Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
Volume 2021 (2021), Article ID 6630802, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6630802

Research Article

A Method of Surface Defect Detection of Irregular Industrial Products Based on Machine Vision

Mengkun Li,¹ Junying Jia,² Xin Lu,² and Yue Zhang¹

¹School of Management, Capital Normal University, Beijing/100089, China
²Shenyang Fengchi Software Co. LTD, Shenyang/110167, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Mengkun Li; limengkun@cnu.edu.cn and Xin Lu; luxin@fchsoft.com

Received 23 November 2020; Revised 8 December 2020; Accepted 9 April 2021; Published 10 May 2021

Academic Editor: Amr Tolba

Copyright © 2021 Mengkun Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

In recent years, the surface defect detection technology of irregular industrial products based on machine vision has been widely used in various industrial scenarios. This paper takes Bluetooth headsets as an example, proposes a Bluetooth headset surface defect detection algorithm based on machine vision to quickly and accurately detect defects on the headset surface. After analyzing the surface characteristics and defect types of Bluetooth headsets, we proposed a surface scratch detection algorithm and a surface glue-overflowed detection algorithm. The result of the experiment shows that the detection algorithm can detect the surface defect of Bluetooth headsets fast as well as effectively, and the accuracy of defect recognition reaches 98%. The experiment verifies the correctness of the theory analysis and detection algorithm; therefore, the detection algorithm can be used in the recognition and detection of surface defect of Bluetooth headsets.

1. Introduction

In the mass production process of Bluetooth headsets, it is necessary to glue the connection of the Bluetooth headset. During the bonding process, the problem of glue overflow may occur. In addition, the surface of the headset is also prone to scratches during the processing process. Therefore, after the production of the Bluetooth headset, it is necessary to check whether the appearance of the headset is scratched and the glue-overflowed. The traditional manual detection efficiency is low, labor and time costs are high, the work is boring and tedious, and it is difficult for the human eye to recognize the relatively small scratches and glue-overflowed, and it is easy to make mistakes when working for a long time. In view of this, this article proposes a Bluetooth headset surface defect detection algorithm based on machine vision.

With the continuous development of machine vision technology, machine vision has been more and more widely used in surface defect detection of irregular industrial products. Jian et al. [1] proposed a detection algorithm to detect mobile phone screen glass. Zhou et al. [2] proposed a new surface defect detection framework. Meng et al. [3] identified the surface defects of the hose. Zhi et al. [4] designed an on-line automatic detection technology for wafer surface defects. Bo et al. [5] detected the surface defects of tiles. Li et al. [6] proposed a novel defect extraction and classification scheme for mobile phone screen based on machine vision. Zhu et al. [7] presented a machine vision based method for detecting surface defects of pipe joints. Le et al. [8] presented a novel framework based on machine vision known as the optical film defect detection and classification system for use in the real-time inspection. Wang et al. [9] designed a detection device for air bubbles, impurities, and other defects inside the flexible connection of aviation aircraft canopy. Yang et al. [10] proposed a method for wafer defect detection. Hu et al. [11] proposed an algorithm based on ellipse fitting and distance threshold to detect the pit defect of steel shell. Sun et al. [12] proposed a weld defect detection and classification algorithm based on machine vision to effectively identify and classify weld defects of thin-walled metal canisters. Wu et al. [13] examined a surface defect detection method based on support vector machine. Lib et al. [14] proposed a novel patterned method for fabric defect detection based on a novel texture descriptor and the low-rank decomposition model. Li et al. [15] proposed a machine-vision-based defect detection method for packaging bags. Yu et al. [16] proposed a method fusing near infrared spectroscopy and machine vision to improve the accuracy in recognizing defects on wood surfaces. Yang et al. [17] proposed efficient approaches based on three-point circle fitting and convolutional neural network (CNN) to achieve automatic aperture detection. Han et al. [18] presented a fast machine-vision-based surface defect detection method using the weighted least-squares model. Hanzaei et al. [19] presented an automatic image processing system with high accuracy and time efficient approaches. Liu et al. [20] proposed a surface defect detection method based on gradient local binary pattern (GLBP), which uses image subblocks to reduce the dimensionality of the LBP data matrix. Mujeeb et al. [21] proposed an algorithm which detects surface level defects without relying on the availability of defect samples for training.

