASs will play a pivotal role in the future. They will be a key element of Smart City IoT support, especially for in-building sensors. As was shown in Figure
A single, carrier-neutral, consolidated system is often sought: a carrier-neutral system avoids multiplicity of antenna distribution, and sharing allows more coverage and higher capacity. A carrier-neutral DAS supports an end-use system, for example a smartphone, regardless of which service provider the user is subscribed to. It would be rather expensive for a building owner to deploy a carrier-neutral DAS that supports a single building, unless it would be a very large building, campus, or installation. With carrier-neutral DAS arrangements the ownership of system is shifted from the building owner, or a specific cellular carrier to a third-party system provider, or a DAS integrator. Figure Scenario/Approach S1: The DAS integrator/provider wires up a remote building or space and drops a fiber link into an existing colo rack at an existing carrier-neutral provider, thus sharing all the Base Station Hotel (BSH) colo equipment and interfaces to the various wireless providers. Scenario/Approach S2: The DAS integrator/provider must build out the requisite base station equipment in the colo (the colo provider only provides power, rack space, HVAC, and so on). The DAS integrator/provider must also build interfaces to the wireless providers and secure business arrangements with them. The DAS integrator/provider builds out the remote buildings or venues. Scenario/Approach S3: The DAS integrator/provider must build out the requisite base station equipment in the colo, but the DAS integrator/provider can make use of existing interfaces and equipment to the various wireless providers. The DAS integrator/provider builds out the remote buildings or venues.
Carrier-neutral DAS.
A less desirable approach is to use “donor antennas” (also shown in Figures
According to GSMA 5G is on track to account for 15% (1.4 billion) of global mobile connections by 2025. By early 2019, according to GSMA, eleven worldwide operators had announced initial 5G service launches and seven other operators had activated 5G base stations with commercial services to follow in the near future [ Q4 2018: South Korea, U.S. Q1 2019: Bahrain, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland Q2 2019: Australia, Qatar Q3 2019: Austria, China, Hong Kong, Kuwait, Spain, UAE Q4 2019: Portugal, UK
Summary of near-term 5G service-deployment activities (2019 view).
Country or Region | Near-term 5G Activities |
---|---|
South Korea | Korea Telecom rolled out a trial 5G network in support of the 2018 Winter Olympics in Seoul, South Korea covering events in several cities. It has also launched a VR/AR games platform supported from the cloud over 5G. SK Telecom has acquired spectrum in the 3.5 GHz and 28 GHz frequencies in preparation of deploying 5G. |
|
|
China | China plans early implementations of 5G. The GSMA estimates that by 2025 China will represent 40 percent of global 5G connections. According to the GSMA, with 460 million projected users China is expected to become the world’s largest 5G market by 2025, higher than Europe’s 205 million and the United States’ 187 million combined. China’s three major mobile operators - China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom - are rolling out trial operations of 5G systems in several cities, and all three aim to fully commercialize the technology by 2020 [ |
|
|
India | 5G trials are contemplated by late 2019 and early deployments may happen late in 2020. |
|
|
Japan | NTT DoCoMo demonstrated an advanced security service based on 5G network technology for use in the 2020 Olympics. |
|
|
United States | Migration from the 4G networks should be relatively simple. The FCC has been making several new bands available as noted elsewhere. Verizon has been aggressive in its advertisement campaigns about its introduction of 5G-related services. |
|
|
Europe | T-Mobile is preparing for the rollout of 5G in 2020, starting in the Netherlands. Some fear that Europe risks falling behind other regions because of restrictive regulation and weak investments; less than half of the countries in Europe have actually allocated spectrum for 5G [ |
As of Q2 2019, there were 303 rollouts of 5G mobile networks across 294 locations worldwide, operated by 20 mobile carriers [
Regarding frequency bands 3GPP is initially focusing on 24 GHz to 43 GHz mmWave spectrum (Release 15.) Other ongoing 5G work relates to NSA and SA configurations Massive MIMO, beamforming, and LTE interoperability. 3GPP Release 16 (2019) aims at full compliance to IMT-2020 (e.g., supporting 1 GHz channels) and other spectrum capabilities (e.g., spectrum sharing, additional bands, and URLCC).
In the U.S., among other possible candidates, the FCC is making available new frequency bands for 5G use under its rubric of “
In terms of rollouts, in the U.S, the spectra at 27.5 – 28.35 GHz and 37 – 40 GHz may see preliminary commercial deployments in 2019; in Korea, the spectrum at 26.5 – 29.5 GHz is similarly expected to see commercial deployments in 2019; and the EU expects commercial deployments for the 24.25 – 27.5 GHz spectrum starting around 2020.
In addition to the radio access for the end-user device, there is also interest in Backhaul and now also in Fronthaul. Backhaul mechanisms are mechanisms to connects the wireless network to the wired network by backhauling traffic from dispersed cell sites to Mobile Switching Offices (MSOs). These links typically are either traditional transmission systems (such as SONET or point-to-point microwave at various operating bands), or they are Ethernet-over-Fiber links (e.g., 1 GbE or 10 GbE). A UMa site has Baseband Unit (BBU) that processes user and control data, which is in turn connected to a Radio Unit (RU) to generate radio signals transmitted over the air via the tower-mounted antennas.
Fronthaul is related to a new type of Radio Access Network (RAN) architecture that is comprised of centralized baseband controllers and standalone radio heads installed at remote UMa or UMi sites possibly many miles away. In the fronthaul model the BBU and RU equipment is located further away from each other than is the case in the backhaul model. The RU equipment (now referred to as a Remote Radio Head [RRH]) is still located at the cell site, but the BBU is relocated to centralized location where it supports multiple RRHs. See Figure
Fronthaul and Backhaul.
A consortium of wireless equipment vendors standardized the Common Public Radio Interface (CPRI) protocol that runs over these fronthaul links a few years ago; more recently, a newer eCPRI 1.0 interface has been defined; additionally, work is underway to defining a more detailed interface. The tight performance requirements of CPRI/eCPRI -- capacity, distance, and latency – drive towards fiber connectivity such as DWDM (or more specifically OTN [Optical Transport Network]) systems between centralized BBUs and the RRHs. Ethernet-based solutions have existed for a number of years using mmWave spectrum. Work is underway in 3GPP to define backhauling solutions using the same spectrum as access. Work is also underway to define new fronthaul interfaces also utilizing mmWave spectrum.
Global IoT revenue are expected to increase at an annual rate of 23% to 2025 to reach $1.1 trillion (up from 267 B in 2018). As discussed in the next section, near term “5G IoT” really equate to NB-IoT and LTE-M capabilities. At the end of 2018, there were 83 commercial deployments of LTE-M and NB-IoT worldwide. However, pure connectivity will become increasingly commoditized, making it difficult for operators to compete on the data transmission alone, declining from 9% of total IoT revenue in 2018 to 5% in 2025. Service providers must develop new strategies and business models beyond connectivity services. Applications, platforms and services (e.g., cloud data analytics and IoT security) are the major growth areas of IoT; this segment will be approximately 70% of the market in 2025. Professional services (e.g., consulting, systems integration, also including managed services) will increase in share and will be approximately 25% of the market in 2025 [
5G IoT will need to compete with other technologies, both of the cellular type (e.g., NB-IoT and LTE-M) as well as the non-cellular type (although NB-IoT and LTE-M are now considered “part of the 5G world”). The economics and availability of these “legacy” networks in various parts of the world may be such that a level of inertia, frustrating a full migration to truly-novel 5G IoT services, will take hold. Clearly, in principle, 5G is better positioned for city/region-wide applications as contrasted with building or campus applications.
From an end-user perspective, design and implementation questions center around the following issues, which 5G IoT technology must be able to address successfully: Availability of equipment; Availability of service (geographic coverage in the area of interest); Support of required technical details (latency, bandwidth, packet loss, and so on); Support of mobility (where needed, e.g., wearables, crowdsensing, Vehicle to Vehicle and Vehicle to Infrastructure applications, to name a few); Adequate reliability (where needed, e.g., physical security, process control, Vehicle to Vehicle and Vehicle to Infrastructure applications, to name a few); Scalability support (functional and geographic/numerical expansion of the application) Initial and recurring cost of the equipment; and Initial and recurring cost of the service.