2. Design of the Detection Algorithm

The flow chart of the Bluetooth headset surface defect detection algorithm is shown in Figure 1. Firstly, we use an industrial camera to collect the headset image and then preprocess the input image. The preprocessing includes threshold segmentation and image enhancement. The purpose of threshold segmentation is to find the area that needs to be detected, and the image enhancement is to make the defects on the headsets surface more obvious. Next, perform surface scratch detection and surface glue-overflowed detection on the preprocessed image to confirm whether there are scratches and glue-overflowed on the headset surface, and finally, output the detection results. If no defects are found in the two detections, it is determined that there is no defect on the surface of the headsets.

Figure 1: The flow chart of the surface defect detection algorithm.

2.1. Preprocess Image

2.1.1. Threshold Segmentation

After we use the industrial camera to collect the headset picture, the image needs to be preprocessed to find out the area to be detected, that is, the area that needs to detect scratches and glue overflow. The method of threshold segmentation is used to extract the region to be detected.

The basic principle of threshold segmentation is:

is the generated image after threshold segmentation, is the input image, and is the threshold used for segmentation value. The selection of threshold is very important for the detection in the image. Currently, the commonly used threshold selection methods mainly include fixed threshold method and automatic threshold method. The threshold in the fixed threshold segmentation is generally set manually, and the method is simple, but the threshold set the manual threshold set needs to be based on a large amount of experimental data, which is low in efficiency and cannot adapt to environmental changes. Automatic threshold segmentation automatically selects the segmentation threshold through image data statistics. There are mainly the maximum between-class variance segmentation method, the maximum entropy threshold segmentation method, and so on.

(1) Maximum Between-Class Variance Segmentation Method. The maximum between-class variance method was first proposed by a Japanese scholar Otsu Zhanzhi in 1979, so it is also called Otsu method. The basic idea is to divide the image grayscale histogram into two groups of background area and target area at a certain threshold according to the grayscale characteristics of the image. The variance between the two groups increases with the gray value difference between the background area and the target area. When the variance between the two groups is the largest, the threshold is determined and segmented [22].

(2) Maximum Entropy Threshold Segmentation Method. The maximum entropy threshold segmentation method is mainly based on the information entropy in the image, designing a reasonable entropy criterion and optimizing it, so that the threshold when the image entropy is maximum can accurately segment the target area and the background area in the image.

Use Eq. (1) to segment the image, and the result is shown in Figure 2. (a) is the input image; (b) is the threshold segmentation result.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: The result of threshold segmentation.

2.1.2. Image Enhancement

There is a difference in the gray value between the defective area on the headset surface and the nondefective area, but the difference is not obvious enough. Increasing this difference through image enhancement algorithms can help to improve the accuracy of subsequent specific defect detection. The specific method is as follows: Firstly, we transform the input image from spatial domain image to frequency domain image by Fourier transform. The high frequency components of frequency domain image are usually defect edge and noise. The low-pass filter is used to filter the frequency domain image to remove the high-frequency components in the frequency domain, and then, the filtered frequency domain image is transformed into the spatial domain image through the inverse Fourier transform. Compared with the original image, the area with larger difference may be the glue-overflowed area, and the surface defect of the difference image is more obvious than the original image, and the image enhancement is realized.

The Fourier transform formula of picture with image size of .

, , , and are the frequency domain variables and and are the spatial domain variables.

Corresponding inverse Fourier transform formula.

We get the frequency domain image after Fourier transform, then filter the frequency domain image. Commonly used methods of filtering include mean filtering, Gaussian filtering, median filtering, and so on.

Mean filtering is a typical linear filtering algorithm. It refers to giving a template to the target pixel on the image. The template includes neigh boring pixels around it (8 pixels around the target pixel as the center to form a filter template). The average value of all pixels in the template replaces the original pixel value. Mean filtering uses a linear method to average the pixel values in the entire window range. Mean filtering has inherent defects. It cannot protect image details well. It also destroys the details of the image while denoising. The image becomes blurred, and the noise points cannot be removed well. Mean filtering is better for Gaussian noise.

Gaussian filtering is to scan each pixel in the image with a template, and use the weighted average gray value of the pixels in the neighbor-hood determined by the template to replace the value of the center pixel of the template. Gaussian filtering is the process of weighted averaging the input image. The value of each pixel is obtained by weighted averaging of itself and other pixel values in the neighbor-hood.

Median filtering is to take the points of adjacent pixels, and then sort the points of adjacent pixels, and take the gray value of the midpoint as the gray value of the pixel. The median filter uses a nonlinear method, which is very effective in smoothing impulse noise, and it can protect the sharp edges of the image, but it performs poorly against Gaussian noise.

Compared with mean filtering and median filtering, Gaussian filtering can keep more features of the overall gray distribution of the image when smoothing the image, so we choose Gaussian filtering in this process. Through Fourier transform, Gaussian filtering, and inverse Fourier transform, get the filtered image, after subtracting from the original image, the image enhanced image is obtained as shown in Figure 3(b). Compared to Figure 3(a) without any image processing, the defects on the headsets surface in Figure 3(b) are more obvious.

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: The result of image enhancement.

2.2. Scratch Detection

During the processing of the Bluetooth headset, scratches may occur on the surface, which affects the appearance of the headset. The scratches are linear, so the usual method in scratch detection is to detect the lines on the surface of the object. For example, some edge detection operators are used to detect the lines on the surface of the object. The more commonly used methods are Sobel operator, Canny operator, etc. The Sobel operator detection method has a better effect on image processing with gray gradient and more noise. When the accuracy requirements are not very high, it is a more commonly used edge detection method. Canny operator [23] is a detection operator proposed by computer scientist John F. Canny in 1986. It is currently the most comprehensive detection algorithm theoretically. Canny operator is not easy to be interfered by noise. Canny operator is a multistage optimization operator with filtering, enhancement, and detection. Before processing, Canny operator first uses Gaussian smoothing filter to smooth the image to remove noise. The operator uses the finite difference of the first-order partial derivative to calculate the gradient amplitude and direction. In the process, the Canny operator also goes through a process of nonmaximum suppression. Finally, the Canny operator also uses two thresholds to connect the edges. We use the canny operator to detect the scratches on the surface of the headset, and the results are shown in Figure 4(b).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 4: The result of scratch detection.

From a morphological point of view, a scratch is composed of a series of adjacent pixels with a large difference in gray value from the background, usually a connected area. However, in the process of image preprocessing, the breakpoints with a small area divided by the shallow scratch may be filtered out, causing the scratch to break, which affects the result of line detection. At this time, performing a morphological expansion operation on the scratch to fill the scratch defect cavity can connect some adjacent fracture scratches, thereby solving the problem of scratch truncation. Then, through the skeleton extraction algorithm, a connected area is refined into the width of one pixel, and all the obtained skeleton subsets are combined to form the final scratch skeleton. The skeleton is constructed in a way that each point on it can be seen as the center point of a circle with the largest radius possible while still being completely contained in the region.

The result of skeleton extraction is as shown in Figure 4(c).

From the detection results in Figure 4, the performance of the skeleton extraction algorithm is better than the line detection algorithm.

2.3. Glue-Overflowed Detection

2.3.1. Watershed Algorithm

The watershed segmentation [24, 25] method is a mathematical morphology segmentation method based on topological theory. The basic idea is to regard the image as a topological topography in geodesy. The gray value of each pixel in the image indicates the altitude of the point. Each local minimum and its affected area are called collection basins, while the boundary of the collection basin forms a watershed.

Firstly, we compute the watersheds without applying a threshold , resulting in the same basins that would be obtained when calling watersheds. Secondly, the basins are successively merged if they are separated by a watershed that is smaller than threshold . Let and be the minimum gray values of two neighboring basins and the minimum gray value of the watershed that separates the two basins. The watershed is eliminated, and the two basins are merged if

Through testing, we can get better image segmentation results by setting to 5. Figure 5 shows the detection results of watershed detection algorithm.