Recent acceptability and economics of NB-IoT and LTE-M can serve as a proxy for the near-term commercial success of 5G IoT in particular and truly-novel 5G IoT services in general. Some developers have looked at cellular services for city-wide or region-wide IoT coverage; in some instances, for example, for national truck transportation a combination of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite service and cellular services have and are being used. A current drawback is the cost of the requisite (miniaturized) modems and the cost of the cellular service. New services such as NB-IoT and LTE Cat-M1 (an LTE-based 3GPP-sponsored alternative to NB-IoT, also known as LTE-M) are short term attempts to address the cost and resource issues. In particular, NB-IoT is seen as providing a pathway to 5G IoT. 5G and truly-novel 5G IoT are the target solutions.
As noted earlier, NB-IoT is a licensed low power LPWAN technology designed to coexist with existing LTE specifications and providing cellular-level QoS connectivity for IoT devices. NB-IoT was standardized by 3GPP in LTE Release 13,
As illustrative commercial examples, in 2018 T-Mobile announced a North American NB-IoT plan that costs just $6 a year – one tenth of Verizon’s Cat-M plans– for up to 12 MB per connected device, and several NB-IoT modules based on Qualcomm® MDM9206 LTE IoT modem that are certified for use on T-Mobile’s network. T-Mobile, in conjunction with Qualcomm and Ericsson conducted the first trial NB-IoT in the U.S. in 2017 across multiple sites; T-Mobile and the City of Las Vegas also announced a partnership to deploy IoT technology throughout the city. For applications that require more bandwidth and voice, T-Mobile offers Cat-1 IoT Access Packs [
LTE-M is a power-efficient system, where two innovations support battery efficiency: LTE eDRX (Extended Discontinuous Reception) and LTE PSM (Power Saving Mode). LTE-M allows the upload of 10 bytes of data a day (LTE-M messages are fairly short compared to NB-IoT messages), but also allows access to Mbps rates. Therefore, LTE-M can support several use cases. In the U.S., major carriers such as Verizon and AT&T offer LTE-M services (as noted, Verizon has announced support for NB-IoT -- T-Mobile and Sprint appears to lean in the NB-IoT direction) [
Support of LTE-M and NB-IoT under 5G.
In summary, LTE-M supports low nodal complexity, high nodal density, low nodal power consumption, low latency and extended geographic coverage, while allowing service operators the reuse of the LTE installed base. NB-IoT aims at improved indoor coverage, high nodal density for low throughput devices, low delay sensitivity, low node cost, low nodal power consumption and simplified network architecture. NB-IoT and LTE-M are currently providing mobile IoT solutions for smart cities, smart logistics, and smart metering, but only in small deployments to date (as of early 2018, there were 43 commercial NB-IoT and LTE-M networks worldwide [
NB-IoT, LTE-M and LTE are 4G standards, but advocates claim that they remain integral parts of early releases of 5G. Proponents make the case that “
This paper discussed a number of issues related to 5G-based IoT applications, particularly in Smart Cities environments, including the need for small cells, the transmission issues at the millimeter wave frequencies, building penetration issues, the need for DAS, and the near term introduction of pre-5G IoT technologies such as NB-IoT and LTE-M, these being possible proxies for 5G IoT deployment.
A firm definition of 5G IoT has still to emerge, although a large number of use cases have been described by various industry entities. Both 3GPP NB-IoT and LTE-M technologies are seen at this juncture as integral to 5G services: these 4G technologies are expected to continue under full support in 5G networks for the immediate future. However, IoT/Smart City applications that require high bandwidth will need implementations of eMBB and mmWave frequencies.
Some controversy existed at press time about the development of 5G equipment, in the context of origin-of-manufacturing and the possible intrinsic risk related to cybersecurity [
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.