(a)

(b)

Figure 5: The result of watershed.

Watershed algorithm is an image region segmentation algorithm. In the process of segmentation, it will take the similarity with adjacent pixels as an important reference basis. Pixels with similar spatial positions and similar gray values are connected to each other to form a closed contour. Through the watershed algorithm, the headset is divided into several small areas according to the similarity of the gray values, which are used as the input of the subsequent gray level cooccurrence matrix.

2.3.2. Gray Level Cooccurrence Matrix

The gray level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM) was first proposed by Haralick et al. in 1973. [26]. GLCM describes the spatial relationship of gray levels in texture images and has been widely used in texture statistics and analysis. The texture is formed by alternating gray levels in spatial positions, so there is a certain spatial relationship between two pixels separated by a certain distance in the image. GLCM is a commonly used method to express the spatial correlation of pixel gray levels, mainly describing the image from the distance, direction, and degree of change between adjacent pixels. Its essence is to calculate the appearance frequency of two gray pixels under a certain spatial relationship, which can indicate the regional consistency and relativity of the image. GLCM changes quickly in fine textures with distance, while coarse textures change slowly. GLCM defines a square matrix whose size represents the probability of the gray value from a fixed spatial position relationship (size and direction) to another gray value . Suppose is a 2D grayscale image, where is a set of pixels with a certain spatial relationship in the area and is GLCM, which can be expressed as

represents the number of elements in the set .

Applying GLCM to describe texture features is based on two-order statistical parameters as texture metrics. Haralick [26] proposed 14 feature statistics to describe image texture features. However, we usually use the following 4 statistical types: energy (ASM), contrast (CON), correlation (COR), and entropy (ENT). The arc second moment (ASM) reflects the regularity and uniformity of image distribution. Contrast (CON) reflects the depth and smoothness of the image texture structure. Correlation (COR) reflects the similarity of image texture in the horizontal or vertical direction. Entropy (ENT) is a measure of image information, reflecting the complexity of texture distribution. The 4 types of statistics are as follows:

We pick out 100 glue overflow areas and 100 normal areas from the small areas extracted by the watershed algorithm and count their energy (ASM), contrast (CON), and correlation (COR), respectively. The results are as follows:

In the gray level cooccurrence matrix, the energy value reflects the uniformity of the image gray level distribution and the texture thickness. If the element values of the gray level cooccurrence matrix are similar, the energy value is smaller, which means the texture is detailed, and the energy value is large, which indicates a more uniform and regular texture pattern. Therefore, the area without glue-overflowed is more regular and usually has a larger energy value, while the area with glue-overflowed has more texture and smaller energy value.

As shown in Figures 6 and 7, the ASM score of the glue-overflowed area is almost less than 0.2, while the ASM score of the area without glue-overflowed is almost greater than 0.3.

Figure 6: The result of ASM (glue-overflowed).

Figure 7: The result of ASM (no-glue-overflowed).

Therefore, set the ASM threshold to 0.2; represents the ASM value of the area .

The area that satisfies the following formula is judged to be a possible glue-overflowed area.

In the gray level cooccurrence matrix, the contrast (CON) reflects the sharpness of the image and the depth of texture. The deeper the texture, the greater the contrast.

As shown in Figures 8 and 9, the CON score of the area without glue-overflowed is almost less than 0.15, while the ASM score of the glue-overflowed area is almost greater than 0.2.

Figure 8: The result of CON (glue-overflowed).

Figure 9: The result of CON (no-glue-overflowed).

Therefore, set the CON threshold to 0.2; represents the CON value of the area .

The area that satisfies the following formula is judged to be a possible glue-overflowed area.

In the gray level cooccurrence matrix, the correlation (COR) reflects the local gray-scale correlation in the image. If there is texture distribution along a certain direction, the correlation value of GLCM is larger.

As shown in Figures 10 and 11, the COR score of the glue-overflowed area is almost greater than 0.9, while the COR score of the area without glue-overflowed is almost less than 0.9.

Figure 10: The result of COR (glue-overflowed).

Figure 11: The result of COR (no-glue-overflowed).

Therefore, set the COR threshold to 0.9. represents the COR value of the area .

The area that satisfies the following formula is judged to be a possible glue-overflowed area.

If the area satisfies Eq. (10), Eq. (11), and Eq. (12) at the same time, we judge the area as the glue-overflowed area. Finally, the adjacent glue-overflowed areas are merged, and the areas that cannot be merged and are particularly small are removed. The final test results are shown in Figure 12. (a–d) are the detection results of glue-overflowed at different positions of the headsets. From the figure below, the glue-overflowed detection effect based on the watershed algorithm, and the gray level cooccurrence matrix algorithm is good.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 12: The result of glue-overflowed detection.

3. Experimental Results and Analysis

In order to verify whether the image enhancement algorithm improves the defect detection ability, we compare the image of the headset without image enhancement algorithm and image enhancement algorithm. As shown in Figure 13, (a) is the original picture of the headset, (b) is the picture after image enhancement, and (c) and (d) are the results of glue-overflowed detection on (a) and (b), respectively. It is proved from the figure that through the image enhancement algorithm, the glue-overflowed area in the image is more obvious, and the misdetection caused by the illumination is reduced. Therefore, the image enhancement algorithm proposed in this paper helps to improve the accuracy of the headset surface defect detection.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 13: The comparison of the image enhancement algorithm.

To further verify the proposed surface defect detection algorithm performance, we have defined the precision (Pr) and recall (Re) which are calculated as Eq. (13) and Eq. (14). The corresponding results are reported in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1: Quantitative index for scratch detection.

Product quantity
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000

Precision (Pr)
97.80%
98.04%
97.88%
97.98%
98.06

Recall (Re)
100%
99.88%
99.83%
99.86%
99.90%

Table 2: Quantitative index for glue-overflowed detection.

Product quantity
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000

Precision (Pr)
98.28%
98.40%
98.12%
98.16%
98.28%

Recall (Re)
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

where TP, FP, and FN denote True Positive, False Positive, and False Negative which correspond to the count of actual defective products detected with defects, actual qualified products detected with defects, and actual defective products detected without defects, respectively.

We draw the precision and recall of the two detections into a line graph, as shown in Figures 14 and 15.

Figure 14: The quantitative indexes of scratch detection.

Figure 15: The quantitative indexes of glue-overflowed detection.

Through actual tests, the scratch detection precision is approximately 98%, and the recall is approximately 100%. The glue-overflowed detection precision is approximately 98%, and the recall is approximately 100%. In addition, the precision and recall of the detection are not affected by the number of images. Basically meet the testing requirements of industrial testing.

4. Conclusions

Taking the surface defect detection of Bluetooth headset as an example, this paper studies a surface defect detection algorithm for irregular industrial products based on machine vision, which can detect both surface scratches and glue-overflowed of irregular industrial products. At present, the Bluetooth headset surface detection algorithm has been applied in the actual industrial production; the practice proves that the detection algorithm proposed in this paper is effective. Meanwhile, it is prone to be applied to the surface defect detection of other products with similar surface features.

Data Availability

Data available on request. The data are available by contacting Mengkun Li (limengkun@cnu.edu.cn).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Major Technology Project of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH): “research and application of key technologies for industrial environment monitoring, early warning and intelligent vibration control (SINOMAST-ZDZX-2017-05),” and partially supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KM201810028021).

References

J. Chuanxia, G. Jian, and A. Yinhui, “Automatic surface defect detection for mobile phone screen glass based on machine vision,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 52, pp. 348–358, 2016.

X. Zhou, Y. Wang, Q. Zhu et al., “Machine vision based automatic apparatus and method for surface defect detection,” in 2018 13th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation(WCICA), pp. 1697–1702, Changsha, China, 2018.

F. Meng, J. Ren, Q. Wang, and T. Zhang, “Rubber hose surface defect detection system based on machine vision,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 108, article 022057, 2018.

C. Zhishan and L. Benyong, “Wafer surface defect detection based on machine vision,” Journal of Guizhou University(Natural Sciences), vol. 4, pp. 68–73, 2019.

X. Bo and Z. Ping, “Research on tile surface defect detection based on machine vision,” Mechanical Engineering & Automation, vol. 5, pp. 130–132, 2017.

C. Li, X. Zhang, Y. Huang, C. Tang, and S. Fatikow, “A novel algorithm for defect extraction and classification of mobile phone screen based on machine vision,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 146, article 106530, 2020.

L. Jiang, K. Sun, F. Zhao, and X. Hao, “Machine vision based on pipe joint surface defect detection and identification,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1621, no. 1, article 012012, 2020.

N. T. Le, J.-W. Wang, M.-H. Shih, and C.-C. Wang, “Novel framework for optical film defect detection and classification,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 60964–60978, 2020.

P. Wang, X. Lu, J. Chen, and P. Zhang, “Flexible connection of cockpit canopy defect detection device based on machine vision,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 711, article 012007, 2020.

J. Yang, Y. Xu, H. J. Rong, S. Du, and H. Zhang, “A method for wafer defect detection using spatial feature points guided affine iterative closest point algorithm,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 79056–79068, 2020.

H. Hu, D. Xu, X. Zheng, and B. Zhang, “Pit defect detection on steel shell end face based on machine vision,” in 2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), Chongqing, China, 2020.

J. Sun, C. Li, X.-J. Wu, V. Palade, and W. Fang, “An effective method of weld defect detection and classification based on machine vision,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 6322–6333, 2019.

Y. Wu and Y. Lu, “An intelligent machine vision system for detecting surface defects on packing boxes based on support vector machine,” Measurement and Control, vol. 52, no. 7-8, pp. 1102–1110, 2019.

C. Li, G. Gao, Z. Liu, D. Huang, and J. Xi, “Defect detection for patterned fabric images based on ghog and low-rank decomposition,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, no. 99, pp. 83962–83973, 2019.

L. Dan, B. Guojun, J. Yuanyuan, and T. Yan, “Machine-vision based defect detection algorithm for packaging bags,” Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, vol. 56, no. 9, article 091501, 2019.

H. Yu, Y. Liang, H. Liang, and Y. Zhang, “Recognition of wood surface defects with near infrared spectroscopy and machine vision,” Journal of Forestry Research, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2379–2386, 2019.

Y. Yang, Y. Lou, M. Gao, and G. Ma, “An automatic aperture detection system for led cup based on machine vision,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 77, no. 18, pp. 23227–23244, 2018.

Y. Han, Y. Wu, D. Cao, and P. Yun, “Defect detection on button surfaces with the weighted least-squares model,” Frontiers of Optoelectronics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 151–159, 2017.

S. H. Hanzaei, A. Afshar, and F. Barazandeh, “Automatic detection and classification of the ceramic tiles’ surface defects,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 66, pp. 174–189, 2017.

X. Liu, F. Xue, and L. Teng, “Surface defect detection based on gradient LBP,” in 2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC), Chongqing, China, 2018.

A. Mujeeb, W. Dai, M. Erdt, and A. Sourin, “Unsupervised surface defect detection using deep autoencoders and data augmentation,” in 2018 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), Singapore, 2018.

N. Otsu, “A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms,” IEEE Transactions on Systems Man & Cybernetics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 62–66, 2007.

J. Canny, “A computational approach to edge detection,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 679–698, 1986.

S. Avinash, K. Manjunath, and S. S. Kumar, “An improved image processing analysis for the detection of lung cancer using Gabor filters and watershed segmentation technique,” in International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies, Coimbatore, India, 2017.

C. R. Jung and J. Scharcanski, “Robust watershed segmentation using wavelets,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 661–669, 2005.

Y. Jian, “Texture image segmentation based on Gaussian mixture models and gray level co-occurrence matrix,” in International Symposium on Information Science & Engineering IEEE, Shanghai, China, 2011.